Skip to main content

BRIEF RESEARCH REPORT article

Front. Immunol., 17 November 2022
Sec. T Cell Biology

T cell-intrinsic protein kinase D3 is dispensable for the cells’ activation

  • 1Institute of Cell Genetics, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
  • 2Division of BioMedical Sciences, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, NL, Canada

Protein kinases D (PKDs) are implicated in T cell receptor (TCR) signaling. Of the two T cell-expressed isoforms PKD2 and PKD3, however, only the former one is rather well understood in this immune cell type. Recently, we have observed a putative hyper-phenotype of T cells from conventional PKD3-knockout mice, which we explained as a secondary effect due to a skewed T cell compartment from naïve towards effector/memory T cells already under steady state conditions. Nonetheless, to this end it is not clear whether these aberrations are mediated by a T cell-intrinsic or -extrinsic function of PKD3. To address this question, we have investigated mice lacking PKD3 specifically in the T cell compartment. We could show that T cells from CD4-Cre-driven conditional knockout mice did not phenocopy the ones from conventional PKD3-knockout mice. In brief, no skewing in the T cell compartment of peripheral lymphoid organs, no hyper-activation upon stimulation in vitro or in vivo as well as no aberrations in follicular helper T cells (TFH) upon immunization were observed. Hence, although PKD3 is strongly regulated upon TCR stimulation, in T cells this kinase seems to be dispensable for their activation. The described skewing in the T cell compartment of conventional PKD3-deficient mice seems to be mediated by T cell-extrinsic mechanisms, thus once more emphasizing the importance of cell type-specific mouse models.

Introduction

The protein kinase D (PKD) family comprises in mammals three highly homologous isoforms (PKD1 - 3) encoded by three different genes (prkd1-3). In recent years, these serine/threonine kinases were described to be involved in a variety of biological processes in distinct cell types including proliferation, differentiation, migration, adhesion, polarization, etc. [reviewed in (1)]. Of note, PKD’s were also implicated in T cell biology, although early studies faced the problem of no availability of specific antibodies allowing to discriminate between the highly homologous isoforms (2). However, today it is clear that in T cells only PKD2 and to a lower extend PKD3 are expressed while PKD1 is absent (2, 3). So far, mainly the role of PKD2 for T cell responses was investigated. Thus, PKD2-deficiency was first described to result in an impaired cytokine production upon antigen-triggered T cell receptor (TCR) stimulation as well as T cell-dependent antibody response (2). Later, these finding were specified and further expanded by other groups. It was shown that PKD2 acts as a digital amplifier upon TCR stimulation (4), plays a role in the cytotoxic activity by regulating the multivesicular body formation (5) and is a direct negative regulator of follicular T helper cell (TFH) development (6). In contrast, much less is known about PKD3’s role for T cell-mediated immunity. Recently, we started to tackle this gap by investigation of the T cell compartment in conventional PKD3 knockout mice. Surprisingly, partially contrary to the known phenotype of PKD2 knockout mice, we observed a hyper-reactive response of T cells upon polyclonal stimulation ex vivo as well as an increased TFH-formation accompanied by heavier spleens upon immunization in vivo. As this putative T cell hyper-phenotype was not observed when stimulation was performed with naïve-sorted T cells, we have speculated that this effect is caused indirectly by a shift in the T cell compartment from naïve towards an effector/memory phenotype already under steady state conditions (7). Of note, although we have observed a strong regulation of PKD3 upon TCR stimulation, up to date it is not known, whether the phenotype of PKD3-deficient T cells is mediated by a cell-intrinsic or rather an -extrinsic mechanism. Here, were have addressed this issue by investigating mice lacking PKD3 specifically in the T cell compartment.

Materials and methods

Mice

To obtain mice harboring a T cell-specific knockout of prkd3 (named PKD3ΔT mice), B6.CgTg(Cd4Cre)1Cwi/BfluJ mice (Jackson Laboratories; JAX stock #022071), containing the CD4 enhancer, promoter and silencer sequences, driving the expression of a Cre recombinase gene, were crossed in our laboratory to a strain with loxP sites flanking exon 2 and 3 of the prkd3 gene (Figure 1A, kindly provided by Michael Leitges). Of note, PKD3ΔT mice carry the CD45.2 allele.

