Skip to main content

OPINION article

Front. Immunol., 19 December 2022
Sec. Immunological Tolerance and Regulation
This article is part of the Research Topic The Role of Vitamin D as an Immunomodulator View all 10 articles

Can vitamin D status influence seroconversion to SARS-COV2 vaccines?

Updated
  • 1Gastroenterology Unit, National Institute of Gastroenterology S. De Bellis Research Hospital (IRCCS), Castellana Grotte, Italy
  • 2Nephrology, Dialysis and Transplantation Unit, Department of Precision and Regenerative Medicine and Ionian Area - (DiMePRe-J), University of Bari “A. Moro”, Bari, Italy
  • 3Medical Oncology Unit, IRCCS Istituto Tumori “Giovanni Paolo II” of Bari, Bari, Italy
  • 4Guido Baccelli Unit of Internal Medicine, Department of Precision and Regenerative Medicine and Ionian Area - (DiMePRe-J), University of Bari “A. Moro”, Bari, Italy

Existing data indicate an association between vitamin D deficiency and increased severity of respiratory distress due to COVID-19 infection, especially in high-risk populations. To date, the effect of vitamin D on immunogenicity to SARS-CoV-2 vaccines has been investigated solely in young healthcare workers in a few studies, yielding conflicting findings, yet highlighting that the response to immunization is inversely related to age. Vitamin D status can potentially influence the antibody titers in people with a previous (or naïve) SARS-CoV-2 infection and vaccination, given its role in immune regulatory functions. From this standpoint, vitamin D supplementation can help reduce the risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection, COVID-19 severity/mortality and rebalance immunological function, particularly in subjects with vigorous T lymphocyte responses to COVID-19. However, more research is needed to establish a correlation between vitamin D status and the generation of protective serological responses to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination.

1 Introduction

Altmann D.M. et al., in their comment, have elaborated elegantly on the plethora of unresolved issues with the reliability of serological tests used for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) identification, after coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) resolution (1). U.S. has been widely tested for SARS-CoV-2 infection from March to April 27, 2020 resulting in 5.44 million people infected, followed by Italy (1.76 million). The identification of infected individuals relies on polymerase chain reaction (PCR) based tests for SARS-CoV-2. In contrast, antibody blood tests determine whether a past infection has occurred by detecting serum antibodies against the virus (1). Despite the higher sensitivity of IgA enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) in detecting antibody titers, their false-negative rates due to lower specificity suggest a particular caution when interpreting the results (2).

It has been observed that COVID-19 outbreaks, and mortality, in particular, have a higher prevalence in the Northern hemisphere, exhibiting a gradient according to the geographical distribution of hypovitaminosis D (3). This is mainly mediated by distinct Earth’s seasonal ultraviolet (UV) exposure, although another reasonable explanation could rely on certain atmospheric phenomena (3, 4).

UV radiation strength, exposure time, and skin colour are all known to influence vitamin D biosynthesis (5). Optimal conditions for vitamin D biosynthesis may differ in each individual, and seasonal changes in sunlight exposure may also have an impact (69). Notably, previous research has also shown that vitamin D levels can drastically decrease from summer to winter in adult and young (apparently) healthy subjects of different ethnicities (1015).

Additionally, several studies on the relationship between sunlight exposure and the global COVID-19 pandemic have been conducted (68), with solar UV showing a direct effect on SARS-CoV-2 inactivation (16, 17). Furthermore, COVID-19 transmission in South America was aided by cold, dry, and windless conditions (18). Even though no conclusive studies are available, seasonal variations in SARS-CoV-2 illness may be influenced in several cases by a lack of sun exposure, which may impair vitamin D status, especially in at-risk patients (19, 20).

2 Vitamin D immunomodulatory properties in the COVID-19 setting

Vitamin D has pleiotropic effects on the immune system (3, 21). Active vitamin D (1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 [1,25-(OH)2D3] is synthesized in renal tubules and acts as a steroid hormone, influencing the expression of hundreds of genes (22). It induces cathelicidins and defensins, which concurrently down-regulate viral replication and pro-inflammatory cytokines that lead to potential interstitial pneumonia and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) after the onset of a cytokine storm (3, 21). Besides, vitamin D modulates adaptive immunity by suppressing T Helper cell type-1 (TH1) responses and promotes the induction of T regulatory cells that counterbalance inflammatory responses (21). Vitamin D inhibits the expression of renin and, therefore also affects the renin-angiotensin system (RAS)/angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) signaling axis (3). Interestingly, vitamin D exerts propitious anti-thrombotic actions in tissues directly or indirectly involved in thrombosis pathophysiology (21).

Chauss and Colleagues have presented new evidence that severe COVID-19 may be caused, in some people, by the lack of the ability to resolve an exuberant type I immune response. They specifically implicated vitamin D receptor (VDR) signaling in this process (23), showing that when vitamin D levels are low, human CD4+ T cells express more type 1 (IFNG) and type 17 genes. In contrast, IL-6R and IL-10 levels are lower. Vitamin D induces STAT3, BACH2, and JUN to increase IL-6R (reinforcing STAT3 activation) and IL-10, which may be necessary for converting the pro-inflammatory TH1 cell-type to that crucial in resolving type 1 inflammation in the setting of severe COVID-19 (23). Minton K also proposed that the impaired transcriptional response to vitamin D in patients with severe COVID-19 could be due to vitamin D deficiency or dysregulation of complement-induced autoregulatory VDR signaling (24). Thus, vitamin D supplementation may modulate IL-6 towards a favorable profile in COVID-19.

3 Evidences linking vitamin D and COVID-19 outcomes

A 2021 meta-analysis of fifty-four observational studies including a total of 1,403,715 individuals, found that all patients with severe deficiency, and/or insufficiency of vitamin D present an increased risk of ARDS requiring admission to intensive care unit (ICU) or mortality due to COVID-19 and a higher susceptibility to SARS-CoV-2 infection and related hospitalization (25).

