Skip to main content

REVIEW article

Front. Immunol., 21 November 2022
Sec. Microbial Immunology

Histones: The critical players in innate immunity

Xia Li&#x;Xia Li1†Youyuan Ye&#x;Youyuan Ye1†Kailan PengKailan Peng1Zhuo ZengZhuo Zeng1Li ChenLi Chen1Yanhua Zeng,*Yanhua Zeng1,2*
  • 1Hunan Provincial Key Laboratory for Special Pathogens Prevention and Control, Institute of Pathogenic Biology, Hengyang Medical College, University of South China, Hengyang, Hunan, China
  • 2Department of Dermatology and Venereology, The First Affiliated Hospital, University of South China, Hengyang, Hunan, China

The highly conserved histones in different species seem to represent a very ancient and universal innate host defense system against microorganisms in the biological world. Histones are the essential part of nuclear matter and act as a control switch for DNA transcription. However, histones are also found in the cytoplasm, cell membranes, and extracellular fluid, where they function as host defenses and promote inflammatory responses. In some cases, extracellular histones can act as damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs) and bind to pattern recognition receptors (PRRs), thereby triggering innate immune responses and causing initial organ damage. Histones and their fragments serve as antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) to directly eliminate bacteria, viruses, fungi, and parasites in vitro and in vivo. Histones are also involved in phagocytes-related innate immune response as components of neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs), neutrophil activators, and plasminogen receptors. In addition, as a considerable part of epigenetic regulation, histone modifications play a vital role in regulating the innate immune response and expression of corresponding defense genes. Here, we review the regulatory role of histones in innate immune response, which provides a new strategy for the development of antibiotics and the use of histones as therapeutic targets for inflammatory diseases, sepsis, autoimmune diseases, and COVID-19.

Introduction

The innate immune system, composed of immune organs, immune cells and immune molecules, is the first line of defense against pathogens and host tissue damage. The innate immune cells such as dendritic cells (DCs), macrophages, natural killer cells, neutrophils, and so on are important parts of the human immune system, which participate in the first non-specific immune responses against invading pathogens (1). Innate immune cells recognize a variety of pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) or damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs) through pattern recognition receptors (PRRs) expressed on the cell surface, and the activated PRRs transmit signals to the corresponding intracellular system through intracellular signal transduction pathways, resulting in an immune response to external stimuli. Activated PRRs play a vital role in resisting pathogen invasion and maintaining balance in the immune system (2, 3).

As early as 1884, Kossel first discovered histones. With the in-depth study of histones, the roles of histones in biology have attracted more and more attention from researchers. It is well known that histones are the main components of nucleosomes, and they participate in the packaging and arranging of DNA into functional units (4). However, there is increasing evidence that histones are also located outside the nucleus, such as in cytoplasm, and cell surface, as well as in the extracellular fluid, and that these “extranuclear” histones can enhance host defense functions and may contribute to inflammatory responses (5). For example, in the cytoplasm, histones bind to lipid droplets to fight intracellular bacteria (6). In addition, histones also act as cytosolic sensors of viral dsDNA to inhibit viral proliferation (7). One of the most obvious in vivo environments in which histones exert their antimicrobial effects in vivo is as part of NETs (8). In addition to their antibacterial role in vivo, some studies showed that histones and their fragments can act as antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) — critical components of the ancient innate immune system that directly eliminate bacteria, viruses, fungi, and parasites in vitro. Histones on cell membranes usually function as protein receptors. Our previous study confirmed that histone H2B located on the cell membrane of human urinary epithelial cells is the receptor of the adhesion protein MgPa of Mycoplasma genitalium (Mg). The combination of MgPa and H2B can mediate the adhesion of Mg and even invade urethral epithelial cells (9). Histones as plasminogen receptors on the surface of the phagocytosis membrane bind to plasminogen to affect the migration and aggregation of inflammatory cells (10). Histones can be passively or actively released from cells during cell damage or signaling. At this time, histones act as DAMPs to promote immune cell activation, inflammasome formation, and pro-inflammatory cytokine release, thereby causing cytotoxicity and immune stimulation and aggravating tissue damage (11, 12). High and low circulating histone levels are associated with the severity or adverse outcomes of several pathophysiological processes, such as inflammatory diseases, sepsis, trauma, autoimmune diseases, and COVID-19 (1315). Studies have shown that anti-histone antibodies and several commercially available drugs (e.g., heparin) effectively neutralize histone cytotoxicity (16, 17). Therefore, extracellular histones can not only be used as biomarkers for the prognosis and severity of human diseases, but also be expected to become molecular targets for disease treatment.

The signaling pathways of innate immune cells sensing pathogens and initiating innate immune responses are strictly regulated at different levels, including epigenetic regulation. Histone modification is a kind of epigenetic regulation, which mainly occurs in the tail of the amino-terminal of histone protruding from the surface of the nucleosome. Recently, a growing number of studies have shown that histone modifications are essential for generating the necessary cell lineage and gene expression in innate immune response (18). Histone modification participates in the expression regulation of many essential innate immune genes, which affects the recognition and response of innate immune cells to pathogens and the occurrence of related diseases (1921).

Here, we review recent progress in that histones act as DAMPs to mediate injury and trigger innate immunity. In addition, we discuss the innate immunity of histones associated with phagocytes, the antimicrobial activity of histones, and the influence of post-translational modification of histones on innate immune response and expression of corresponding defense genes. This provides a refreshing perspective for the revitalization of the current antibiotic development strategy and further reveals the occurrence and development mechanism of infection, inflammation, and autoimmune diseases.

Histone and nucleosome structure

Genomic DNA in eukaryotic cell nuclei is highly restricted, folded, and dense in chromatin formed by dynamic aggregation of histone and non-histone proteins (4). Histones are highly conserved basic proteins that regulate and organize DNA. Five types of histones have been identified, among which H2A, H2B, H3, and H4 are referred to as “core histones” and H1 is “linker histones” (22). The positive charge of histone combines with negatively charged DNA to form the basic unit of chromatin referred to as the nucleosome (22). The nucleosome is formed by wrapping a 147bp DNA fragment around a histone octamer, which consists of a central tetramer composed of two histone H3 molecules and two histone H4 molecules, and two dimers consisting of one histone H2A molecule and one histone H2B molecule. The linker histone H1 binds to DNA in the nucleosome to form a complete nucleosome or chromosome and stabilize the higher-order chromatin structure (23). Each core histone has a central “histone folding” domain and two tails densely packed with basic Lysine and Arginine residues. These amino-terminal sites are flexible and affected by many post-translational modifications associated with transcriptional activation, silencing, chromatin assembly, and DNA replication, which is required for gene regulation and gene replication (24). There is increasing evidence that histone modification is a key mechanism for regulating the expression of important innate immune genes, which play an important role in host perceive and response to microbial pathogens (21).

Histones act as the damage-associated molecular patterns

Histones are generally confined to the nucleus, but can be released actively or passively in the event of cell injury, stress, or necrosis. When histones are released from nucleosomes, extracellular histones act as DAMPs to interact with TLRs, complements, and cell membrane phospholipids (25, 26), and then exert damage in three ways: (a) as chemokine or inducing chemokine release; (b) inducing adjacent cells and immune cells to release cytokines; and (c) direct cytotoxicity. The occurrence of the innate immune system relies heavily on the interaction of PRRs with PAMPs or DAMPs (2). Extracellular histones belong to DAMPs which also activate innate immunity response similar to PAMPs and promote immune cell maturation. Histones release and its immunostimulatory effects as DAMPs are shown in Figure 1.

FIGURE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 1 Histones release and its immunostimulatory effects as DAMPs. Histones are released from tissue cells by NETosis, apoptosis, and necrosis. Extracellular histones bind to TLR to trigger intracellular MyD88-dependent signaling pathways and promote the release of cytokines and chemokines, which trigger inflammatory responses and the recruitment and migration of immune cells. Activation of TLR9 leads to the release of ROS, which activates the NLRP3 inflammasome, Caspase1, and further immune cell recruitment. Extracellular histones also induce the surface expression of three endothelial adhesion molecules (E-selectin, ICAM-1 and VCAM-1) through TLR9, thereby facilitating promoting leukemia cell adhesion and migration. Extracellular histones induce endothelial and epithelial cell damage and platelet aggregation, but both are inhibited by CRP. In addition, HSA also inhibits histone - induced platelet aggregation. Both CRP and HSA protect the body from the toxicity of histones released into circulation. HSA, Human Serum Albumin; CRP, C-reactive protein.