FIGURE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 1 T cell-specific PKD3 deletion does not affect the T cell compartment under homeostatic conditions. (A) Scheme of the floxed prkd3 locus. (B) Confirmation of T cell-specific PKD3-deletion. Ex vivo MACS-sorted CD4+ or CD8+ T cells from spleen and lymph nodes of prkd3-floxed mice with or without Cre recombinase were investigated for PKD3 expression on mRNA level by qRT-PCR and on protein level by western blotting. GAPDH and β-actin were used as a house keeping gene or loading control, respectively. (n = 2) (C) Analysis of the splenic T cell compartment of PKD3ΔT mice and respective controls by flow cytometry. Frequencies of naïve (CD62L+CD44-), central memory (CD62L+CD44+) and effector/memory (CD62L-CD44+) T cells were determined. Representative FACS dot plots (left) as well as summarizing graphs (right) are shown. (n = 9, from two independent experiments) (D) Analysis of cytokine expression: splenocytes from PKD3ΔT mice and respective controls were stimulated for 4 h with soluble 5 µg/mL anti-CD3 and 2.5 µg/mL anti-CD28 antibodies. IL-2 and IFN-γ were trapped intracellularly with monensin/brefeldin A and analyzed by flow cytometry. (n = 9, from two independent experiments).

For in vivo MLRs, male DBA/2J mice (Jackson Laboratories; JAX stock #000671; CD45.2+) were crossed with female B6.SJL-Ptrca Pepcb/BoyJ (Jackson Laboratories; JAX stock #002014; CD45.1+) to obtain B6D2F1 hybrids.

Mice were housed under specific pathogen free (SPF) conditions at the animal facility of the Medical University of Innsbruck. Experiments were performed with 10 to 16 weeks old mice.

Genotyping

Genotyping was performed from ear tag biopsies using PCRs specific for either the Cre transgene or the floxed region within the prkd3 gene. The following primers were used for the Cre-detecting PCR (resulting in a 100 bp amplicon) and the included internal control (amplicon of 324 bp): Cre_FWD: GCGGTCTGGCAGTAAAAACTATC, Cre_REV: GTGAAACAGCATTGCTGTCACTT, Ctrl_FWD: CTAGGCCACAGAATTGAAAGATCT and Ctrl_REV: GTAGGTGGAAATTCTAGCATCATCC applying the following thermocycler protocol: initial denaturation followed by 40 cycles of 94°C for 30 s, 51.7°C for 60 s and 72°C for 45 s.

The PCR specific for the floxed region within the prkd3 gene used the following primers: prkd3-fl_FWD: GACTGTCATCACCAGCATCTTTCAGC and prkd3-fl_REV: CCTGGAGAGAGACTGAAGCCTTGG. The following thermocycler protocol was applied: initial denaturation followed by 40 cycles of 94°C for 40 s, 61°C for 30 s and 72°C for 30 s. The resulting amplicon comprises 458 or 593 bp; dependent on the presence or absence of loxP sites. All primers were custom synthesized from Eurofins Genomics Germany GmbH.

Isolation of T cells

Single cell suspensions from spleen and lymph nodes were obtained as described earlier (7). Cell counts and viability were determined using LUNA Automated Cell Counter (Logos Biosystems) after staining with acridine orange/propidium iodide (Biocat; F23001-LG). Pan-T cells were isolated by negative selection using magnetic-activated cell separation (MACS) (Miltenyi Biotec; 130-095-130) with pre-separation filters, LS columns and a QuadroMACS separator (all Miltenyi Biotec) following the manufacturers` instructions. T cell purity was checked by flow cytometry.

Cell proliferation dye labeling

In order to track proliferation, T cells were stained with 2.5 μM Cell Proliferation Dye eFluor™ 670 (Thermo Fisher Scientific; 65-0840) for 5 min at 37°C in the dark after being washed twice with Hank’s balanced salt solution (HBSS) with Mg2+ and Ca2+ (Merck, L2305). Staining was stopped by addition of ice-cold FCS and excess of RPMI and the labelled cells were washed twice with cRPMI (see below).

T cell culture, in vitro polyclonal stimulation and mixed lymphocyte reaction

Purified T cells were cultured in RPMI 1640 medium (PAN Biotech; P04-17500) supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated FCS (Biowest; S1810-500), 100 U/mL penicillin, 100 μg/mL streptomycin (PAN Biotech; P06-07100), 2 mM L-glutamine (PAN Biotech; P04-80050), 1 mM sodium pyruvate (Sigma; S8636) and 1x mix of non-essential amino acids (Sigma; M7145) (from here on cRPMI) at 37°C and 5% CO2.