Current evidence supports a solid relationship between vitamin D deficiency and increased severity of ARDS associated with COVID-19, especially in high-risk populations for hypovitaminosis D (e.g., elderly, Northern people, hospitalized, cardiovascular disease, gastrointestinal diseases, chronic kidney disease, diabetics, obese, impaired immune function, dark-skinned ethnicities, vegetarians or vegans) (3, 2144). The studies listed in the Supplementary Material support the association between vitamin D levels and COVID-19 outcomes.

Several studies have investigated vitamin D deficiency in the context of COVID-19 severity/mortality based on specific evidence of a protective effect of vitamin D supplementation (400-1000 IU daily) against respiratory tract infections resulting from two rigorous and large meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials (RCTs), particularly in individuals with baseline 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 [25(OH)D3] levels < 25 nmol/L (44, 45).

4 Vitamin D status and COVID-19 immunization

Antibody titers, after recovery from COVID-19, indicate healing, but still, there is uncertainty about their neutralizing nature. The levels of such antibodies can be theoretically influenced also by vitamin D status in patients with previous SARS-CoV-2 infection given the immunomodulatory properties of vitamin D, which also include the inhibition of lymphocyte proliferation and immunoglobulin production in healthy conditions (46).

4.1 Seroconversion in immune-mediated diseases

A meta-analysis published in 2022 found that seroconversion rates after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination are lower in patients with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases. Specific therapies (anti-TNF, anti-integrin, anti-IL17, anti-IL6, anti-IL12/23) do not affect seroconversion rates, whereas others (anti-CD20, anti-CTLA-4) have a negative impact (47). Notably, there is an inverse relationship between vitamin D status and the development of several autoimmune diseases (48). It is known that vitamin D counteracts the suppressive effect of inflammatory cytokines on CTLA-4 expression and regulatory function (49). Furthermore, 1,25-(OH)2D3 has a critical positive regulation of CTLA4, an essential negative regulator in immune responses (50).

4.2 Vitamin D supplementation

The conundrum has been raised of whether vitamin D would be beneficial in reducing the severity of COVID-19 illness, its requirement for hospitalization, and the length of symptoms.

Vitamin D supplementation may reduce the risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection, COVID-19 severity, and mortality risk (3). It may also help rebalance immunological function in high-risk individuals, particularly those with COVID-19 who demonstrated strong T lymphocyte responses (1, 51).

To decrease the risk of infection and enhance the immunological reactivity against COVID-19, oral supplementation in patients with vitamin D deficiency has been initially suggested at a dosage of 10,000 IU/day of vitamin D3 for a few weeks, followed by a daily dosage of 5,000 IU (3, 52). The ideal target is a 25(OH)D3 over 40-60 ng/mL.

A meta-analysis of 6 RCTs involving 551 COVID-19 patients published in 2022 concluded that despite the heterogeneity of the included studies, vitamin D supplementation was beneficial in COVID-19 and was associated with a lower rate of ICU admission, mortality events, and RT-PCR positivity (53).

Based on a pilot study and several observational intervention studies in which the use of high doses of calcifediol dramatically reduced the need for ICU admission and the mortality rate, it was proposed a rapid correction of 25(OH)D3 deficiency in all patients in the early stages of COVID-19 (54). In particular, early administration of high-dose versus standard-dose vitamin D3 to at-risk older patients with COVID-19 improved the two-week mortality (55). Similarly, other Authors in a recent meta-analysis of thirteen observational and RCTs involving a total of 2,933 COVID-19 patients (56), concluded that high-dose cholecalciferol supplementation may be associated with better clinical outcomes, particularly when administered after the diagnosis of COVID-19.

On the contrary, another recent RCT found that a single high oral dose of vitamin D3 (200,000 IU) did not significantly reduce hospital length of stay in 237 COVID-19 patients hospitalized (57). Other previous RCTs produced mixed and inconsistent results, with no clear positive results, and two 2021 meta-analyses found no significant difference between vitamin D supplementation and major health outcomes in COVID-19 (5861).

Bergman P discussed vitamin D’s role in protecting against COVID-19 infection in a recent Editorial (62). He hypothesized that the association could be due to reverse causality or confounding. However, because COVID-19 vaccination was being rolled out during the previous null studies, he did not rule out the possibility that the highly effective vaccination could have masked any vitamin D effect.

Therefore, questions about the correct dosage, period, and methods of administration of vitamin D still need to be answered. A group from Harvard Medical School is currently investigating this question in a new pragmatic, cluster-randomized, double-blinded trial officially named VIVID (Vitamin D for COVID Trial), which is experimenting with the effects of a higher dose of vitamin D above 3,000 IU per day on disease progression and post-exposure prophylaxis for COVID-19 infection (63).

5 Vitamin D and gastrointestinal diseases during the COVID-19 scenario

Notably, even though SARS-CoV-2 is a lung-tropic virus damaging the respiratory tract by binding to the ACE2 cell-surface compounds found on alveolar pulmonary epithelial cells, gastrointestinal symptoms are common in COVID-19 patients and often precede respiratory tract disease. Recently, it was discovered that SARS-CoV-2 actively replicates in the gut, particularly in mature enterocytes expressing the ACE2 viral receptor and the TMPRSS4 protease (64).

According to current research, the host’s gut microbiota is key in influencing their health, particularly as a mediator of chronic systemic low-grade inflammation (65). During SARS-CoV-2 infection, the viral balance in the gastrointestinal tract may be disrupted, influencing the equilibrium of the intestinal microbiota (66).

