AUTHOR=Botticelli Andrea , Pomati Giulia , Cirillo Alessio , Scagnoli Simone , Pisegna Simona , Chiavassa Antonella , Rossi Ernesto , Schinzari Giovanni , Tortora Giampaolo , Di Pietro Francesca Romana , Cerbelli Bruna , Di Filippo Alessandra , Amirhassankhani Sasan , Scala Alessandro , Zizzari Ilaria Grazia , Cortesi Enrico , Tomao Silverio , Nuti Marianna , Mezi Silvia , Marchetti Paolo TITLE=The role of immune profile in predicting outcomes in cancer patients treated with immunotherapy JOURNAL=Frontiers in Immunology VOLUME=13 YEAR=2022 URL=https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/immunology/articles/10.3389/fimmu.2022.974087 DOI=10.3389/fimmu.2022.974087 ISSN=1664-3224 ABSTRACT=Background

Despite the efficacy of immunotherapy, only a small percentage of patients achieves a long-term benefit in terms of overall survival. The aim of this study was to define an immune profile predicting the response to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs).

Methods

Patients with advanced solid tumors, who underwent ICI treatment were enrolled in this prospective study. Blood samples were collected at the baseline. Thirteen soluble immune checkpoints, 3 soluble adhesion molecules, 5 chemokines and 11 cytokines were analyzed. The results were associated with oncological outcomes.

Results

Regardless of tumor type, patients with values of sTIM3, IFNα, IFNγ, IL1β, IL1α, IL12p70, MIP1β, IL13, sCD28, sGITR, sPDL1, IL10 and TNFα below the median had longer overall survival (p<0.05). By using cluster analysis and grouping the patients according to the trend of the molecules, two clusters were found. Cluster A had a significantly higher mean progression free survival (Cluster A=11.9 months vs Cluster B=3.5 months, p<0.01), a higher percentage of disease stability (Cluster A=34.5% vs. Cluster B=0%, p<0.05) and a lower percentage of disease progression (Cluster A=55.2% vs. Cluster B = 94.4%, p=0.04).

Conclusion

The combined evaluation of soluble molecules, rather than a single circulating factor, may be more suitable to represent the fitness of the immune system status in each patient and could allow to identify two different prognostic and predictive outcome profiles.