In vitro polyclonal stimulation was performed by seeding 4.5x 105 eFluor670-stained T cells in a 96 well flat-bottom plate coated overnight (o/n) with 5 µg/mL anti-CD3ϵ antibodies (BioXcell; clone 145-2C11; BE0001-1) in PBS. Co-stimulation was provided with anti-CD28 antibodies (BioXcell; clone 37.51; BE0015-1) at final concentration of 1 µg/mL added soluble to the culture medium.

For mixed lymphocyte reaction (MLR) and thus, semi-allogenic stimulation in vitro, 1.5x 105 CD3+ eFluor670-labelled T cells (C57BL/6 background) were co-cultured with 4.5x 105 mitomycin C-treated (50 μg/ml for 45 min; AppliChem; A2190) splenocytes (B6D2F1 hybrids) in 96 well round-bottom plates. The populations were discriminated by the congenic marker CD45 (CD45.2+ C57BL/6 mice; CD45.1+/2+ B6D2F1 mice).

Mouse models for in vivo T cell stimulation: OVA/alum immunization and in vivo MLR (P into F1 model)

For immunization, mice were injected intraperitoneally (i.p.) with 200 µL of the model antigen ovalbumin (OVA) (Endograde, LET0027) with aluminum potassium sulfate dodecahydrate (alum) (Sigma, Cat.No. 31242-500G). For this alum was dissolved at 37°C in PBS (0.1 g/mL) and mixed in a ratio of 1:1 with 1 mg/mL OVA. Acidity was adjusted to pH = 7 by addition of NaOH. Afterwards, OVA/alum mix was washed three times with PBS by centrifuging (2150 x g; 15 s; 4°C). Analysis of immune response (in the spleen) was performed on day seven by flow cytometry.

In vivo MLR was performed as described recently in detail (8). In brief, 8x 106 CD3+ eFluor670-labelled cells from C57BL/6 mice (CD45.2+, MHC haplotype b) were transferred intravenously (i.v.) to semi-allogeneic B6D2F1 recipient mice (CD45.1+/2+, MHC haplotype b/d). Transferred T cells were analyzed on day 3 after adoptive cell transfer (ACT) by flow cytometry from spleen of the recipient mice.

RNA extraction, cDNA synthesis and quantitative real time (qRT)-PCR

RNA was isolated using RNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen; 704004) and transcribed into cDNA using Omniscript RT Kit (Qiagen; 205113) with oligo (dt) 15 primer and random primers (Promega; C110A and C118A) in the presence of ribonuclease inhibitors (Promega; N2511) according to manufacturers' instructions. TaqMan technology-based quantitative real-time PCR for prkd3 and the house keeping transcript, gapdh, was performed with Luna Universal Probe qPCR Master Mix (NEB; M3004E) and respective TaqMan gene expression assays (Applied Biosystem: Mm00472455_m1 for prdk3) and Mm99999915_g1 for gapdh) in a 7500 Fast Real-Time PCR instrument (Applied Biosystems). PCR program: initial denaturation at 95°C for 60 s, then repetitive cycles of 15 s at 95°C and 30 s at 60°C. All measurements were performed in duplicates.

SDS-PAGE and western blotting

For PKD3 protein level analysis, immunoblot was performed as described previously (7) with antibodies specific for PKD3 (Cell Signaling, rabbit mAb #5655, D57E6, 1:1000) and β-actin (Santa Cruz, sc-1615, C-11, 1:2000).

Flow cytometry of surface antigens and intracellular cytokines upon re-stimulation

Flow cytometry was performed on a FACS Canto II (4-2-2 configuration, BD Biosciences). Optionally, for dead cell exclusion, cells were stained with the Fixable Viability Stain 780 (BD Biosciences, 65-0865-14; diluted 1:2000 in HBSS) for 10 min at RT in the dark according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Then, cells were incubated for 5 min with FcR block (anti-CD16/32; BD Biosciences). Subsequent staining of surface antigens was performed for 20 min in the fridge. When using biotinylated antibodies, cells were washed and subsequently incubated for 15 min with streptavidin-conjugates (SA-APC, BD Biosciences, 554067). SIINFEKL-specific T cells were analyzed by tetramer staining (MBL, TB-5001-2, 1:20 in HBSS with 10% FCS) incubating at 37°C for 20 min.