There is mounting evidence that a cross-talk between the gut microbiome, vitamin D, and the RAS/ACE2 system is key for the elderly immune system’s balanced functioning. It has been proposed that the state of the gut microbiome prior to infection determines the outcome of COVID-19 sepsis and may also be a critical factor in vaccination success. Evidence suggests a complex relationship between COVID-19 severity and gut microbiota, ACE-2 expression, and vitamin D. Vitamin D promotes the growth of commensal strains of Bifida and Firmicutes species in the gut (67).

Anyway, for those with low vitamin D levels below 50 nmol/L, the 1000-2000 IU/day supplementation may be appropriate. Importantly, high-risk individuals with gastrointestinal malabsorption diseases such as celiac disease, Crohn’s disease, intestinal bypass surgery, hepatobiliary/pancreatic diseases, and sarcopenia, should continue to receive vitamin D and calcium.

Taking vitamin D supplements could have multifaced advantages, including the fact that COVID-19 may act as a potential trigger factor for several autoimmune diseases, such as celiac disease, in predisposed patients (68, 69).

6 Vitamin D levels and immune response to SARS-CoV-2 vaccines

Grifoni A and Sette A found early that CD4+ T cell responses to spike protein, the main target of most vaccine efforts, were robust and correlated with the anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG and IgA magnitude titers in COVID-19 convalescent patients. Notably, they also found a significant prevalence of SARS-CoV-2-reactive CD4+ T cells in uninfected people, implying cross-reactive T cells between circulating commonly coronaviruses and SARS-CoV-2 (70).

On the other hand, a 2022 Chinese multicenter study found that, when compared to seronegative healthy controls, patients with solid malignancies who failed the standard 2-dose inactivated COVID-19 vaccines had a relatively poor humoral response to the third dose of vaccines, which was associated with low vitamin D levels and intake (71).

Several studies have confirmed that vitamin D and its pathway polymorphism can improve vaccine efficacy for infectious diseases like influenza, measles, rubella, pneumococcal/meningococcal/human papillomavirus disease, tuberculosis, or hepatitis B in a variety of ways (72, 73). Only a few studies excluded that serum 25(OH)D3 concentrations affected the immunogenicity of influenza vaccination in the elderly (74, 75).

To date, the impact of vitamin D on immunogenicity to SARS-CoV-2 vaccines has been studied mainly in healthy healthcare workers (HCWs) in a few studies with contrasting results.

In a 2021 German observational trial, SARS-CoV-2 IgG and neutralization potency and 25(OH)D3 concentrations were measured in a cohort of 126 mostly female and young healthy HCWs 24 weeks after BNT162b2 vaccination. The antibody response was inversely related to age. A similar trend in neutralizing antibodies was observed, though significance was lost at the final sampling time point. Still, the dynamic change of SARS-CoV-2 IgG as a function of 25(OH)D3 status showed no significant differences (76). Nevertheless, the results could have been influenced by the fact that almost 50% of participants were supplementing vitamin D during winter, and the final blood sample was taken in summer when vitamin D levels usually increase even in those not supplementing. Also, the number of patients whose antibody level values were available at the end of the study was drastically reduced compared to the beginning to make reliable results (n = 56 vs. 126). Finally, the authors did not specify the proportion of vitamin D deficiency/insufficiency among participants.

Similarly, three sub-studies were conducted within the CORONAVIT RCT UK adults (n = 2,808) with low vitamin D levels to see if vitamin D supplements could improve the immunogenicity and efficacy of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination. Vitamin D supplementation did not affect the risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection in vaccinated participants when 800 IU/day or 3200 IU/day supplementation was used versus no supplementation, nor on combined IgG-IgA-IgM anti-Spike or neutralizing antibody titers. However, the study had some biases because 69.3% of the mostly white participants (with various comorbidities) received two doses of ChAdOx1nCoV-19, while the remaining participants received two doses of BNT162b2; nearly 5% of subjects had SARS-CoV-2 infection before vaccination and only 11% of patients had vitamin D deficiency, whereas vitamin D levels were not determined in the non-supplemented group (n = 908) (77).

Another Romanian study looked at antibody responses after BNT162b2 vaccination concerning previous SARS-CoV-2 infection status and age and looked for potential biomarkers associated with changes in immune responses. They discovered that prior infection yielded an 8-fold growth in antibody titers, an effect that was weaker in people over 60 years old and unaffected by vitamin D serum levels (78).

Conversely, in an Italian study, the Authors explored the relationship between serum 25(OH)D3 levels and the immune response evoked by the BNT162b2 vaccine in a group of 101 HCWs, the majority of whom were young females naïve for SARS-CoV-2 infection (79). There were significant correlations between baseline 25(OH)D3 concentration and anti-spike IgG response and neutralizing antibody titer 24 weeks after the second dose when serum 25(OH)D3 levels increased significantly. These findings may be justified by the coincidence of the summer season after the six months when sun exposure usually increases vitamin D levels. As a result, 25(OH)D3 levels at the time of vaccination may influence the persistence of the antibody response, even if further studies are required to corroborate these findings, particularly in vulnerable populations.

Interestingly, a recent Indonesian study followed 194 volunteers for eight months after receiving two inactivated SARS-CoV2 vaccination injections. The subjects with low vitamin D levels had lower IFN-γ and IL-12 levels 6 to 7 weeks after the second vaccine injection. Also, those with low IFN-γ levels had a higher risk of COVID-19 infections during follow-up. Therefore, inadequate vitamin D levels were associated with a lower Th1 immune response, whereas adequate IFN-γ levels were necessary to improve vaccine efficacy (80).

Similarly, a 2022 single-center study examined the effect of vitamin D on the response to SARS-CoV-2 immunization after the first BNT162b2 vaccine dose as measured by anti-SARS-CoV-2 Spike IgG concentration in 97 UK HCWs, primarily white and female, over 8 weeks. After two months, the response to immunization was inversely related to age and significantly affected by vitamin D status. Younger people with 25(OH)D3 levels greater than 50 nmol/L had a 29.3% higher IgG peak value. Antibody concentrations decreased in an age-dependent manner, with younger HCWs with higher peaks decreasing faster to comparable concentrations across ages at week 8 (81). These findings support the authors’ conclusion that a booster immunization program should be planned after sun exposure (end of summer or early autumn) or following vitamin D supplementation.

