![Man ultramarathon runner in the mountains he trains at sunset](https://d2csxpduxe849s.cloudfront.net/media/E32629C6-9347-4F84-81FEAEF7BFA342B3/0B4B1380-42EB-4FD5-9D7E2DBC603E79F8/webimage-C4875379-1478-416F-B03DF68FE3D8DBB5.png)
94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.
Find out more
CORRECTION article
Front. Immunol. , 14 November 2023
Sec. Alloimmunity and Transplantation
Volume 14 - 2023 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2023.1325584
This article is a correction to:
Dynamic risk prediction of BK polyomavirus reactivation after renal transplantation
A Corrigendum on
Dynamic risk prediction of BK polyomavirus reactivation after renal transplantation
by Fang Y, Zhang C, Wang Y, Yu Z, Wu Z, Zhou Y, Yan Z, Luo J, Xia R, Zeng W, Deng W, Xu J, Chen Z and Miao Y (2022). Front. Immunol. 13:971531. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.971531
In the published article, there was an error. In the description of cohort screening, an important inclusion criterion was not mentioned, which is “with strictly punctual follow-ups”, based on modeling requirements. It does not affect the actual studied cohort which has already followed the requirements.
A correction has been made to Abstract: Methods. This sentence previously stated:
“A retrospective study of 312 first renal allograft recipients was conducted between January 2015 and March 2022”
The corrected sentence appears below:
“A retrospective study of 312 first renal allograft recipients with strictly punctual follow-ups was conducted between January 2015 and March 2022.”
A correction has been made to Materials and Methods, Cohort. This sentence previously stated:
“We retrospectively analyzed 312 first renal allograft recipients at Nanfang Hospital (Guangzhou, China) between January 2015 and March 2022.”
The corrected sentence appears below:
“We retrospectively analyzed 312 first renal allograft recipients who kept strictly punctual follow-ups (break of follow-ups no more than twice a year and delay no more than a week) at Nanfang Hospital (Guangzhou, China) between January 2015 and March 2022.”
The authors apologize for these errors and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Keywords: BK polyomavirus, reactivation, dynamic Cox regression, prediction, renal transplantation
Citation: Fang Y, Zhang C, Wang Y, Yu Z, Wu Z, Zhou Y, Yan Z, Luo J, Xia R, Zeng W, Deng W, Xu J, Chen Z and Miao Y (2023) Corrigendum: Dynamic risk prediction of BK polyomavirus reactivation after renal transplantation. Front. Immunol. 14:1325584. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1325584
Received: 21 October 2023; Accepted: 09 November 2023;
Published: 14 November 2023.
Edited and Reviewed by:
Yuanyuan Zhao, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, ChinaCopyright © 2023 Fang, Zhang, Wang, Yu, Wu, Zhou, Yan, Luo, Xia, Zeng, Deng, Xu, Chen and Miao. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Zheng Chen, emhlbmctY2hlbkBob3RtYWlsLmNvbQ==; Yun Miao, bWlhb3l1bmVjaG9AMTI2LmNvbQ==
†These authors have contributed equally to this work and share first authorship
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Research integrity at Frontiers
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.