The following antibodies were used: CD3 Pb (clone 17A2; 100214), CD8 PerCP-Cy5.5 (clone 53-6.7; 100733), CD25 PE (clone PC61; 102008), CD44 PE-Cy7 (clone IM7; 103029), CD44 FITC (clone IM7; 103005), CD45.1 Pb (clone A20; 110721), CD45.2 FITC (clone 104;109806), CD62L APC-Cy7 (clone MEL-14; 104428), GL7 FITC (clone GL7; 144604), IFN-γ PE-Cy7 (clone XMG1.2; 505826) (from Biolegend), CD4 V500 (clone RM4-5; 560782), CXCR5 biotin (clone 2G8; 551960), Fas A647 (clone Jo2; 563647), IL-2 PE (clone JES6-5H4; 554428) (from BD Biosciences) and PD-1 PE (clone J43; eBiosciences, 12-9985-82). After staining, the cells were either washed with PBS, 0.5% BSA, 2 mM EDTA and used directly for FACS or fixed for 20 min at RT in a 2% formaldehyde solution.

For intracellular cytokine analysis, splenocytes were stimulated for 4 h either with soluble anti-CD3 (5 µg/mL) and anti-CD28 (1 µg/mL) antibodies (BioXcell; clones 145-2C11 & clone 37.51) or with 50 ng/mL phorbol-12,13-dibutyrate (Sigma, P1269) together with 500 ng/mL ionomycin (Sigma, I0634); in the presence of brefeldin A and monensin (1:1000 and 1:1500, BD Biosciences, 555029 & 554724), which were added 45 min after start of the stimulation. After this stimulation, cells were fixed for 30 min at RT and subsequently permeabilized (Biolegend, 421002 and 420801), before applying the antibody mix in permeabilization buffer for 30 min. Thereafter, the cells were washed once with permeabilization buffer and additionally with PBS, 0.5% BSA, 2 mM EDTA.

Luminex technology

Secreted IL-2 and IFN-γ concentrations from cell culture supernatant were determined by Luminex xMAP technology with the respective kits (Bio-Rad; 171G5003M and 171G5017M) according to manufacturer’s instructions with a subsequent readout on a Bio-Plex 200 machine (Bio-Rad; 171000201).

Electronic data processing and statistical analysis

Flow cytometric data were analyzed with FlowJo (version 10.6.1). Graphical presentation of data as well as statistical analysis was performed with GraphPad Prism (version 8). Figures were generated with Affinity Photo and Affinity Designer (both version 1.6.4.104).

All data are presented as individual data points together with the mean. All data shown emerge from at least two independent experiments. Total number of biological replicates (n) is stated in each figure legend. Statistical testing was performed using unpaired student’s t-test. A p-value < 0.05 was considered significant.

Results

PKD3ΔT mice do not phenocopy the skewed T cell compartment of conventional PKD3-deficient mice

Our recent study of conventional PKD3-deficient mice has revealed a skewed T cell compartment from naïve towards effector/memory phenotype, which resulted in a putative hyper-phenotype upon polyclonal stimulation ex vivo or immunization in vivo (7). However, since we could so far only speculate whether this effect is mediated by T cell-intrinsic or rather -extrinsic mechanisms, we aimed to investigate mice lacking PKD3 specifically in the T cell compartment (PKD3ΔT mice). Thus, we have crossed mice harboring a floxed prkd3 gene with those expressing Cre-recombinase driven by the CD4 promoter, which is active in all T cells during double positive stage (DP) of thymic development. The absence of PKD3 in both, CD4+ and CD8+ T cells sorted from secondary lymphoid organs of PKD3ΔT mice, was confirmed on mRNA level by qRT-PCR as well as on protein level by western blot (Figure 1B).

Using these mouse lines, we characterized the splenic T cell compartment under steady state conditions. In contrast to conventional PKD3-deficient mice (7), we have not observed any aberrances compared to control mice in terms of the frequency of naïve, central memory or effector/memory T cells distinguished by expression of CD44 and CD62L (Figure 1C). In accordance with this, we have not observed any differences in the ability of the production of the effector cytokines IL-2 or IFN-γ upon short stimulation of the splenocytes for 4 h with anti-CD3 and anti-CD28 antibodies (Figure 1D) or with phorbol-12,13-dibutyrate (PDBu, mimicking DAG binding) and ionomycin (Ca2+ ionophore) (data not shown). Thus, these results reveal that PKD3ΔT mice do not phenocopy the skewed T cell compartment of conventional PKD3-deficient mice. This, in addition to an unaltered thymic development (Supplementary Figure 1) suggests that T cell-extrinsic PKD3 is responsible for the aberrances of PKD3-/- mice.