However, conclusive data associating antibody titers against the virus with vitamin D serum levels in COVID-19 patients still need to be included. Figure 1 depicts in detail a proposed mechanism linking vitamin D deficiency to COVID-19 antibody response while Figure 2 illustrates the role of vitamin D deficiency in the context of gut microbiome and the intestinal immune response concerning COVID-19.

FIGURE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 1 Proposed mechanism linking vitamin D deficiency to COVID-19 antibody response. “Created with BioRender.com” (Agreement number: MW24DBIWVD, Academic License). Vitamin D inhibits both the acquired immune system and stimulates the innate immune response as well. VDR modulates immunity processes, such as anti-microbial/anti-viral defense and the induction of T-cell tolerance. Several immune cells express the VDR and CYP27B1 (enzyme 1α-hydroxylase that converts vitamin D to the active form, 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3). The activation of innate immunity in SARS-CoV-2 infection seems to result in an increased local 1,25(OH)2D3 production and viral clearance while altering the pro-inflammatory response. The active form of vitamin D, 1,25(OH)2D3, is an inhibitor of dendritic cell maturation and functions as an immune modulator, reducing the activation of the acquired immune system. Furthermore, vitamin D induces transcription factors, including STAT3, BACH2, and JUN, which repress TH1 and TH17 responses and increase IL-10 via IL-6-STAT3 signaling, which is crucial in resolving type 1 inflammation in severe COVID-19 patients. Low vitamin D levels impair innate immune function, inactivating T reg cells and expanding the activated T and B cells, along with the immunoglobulin production. Specifically, human CD4+ T cell activation is associated with high levels of IFNγ, IL-2, IL-17, and low levels of IL-6R, TGF-β, and IL-10, resulting in the pro-inflammatory TH1 skewing and potentially severe tissue damage. COVID-19: Coronavirus Disease 2019; SARS CoV 2: Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2; S1: S1 domain of the coronavirus spike (S) protein; TMPRSS2: Transmembrane protease serine 2; S2: S2 domain of the coronavirus spike (S) protein; ACE2: Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme 2; PAMP: Pathogen Associated Molecular Patterns; TLR: Toll-like receptor; 25(OH)D3: 25-hydroxycholecalciferol; ILC3: Type 3 Innate Lymphoid Cells; IL-22: Interleukin 22; IL-4: Interleukin 4; IL-5: Interleukin 5; IL-13: Interleukin 13; Th2: Type 2 T Helper Cell; Th1: Type 1 T Helper Cell; Th17: Type 17 T Helper Cell; VDR: Vitamin D Receptor; CD8αα: Cluster of Differentiation 8αα; Treg: Regulatory T cells; IFNγ: Gamma Interferon; IL-2: Interleukin 2; IL-10: Interleukin 10; IL-17: Interleukin 17; CD40: Cluster of Differentiation 40; CD80: Cluster of Differentiation 80; CD86: Cluster of Differentiation 86; CD28: Cluster of Differentiation 28; MHCII: Major Histocompatibility Complex; TCR: Toll-like receptor; IL-12: Interleukin 12; IL-12R: Interleukin-12 Receptor; CD40L: Cluster of Differentiation 40 Ligand; CD28: Cluster of Differentiation 28; IL-6R: Interleukin-6 Receptor; TGF-β: Transforming Growth Factor Beta; NK: Natural Killer; IFNγR: Gamma Interferon Receptor; STAT3: Signal Transducer And Activator Of Transcription 3; BACH2: BTB Domain And CNC Homolog 2; JUN: Jun proto-oncogene; IgG: Immunoglobulin G. APC: Antigen-presenting cells; VDR: vitamin D receptor.

FIGURE 2
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 2 A schematic view linking vitamin D deficiency, the gut microbiome, and the intestinal immune response to COVID-19. “Created with BioRender.com” (Agreement number: ON24KBPV47, Academic License). Vitamin D promotes the expression of gap junction proteins within the gastrointestinal tract, which maintain barrier integrity and thus prevent tissue entry by bacteria from the gut microbiome. The VDR-vitamin D endocrine system can modulate acquired and innate immune system functions in viral infections. Specifically, SARS-COV-2 infection of the intestinal epithelium results in rapid viral replication. In the presence of vitamin D deficiency intestinal dendritic cells activated by viruses migrate to lymph nodes, where they earn an enhanced capacity to present antigen or T cell activation (e.g., CD4, CD8, TH, T reg, and ILC). Lower Vitamin D levels alter immune balance promoting pro-inflammatory cytokines and T Helper cell type-1 (TH1), 17 (TH17) and suppressing T regulatory response. Vit.D: Vitamin D; SARS CoV 2: Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2; ACE-2: Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme 2; VDR: Vitamin D Receptor; IgA: Immunoglobulin A; IL-12: Interleukin 12; TNF-α: Transforming Growth Factor; IL-6: Interleukin-6; ILC3: Type 3 Innate Lymphoid Cells; IL-22: Interleukin 22; IL-10: Interleukin 10; TGF-β: Transforming Growth Factor Beta; Th1: Type 1 T Helper Cell; CD8αα T reg: Cluster of Differentiation 8αα T Regulatory Cell; Th17: Type 17 T Helper Cell; IFNγ: Gamma Interferon; IL-17: Interleukin 17. VDR: vitamin D receptor.

Furthermore, as the next Gordian knot, we need to establish whether the host residual immunological activation after SARS-CoV-2 eradication will latently progress into full-blown B‐cell polyclonal or monoclonal expansion. At the state of our knowledge, this enigma is currently unsolvable as it requires long-term surveillance.