TLR-dependent pro-inflammatory cytokine/chemokine release

When histones are released extracellular from necrotic tissues or cells, they act as DAMPs through TLRs, MyD88, NF-κB, and NLRP3 inflammasomes to act on intracellular signal transduction and thus mediate cytokine production and trigger innate immunity (26). Tsourouktsoglou et al. showed that chromatin DNA recruits TLR4 to endosomes containing internalized chromatin after histone binding and activation of TLR4, thereby acting as signaling mediators of inflammation to promote cytokine release in infections and sterile diseases (27). Histones specifically induce monocytes to release chemokines CXCL9 and CXCL10, and chemokine induction is closely related to the TLR4/myeloid differentiation factor 2 (MD-2) complex on monocytes (28). In addition, in vivo experiments in mice showed that the elevation of extracellular histone not only increased the level of CXCL10, but also led to leukocyte recruitment in a TLR4-dependent manner (29). Extracellular arginine-rich histones, namely H3 and H4, also activate vascular endothelial cells and induce expression of endothelial adhesion molecules such as E-selectin, ICAM-1, and VCAM-1, thus increasing leukocyte adhesion, rolling, and migration in a TLR9 dependent manner (3032). Functionally, when renal tubular epithelial cells die, histones are released outside the cells and interact directly with TLR2 and TLR4 to induce MyD88, NF-κB, and MAPK signal transduction. In addition, direct injection of histone into the renal artery of rats can lead to necroinflammation and the release of related inflammatory molecules, such as IL-6, TNF-α, and inducible nitric oxide synthase (16). These effects were attenuated in TLR2 and TLR4 knockout mice. Hiroki Kawano et al. showed that histones induce ARPE-19 cells to produce IL-8 and IL-6 through TLR4 and ERK1/2 and p38 MAPK-dependent pathways, and inhibit ERK1/2 and p38MAPK to reduce cytokine release (33). In addition to its effect on TLR, histones also activate bone-marrow-derived DCs through NLRP3 inflammasome, a critical system inducing IL-1β and IL-18 production in the innate immune system. Allam et al. demonstrated that histones induce IL-1β secretion and the production of sterile inflammation in an NLRP3-Asc-Caspase-dependent manner, and the deletion of mouse NLRP3 gene significantly reduces both histone-induced IL-1β secretion and neutrophil recruitment (34). Another research also confirmed histones activate the NLRP3 inflammasome in Kupffer cells and thus induce secretion of the downstream molecules such as caspase-1, pro-lL-1β, and pro-IL-18 through TLR9-dependent ROS production during liver injury, thereby promoting the innate immune response after I/R injury (35). However, histones and NETs directly initiate IL-1β release from macrophages before inflammasome activation, thereby driving sterile inflammation (36). This suggests that histones can act directly as a priming signal or as DAMP to activate the inflammasome to stimulate IL-1β secretion. In summary, in these examples of “sterile inflammation”, histones play a crucial role in initial organ damage and innate immune activation. At the same time, it also reveals a novel mechanism of organ damage in which neutralizing histones may benefit sterile inflammation-induced pathology.

Extracellular histones related to clinical conditions

In the case of infection, extracellular histones can be used as bactericidal proteins to locally limit the spread of infection and initiate tissue regeneration and repair. On the other hand, circulating extracellular histones can bind to double stranded (ds) DNA or high motility group box 1 (HMGB1) in cells to form DAMPs, which initiate and persist systemic cytotoxic damage through a non-infectious inflammatory response (27, 37). Xu et al. first proved that the cytotoxicity of extracellular histones is non-specific and can damage host cells in sepsis experiments (38). Extracellular histone H4 can also cause the dissolution of the smooth muscle cell (SMC) membrane, which triggers arterial tissue injury and chronic inflammation (39). Extracellular histone is the primary mediator of organ dysfunction and death in patients with sepsis, which can cause microcirculatory dysfunction. In septicemia or major trauma, histone release mainly affects endothelial cells and even leads to fatal organ dysfunction (40). This may be caused by the interaction of histone with the negatively charged phosphate group of the phospholipid bilayer and the influx of abnormal ions. Notably, c-reactive protein can competitively bind histones with phospholipid liposomes, prevent histones from entering the cell membrane and prevent calcium influx, thus reducing histone-mediated toxicity (41, 42). In addition, in an animal model of sepsis, heparin has been shown to bind to histone and neutralize its cytotoxicity (43). Other studies have shown that myeloperoxidase derived from neutrophils can inhibit the release of histones, thus reducing septicemia (44). In sterile and infectious acute inflammatory disease models, continuous histone administration can aggravate end-organ damage, such as kidneys (16), liver (35), heart (45), and lungs (46). Similarly, histone targeting or histone-specific therapy can partially ameliorate organ damage.

Several studies showed that the severity of COVID-19 is associated with circulating extracellular histone levels (15, 4749). Circulating histone is the mediator of epithelial/endothelial cell injury, which may trigger and spread inflammatory storms and thrombosis, increase the severity of the disease and reduce the survival rate of patients (5052). Compared with healthy controls, the level of free histones (related to DNA fragments) in the plasma of patients with severe COVID-19 was significantly higher (47, 49). Huckriede et al. further demonstrated the harmful role of extracellular histone in the progression of COVID-19 disease (47). It is worth noting that the presence of citrulline histone H3 positive neutrophils in pulmonary micro thrombosis suggests that citrulline histone H3 may also play a role in COVID-associated thrombotic inflammation (42, 53, 54). Therefore, monitoring circulating histone concentrations, including unmodified and citrulline histone H3, may be a useful tool for early prediction of a higher risk of progression of adverse disease during admission and hospitalization in SARS-CoV-2-infected patients.

Histones and phagocytes-related innate immune response

Histones and neutrophil extracellular traps

Phagocytes play a crucial role as the building blocks of innate immune defense against infectious pathogens. There is growing evidence suggesting intriguing associations between histones and phagocytes. In addition to binding as DAMPs to PRRs on phagocytes, histones also function as bactericidal components in NETs. NETs, fibrous structures, are decondensed chromatin networks released from activated neutrophils during infection and aseptic inflammation and can capture and eliminate pathogens (55, 56). NETs neutralize, capture and kill bacteria, fungi, viruses, and parasites, but some pathogenic bacteria can avoid Net-induced killing (57). All core histones are present in NETs, accounting for 70% of all NET-related proteins (8). Some research data reported that the linker histone H1 also exists in NETs (58), but other data indicated that H1 could be degraded during NETs formation (59). In unstimulated neutrophils, the content of all core histones is equal. However, in NETs, the concentrations of H2A and H2B are higher than those of H3 and H4 (8). Histones can either act as bactericidal components in NETs or activate neutrophils in a dose-dependent manner to form NETs. The function of histones in NETs is initially unclear, as histones may be merely residual features of neutrophils (60). Nevertheless, the coexistence of histones in NETs scaffolders with human AMPs suggested that histones may act as antimicrobial agents in NETs (61, 62). Importantly, when NETs react with antibodies against histone H2A and H2B, NETs lose almost all potency against Gram-positive and negative bacteria, indicating the importance of histone (58). However, in addition to enhancing host defense, NETs also cause damage to surrounding tissues by increasing pro-inflammatory responses or by themselves. For example, NETs are associated with the pathology of autoimmune diseases (psoriasis, systemic lupus erythematosus, and rheumatoid arthritis), sepsis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and cancer (60). Therefore, there is a need to balance between the inflammatory damage caused by NETs and the benefits of host defense.

Histones and the activation of neutrophils

Extracellular histone H4 is an activator of neutrophils, which continuously increases the concentration of intracellular calcium by affecting the membrane permeability of neutrophils, leading to respiratory burst response, adhesion, myeloperoxidase (MPO), and IL-8 release (63, 64). Respiratory burst and degranulation responses depend primarily on the elevation of intracellular calcium from extracellular sources. Conversely, the influx of calcium results from histone H4 permeating the neutrophil membrane. Another Arginine rich histone, histone H3, has a similar effect on neutrophil activation, while histone H2A and H2B cannot activate neutrophils (64). These suggest that activating neutrophils is a characteristic of Arginine-rich histones.

Histones act as plasminogen receptors

Related studies manifested that H2B is a controllable plasminogen receptor on the membrane surface of monocytes, macrophages, and neutrophils. The recognition and binding site of plasminogen is the C-terminal Lysine residue of H2B (10). After binding to H2B, plasminogen is transformed into plasmin, which mediates pericellular proteolysis and thus promotes cell migration and matrix remodeling, which influence the migration and recruitment of inflammatory cells during inflammatory responses (65). It is worth noting that the function of H2B as a plasminogen receptor may be inhibited by histone H2B autoantibodies. For example, autoantibodies against histone H2B on CD4+ T lymphocytes are associated with disease activity in HIV-infected individuals. The reduced ability of these cells to use plasminogen to facilitate inflammatory cell migration may increase the susceptibility of HIV individuals to infectious diseases (66). According to reports, more than 70% of patients with autoimmune diseases such as systemic lupus erythematosus have autoantibodies against histone H2B (67), which also explains the increased risk of thromboembolism in patients with autoimmune diseases.

Antimicrobial activity of histones

The antibacterial role of histones in many different species is increasingly being recognized, including invertebrates (68), chickens (69, 70), frogs (71), fish (72), and mammals such as mice (73), cattle (74) and humans (75). The antibacterial activity of histones was reported as early as 1942 (76). Subsequently, various studies have shown that histones and histone-derived fragments from arthropods to mammals have broad-spectrum antibacterial activity (73, 77). AMPs, also known as host defense peptides (HDPs), are ubiquitous in all living organisms. They can eliminate or destroy pathogenic microorganisms, including bacteria, fungi, viruses, and parasites, and are key components of the host’s innate immune system. There are many biochemical similarities between histones and AMPs. They are cationic proteins with the ability to form α helices and contain a large amount of hydrophobic amino acids, suggesting histones may also have antibacterial properties (78). Histones and their fragments play a vital role in host defense by binding to bacterial nucleic acid, binding to bacterial lipopolysaccharide (LPS, a bacterial membrane component), changing the permeability of bacterial cell membrane, and inhibiting viral binding. Table 1 summarizes the antibacterial properties of histones and related fragments obtained from various animals.

TABLE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1 Antimicrobial activity of his tones and his tone fragments.

Antibacterial activity

Many studies have shown that core and linker histones have antibacterial activities in various organisms. Linker histone was found in the granules of macrophages and was originally named murine microbial proteins 1 and 2 (MUMP-1, MUMP-2). MUMP exhibits antibacterial activity against various microorganisms, including S. typhimurium, E. coli, S. aureus, M. fortuitum, and L. monocytogenes (73). The antibacterial activity of histone H1 has been reported in various species from humans to fish. In humans, H1 in the terminal ileum mucosa and the colonic epithelial cells showed antimicrobial activity against S. typhimurium and E. coli, respectively (75, 79). When histones from epithelial cells reach the lumen, they may represent critical innate antimicrobial defense of the human intestine against luminal bacteria (79). Recombinant human histone H1 showed broad-spectrum antimicrobial activity against Gram-negative and positive bacteria, including drug-resistant strains (80). In fish, histone H1 is an important antibacterial protein in the stomach, intestine, and liver of Atlantic salmon, with significant anti-E. coli activity. Histone H1, isolated and identified from the testis of Atlantic salmon, showed significant antibacterial activity against both Gram-negative and positive bacteria (72). In chickens, H1 in the ovary and oviduct showed antibacterial activity against B. subtilis and E. coli, indicating the defense of histone H1 against pathogens during ovarian follicle development and ovum formation in fallopian tubes (70).