T cell-intrinsic PKD3 is dispensable for T cell activation in vitro

In spite of the fact that PKD3ΔT mice show no aberrations in the T cell compartment under homeostatic conditions ex vivo, we have considered it to be worth to further investigate the activation of T cells specifically lacking PKD3. Especially since PKD3 is strongly regulated upon TCR stimulation (7) and the highly homologous PKD2 is well known to act as a digital amplifier of TCR signaling (4, 9), this kinase might still be important for the T cell activation processes. Of note, the skewed T cell compartment in conventional PKD3-deficient mice, which results in a bigger proportion of effector/memory T cells already from the beginning, could have had masked a defect in T cell activation. Such an impaired T cell activation would be plausible, since this is observed in mice deficient for the closely related PKD2 (4, 9) as well as different upstream located PKC isoforms (1012). To address this point, we have labelled CD3+ T cells isolated from spleens of either PKD3ΔT mice or the respective controls with the proliferation dye eFluor670 and stimulated these cells using anti-CD3/anti-CD28 antibodies. At day 3 the polyclonally stimulated T cells were analyzed by flow cytometry for proliferation as well as activation marker expression and furthermore cytokine secretion by luminex technology. No differences in proliferation, activation (assessed by upregulation of CD25) or IL-2 and IFN-γ secretion were observed (Figures 2A, B). Of note, the strong and artificial stimulus using antibodies crosslinking the CD3ϵ chain of the TCR complex and the co-stimulatory receptor CD28, may have masked small differences. Thus, to obtain a more physiological activation setting, we additionally checked the same parameters upon stimulation through allogenic splenocytes in a mixed lymphocyte reaction (MLR) approach. As expected, thereby a much smaller proportion of the T cells got activated (Figure 2C). However, also in this setting, no differences between the two genotypes were observed at any of the analyzed time points (Figures 2C, D).

FIGURE 2
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 2 T cells from PKD3ΔT mice show a similar response to wild type T cells upon polyclonal stimulation in vitro. Ex vivo MACS-sorted CD3+ T cells from PKD3ΔT mice (⬦) and respective controls (♦) were labelled with the proliferation dye eFluor670 and subsequently stimulated with platebound anti-CD3 and soluble anti-CD28 antibodies (left side) or in a mixed lymphocyte reaction with allogeneic splenocytes (right side). (A + C) Activation/proliferation was analyzed by flow cytometry after 3 or 3 – 5 days, respectively. Representative FACS histograms of the proliferation dye together with summarizing graphs are shown. (B + D) Secretion of IL-2 and IFN-γ (see Figure 1D) was determined by luminex from the cell culture supernatant. (n = 4, from 2 independent experiments).

PKD3ΔT mice do not show an aberrant T cell response in vivo

Both, polyclonal stimulation using anti-CD3/anti-CD28 antibodies as wells as the in vitro MLR have allowed us to assess activation of the T cells in vitro. However, one has to consider that these models do not take into account several factors influencing an immune response as it occurs in vivo. These include inter alia a physiologic environment, migration of the T cells, interactions with other cells, etc. Thus, for a comprehensive study, it is crucial to expand the investigations to an in vivo setting. For this, we have used our recently established in vivo MLR model (8). In brief, eFluor670-labelled T cells of interest from mice of a C57BL/6 background are transferred into semi-allogeneic B6D2F1 recipients; thereby getting activated, while not being rejected (Figure 3A). The transferred T cells can be tracked in the recipient mice by flow cytometry using antibodies to the congenic markers CD45.1/2 (Figure 3B). The frequency of transferred T cells among the recipients´ splenocytes is already a first indicator whether a comparable T cell activation and thus expansion took place. In accordance with the previous in vitro approaches, there were no visible differences in proliferation or IL-2 and IFN-γ production (after re-stimulation ex vivo) between the two genotypes (Figures 3C, D). In this in vivo setting, however, it is also possible to check for the transition from naïve to effector/memory state as indicated by the loss of the lymph node homing receptor CD62L and upregulation of CD44. Confirming our previous results, these parameters did not differ between the two genotypes (Figures 3E, F). Thus, these experiments suggest that although PKD3 is strongly regulated upon TCR signaling, its T cell-intrinsic role is dispensable for the activation process.