7 Conclusion

Further research is needed to determine a link between vitamin D status and the generation of protective serological responses to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination.

Author contributions

Study conceptualization, ES. Drafting the original manuscript, ES. Supervision, FP, AA, and AS. Data collecting and curation, ES. Data gathering, manipulation, analysis, ES, FP, AA, and AS. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Supplementary material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fimmu.2022.1038316/full#supplementary-material

References

1. Altmann DM, Douek DC, Boyton RJ. What policy makers need to know about COVID-19 protective immunity. Lancet (2020) 395(10236):1527–9. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30985-5

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Okba NMA, Müller MA, Li W, Wang C, GeurtsvanKessel CH, Corman VM, et al. Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2-specific antibody responses in coronavirus disease patients. Emerg Infect Dis (2020) 26(7):1478–88. doi: 10.3201/eid2607.200841

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Panarese A, Shahini E. Letter: Covid-19, and vitamin d. Aliment Pharmacol Ther (2020) 51(10):993–5. doi: 10.1111/apt.15752

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Accarino G, Lorenzetti S, Aloisio G. Assessing correlations between short-term exposure to atmospheric pollutants and COVID-19 spread in all Italian territorial areas. Environ pollut (2021) 268(Pt A):115714. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2020.115714

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Olick MF. Sunlight and vitamin d for bone health and prevention of autoimmune diseases, cancers, and cardiovascular disease. Am J Clin Nutr (2004) 80:1678S–88S. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/80.6.1678S

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Nakano T, Chiang KC, Chen CC, Chen PJ, Lai CY, Hsu LW, et al. Sunlight exposure and phototherapy: Perspectives for healthy aging in an era of COVID-19. Int J Environ Res Public Health (2021) 18(20):10950. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182010950

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Walrand S. Autumn COVID-19 surge dates in Europe correlated to latitudes, not to temperature-humidity, pointing to vitamin d as contributing factor. Sci Rep (2021) 11:1981. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-81419-w

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Sharun K, Tiwari R, Dhama K. COVID-19 and sunlight: Impact on SARS-CoV-2 transmissibility, morbidity, and mortality. Ann Med Surg (2021) 66:102419. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2021.102419

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Coccia M. COVID-19 pandemic over 2020 (withlockdowns) and 2021 (with vaccinations): similar effects for seasonality and environmental factors. Environ Res (2022) 208:112711. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2022.112711

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Fontanive TO, Dick NRM, Valente MCS, Laranjeira VDS, Antunes MV, Corrêa MP, et al. Seasonal variation of vitamin d among healthy adult men in a subtropical region. Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992) (2020) 66(10):1431–6. doi: 10.1590/1806-9282.66.10.1431

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Tangpricha V, Pearce EN, Chen TC, Holick MF. Vitamin d insufficiency among free-living healthy young adults. Am J Med (2002) 112(8):659–62. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9343(02)01091-4

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Ramakrishnan S, Bhansali A, Bhadada SK, Sharma R, Walia R, Ravikiran M, et al. Vitamin d status and its seasonal variability in healthy young adults in an Asian Indian urban population. Endocr Pract (2011) 17(2):185–91. doi: 10.4158/EP10155.OR

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Nakano S, Suzuki M, Minowa K, Hirai S, Takubo N, Sakamoto Y, et al. Current vitamin d status in healthy Japanese infants and young children. J Nutr Sci Vitaminol (Tokyo) (2018) 64(2):99–105. doi: 10.3177/jnsv.64.99

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Sham L, Yeh EA, Magalhaes S, Parra EJ, Gozdzik A, Banwell B, et al. Evaluation of fall sun exposure score in predicting vitamin d status in young Canadian adults, and the influence of ancestry. J Photochem Photobiol B (2015) 145:25–9. doi: 10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2015.02.007

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Li L, Li K, Li J, Luo Y, Cheng Y, Jian M, et al. Ethnic, geographic, and seasonal differences of vitamin d status among adults in south-west China. J Clin Lab Anal (2020) 34(12):e23532. doi: 10.1002/jcla.23532

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Nicastro F, Sironi G, Antonello E, Bianco A, Biasin M, Brucato JR, et al. Solar UV-B/A radiation is highly effective in inactivating SARS-CoV-2. Sci Rep (2021) 11:14805. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-94417-9

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Lo CW, Matsuura R, Iimura K, Wada S, Shinjo A, Benno Y, et al. UVC disinfects SARS-CoV-2 by induction of viral genome damage without apparent effects on viral morphology and proteins. Sci Rep (2021) 11:13804. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-93231-7

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Yin C, Zhao W, Pereira P. Meteorological factors’ effects on COVID-19 show seasonality and spatiality in Brazil. Environ Res (2022) 208:112690. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2022.112690

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Hedlund R, Diamond TK, Uversky VN. The latitude hypothesis, vitamin d, and SARS-Co-V2. J Biomol Struct Dyn (2021) 39(16):6168–70. doi: 10.1080/07391102.2020.1794973

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Mukherjee SB, Gorohovski A, Merzon E, Levy E, Mukherjee S, Frenkel-Morgenstern M. Seasonal UV exposure and vitamin d: association with the dynamics of COVID-19 transmission in Europe. FEBS Open Bio (2022) 12(1):106–17. doi: 10.1002/2211-5463.13309

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Mohammad S, Mishra A, Ashraf MZ. Emerging role of vitamin d and its associated molecules in pathways related to pathogenesis of thrombosis. Biomolecules (2019) 9(11):649. doi: 10.3390/biom9110649

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

22. Subramanian S, Griffin G, Hewison M, Hopkin J, Kenny RA, Laird E, et al. Vitamin d and COVID-19-Revisited. J Intern Med (2022) 292(4):604–26. doi: 10.1111/joim.13536