As an antimicrobial agent, H2A is the most studied member of the histone protein family. H2B was first isolated in 1958 from mouse macrophage line RAW264.7 and proved to have extensive antibacterial properties (73). After purification, low doses of H2A have a strong killing effect on S. typhimurium, S. flexneri, and S. aureus within a short time, and its bactericidal activity is canceled in the presence of anti-histone H2A antibody, which proves that H2A is an effective antibacterial protein (58). H2A and H2B also exist on the surface of the human placental epithelium, protecting the fetus and placenta from microbial infection (89). In addition, H2A and H2B showed antibacterial activity against Gram-positive and negative bacteria in chicken, fish, and shrimp (68, 69, 91). The antibacterial protein H2B isolated from the epidermal mucus of Atlantic cod (Gadus Morhua) also showed antibacterial activity against Candida albicans (96). Notably, histones H2A and H2B, as well as H3 and H4, bind to the LPS of bacteria, possibly showing antibacterial activity by binding to bacterial membranes under certain conditions. The affinity of histones to LPS was higher than polymyxin B except for H4 (81).

So far, there are relatively few studies on the antibacterial activity of histones rich in Arginine (H3, H4). Although histone H3 has shown antibacterial activity against both S. aureus and E. coli, little is known about its antibacterial mechanism (98). Lee et al. showed that human cortical cells fully secreted and released H4, which had bactericidal activity against P. acnes and S. aureus. In addition, histone H4 enhanced the antibacterial effect of free fatty acids in human sebum (99). These results indicate that histone H4 is the main component of the antibacterial action of human sebum cells and plays a vital role in the innate immune defense of the skin. H4 found in calf thymus can also kill E. coli and S. aureus, which further strengthens the understanding of the antibacterial activity of H4 (98).

Antifungal activity

Histones also show antifungal properties. Within 10 minutes, only eight micrograms of human epidermal histone H1 killed 90% of Candida tropicalis (1x105 CFU). Therefore, when skin Candida albicans infection, histone H1 may form an antifungal barrier in the human epidermis, which prevents Candida from invading deeper than the granular cell layer (100). In addition, the study of antibacterial proteins in mouse macrophages found that H1 and H2B have bactericidal activities not only against a variety of bacteria, but also Cryptococcus neoformans A (73). It has also been found that wheat histones H1 and H4 have apparent inhibitory effects on Fusarium and some wheat pathogens such as Aspergillus, Penicillium, and Greeneria in vitro, indicating that extracellular histones may enhance the resistance of host plants to these funguses (86). It is worth noting that we still know little about the antifungal mechanism and antifungal spectrum of histones, which needs to be further studied.

Antiviral and antiparasitic activity

So far, most studies on histone antipathogens have focused on their antibacterial and antifungal activities. However, histones have also been shown to have antiviral and antiparasitic activities. The binding of histones to DNA not only helps regulate the transcriptional activity of genes, but also indirectly protects against viral replication in host cells. In human cells infected with human papillomavirus type 11 (HPV-11), H1 blocked viral replication by binding to the viral genome (82). Another study showed that H2B binds to viral dsDNA, hence activating the natural antiviral pathway and inhibiting viral proliferation (7). Kozlowski et al. found that extracellular H1 and H2A, but not H2B, H3, or H4, significantly inhibited HIV-1 infection at the viral transcriptional level (83). Of course, histones also exhibit antiviral activity through direct action. Both linker histone H1 and core histone showed anti-Norwalk activity by inhibiting Norwalk virus attachment to host cells by binding to virus particles and cell membranes (84). For Influenza viruses, histones have a strong neutralization effect against H3N2 and H1N1 seasonal strains, but not against pandemic H1N1 strains (85). In summary, all five histones have antiviral activity, but the antiviral activity of H1, H2A, and H2B is weaker than that of H3 and H4. H4 is the most effective histone to inhibit viral infectivity, inhibiting viral uptake and replication by directly interacting with virus particles (85). Notably, histones also have antiparasitic activity. Human histone H2A and H2B kill Leishmania promastigotes, and the killing intensity is dose-dependent. Histones also significantly reduced the infectivity of mouse macrophage promastigotes in vitro (90).

Histone-derived fragments

In addition to intact histones, histone fragments and histone derivatives also showed prominent antibacterial activity. The fragmented histone H1 showed antibacterial activity. For example, the N-terminal of histone H1 fragment found in salmon mucus and blood samples showed antibacterial activity against Gram-positive and negative bacteria (87). Oncorhyncin II, the C-terminal fragment of H1 found in the acidic extract of rainbow trout skin secretion, showed antibacterial activity against Gram-positive and negative bacteria and even fungi (88). H2A fragments exert strong antibacterial activity in natural or synthetic form. Buforin I (BF1) and Buforin II (BF2) are H2A fragments isolated from the stomach of the Asian toad. Compared with BF1, BF2 has higher antibacterial activity and can bind to DNA and RNA like H2A, and inhibit the function of bacteria by binding to bacterial nucleic acid (71, 92). Two kinds of AMP related to histone H2A, Parasin I and Hipposin, were found in fish skin. Parasin I is the N-terminal peptide of H2A, which has antibacterial activity against fish-specific bacterial pathogens and helps fish to resist the invasion of microorganisms after injury (93). Hipposin is an AMP derived from histone H2A isolated from the skin mucus of Atlantic halibut and has antibacterial activity against Gram-positive and negative bacteria (94, 95). For the histone H2B fragment, the C-terminal fragment isolated from chicken liver could inhibit the activity of Gram-positive and negative bacteria (69), and the N-terminal fragment in the human wounds and blister fluid inhibited the growth of Micrococcus luteus and Bacillus megaterium (97). No natural fragment of histone H3 has been found. However, Histogrannin, an H4 fragment isolated from bovine adrenal medulla, can inhibit the activity of ATP-dependent DNA gyrase and thus exhibit antibacterial activity against Gram-positive and negative bacteria (74).

Histone modification and innate immunity

“Epigenetic” refers to the change of gene activity but independent of DNA sequence. There are four main mechanisms of epigenetic regulation: DNA methylation, chromatin structure regulation, histone post-translational modification, and non-coding RNA regulation (101). Histones post-translational modification typically occurs on amino acid residues, including methylation and acetylation of Lysine and Arginine, phosphorylation of Serine and Threonine, ubiquitination of Lysine, total methylation, citrullination, and ribosylation. These modifications are associated with transcriptional activation, silencing, chromatin assembly, and DNA replication, which can activate or inactivate gene expression and thus regulate cellular behavior. Tissue modification enzymes involved in epigenetic regulation include histone methyltransferases (HMTs), histone demethylases (HDMs), histone acetyltransferases (HATs), and histone deacetylases (HDACs), as well as other proteins (18). Histone modification and regulatory enzymes critically regulate the expression of corresponding defense genes and the occurrence of innate immune responses at multiple levels. Among these histone modifications, acetylation and methylation are the most important in regulating the transcription of pro-inflammatory cytokines.

Histone acetylation/deacetylation

Histone acetylation is an essential epigenetic mechanism that controls DNA accessibility, chromatin structure, and gene expression. It is dynamically and reversibly regulated by two groups of relative enzymes, namely HDACs and HATs. HATs are involved in specific gene activation in the process of inflammation (21). For example, histone acetyltransferase p300 mediated the acetylation of H3 at Lysine 18 and 27 (H3K18/27ac) to activate the expression of pro-inflammatory genes (102). Nevertheless, H3k9ac and H3K14ac are necessary for transcription factors and Polymerase II (Pol-II) to enter the promoter region. H3k9ac and H3K14ac are downregulated in the promoter region of inflammatory mediator genes, such as CIITA, TNF-α, IL-6, NOS2, and H2EB, under the stimulation of soluble/secretory factor (HSF) of parasite M. Corti (21). During macrophage infection, inhibition of HAT activity reduces the secretion of matrix metalloproteinase-1 (MMP-1) and matrix metalloproteinase-3 (MMP-3), which are closely related to the immune pathogenesis of Mycobacterium tuberculosis (103).