FIGURE 3
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 3 T cells from PKD3ΔT mice show no impairment in activation, proliferation or cytokine secretion upon allogenic stimulation in vivo. T cells from PKD3ΔT mice (⬦) and respective controls (♦) were stimulated in an in vivo MLR approach. (A) Experimental set-up (B) Frequency of transferred T cells as well as their proliferation (C) shown with representative FACS dot plots/histograms together with a summarizing graph. (D) Analysis of cytokine expression: Splenocytes from recipient mice were restimulated for 4 h with PDBu/iono together with monensin/brefeldin A. IL-2 and IFN-γ were analyzed by flow cytometry. (E + F) Median fluorescence intensity of CD62L and CD44 as surrogate markers for the naïve and effector/memory state of transferred T cells. (n = 5 - 6, from 2 independent experiments).

Besides thorough study of the MLR models, we aimed to investigate the whole T cell response upon immunization with a model antigen. This was of interest due to several reasons. First, this approach allows to investigate an antigen-specific T cell response in an in vivo setting without adoptive T cell transfer of in vitro sorted cells. Furthermore, there are already known implications of PKDs in follicular T helper cell (TFH) development, showing that PKD2 as well as PKD3 knockout results in increased TFH numbers upon immunization with OVA/alum (6, 7). Based on this, we have considered it crucial to perform these experiments also with PKD3ΔT mice (Figure 4A). Successful immunization was confirmed by an increase in the spleen weight as well as direct proof of SIINFEKL-specific CD8+ T cells by MHC I-tetramer technology. Comparing these parameters between the genotypes already indicated a comparable strength of the ongoing immune response (Figures 4B, C). Hence, PKD3ΔT mice did not reflect aberrances in GC B cell or TFH induction as it is the case in conventional PKD2- and PKD3-deficient mice (Figures 4D, E) (6, 7).

FIGURE 4
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 4 Loss of T cell-intrinsic PKD3 does not affect adaptive immune response upon immunization. PKD3ΔT mice (⬦) and respective controls (♦) were immunized i.p. with OVA/alum. Immune response was analyzed after 7 days. (A) Experimental set-up (B) Spleen weight (C-E) Frequency of SIINFEKL-specific T cells, GC B cells and TFH cells analyzed by flow cytometry. Data from non-immunized controls are represented by a gray dashed line. (n = 5 – 6 for immunized mice, n = 2 for controls; from 2 independent experiments).

Discussion

T cell activation and differentiation are critical during immune response and thus crucial for proper host defense. These are initiated by TCR signaling, a process dependent on several kinases, such as members of the classical or novel PKC family (10, 11, 13, 14). Of note, PKDs, which are downstream targets of PKCs are also of interest for T cell immunologists. While several studies have outlined the importance of PKD2 for proper T cell responses, much less is known about the highly homologous PKD3. Recently, we have addressed this issue by a characterization of conventional PKD3-/- mice. Interestingly, we have observed increased effector cytokine responses upon polyclonal activation in vitro as well as a stronger immune response upon immunization in vivo. These observations partially mimic but are also partially inconsistent with the described phenotype upon PKD2 deficiency (4, 6, 9). Moreover, from our last study we could not conclude on whether the observed effects are caused by T cell-intrinsic or rather -extrinsic mechanisms. Thus, here we analyzed this by investigating mice with a T cell-specific PKD3 deficiency.

In the present work, we have used several models and thereby meticulously investigated PKD3-deficient T cells upon stimulation. Although PKD3 expression is strongly regulated upon TCR signaling (7), we have not observed any differences in activation or effector cytokine production, leading us to the conclusion that this kinase is dispensable for proper T lymphocyte activation. This may be explained by a possible compensation by PKD2, which is not only highly homologous, but also expressed to a much higher level in T cells (2). Of note, there are several examples of redundant, but also unique functions of PKD isoforms [discussed in more detail in our last work (7)]. This cannot be addressed with our present mice models, though.