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Chauss D, Freiwald T, McGregor R, Yan B, Wang L, Nova-Lamperti E, et al. Autocrine vitamin d signaling switches off pro-inflammatory programs of TH1 cells. Nat Immunol (2022) 23(1):62–74. doi: 10.1038/s41590-021-01080-3

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

24. Minton K. Vitamin d shuts down T cell-mediated inflammation. Nat Rev Immunol (2022) 22(1):1. doi: 10.1038/s41577-021-00663-3

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

25. Chiodini I, Gatti D, Soranna D, Merlotti D, Mingiano C, Fassio A, et al. Vitamin d status and SARS-CoV-2 infection and COVID-19 clinical outcomes. Front Public Health (2021) 9:736665. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.736665

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

26. Pereira M, Dantas Damascena A, Galvão Azevedo LM, de Almeida Oliveira T, da Mota Santana J. Vitamin d deficiency aggravates COVID-19: systematic review and meta-analysis. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr (2022) 62(5):1308–16. doi: 10.1080/10408398.2020.1841090

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

27. D’Avolio A, Avataneo V, Manca A, Cusato J, De Nicolò A, Lucchini R, et al. 25-hydroxyvitamin d concentrations are lower in patients with positive PCR for SARS-CoV-2. Nutrients (2020) 12(5):1359. doi: 10.3390/nu12051359

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

28. Merzon E, Tworowski D, Gorohovski A, Vinker S, Golan Cohen A, Green I, et al. Low plasma 25(OH) vitamin d level is associated with increased risk of COVID-19 infection: an Israeli population-based study. FEBS J (2020) 287(17):3693–702. doi: 10.1111/febs.15495

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

29. Meltzer DO, Best TJ, Zhang H, Vokes T, Arora V, Solway J. Association of vitamin d status and other clinical characteristics with COVID-19 test results. JAMA Netw Open (2020) 3(9):e2019722. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.19722

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

30. Kaufman HW, Niles JK, Kroll MH, Bi C, Holick MF. SARS-CoV-2 positivity rates associated with circulating 25-hydroxyvitamin d levels. PloS One (2020) 15(9):e0239252. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0239252

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

31. Liu N, Sun J, Wang X, Zhang T, Zhao M, Li H. Low vitamin d status is associated with coronavirus disease 2019 outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Infect Dis (2021) 104:58–64. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2020.12.077

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

32. Kazemi A, Mohammadi V, Aghababaee SK, Golzarand M, Clark CCT, Babajafari S. Association of vitamin d status with SARS-CoV-2 infection or COVID-19 severity: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Adv Nutr (2021) 12(5):1636–58. doi: 10.1093/advances/nmab012

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

33. Sulli A, Gotelli E, Casabella A, Paolino S, Pizzorni C, Alessandri E, et al. Vitamin d and lung outcomes in elderly COVID-19 patients. Nutrients (2021) 13(3):717. doi: 10.3390/nu13030717

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

34. Szarpak L, Rafique Z, Gasecka A, Chirico F, Gawel W, Hernik J, et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of effect of vitamin d levels on the incidence of COVID-19. Cardiol J (2021) 28(5):647–54. doi: 10.5603/CJ.a2021.0072

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

35. AlSafar H, Grant WB, Hijazi R, Uddin M, Alkaabi N, Tay G, et al. COVID-19 disease severity and death in relation to vitamin d status among SARS-CoV-2-Positive UAE residents. Nutrients (2021) 13(5):1714. doi: 10.3390/nu13051714

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

36. Demir M, Demir F, Aygun H. Vitamin d deficiency is associated with COVID-19 positivity and severity of the disease. J Med Virol (2021) 93(5):2992–9. doi: 10.1002/jmv.26832

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

37. Campi I, Gennari L, Merlotti D, Mingiano C, Frosali A, Giovanelli L, et al. Vitamin d and COVID-19 severity and related mortality: a prospective study in Italy. BMC Infect Dis (2021) 21(1):566. doi: 10.1186/s12879-021-06281-7

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

38. Israel A, Cicurel A, Feldhamer I, Stern F, Dror Y, Giveon SM, et al. Vitamin d deficiency is associated with higher risks for SARS-CoV-2 infection and COVID-19 severity: a retrospective case-control study. Intern Emerg Med (2022) 17(4):1053–63. doi: 10.1007/s11739-021-02902-w

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

39. Petrelli F, Luciani A, Perego G, Dognini G, Colombelli PL, Ghidini A. Therapeutic and prognostic role of vitamin d for COVID-19 infection: A systematic review and meta-analysis of 43 observational studies. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol (2021) 211:105883. doi: 10.1016/j.jsbmb.2021.105883

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

40. Kaya MO, Pamukçu E, Yakar B. The role of vitamin d deficiency on COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. Epidemiol Health (2021) 43:e2021074. doi: 10.4178/epih.e2021074

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

41. Ghasemian R, Shamshirian A, Heydari K, Malekan M, Alizadeh-Navaei R, Ebrahimzadeh MA, et al. The role of vitamin d in the age of COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Clin Pract (2021) 75(11):e14675. doi: 10.1111/ijcp.14675

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

42. Seal KH, Bertenthal D, Carey E, Grunfeld C, Bikle DD, Lu CM. Association of vitamin d status and COVID-19-Related hospitalization and mortality. J Gen Intern Med (2022) 37(4):853–61. doi: 10.1007/s11606-021-07170-0

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

43. Hurst EA, Mellanby RJ, Handel I, Griffith DM, Rossi AG, Walsh TS, et al. ISARIC4C investigators. vitamin d insufficiency in COVID-19 and influenza a, and critical illness survivors: a cross-sectional study. BMJ Open (2021) 11(10):e055435. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-055435

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

44. Martineau AR, Jolliffe DA, Hooper RL, Greenberg L, Aloia JF, Bergman P, et al. Vitamin d supplementation to prevent acute respiratory tract infections: systematic review and meta-analysis of individual participant data. BMJ (2017) 356:i6583. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i6583