The role of HDACs and their inhibitors in innate immune pathways has also been gradually discovered. Some studies have linked the development of myeloid cells to specific HDACs (104). For example, HDAC3 interacts with the transcription factor PU.1 and blocks the expression of target genes, thereby negatively regulating the differentiation of myeloid cells (105). However, the expression of HDAC5 was upregulated during the differentiation of human monocytes into macrophages. HDACs also regulate the function of mature macrophages and DCs by controlling the production of inflammatory mediators such as chemokines, cytokines, and matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs). In these cells, the TLR and IFN signaling pathways are especially regulated by HDACs (106). HDACs can act as either positive regulators or negative regulators of TLR signaling. HDACs promote the expression of TLR target genes such as chemokines (e.g., CCL2, CCL7, and CXCL10), cytokines (e.g., IL-6, IL-12, TNF, and IFN-β), and other secreted inflammatory mediators (e.g., MMP-9 and endothelin-1), but its promotion mechanism and the specific HDAC involved are still unclear (107). HDACs also promote the TLR response by regulating the function of transcription factors (HIF-1α and IRF transcription factor family) (106). HDAC1 and HDAC8 suppress the IRF function, while HDAC6 promotes the IRF function to respond to virus challenges. However, class I HDACs possibly exert a negative regulatory effect on TLR response by promoting histone deacetylation and transcriptional inhibition. For example, HDAC1 inhibits the activity of many inflammatory gene promoters induced by TLR and/or pathogens, including IFN-β, COX-2 (108), and IL-12p40 (109). NF-κB signal is activated by the TLR signal, which is the center of inflammatory response. Classic HDACs 1, 2, and 3 negative regulation NF-κB. HDAC1 inhibits inflammatory gene promoters by inhibiting NF-κB p65 and mediating NF-κB p50 homodimer (110). HDAC2 blocks the activation of inflammatory cytokine genes in macrophages by interacting with transcriptionally activated metastatic tumor antigen (MTA) 1 (111). HDAC3 deacetylates p65 subunit and promotes the interaction between the p65 and NF-κB inhibitor-α (IκBα) to indirectly and negatively regulate NF-κB signal transduction (112). In addition, the effect of HDAC inhibitors on the innate immune system has also received widespread attention. Some studies showed that HDAC inhibitors can down-regulate the expression of multiple host defense genes, including PRR, chemokines, growth factors, and transcriptional regulators, and inhibit the expression of critical antibacterial cytokines and co-signal molecules in macrophages and DCs (107). In vivo, HDAC inhibitors can increase sensitivity to bacterial and fungal infections, but have protective effects on toxic and septic shock (113). These indicated HDAC inhibitors play multiple regulatory roles in different functional states of the organism. These studies confirmed the significant role of histone acetylation in regulating innate immune gene expression.

Histone methylation/demethylation

Histone methylation occurs at the N-terminus of lysine or arginine residues of histone H3 and H4, including H3K4, H3K9, H3K27, H3K36, and H4K20. Histone methylation is closely regulated by HMTs and HDMs and plays a vital role in the transcription of inflammatory cytokines [Figure 2]. H3K4me3 can regulate the induction of pro-inflammatory genes in macrophages. For example, the methyltransferase SETD4 directly activates H3K4 methylation to positively regulate the expression of IL-6 and TNF-α in macrophages (114). Another H3K4 methyltransferase, SET7/9, also has a positive regulatory effect on TNF-α induced MCP-1, and IL-8 gene subsets in THP-1 macrophages. However, histone H3K4 methyltransferase ASH1L inhibited NF-κB signaling downstream of the TLR by promoting the expression of TNFaip3 (a negative regulator of TLR signaling pathway), thereby inhibiting macrophage production of IL-6 and TNF-α (115).

FIGURE 2
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 2 Regulation of transcriptional activation of inflammatory cytokines by histone methyltransferases and demethylases. Histone methylation occurs at the N-terminus of Lysine or Arginine residues of Histone H3 and H4, including H3K4, H3K9, H3K27, H3K36, and H4K20. SMYD2, EZH2, G9a, SETD4, SET7/9, ASH1L and SMYD5 are histone methyltransferases. KDM6B (JMJD3), KDM6A, LSD1 and DHF2 are histone demethylases. ISG, IFN-stimulated gene; TNFaip3, a negative regulator of TLR signaling pathway.

H3K9 methylation is correlated with promoters of inducible inflammatory cytokines. Histone methyltransferase G9a promotes the recruitment of heterochromatin protein 1 (HP-1) and inhibits TNF-α expression by catalyzing H3K9 di-methylation of TNF-α promoter in THP-1 macrophages (116). Another research showed that G9a interacts with the NF-κB transcription factor RelB to induce endotoxin tolerance in macrophages. HP1 and G9a form a complex at the IL-1β promoter, while RelB decomposes the complex and removes transcriptional silencing, which ultimately affects the production of IL-1β in innate immune cells (116). Fang et al. found that H3K9me2 establishes cell-specific inducibility of IFN and IFN-stimulated gene (ISG). In addition, the knockout of the H3K9 methyltransferase G9a gene increased the ability of fibroblasts to produce interferon and its resistance to viruses (117, 118). These showed that H3K9me2 and G9a are the critical regulators of innate antiviral immunity.

H3K27 methylation also regulates the transcriptional response of innate immune cells. KDM6B (JMJD3) is the first reported Lysine demethylase that controls inflammation, responsible for the demethylation of di-methylated and tri-methylated H3K27 (119). The down-regulation of JMJD3 in THP1 monocytes deregulates the transcriptional regulation of the NF-κB target genes network, including cytokines, chemokines, and immune receptors (120, 121). Another Lysine demethylase, KDM6A, specifically promotes the transcription of INF-β through increasing enhancers activity during virus infecting macrophages and of IL-6 through demethylating H3K27me3 (122). During ontogeny, H3K27 methylation and JMJD3 are closely related to the expression of AMP in skin. Knockdown of JMJD3 in the skin keratinocytes (KC) elevates H3K27me3 levels, while the expression of AMPs HBD-3, S100A7, S100A8, S100A9, and actinomycin downregulated significantly (123).

H4K20me3 is the crucial point to inhibit the expression of TLR4 target genes in macrophages, indicating that inflammation can be regulated by co-regulators activating or inhibiting specific histones. H4K20me3 methylation/demethylation is required for signal-dependent regulation of the subset inflammatory response genes, catalyzed by SMYD5 and PHF2, respectively (21). SMYD5 maintains H4K20me3 on TLR4 response promoters (IL-1, TNF-α, CCl4, and CXCL10) by binding to NCoR corepressor complexes. Two hours after TLR4-mediated activation, down-regulation of PHF2 resulted in an increase in the inflammatory promoter H4K20me3, and a decrease in the activation of inflammatory genes such as TNF-α and CXCL10 (124). In addition, SMYD2 specifically facilitates H3K36 di-methylation on the IL-6 supporters, thus suppressing the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines induced by macrophage activation (125).

Histone citrullination

Histone citrullination is a post-transcriptional modification catalyzed by the peptide arginine deiminase (PAD) family, including five isozymes (PAD1-4 and PAD6) with different tissue-specific targets (126). PAD4-dependent citrullination of histone H3 and H4 in neutrophil nuclei is a key process that allows chromatin decryption and NETs excretion, constituting a unique form of cell death called NETosis (57). Although there is no specific marker for NETs, citrullinated histone 3 (H3Cit) is considered to be the key component to determine the existence of NETs and is deemed to be a biomarker of inflammation (127). H3Cit also increases in various inflammatory states in mice and humans. H3Cit can directly participate in inflammatory injury by destroying the microvascular endothelial barrier (128). H3Cit may have a pathogenic effect on tissue damage because it has been shown that injection of H3Cit antibodies or PAD inhibitors can improve the prognosis of systemic inflammation (129). The activation of inflammatory bodies in neutrophils and monocytes/macrophages in COVID-19 patients also showed that the formation of inflammatory bodies was significantly related to the citrullination of H3 in the nucleus (54). In addition, histone H4 can also induce NET formation in a calcium-and PAD4-dependent manner. However, citrullinated histone H4 induced less calcium influx, resulting in a decrease in NET formation (130). This suggests that citrullinated histone H4 may act as a brake in the pathological process of NETs and slow down the vicious circle between histone H4 and NETs. Since histone H3 citrullination is necessary for NETs formation, histone citrullination is also inextricably linked with thrombosis, atherosclerosis, autoimmunity, tissue repair in diabetes, and cancer through NETs (27, 131133). These data show that the circulating level of H3Cit in the blood can be used as a marker of inflammation, which provides a reliable standard for the diagnosis and prognosis of various inflammatory diseases.

Other modifications of histones

The E3 ubiquitin ligase RNF20 drives monoubiquitylation of histone H2B, which contributes to target inhibitory p50 homodimers and increases H3K9me3 on the pro-inflammatory cytokine subset promoter to inhibit colon inflammation (134). Histone H2A monoubiquitylation catalyzed by DZIP3 inhibits the transcription of chemokines, crucially regulating the migration response of macrophages to TLR activation (135).

Conclusions and outlook

Histones act as therapeutic targets for disease

Histones are essential components of nuclear material that help to form chromatin and act as a control switch for DNA transcription. In addition to regulating transcription, the roles of extracellular histones in the pathology of serious diseases such as stroke, sepsis, and systemic lupus erythematosus have recently attracted considerable attention. High concentrations of histones can cause toxic reactions and systemic inflammatory reactions, which even lead to life-threatening complications (41). However, lower extracellular histones act as DAMPs to participate in the immune defense or wound healing by triggering local host responses. In aseptic inflammation, histones as DAMPs not only play an essential role in innate immune activation but also cause initial damage to the corresponding organs. These findings indicated the dual role of extracellular histones in both systemic and local inflammation. Allam et al. demonstrated that anti-histone (and other anti-nucleosome) antibodies could block histone immune activity without any unexpected consequences to autoimmunity (34), and thus could be used as a novel biological agent for the treatment of autoimmune diseases such as shock, liver, and kidney failure, and even lupus. Therefore, understanding the details of histone’s dual role and targeting treatment can limit systemic damage and improve survival.

Histones are promising antibacterial agents

The speed of discovery and development of antibiotics is stagnant. At the same time, the resistance of pathogens to antibiotics is increasing, resulting in a large number of fatal untreatable infections around the world. Therefore, there is an urgent need to develop new antibiotic strategies to combat this shocking reality. In addition to finding new antibiotics, strengthening research on existing natural host defense mechanisms may help researchers develop effective synthetic drugs that conform to biological principles. There is plenty of evidence that histones and histone fragments, as AMPs, directly eliminate bacteria, fungi, viruses, and parasites in vitro and in vivo, and their mechanism has begun to be precise. In general, extracellular histones play an antibacterial role like cationic AMPs. The primary mechanism by which histones exert the antibacterial effect in vivo is the primary component of neutrophil extracellular traps. Histones are expected to become a universal antibacterial, antiviral, and/or antifungal drug due to their highly conserved amino acid sequences among species, which provides a refreshing perspective to revitalize current antibiotic development strategies. It is worth noting that caution should be exercised when considering using histones as antimicrobials because histone itself is the cytotoxic and systematic injection of histone may be harmful to patients with life-aggravating infections (35, 136). However, studies have shown that during sodium chlorate treatment, the accumulation of circulating histones does not cause pathology, which challenges the idea that histones themselves are pathogenic (44). The application of histones as antimicrobial agents can be considered from two aspects. On the one hand, the level of free histones can be regulated by controlling the release of histones in NETs or lipid droplets to inhibit bacterial growth. On the other hand, safer and more effective histone and AMPs analogs can be developed to treat various infections.