Moreover, PKD3ΔT mice did not phenocopy the skewed mature T cell compartment from naïve towards effector/memory phenotype. Additionally, we observed that a sole loss of PKD3 in the T cell compartment did not disarrange thymocyte development (Supplementary Figure 1). Of note, we cannot exclude a T cell-intrinsic role of PKD3 within the very early, CD4 and CD8 double negative (DN) stage, since in the present mouse line Cre recombinase is only expressed from the DP stage on. However, our results match the observations by Ishikawa et al. using a mouse harboring Cre driven under the Lck proximal promoter, which leads to expression and thus recombination at the DN3 stage (15, 16). In their work, ablation of either PKD2 or PKD3 at the DN stage did not affect thymic development – only simultaneous deletion of both T cell-expressed PKD isoforms resulted in impaired positive selection accompanying with an aberrant transition from DP to single positive (SP) stage. Hence, PKD3’s crucial role in the DN stage that we would miss using CD4-Cre mice seems unlikely. Therefore, we assume PKD3 acts via T cell-extrinsic mechanisms on the cells’ fate, which is also in accordance with our recent findings, that naïve-sorted CD4+ T cells from PKD3-/- mice do not show increased secretion of IL-2 or IFN-γ (7). In this case, our observations may be explained by aberrations in cells, which interact with T cells, like especially major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class II+ professional antigen presenting cells, stromal cells or in a broader sense all MHC class I+ cells. We have recently discussed studies targeting the role of PKD3 in these cell types (7), however, to the best of our knowledge there is only one study taking this indirect effect on T cells into account. Thus, when human peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) were co-cultured with tumor cells previously transfected with anti-prkd3-directed siRNA, this resulted in enhanced activation and proliferation of the included T cells (17). Hence, this further supports a T cell-extrinsic mechanism. Nonetheless, so far both, the cell type as well as the molecular mechanism responsible for skewing of the T cell compartment in PKD3-/- mice remain elusive.

Overall, our analyses of T cell-specific PKD3-deficiency suggest that T cell-intrinsic PKD3 is dispensable for T cell activation in vitro as well as for robust immune response under in vivo settings. However, we cannot exclude compensatory mechanisms of the more prominent PKD2 covering for a lack of PKD3 throughout T cell life.

Data availability statement

The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.

Ethics statement

The animal study was reviewed and approved by the animal care and use committee of the Medical University of Innsbruck and the Austrian Federal Ministry of Science and Research (approval reference numbers: 2020-0.392.972, 2020-0.345.526 and 2020-0.345.522).

Author contributions

KS conceived the study. JK and KS performed and analyzed the experiments, interpreted the data and wrote the manuscript. JK designed the figures. ML provided mouse strain with floxed prkd3 allele. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.

Funding

This work was supported by grants from the Austrian Academy of Sciences (DOC Fellowship to JK) and the Austrian Science Fund FWF (TAI 88-B and P34368-B to KS).

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Maria Pommermayr, Nina Posch and Nadja Haas for technical assistance and support with mouse care.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Supplementary material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fimmu.2022.1049033/full#supplementary-material

Supplementary Figure 1 | Unaltered thymic development of PKD3ΔT mice.

References

1. Rozengurt E. Protein kinase d signaling: multiple biological functions in health and disease. Physiol (Bethesda) (2011) 26(1):23–33. doi: 10.1152/physiol.00037.2010

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Matthews SA, Navarro MN, Sinclair LV, Emslie E, Feijoo-Carnero C, Cantrell DA. Unique functions for protein kinase D1 and protein kinase D2 in mammalian cells. Biochem J (2010) 432(1):153–63. doi: 10.1042/BJ20101188

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Irie A, Harada K, Tsukamoto H, Kim JR, Araki N, Nishimura Y. Protein kinase D2 contributes to either IL-2 promoter regulation or induction of cell death upon TCR stimulation depending on its activity in jurkat cells. Int Immunol (2006) 18(12):1737–47. doi: 10.1093/intimm/dxl108

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Navarro MN, Feijoo-Carnero C, Arandilla AG, Trost M, Cantrell DA. Protein kinase D2 is a digital amplifier of T cell receptor-stimulated diacylglycerol signaling in naive CD8(+) T cells. Sci Signal (2014) 7(348):ra99. doi: 10.1126/scisignal.2005477

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Mazzeo C, Calvo V, Alonso R, Merida I, Izquierdo M. Protein kinase D1/2 is involved in the maturation of multivesicular bodies and secretion of exosomes in T and b lymphocytes. Cell Death Differ (2016) 23(1):99–109. doi: 10.1038/cdd.2015.72