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

45. Jolliffe DA, Camargo CA Jr, Sluyter JD, Aglipay M, Aloia JF, Ganmaa D, et al. Vitamin d supplementation to prevent acute respiratory infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis of aggregate data from randomized controlled trials. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol (2021) 9(5):276–92. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(21)00051-6

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

46. Shahini E, Iannone A, Romagno D, Armandi A, Carparelli S, Principi M, et al. Clinical relevance of serum non-organ-specific antibodies in patients with HCV infection receiving direct-acting antiviral therapy. Aliment Pharmacol Ther (2018) 48(10):1138–45. doi: 10.1111/apt.14999

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

47. Jena A, Mishra S, Deepak P, Jena A, Mishra S, Deepak P, et al. Response to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in immune-mediated inflammatory diseases: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Autoimmun Rev (2022) 21(1):102927. doi: 10.1016/j.autrev.2021.102927

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

48. Murdaca G, Tonacci A, Negrini S, Greco M, Borro M, Puppo F, et al. Emerging role of vitamin d in autoimmune diseases: An update on evidence and therapeutic implications. Autoimmun Rev (2019) 18(9):102350. doi: 10.1016/j.autrev.2019.102350

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

49. Jeffery LE, Qureshi OS, Gardner D, Hou TZ, Briggs Z, Soskic B, et al. Vitamin d antagonises the suppressive effect of inflammatory cytokines on CTLA-4 expression and regulatory function. PloS One (2015) 10(7):e0131539. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0131539

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

50. Hayes CE, Hubler SL, Moore JR, Barta LE, Praska CE, Nashold FE. Vitamin d actions on CD4(+) T cells in autoimmune disease. Front Immunol (2015) 6:100. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2015.00100

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

51. Temperton NJ, Chan PK, Simmons G, Zambon MC, Tedder RS, Takeuchi Y, et al. Longitudinally profiling neutralizing antibody response to SARS coronavirus with pseudotypes. Emerg Infect Dis (2005) 11(3):411–6. doi: 10.3201/eid1103.040906

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

52. Chhetri JK, Chan P, Arai H, Chul Park S, Sriyani Gunaratne P, Setiati S, et al. Prevention of COVID-19 in older adults: A brief guidance from the international association for gerontology and geriatrics (IAGG) Asia/Oceania region. J Nutr Health Aging (2020) 24(5):471–2. doi: 10.1007/s12603-020-1359-7

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

53. Varikasuvu SR, Thangappazham B, Vykunta A, Duggina P, Manne M, Raj H, et al. COVID-19 and vitamin d (Co-VIVID study): a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther (2022) 20(6):907–13. doi: 10.1080/14787210.2022.2035217

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

54. Quesada-Gomez JM, Lopez-Miranda J, Entrenas-Castillo M, Casado-Díaz A, Nogues Y Solans X, Mansur JL, et al. Vitamin d endocrine system and COVID-19: Treatment with calcifediol. Nutrients (2022) 14(13):2716. doi: 10.3390/nu14132716

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

55. Annweiler C, Beaudenon M, Gautier J, Gonsard J, Boucher S, Chapelet G, et al. High-dose versus standard-dose vitamin d supplementation in older adults with COVID-19 (COVIT-TRIAL): A multicenter, open-label, randomized controlled superiority trial. PloS Med (2022) 19(5):e1003999. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003999

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

56. Pal R, Banerjee M, Bhadada SK, Shetty AJ, Singh B, Vyas A. Vitamin d supplementation and clinical outcomes in COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Endocrinol Invest (2022) 45(1):53–68. doi: 10.1007/s40618-021-01614-4

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

57. Murai IH, Fernandes AL, Sales LP, Pinto AJ, Goessler KF, Duran CSC, et al. Effect of a single high dose of vitamin D3 on hospital length of stay in patients with moderate to severe COVID-19: A randomized clinical trial. JAMA (2021) 325(11):1053–60. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.26848

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

58. Rawat D, Roy A, Maitra S, Shankar V, Khanna P, Baidya DK. Vitamin d supplementation and COVID-19 treatment: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Diabetes Metab Syndr (2021) 15(4):102189. doi: 10.1016/j.dsx.2021.102189

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

59. Chen J, Mei K, Xie L, Yuan P, Ma J, Yu P, et al. Low vitamin d levels do not aggravate COVID-19 risk or death, and vitamin d supplementation does not improve outcomes in hospitalized patients with COVID-19: a meta-analysis and GRADE assessment of cohort studies and RCTs. Nutr J (2021) 20(1):89. doi: 10.1186/s12937-021-00744-y

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

60. Jolliffe DA, Holt H, Greenig M, Talaei M, Perdek N, Pfeffer P, et al. Effect of a test-and-treat approach to vitamin d supplementation on risk of all cause acute respiratory tract infection and covid-19: phase 3 randomized controlled trial (CORONAVIT). BMJ (2022) 378:e071230. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2022-071230

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

61. Brunvoll SH, Nygaard AB, Ellingjord-Dale M, Holland P, Istre MS, Kalleberg KT, et al. Prevention of covid-19 and other acute respiratory infections with cod liver oil supplementation, a low dose vitamin d supplement: quadruple blinded, randomized placebo-controlled trial. BMJ (2022) 378:e071245. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2022-071245

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

62. Bergman P. Can vitamin d protect against covid-19? BMJ (2022) 378:o1822. doi: 10.1136/bmj.o1822

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

63. Wang R, DeGruttola V, Lei Q, Mayer KH, Redline S, Hazra A, et al. The vitamin d for COVID-19 (VIVID) trial: A pragmatic cluster-randomized design. Contemp Clin Trials (2021) 100:106176. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2020.106176

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

64. Devaux CA, Lagier JC, Raoult D. New insights into the physiopathology of COVID-19: SARS-CoV-2-Associated gastrointestinal illness. Front Med (Lausanne) (2021) 8:640073. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.640073