Prospects of histone modification therapy

Histone modification is a critical mechanism that regulates the expression of essential innate immune genes that sense responses to microbial pathogens. In the past decade, the role of histone acetylation and methylation in intrinsic immune cell function has been studied extensively. The reverse action of each enzyme reveals a complicated interplay of methyl and acetyl markers on a single promoter. However, it can be predicted that histone modification not only provides new perspectives and molecular biological tools for revealing the occurrence and development mechanisms of infection, inflammation, and autoimmune diseases, but also promotes the development of effective biotherapy for major clinical diseases. Therefore, it has a good application prospect.

Author contributions

XL, YY, and YZ put forward the concept. XL and YZ studied literature and wrote manuscripts. XL and YY drew the figure and collected the tables. KP, ZZ, and LC contributed to language modification and content adjustment. XL, YY, and YZ participated in the revision of this manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Funding

This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NO: 31370207, 81871256).

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Abbreviations

DAMPs, damage-associated molecular patterns; PAMPs, pathogen-associated molecular patterns; PRRs, pattern recognition receptors; AMPs, antimicrobial peptides; NETs, neutrophil extracellular traps; DC, dendritic cell; Mg, Mycoplasma genitalium; HMTs, histone methyltransferases; HDMS, histone demethylases; HATS, histone acetyltransferases; HDACs, histone deacetylases; HDPs, host defense peptides; MUMP, murine microbial proteins; Pol-II, Polymerase II; MMP, matrix metalloproteinase; MTA, metastatic tumor antigen; IκBα, NF-κB inhibitor-α; ISG,IFN-stimulated gene; CRP: C-reactive protein; SARS-CoV-2, Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus-2; H3Cit, Citrullinated histone 3; PAD, peptide arginine deiminase.

References

1. Kaur BP, Secord E. Innate immunity. Immunol Allergy Clinics North America (2021) 41(4):535–41. doi: 10.1016/j.iac.2021.07.003

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Kawai T, Akira S. The role of pattern-recognition receptors in innate immunity: Update on toll-like receptors. Nat Immunol (2010) 11(5):373–84. doi: 10.1038/ni.1863

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Zhang Q, Cao X. Epigenetic remodeling in innate immunity and inflammation. Annu Rev Immunol (2021) 39:279–311. doi: 10.1146/annurev-immunol-093019-123619

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Venkatesh S, Workman JL. Histone exchange, chromatin structure and the regulation of transcription. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol (2015) 16(3):178–89. doi: 10.1038/nrm3941

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Frydman GH, Tessier SN, Wong KHK, Vanderburg CR, Fox JG, Toner M, et al. Megakaryocytes contain extranuclear histones and may be a source of platelet-associated histones during sepsis. Sci Rep (2020) 10(1):4621. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-61309-3

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Anand P, Cermelli S, Li Z, Kassan A, Bosch M, Sigua R, et al. A novel role for lipid droplets in the organismal antibacterial response. eLife (2012) 1:e00003. doi: 10.7554/eLife.00003

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Kobiyama K, Takeshita F, Jounai N, Sakaue-Sawano A, Miyawaki A, Ishii KJ, et al. Extrachromosomal histone H2b mediates innate antiviral immune responses induced by intracellular double-stranded DNA. J Virol (2010) 84(2):822–32. doi: 10.1128/jvi.01339-09

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Urban CF, Ermert D, Schmid M, Abu-Abed U, Goosmann C, Nacken W, et al. Neutrophil extracellular traps contain calprotectin, a cytosolic protein complex involved in host defense against candida albicans. PloS Pathog (2009) 5(10):e1000639. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1000639

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Liao Y, Deng X, Peng K, Dai P, Luo D, Liu P, et al. Identification of histone H2b as a potential receptor for mycoplasma genitalium protein of adhesion. Pathog Dis (2021) 79(7):ftab053. doi: 10.1093/femspd/ftab053

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Das R, Burke T, Plow EF. Histone H2b as a functionally important plasminogen receptor on macrophages. Blood (2007) 110(10):3763–72. doi: 10.1182/blood-2007-03-079392

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Chen R, Kang R, Fan XG, Tang D. Release and activity of histone in diseases. Cell Death Dis (2014) 5(8):e1370. doi: 10.1038/cddis.2014.337

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Ekaney ML, Otto GP, Sossdorf M, Sponholz C, Boehringer M, Loesche W, et al. Impact of plasma histones in human sepsis and their contribution to cellular injury and inflammation. Crit Care (London England) (2014) 18(5):543. doi: 10.1186/s13054-014-0543-8

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Conceição-Silva F, Reis CSM, De Luca PM, Leite-Silva J, Santiago MA, Morrot A, et al. The immune system throws its traps: Cells and their extracellular traps in disease and protection. Cells (2021) 10(8):1891. doi: 10.3390/cells10081891

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Block H, Rossaint J, Zarbock A. The fatal circle of nets and net-associated damps contributing to organ dysfunction. Cells (2022) 11(12):1919. doi: 10.3390/cells11121919

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Bouchard BA, Colovos C, Lawson MA, Osborn ZT, Sackheim AM, Mould KJ, et al. Increased histone-DNA complexes and endothelial-dependent thrombin generation in severe covid-19. Vasc Pharmacol (2022) 142:106950. doi: 10.1016/j.vph.2021.106950

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Allam R, Scherbaum CR, Darisipudi MN, Mulay SR, Hägele H, Lichtnekert J, et al. Histones from dying renal cells aggravate kidney injury Via Tlr2 and Tlr4. J Am Soc Nephrol JASN (2012) 23(8):1375–88. doi: 10.1681/asn.2011111077

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Urusov AE, Aulova KS, Dmitrenok PS, Buneva VN, Nevinsky GA. Experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis of mice: Enzymatic cross site-specific hydrolysis of H4 histone by iggs against histones and myelin basic protein. Int J Mol Sci (2022) 23(16):9182. doi: 10.3390/ijms23169182

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Mehta S, Jeffrey KL. Beyond receptors and signaling: Epigenetic factors in the regulation of innate immunity. Immunol Cell Biol (2015) 93(3):233–44. doi: 10.1038/icb.2014.101

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Zhao Z, Su Z, Liang P, Liu D, Yang S, Wu Y, et al. Usp38 couples histone ubiquitination and methylation Via Kdm5b to resolve inflammation. Adv Sci (Weinheim Baden-Wurttemberg Germany) (2020) 7(22):2002680. doi: 10.1002/advs.202002680

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Carson W, Kunkel SL. Regulation of cellular immune responses in sepsis by histone modifications. Adv Protein Chem Struct Biol (2017) 106:191–225. doi: 10.1016/bs.apcsb.2016.08.004

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Daskalaki MG, Tsatsanis C, Kampranis SC. Histone methylation and acetylation in macrophages as a mechanism for regulation of inflammatory responses. J Cell Physiol (2018) 233(9):6495–507. doi: 10.1002/jcp.26497

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

22. Felsenfeld G, Groudine M. Controlling the double helix. Nature (2003) 421(6921):448–53. doi: 10.1038/nature01411

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Allan J, Hartman PG, Crane-Robinson C, Aviles FX. The structure of histone H1 and its location in chromatin. Nature (1980) 288(5792):675–9. doi: 10.1038/288675a0

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

24. Sun W, Lv S, Li H, Cui W, Wang L. Enhancing the anticancer efficacy of immunotherapy through combination with histone modification inhibitors. Genes (2018) 9(12):633. doi: 10.3390/genes9120633

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

25. Silk E, Zhao H, Weng H, Ma D. The role of extracellular histone in organ injury. Cell Death Dis (2017) 8(5):e2812. doi: 10.1038/cddis.2017.52

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

26. Li Y, Wan D, Luo X, Song T, Wang Y, Yu Q, et al. Circulating histones in sepsis: Potential outcome predictors and therapeutic targets. Front Immunol (2021) 12:650184. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.650184

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

27. Tsourouktsoglou TD, Warnatsch A, Ioannou M, Hoving D, Wang Q, Papayannopoulos V. Histones, DNA, and citrullination promote neutrophil extracellular trap inflammation by regulating the localization and activation of Tlr4. Cell Rep (2020) 31(5):107602. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2020.107602

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

28. Chen R, Xie Y, Zhong X, Fu Y, Huang Y, Zhen Y, et al. Novel chemokine-like activities of histones in tumor metastasis. Oncotarget (2016) 7(38):61728–40. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.11226

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

29. Westman J, Papareddy P, Dahlgren MW, Chakrakodi B, Norrby-Teglund A, Smeds E, et al. Extracellular histones induce chemokine production in whole blood ex vivo and leukocyte recruitment in vivo. PloS Pathog (2015) 11(12):e1005319. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1005319

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

30. Yoo HJ, Lee JS, Kim JE, Gu J, Koh Y, Kim I, et al. Extracellular histone released from leukemic cells increases their adhesion to endothelium and protects them from spontaneous and chemotherapy-induced leukemic cell death. PloS One (2016) 11(10):e0163982. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0163982

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

31. Ramasubramanian B, Kim J, Ke Y, Li Y, Zhang CO, Promnares K, et al. Mechanisms of pulmonary endothelial permeability and inflammation caused by extracellular histone subunits H3 and H4. FASEB J Off Publ Fed Am Soc Exp Biol (2022) 36(9):e22470. doi: 10.1096/fj.202200303RR