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Misawa T, SoRelle JA, Choi JH, Yue T, Wang KW, McAlpine W, et al. Mutual inhibition between Prkd2 and Bcl6 controls T follicular helper cell differentiation. Sci Immunol (2020) 5(43):eaaz0085. doi: 10.1126/sciimmunol.aaz0085

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Koutník J, Neururer V, Gruber T, Peer S, Hermann-Kleiter N, Olson WJ, et al. Addressing the role of PKD3 in the T cell compartment with knockout mice. Cell Commun Signal (2022) 20(1):54. doi: 10.1186/s12964-022-00864-w

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Koutník J, Klepsch V, Pommermayr M, Thuille N, Baier G, Siegmund K. A MLR-based approach to analyze regulators of T lymphocyte activation In vivo. Int J Mol Sci (2022) 23(10):5337. doi: 10.3390/ijms23105337

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Navarro MN, Sinclair LV, Feijoo-Carnero C, Clarke R, Matthews SA, Cantrell DA. Protein kinase D2 has a restricted but critical role in T-cell antigen receptor signalling in mature T-cells. Biochem J (2012) 442(3):649–59. doi: 10.1042/BJ20111700

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Sun Z, Arendt CW, Ellmeier W, Schaeffer EM, Sunshine MJ, Gandhi L, et al. PKC-theta is required for TCR-induced NF-kappaB activation in mature but not immature T lymphocytes. Nature (2000) 404(6776):402–7. doi: 10.1038/35006090

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Pfeifhofer C, Kofler K, Gruber T, Tabrizi NG, Lutz C, Maly K, et al. Protein kinase c theta affects Ca2+ mobilization and NFAT cell activation in primary mouse T cells. J Exp Med (2003) 197(11):1525–35. doi: 10.1084/jem.20020234

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Siegmund K, Thuille N, Posch N, Fresser F, Leitges M, Baier G. Novel mutant mouse line emphasizes the importance of protein kinase c theta for CD4(+) T lymphocyte activation. Cell Commun Signal (2019) 17(1):56. doi: 10.1186/s12964-019-0364-0#

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Gruber T, Hermann-Kleiter N, Pfeifhofer-Obermair C, Lutz-Nicoladoni C, Thuille N, Letschka T, et al. PKC theta cooperates with PKC alpha in alloimmune responses of T cells in vivo. Mol Immunol (2009) 46(10):2071–9. doi: 10.1016/j.molimm.2009.02.030

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Fu G, Hu J, Niederberger-Magnenat N, Rybakin V, Casas J, Yachi PP, et al. Protein kinase c eta is required for T cell activation and homeostatic proliferation. Sci Signal (2011) 4(202):ra84. doi: 10.1126/scisignal.2002058

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Ishikawa E, Kosako H, Yasuda T, Ohmuraya M, Araki K, Kurosaki T, et al. Protein kinase d regulates positive selection of CD4(+) thymocytes through phosphorylation of SHP-1. Nat Commun (2016) 7:12756. doi: 10.1038/ncomms12756

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Shi J, Petrie HT. Activation kinetics and off-target effects of thymus-initiated cre transgenes. PLoS One (2012) 7(10):e46590. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0046590

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Lv D, Chen J, Kang Y, Luo M, Chen H, Cui B, et al. Protein kinase D3 promotes the reconstruction of OSCC immune escape niche Via regulating MHC-I and immune inhibit molecules expression. J Immunother (2021) 44(9):339–47. doi: 10.1097/CJI.0000000000000395

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: Protein kinase D3, T cell signaling, T cell activation, T lymphocyte, Lymphatic knockout

Citation: Koutník J, Leitges M and Siegmund K (2022) T cell-intrinsic protein kinase D3 is dispensable for the cells’ activation. Front. Immunol. 13:1049033. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.1049033

Received: 20 September 2022; Accepted: 24 October 2022;
Published: 17 November 2022.

Edited by:

Noah Isakov, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Israel

Reviewed by:

Byron Au-Yeung, Emory University, United States
Robert Joseph Mallis, Dana–Farber Cancer Institute, United States

Copyright © 2022 Koutník, Leitges and Siegmund. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Kerstin Siegmund, S2Vyc3Rpbi5TaWVnbXVuZEBpLW1lZC5hYy5hdA==

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.