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

65. Mundula T, Russo E, Curini L, Giudici F, Piccioni A, Franceschi F, et al. Chronic systemic low-grade inflammation and modern lifestyle: The dark role of gut microbiota on related diseases with a focus on COVID-19 pandemic. Curr Med Chem (2022) 29(33):5370–96. doi: 10.2174/0929867329666220430131018

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

66. Zhang J, Garrett S, Sun J. Gastrointestinal symptoms, pathophysiology, and treatment in COVID-19. Genes Dis (2021) 8(4):385–400. doi: 10.1016/j.gendis.2020.08.013

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

67. Shenoy S. Gut microbiome, vitamin d, ACE2 interactions are critical factors in immune-senescence and inflammaging: key for vaccine response and severity of COVID-19 infection. Inflammation Res (2022) 71(1):13–26. doi: 10.1007/s00011-021-01510-w

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

68. Al-Ani AH, Prentice RE, Rentsch CA, Johnson D, Ardalan Z, Heerasing N, et al. Review article: prevention, diagnosis and management of COVID-19 in the IBD patient. Aliment Pharmacol Ther (2020) 52(1):54–72. doi: 10.1111/apt.15779

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

69. Ahmad SJ, Ahmed AR, Ali J, Macfaul G, Johnson MW, Exadaktylos AK, et al. The correlation between vitamin d levels and demographics in patients with gastrointestinal disorders; a cross-sectional study. Gastroenterol Hepatol Bed Bench (2020) 13(3):223–31.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

70. Grifoni A, Weiskopf D, Ramirez SI, Mateus J, Dan JM, Moderbacher CR, et al. Targets of T cell responses to SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus in humans with COVID-19 disease and unexposed individuals. Cell (2020) 181(7):1489–1501.e15. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2020.05.015

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

71. Ma Y, Zhu P, Zhong G, Wang D, Cao L, Bai S, et al. Serial negative response after standard and third (Booster) dose of COVID-19 inactivated vaccine is associated with low vitamin d levels in patients with solid cancers. Front Med (Lausanne) (2022) 9:898606. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.898606

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

72. Sadarangani SP, Whitaker JA, Poland GA. Let there be light”: the role of vitamin d in the immune response to vaccines. Expert Rev Vaccines (2015) 14(11):1427–40. doi: 10.1586/14760584.2015.1082426

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

73. Goncalves-Mendes N, Talvas J, Dualé C, Guttmann A, Corbin V, Marceau G, et al. Impact of vitamin d supplementation on influenza vaccine response and immune functions in deficient elderly persons: a randomized placebo-controlled trial. Front Immunol (2019) 10:65. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.00065

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

74. Sundaram ME, Talbot HK, Zhu Y, Griffin MR, Spencer S, Shay DK, et al. Vitamin d is not associated with serologic response to influenza vaccine in adults over 50 years old. Vaccine (2013) 31(16):2057–61. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2013.02.028

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

75. Sławin A, Brydak LB, Doniec Z, Bujnowska-Fedak M, Mastalerz-Migas A. Serum vitamin d and immunogenicity of influenza vaccination in the elderly. Adv Exp Med Biol (2021) 1324:21–8. doi: 10.1007/5584_2020_580

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

76. Chillon TS, Demircan K, Heller RA, Hirschbil-Bremer IM, Diegmann J, Bachmann M, et al. Relationship between vitamin d status and antibody response to COVID-19 mRNA vaccination in healthy adults. Biomedicines (2021) 9(11):1714. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines9111714

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

77. Jolliffe DA, Vivaldi G, Chambers ES, Cai W, Li W, Faustini SE, et al. Vitamin d supplementation does not influence SARS-CoV-2 vaccine efficacy or immunogenicity: Sub-studies nested within the CORONAVIT randomised controlled trial. Nutrients (2022) 14(18):3821. doi: 10.3390/nu14183821

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

78. Pavel-Tanasa M, Constantinescu D, Cianga CM, Anisie E, Mereuta AI, Tuchilus CG, et al. Associate with antibody immune responses following dual BNT162b2 vaccination within individuals younger than 60 years. Front Immunol (2022) 13:1000006. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.1000006

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

79. Zelini P, d’Angelo P, Cereda E, Klersy C, Sabrina P, Albertini R, et al. Association between vitamin d serum levels and immune response to the BNT162b2 vaccine for SARS-CoV-2. Biomedicines (2022) 10(8):1993. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines10081993

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

80. Hanggara DS, Iskandar A, Susianti H, Wahono CS, Pratama MZ, Nugraha AS, et al. The role of vitamin d for modulating the T helper 1 immune response after the coronavac vaccination. J Interferon Cytokine Res (2022) 42(7):329–35. doi: 10.1089/jir.2021.0218

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

81. Piec I, Cook L, Dervisevic S, Fraser WD, Ruetten S, Berman M, et al. Age and vitamin d affect the magnitude of the antibody response to the first dose of the SARS-CoV-2 BNT162b2 vaccine. Curr Res Transl Med (2022) 70(3):103344. doi: 10.1016/j.retram.2022.103344

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: COVID-19, coronavirus, vitamin D, antibodies, serology, autoimmune disorders, pneumonia

Citation: Shahini E, Pesce F, Argentiero A and Solimando AG (2022) Can vitamin D status influence seroconversion to SARS-COV2 vaccines? Front. Immunol. 13:1038316. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.1038316

Received: 07 September 2022; Accepted: 05 December 2022;
Published: 19 December 2022.

Edited by:

Matthew Cook, University of Cambridge, United Kingdom

Reviewed by:

Claudia Raja Gabaglia, Biomedical Research Institute of Southern California, United States

Copyright © 2022 Shahini, Pesce, Argentiero and Solimando. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Endrit Shahini, endrit.shahini@irccsdebellis.it

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.