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

32. Arnaud M, Demonchy J, Arrii E, Luperto M, Lion J, Fodil S, et al. Endothelial cells activated by extracellular histones promote Foxp3(+) suppressive treg cells in vitro. Int J Mol Sci (2022) 23(9):4527. doi: 10.3390/ijms23094527

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

33. Kawano H, Ito T, Yamada S, Hashiguchi T, Maruyama I, Hisatomi T, et al. Toxic effects of extracellular histones and their neutralization by vitreous in retinal detachment. Lab investigat J Tech Methods Pathol (2014) 94(5):569–85. doi: 10.1038/labinvest.2014.46

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

34. Allam R, Darisipudi MN, Tschopp J, Anders HJ. Histones trigger sterile inflammation by activating the Nlrp3 inflammasome. Eur J Immunol (2013) 43(12):3336–42. doi: 10.1002/eji.201243224

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

35. Huang H, Chen HW, Evankovich J, Yan W, Rosborough BR, Nace GW, et al. Histones activate the Nlrp3 inflammasome in kupffer cells during sterile inflammatory liver injury. J Immunol (2013) 191(5):2665–79. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1202733

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

36. Warnatsch A, Ioannou M, Wang Q, Papayannopoulos V. Inflammation. neutrophil extracellular traps license macrophages for cytokine production in atherosclerosis. Science (2015) 349(6245):316–20. doi: 10.1126/science.aaa8064

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

37. Ito T, Nakahara M, Masuda Y, Ono S, Yamada S, Ishikura H, et al. Circulating histone H3 levels are increased in septic mice in a neutrophil-dependent manner: Preclinical evaluation of a novel sandwich Elisa for histone H3. J Intensive Care (2018) 6:79. doi: 10.1186/s40560-018-0348-y

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

38. Xu J, Zhang X, Pelayo R, Monestier M, Ammollo CT, Semeraro F, et al. Extracellular histones are major mediators of death in sepsis. Nat Med (2009) 15(11):1318–21. doi: 10.1038/nm.2053

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

39. Silvestre-Roig C, Braster Q, Wichapong K, Lee EY, Teulon JM, Berrebeh N, et al. Externalized histone H4 orchestrates chronic inflammation by inducing lytic cell death. Nature (2019) 569(7755):236–40. doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1167-6

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

40. Zhu C, Liang Y, Li X, Chen N, Ma X. Unfractionated heparin attenuates histone-mediated cytotoxicity in vitro and prevents intestinal microcirculatory dysfunction in histone-infused rats. J Trauma acute Care Surg (2019) 87(3):614–22. doi: 10.1097/ta.0000000000002387

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

41. Cheng Z, Abrams ST, Alhamdi Y, Toh J, Yu W, Wang G, et al. Circulating histones are major mediators of multiple organ dysfunction syndrome in acute critical illnesses. Crit Care Med (2019) 47(8):e677–e84. doi: 10.1097/ccm.0000000000003839

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

42. Cai X, Panicker SR, Biswas I, Giri H, Rezaie AR. Protective role of activated protein c against viral mimetic Poly(I:C)-induced inflammation. Thromb haemostasis (2021) 121(11):1448–63. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1726093

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

43. Sharma N, Haggstrom L, Sohrabipour S, Dwivedi DJ, Liaw PC. Investigations of the effectiveness of heparin variants as inhibitors of histones. J Thromb haemostasis JTH (2022) 20(6):1485–95. doi: 10.1111/jth.15706

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

44. Ioannou M, Hoving D, Aramburu IV, Temkin MI, De Vasconcelos NM, Tsourouktsoglou TD, et al. Microbe capture by splenic macrophages triggers sepsis Via T cell-Death-Dependent neutrophil lifespan shortening. Nat Commun (2022) 13(1):4658. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-32320-1

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

45. Shah M, He Z, Rauf A, Kalkhoran SB, Heiestad CM, Stensløkken KO, et al. Extracellular histones are a target in myocardial ischaemia reperfusion injury. Cardiovasc Res (2022) 118(4):1115–25. doi: 10.1093/cvr/cvab139

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

46. Ashar HK, Mueller NC, Rudd JM, Snider TA, Achanta M, Prasanthi M, et al. The role of extracellular histones in influenza virus pathogenesis. Am J Pathol (2018) 188(1):135–48. doi: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2017.09.014

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

47. Huckriede J, de Vries F, Hultström M, Wichapong K, Reutelingsperger C, Lipcsey M, et al. Histone H3 cleavage in severe covid-19 icu patients. Front Cell infect Microbiol (2021) 11:694186. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2021.694186

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

48. Lagedal R, Eriksson O, Sörman A, Huckriede JB, Kristensen B, Franzén S, et al. Impaired antibody response is associated with histone-release, organ dysfunction and mortality in critically ill covid-19 patients. J Clin Med (2022) 11(12):3419. doi: 10.3390/jcm11123419

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

49. Shaw RJ, Abrams ST, Austin J, Taylor JM, Lane S, Dutt T, et al. Circulating histones play a central role in covid-19-Associated coagulopathy and mortality. Haematologica (2021) 106(9):2493–8. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2021.278492

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

50. Ligi D, Lo Sasso B, Giglio RV, Maniscalco R, DellaFranca C, Agnello L, et al. Circulating histones contribute to monocyte and mdw alterations as common mediators in classical and covid-19 sepsis. Crit Care (2022) 26(1):260. doi: 10.1186/s13054-022-04138-2

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

51. Ondracek AS, Lang IM. Neutrophil extracellular traps as prognostic markers in covid-19: A welcome piece to the puzzle. Arteriosclerosis thrombosis Vasc Biol (2021) 41(2):995–8. doi: 10.1161/atvbaha.120.315633

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

52. Ackermann M, Anders HJ, Bilyy R, Bowlin GL, Daniel C, De Lorenzo R, et al. Patients with covid-19: In the dark-nets of neutrophils. Cell Death different (2021) 28(11):3125–39. doi: 10.1038/s41418-021-00805-z

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

53. Middleton EA, He XY, Denorme F, Campbell RA, Ng D, Salvatore SP, et al. Neutrophil extracellular traps contribute to immunothrombosis in covid-19 acute respiratory distress syndrome. Blood (2020) 136(10):1169–79. doi: 10.1182/blood.2020007008

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

54. Aymonnier K, Ng J, Fredenburgh LE, Zambrano-Vera K, Münzer P, Gutch S, et al. Inflammasome activation in neutrophils of patients with severe covid-19. Blood Adv (2022) 6(7):2001–13. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2021005949

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

55. Song Y, Kadiyala U, Weerappuli P, Valdez JJ, Yalavarthi S, Louttit C, et al. Antimicrobial microwebs of DNA-histone inspired from neutrophil extracellular traps. Adv mat (Deerfield Beach Fla) (2019) 31(14):e1807436. doi: 10.1002/adma.201807436

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

56. Tan C, Aziz M, Wang P. The vitals of nets. J leukocyte Biol (2021) 110(4):797–808. doi: 10.1002/jlb.3ru0620-375r

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

57. Papayannopoulos V. Neutrophil extracellular traps in immunity and disease. Nat Rev Immunol (2018) 18(2):134–47. doi: 10.1038/nri.2017.105

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

58. Brinkmann V, Reichard U, Goosmann C, Fauler B, Uhlemann Y, Weiss DS, et al. Neutrophil extracellular traps kill bacteria. Science (2004) 303(5663):1532–5. doi: 10.1126/science.1092385

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

59. Papayannopoulos V, Metzler KD, Hakkim A, Zychlinsky A. Neutrophil elastase and myeloperoxidase regulate the formation of neutrophil extracellular traps. J Cell Biol (2010) 191(3):677–91. doi: 10.1083/jcb.201006052

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

60. Shrestha B, Ito T, Kakuuchi M, Totoki T, Nagasato T, Yamamoto M, et al. Recombinant thrombomodulin suppresses histone-induced neutrophil extracellular trap formation. Front Immunol (2019) 10:2535. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.02535

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

61. Doolin T, Amir HM, Duong L, Rosenzweig R, Urban LA, Bosch M, et al. Mammalian histones facilitate antimicrobial synergy by disrupting the bacterial proton gradient and chromosome organization. Nat Commun (2020) 11(1):3888. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-17699-z

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

62. Duong L, Gross SP, Siryaporn A. A novel antibacterial strategy: Histone and antimicrobial peptide synergy. Microbial Cell (2020) 7(11):309–11. doi: 10.15698/mic2020.11.736

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

63. Hsieh IN, White M, Hoeksema M, Deluna X, Hartshorn K. Histone H4 potentiates neutrophil inflammatory responses to influenza a virus: Down-modulation by H4 binding to c-reactive protein and surfactant protein d. PloS One (2021) 16(2):e0247605. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0247605

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

64. Hsieh IN, Deluna X, White MR, Hartshorn KL. Histone H4 directly stimulates neutrophil activation through membrane permeabilization. J leukocyte Biol (2021) 109(4):763–75. doi: 10.1002/jlb.3a0620-342r

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

65. Herren T, Burke TA, Das R, Plow EF. Identification of histone H2b as a regulated plasminogen receptor. Biochemistry (2006) 45(31):9463–74. doi: 10.1021/bi060756w

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

66. Williams WM, Whalley AS, Comacchio RM, Rosenberg J, Watts RA, Isenberg DA, et al. Correlation between expression of antibodies to histone H2b and clinical activity in hiv-infected individuals. Clin Exp Immunol (1996) 104(1):18–24. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2249.1996.d01-633.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

67. Doyle HA, Aswad DW, Mamula MJ. Autoimmunity to isomerized histone H2b in systemic lupus erythematosus. Autoimmunity (2013) 46(1):6–13. doi: 10.3109/08916934.2012.710859

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

68. Patat SA, Carnegie RB, Kingsbury C, Gross PS, Chapman R, Schey KL. Antimicrobial activity of histones from hemocytes of the pacific white shrimp. Eur J Biochem (2004) 271(23-24):4825–33. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.2004.04448.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

69. Li GH, Mine Y, Hincke MT, Nys Y. Isolation and characterization of antimicrobial proteins and peptide from chicken liver. J Pept Sci an Off Publ Eur Pept Soc (2007) 13(6):368–78. doi: 10.1002/psc.851

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

70. Silphaduang U, Hincke MT, Nys Y, Mine Y. Antimicrobial proteins in chicken reproductive system. Biochem Biophys Res Commun (2006) 340(2):648–55. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2005.12.054

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

71. Cho JH, Sung BH, Kim SC. Buforins: Histone H2a-derived antimicrobial peptides from toad stomach. Biochim Biophys Acta (2009) 1788(8):1564–9. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamem.2008.10.025

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

72. Fu B, Lin H, Ramesh Pavase T, Mi N, Sui J. Extraction, identification, modification, and antibacterial activity of histone from immature testis of Atlantic salmon. Mar Drugs (2020) 18(3):133. doi: 10.3390/md18030133

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

73. Hiemstra PS, Eisenhauer PB, Harwig SS, van den Barselaar MT, van Furth R, Lehrer RI. Antimicrobial proteins of murine macrophages. Infect Immun (1993) 61(7):3038–46. doi: 10.1128/iai.61.7.3038-3046.1993

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

74. Lemaire S, Trinh TT, Le HT, Tang SC, Hincke M, Wellman-Labadie O, et al. Antimicrobial effects of H4-(86-100), histogranin and related compounds–possible involvement of DNA gyrase. FEBS J (2008) 275(21):5286–97. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-4658.2008.06659.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

75. Howell SJ, Wilk D, Yadav SP, Bevins CL. Antimicrobial polypeptides of the human colonic epithelium. Peptides (2003) 24(11):1763–70. doi: 10.1016/j.peptides.2003.07.028

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

76. Miller BF, Abrams R, Dorfman A, Klein M. Antibacterial properties of protamine and histone. Science (1942) 96(2497):428–30. doi: 10.1126/science.96.2497.428

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

77. Hirsch JG. Bactericidal action of histone. J Exp Med (1958) 108(6):925–44. doi: 10.1084/jem.108.6.925

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

78. Pasupuleti M, Schmidtchen A, Malmsten M. Antimicrobial peptides: Key components of the innate immune system. Crit Rev Biotechnol (2012) 32(2):143–71. doi: 10.3109/07388551.2011.594423

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

79. Rose FR, Bailey K, Keyte JW, Chan WC, Greenwood D, Mahida YR. Potential role of epithelial cell-derived histone H1 proteins in innate antimicrobial defense in the human gastrointestinal tract. Infect Immun (1998) 66(7):3255–63. doi: 10.1128/iai.66.7.3255-3263.1998

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

80. Jacobsen F, Baraniskin A, Mertens J, Mittler D, Mohammadi-Tabrisi A, Schubert S, et al. Activity of histone H1.2 in infected burn wounds. J antimicrobial chemother (2005) 55(5):735–41. doi: 10.1093/jac/dki067

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

81. Augusto LA, Decottignies P, Synguelakis M, Nicaise M, Le Maréchal P, Chaby R. Histones: A novel class of lipopolysaccharide-binding molecules. Biochemistry (2003) 42(13):3929–38. doi: 10.1021/bi0268394

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

82. Swindle CS, Engler JA. Association of the human papillomavirus type 11 E1 protein with histone H1. J Virol (1998) 72(3):1994–2001. doi: 10.1128/jvi.72.3.1994-2001.1998

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

83. Kozlowski HN, Lai ET, Havugimana PC, White C, Emili A, Sakac D, et al. Extracellular histones identified in crocodile blood inhibit in-vitro hiv-1 infection. AIDS (London England) (2016) 30(13):2043–52. doi: 10.1097/qad.0000000000001159

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

84. Tamura M, Natori K, Kobayashi M, Miyamura T, Takeda N. Inhibition of attachment of virions of Norwalk virus to mammalian cells by soluble histone molecules. Arch Virol (2003) 148(9):1659–70. doi: 10.1007/s00705-003-0143-4

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

85. Hoeksema M, Tripathi S, White M, Qi L, Taubenberger J, van Eijk M, et al. Arginine-rich histones have strong antiviral activity for influenza a viruses. Innate Immun (2015) 21(7):736–45. doi: 10.1177/1753425915593794

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

86. De Lucca AJ, Heden LO, Ingber B, Bhatnagar D. Antifungal properties of wheat histones (H1-H4) and purified wheat histone H1. J Agric Food Chem (2011) 59(13):6933–9. doi: 10.1021/jf201646x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

87. Lüders T, Birkemo GA, Nissen-Meyer J, Andersen Ø, Nes IF. Proline conformation-dependent antimicrobial activity of a proline-rich histone H1 n-terminal peptide fragment isolated from the skin mucus of Atlantic salmon. Antimicrobial Agents chemother (2005) 49(6):2399–406. doi: 10.1128/aac.49.6.2399-2406.2005

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

88. Fernandes JM, Molle G, Kemp GD, Smith VJ. Isolation and characterisation of oncorhyncin ii, a histone H1-derived antimicrobial peptide from skin secretions of rainbow trout, oncorhynchus mykiss. Dev Comp Immunol (2004) 28(2):127–38. doi: 10.1016/s0145-305x(03)00120-4

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

89. Kim HS, Cho JH, Park HW, Yoon H, Kim MS, Kim SC. Endotoxin-neutralizing antimicrobial proteins of the human placenta. J Immunol (2002) 168(5):2356–64. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.168.5.2356

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

90. Wang Y, Chen Y, Xin L, Beverley SM, Carlsen ED, Popov V, et al. Differential microbicidal effects of human histone proteins H2a and H2b on leishmania promastigotes and amastigotes. Infect Immun (2011) 79(3):1124–33. doi: 10.1128/iai.00658-10

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

91. Fernandes JM, Kemp GD, Molle MG, Smith VJ. Anti-microbial properties of histone H2a from skin secretions of rainbow trout, oncorhynchus mykiss. Biochem J (2002) 368(Pt 2):611–20. doi: 10.1042/bj20020980

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

92. Sim S, Wang P, Beyer BN, Cutrona KJ, Radhakrishnan ML, Elmore DE. Investigating the nucleic acid interactions of histone-derived antimicrobial peptides. FEBS Lett (2017) 591(5):706–17. doi: 10.1002/1873-3468.12574

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

93. Koo YS, Kim JM, Park IY, Yu BJ, Jang SA, Kim KS, et al. Structure-activity relations of parasin I, a histone H2a-derived antimicrobial peptide. Peptides (2008) 29(7):1102–8. doi: 10.1016/j.peptides.2008.02.019

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

94. Bustillo ME, Fischer AL, LaBouyer MA, Klaips JA, Webb AC, Elmore DE. Modular analysis of hipposin, a histone-derived antimicrobial peptide consisting of membrane translocating and membrane permeabilizing fragments. Biochim Biophys Acta (2014) 1838(9):2228–33. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamem.2014.04.010

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

95. Athira PP, Anju MV, Anooja VV, Archana K, Neelima S, Rosamma P. A histone H2a-derived antimicrobial peptide, hipposin from mangrove whip ray, himantura walga: Molecular and functional characterisation. 3 Biotech (2020) 10(11):467. doi: 10.1007/s13205-020-02455-3

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

96. Bergsson G, Agerberth B, Jörnvall H, Gudmundsson GH. Isolation and identification of antimicrobial components from the epidermal mucus of Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua). FEBS J (2005) 272(19):4960–9. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-4658.2005.04906.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

97. Frohm M, Gunne H, Bergman AC, Agerberth B, Bergman T, Boman A, et al. Biochemical and antibacterial analysis of human wound and blister fluid. Eur J Biochem (1996) 237(1):86–92. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1996.0086n.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

98. Tagai C, Morita S, Shiraishi T, Miyaji K, Iwamuro S. Antimicrobial properties of arginine- and lysine-rich histones and involvement of bacterial outer membrane protease T in their differential mode of actions. Peptides (2011) 32(10):2003–9. doi: 10.1016/j.peptides.2011.09.005

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

99. Lee DY, Huang CM, Nakatsuji T, Thiboutot D, Kang SA, Monestier M, et al. Histone H4 is a major component of the antimicrobial action of human sebocytes. J Invest Dermatol (2009) 129(10):2489–96. doi: 10.1038/jid.2009.106

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

100. Kashima M. H1 histones contribute to candidacidal activities of human epidermal extract. J Dermatol (1991) 18(12):695–706. doi: 10.1111/j.1346-8138.1991.tb03160.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

101. Cavalli G, Heard E. Advances in epigenetics link genetics to the environment and disease. Nature (2019) 571(7766):489–99. doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1411-0

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

102. Jin Q, Yu LR, Wang L, Zhang Z, Kasper LH, Lee JE, et al. Distinct roles of Gcn5/Pcaf-mediated H3k9ac and Cbp/P300-mediated H3k18/27ac in nuclear receptor transactivation. EMBO J (2011) 30(2):249–62. doi: 10.1038/emboj.2010.318

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

103. Moores RC, Brilha S, Schutgens F, Elkington PT, Friedland JS. Epigenetic regulation of matrix metalloproteinase-1 and -3 expression in mycobacterium tuberculosis infection. Front Immunol (2017) 8:602. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2017.00602

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

104. Pentagna N, Pinheiro da Costa T, Soares Dos Santos Cardoso F, Martins de Almeida F, Blanco Martinez AM, Abreu JG, et al. Epigenetic control of myeloid cells behavior by histone deacetylase activity (Hdac) during tissue and organ regeneration in xenopus laevis. Dev Comp Immunol (2021) 114:103840. doi: 10.1016/j.dci.2020.103840

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

105. Ueki N, Zhang L, Hayman MJ. Ski can negatively regulates macrophage differentiation through its interaction with Pu.1. Oncogene (2008) 27(3):300–7. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1210654

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

106. Shakespear MR, Halili MA, Irvine KM, Fairlie DP, Sweet MJ. Histone deacetylases as regulators of inflammation and immunity. Trends Immunol (2011) 32(7):335–43. doi: 10.1016/j.it.2011.04.001

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

107. Roger T, Lugrin J, Le Roy D, Goy G, Mombelli M, Koessler T, et al. Histone deacetylase inhibitors impair innate immune responses to toll-like receptor agonists and to infection. Blood (2011) 117(4):1205–17. doi: 10.1182/blood-2010-05-284711

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

108. Deng WG, Zhu Y, Wu KK. Role of P300 and pcaf in regulating cyclooxygenase-2 promoter activation by inflammatory mediators. Blood (2004) 103(6):2135–42. doi: 10.1182/blood-2003-09-3131

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

109. Bode KA, Schroder K, Hume DA, Ravasi T, Heeg K, Sweet MJ, et al. Histone deacetylase inhibitors decrease toll-like receptor-mediated activation of proinflammatory gene expression by impairing transcription factor recruitment. Immunology (2007) 122(4):596–606. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2567.2007.02678.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

110. Elsharkawy AM, Oakley F, Lin F, Packham G, Mann DA, Mann J. The nf-kappab P50:P50:Hdac-1 repressor complex orchestrates transcriptional inhibition of multiple pro-inflammatory genes. J Hepatol (2010) 53(3):519–27. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2010.03.025

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

111. Pakala SB, Bui-Nguyen TM, Reddy SD, Li DQ, Peng S, Rayala SK, et al. Regulation of nf-Kb circuitry by a component of the nucleosome remodeling and deacetylase complex controls inflammatory response homeostasis. J Biol Chem (2017) 292(11):4764. doi: 10.1074/jbc.A117.139469

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

112. Falkenberg KJ, Johnstone RW. Histone deacetylases and their inhibitors in cancer, neurological diseases and immune disorders. Nat Rev Drug Discovery (2014) 13(9):673–91. doi: 10.1038/nrd4360

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

113. Qiao Y, Giannopoulou EG, Chan CH, Park SH, Gong S, Chen J, et al. Synergistic activation of inflammatory cytokine genes by interferon-Γ-Induced chromatin remodeling and toll-like receptor signaling. Immunity (2013) 39(3):454–69. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2013.08.009

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

114. Zhong Y, Ye P, Mei Z, Huang S, Huang M, Li Y, et al. The novel methyltransferase Setd4 regulates tlr agonist-induced expression of cytokines through methylation of lysine 4 at histone 3 in macrophages. Mol Immunol (2019) 114:179–88. doi: 10.1016/j.molimm.2019.07.011

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

115. Xia M, Liu J, Wu X, Liu S, Li G, Han C, et al. Histone methyltransferase Ash1l suppresses interleukin-6 production and inflammatory autoimmune diseases by inducing the ubiquitin-editing enzyme A20. Immunity (2013) 39(3):470–81. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2013.08.016

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

116. Chen X, El Gazzar M, Yoza BK, McCall CE. The nf-kappab factor relb and histone H3 lysine methyltransferase G9a directly interact to generate epigenetic silencing in endotoxin tolerance. J Biol Chem (2009) 284(41):27857–65. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M109.000950

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

117. Fang TC, Schaefer U, Mecklenbrauker I, Stienen A, Dewell S, Chen MS, et al. Histone H3 lysine 9 di-methylation as an epigenetic signature of the interferon response. J Exp Med (2012) 209(4):661–9. doi: 10.1084/jem.20112343

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

118. Scheer S, Zaph C. The lysine methyltransferase G9a in immune cell differentiation and function. Front Immunol (2017) 8:429. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2017.00429

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

119. Byun S, Seok S, Kim YC, Zhang Y, Yau P, Iwamori N, et al. Fasting-induced Fgf21 signaling activates hepatic autophagy and lipid degradation Via Jmjd3 histone demethylase. Nat Commun (2020) 11(1):807. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-14384-z

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

120. Zhang X, Liu L, Yuan X, Wei Y, Wei X. Jmjd3 in the regulation of human diseases. Protein Cell (2019) 10(12):864–82. doi: 10.1007/s13238-019-0653-9

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

121. Johnstone AL, Andrade NS, Barbier E, Khomtchouk BB, Rienas CA, Lowe K, et al. Dysregulation of the histone demethylase Kdm6b in alcohol dependence is associated with epigenetic regulation of inflammatory signaling pathways. Addict Biol (2021) 26(1):e12816. doi: 10.1111/adb.12816

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

122. Jiang Q, Huang X, Hu X, Shan Z, Wu Y, Wu G, et al. Histone demethylase Kdm6a promotes somatic cell reprogramming by epigenetically regulating the pten and il-6 signal pathways. Stem Cells (Dayton Ohio) (2020) 38(8):960–72. doi: 10.1002/stem.3188

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

123. Gschwandtner M, Zhong S, Tschachler A, Mlitz V, Karner S, Elbe-Bürger A, et al. Fetal human keratinocytes produce Large amounts of antimicrobial peptides: Involvement of histone-methylation processes. J Invest Dermatol (2014) 134(8):2192–201. doi: 10.1038/jid.2014.165

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

124. Stender JD, Pascual G, Liu W, Kaikkonen MU, Do K, Spann NJ, et al. Control of proinflammatory gene programs by regulated trimethylation and demethylation of histone H4k20. Mol Cell (2012) 48(1):28–38. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2012.07.020

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

125. Rubio-Tomás T. The smyd family proteins in immunology: An update of their obvious and non-obvious relations with the immune system. Heliyon (2021) 7(6):e07387. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07387

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

126. Beato M, Sharma P. Peptidyl arginine deiminase 2 (Padi2)-mediated arginine citrullination modulates transcription in cancer. Int J Mol Sci (2020) 21(4):1351. doi: 10.3390/ijms21041351

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

127. Li M, Lin C, Leso A, Nefedova Y. Quantification of citrullinated histone H3 bound DNA for detection of neutrophil extracellular traps. Cancers (2020) 12(11):3424. doi: 10.3390/cancers12113424

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

128. Meegan JE, Yang X, Beard RS Jr., Jannaway M, Chatterjee V, Taylor-Clark TE, et al. Citrullinated histone 3 causes endothelial barrier dysfunction. Biochem Biophys Res Commun (2018) 503(3):1498–502. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2018.07.069

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

129. Li Y, Liu Z, Liu B, Zhao T, Chong W, Wang Y, et al. Citrullinated histone H3: A novel target for the treatment of sepsis. Surgery (2014) 156(2):229–34. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2014.04.009

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

130. Shi L, Aymonnier K, Wagner DD. Neutrophil stimulation with citrullinated histone H4 slows down calcium influx and reduces net formation compared with native histone H4. PloS One (2021) 16(5):e0251726. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0251726

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

131. Tian Y, Russo RM, Li Y, Karmakar M, Liu B, Puskarich MA, et al. Serum citrullinated histone H3 concentrations differentiate patients with septic verses non-septic shock and correlate with disease severity. Infection (2021) 49(1):83–93. doi: 10.1007/s15010-020-01528-y

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

132. Kimura H, Mii A, Shoji J, Arakawa Y, Shimizu A. Immunohistochemical detection of citrullinated histone H3-positive neutrophils is useful for identifying active glomerular and interstitial lesions in antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated vasculitis. Histopathology (2021) 78(4):520–31. doi: 10.1111/his.14247

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

133. Eilenberg W, Zagrapan B, Bleichert S, Ibrahim N, Knöbl V, Brandau A, et al. Histone citrullination as a novel biomarker and target to inhibit progression of abdominal aortic aneurysms. Trans Res J Lab Clin Med (2021) 233:32–46. doi: 10.1016/j.trsl.2021.02.003

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

134. Tarcic O, Pateras IS, Cooks T, Shema E, Kanterman J, Ashkenazi H, et al. Rnf20 links histone H2b ubiquitylation with inflammation and inflammation-associated cancer. Cell Rep (2016) 14(6):1462–76. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2016.01.020

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

135. Zhou W, Zhu P, Wang J, Pascual G, Ohgi KA, Lozach J, et al. Histone H2a monoubiquitination represses transcription by inhibiting rna polymerase ii transcriptional elongation. Mol Cell (2008) 29(1):69–80. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2007.11.002

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

136. Lai JJ, Cruz FM, Rock KL. Immune sensing of cell death through recognition of histone sequences by c-type lectin-Receptor-2d causes inflammation and tissue injury. Immunity (2020) 52(1):123–35.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2019.11.013

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: histones, innate immunity, DAMPs, AMPs, histone modification

Citation: Li X, Ye Y, Peng K, Zeng Z, Chen L and Zeng Y (2022) Histones: The critical players in innate immunity. Front. Immunol. 13:1030610. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.1030610

Received: 29 August 2022; Accepted: 07 November 2022;
Published: 21 November 2022.

Edited by:

Taylor Sitarik Cohen, AstraZeneca, United States

Reviewed by:

Peter A. Ward, University of Michigan, United States
Indranil Biswas, Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation, United States
Venizelos Papayannopoulos, Francis Crick Institute, United Kingdom

Copyright © 2022 Li, Ye, Peng, Zeng, Chen and Zeng. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Yanhua Zeng, emVuZ3lpaHVhMjFjbkAxMjYuY29t; emVuZ3lpaHVhMjFjbkB1c2MuZWR1LmNu

These authors have contributed equally to this work

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.