Swatantra Kumar
Shailendra K. Saxena
Vimal K. Maurya- Centre for Advanced Research (CFAR), Faculty of Medicine, King George’s Medical University (KGMU), Lucknow, India
Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) causing the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic is a serious global threat until we identify the effective preventive and therapeutic strategies. SARS-CoV-2 infection is characterized by various immunopathological consequences including lymphocyte activation and dysfunction, lymphopenia, cytokine storm, increased level of neutrophils, and depletion and exhaustion of lymphocytes. Considering the low level of antibody-mediated protection during coronavirus infection, understanding the role of T cell for long-term protection is decisive. Both CD4+ and CD8+ T cell response is imperative for cell-mediated immune response during COVID-19. However, the level of CD8+ T cell response reduced to almost half as compared to CD4+ after 6 months of infection. The long-term protection is mediated via generation of immunological memory response during COVID-19. The presence of memory CD4+ T cells in all the severely infected and recovered individuals shows that the memory response is predominated by CD4+ T cells. Prominently, the antigen-specific CD4+ and CD8+ T cells are specifically observed during day 0 to day 28 in COVID-19-vaccinated individuals. However, level of antigen-specific T memory cells in COVID-19-vaccinated individuals defines the long-term protection against forthcoming outbreaks of SARS-CoV-2.
Introduction
The global emergence of Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) caused the pandemic coronavirus disease (COVID-19), affecting at least 243 million cases with 4.9 million deaths (1). SARS-CoV-2 belongs to Coronaviridae which is a family of diverse enveloped RNA viruses of positive sense (2). SARS-CoV-2 is primarily transmitted via direct, indirect, or close contact with respiratory droplets generated by infected individuals through sneezing, coughing, talking, or singing. However, other possible routes of transmission occur via fomite, blood-borne, fecal–oral, mother-to-child, and animal-to-human transmission (3). Among the coronaviruses (CoVs), SARS-CoV-2 is the seventh coronavirus that infected humans. The size of the SARS-CoV-2 genome ranges from 27 to 32 kb which comprises of 6–11 open reading frames (ORFs). Among all the ORFs, the replicase (ORF1a/ORF1b), spike (S), membrane (M), envelope (E), and nucleocapsid (N) are the six functional ORFs, whereas seven putative ORFs encode for accessory proteins, which are interspersed in between the structural genes. The replicase gene encompasses 67% of the genome that encodes for a large polyprotein (pp1ab) that gets processed into 16 non-structural proteins (nsps) (4, 5). SARS-CoV-2 infection initiates upon attachment of spike glycoprotein with the ACE2 receptor and consequent priming of spike protein through host cell serine protease TMPRSS2 (6). Following entry, viral RNA is released into the cytoplasm which instantly undergoes translation to generate ORF1a and ORF1b (7). Crystal structures of crucial SARS-CoV-2 proteins have been resolved which are crucial for the designing of effective therapeutic strategies (8–11). However, understanding of SARS-CoV-2 immunopathology and immune response is crucial for designing effective vaccines and immunotherapeutics (12). Importantly, understating of effector T and B cell response is vital for controlling SARS-CoV-2 infection and crucial to providing long-lasting protection via generation of antigen-specific immunological memory response (13, 14). This strategy may help us to implement more effective vaccines in the mass population for reducing the burden of COVID-19 (15, 16).
Immunopathology of SARS-CoV-2 Infection
COVID‐19 represents a complex profile with heterogeneous clinical manifestations (17). Most of the SARS-CoV-2 infections are asymptomatic and may present mild to moderate clinical symptoms of upper respiratory tract whereas around 15% of the cases result in severe pneumonia and approximately 5% of the cases result in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) or multiple-organ dysfunction due to septic shock (18). Severe patients are identified with bilateral lung involvement where 80% of the severe cases necessitate oxygenation, of which 30%–40% need mechanical ventilation. Importantly, 80%–90% of the severe cases of mechanical ventilation is the prime cause of COVID-19-associated mortality (19). Critically ill or severe COVID-19 patients are characterized as lymphocyte activation identified as increased levels of CD38, CD69, and CD44 T cell activation markers and exhaustion of T cells identified as the increased expression of T cell immunoglobulin domain and mucin domain-3 (TIM3), programmed cell death protein-1 (PD1), and killer cell lectin-like receptor subfamily C member 1 (NKG2A) (20). Therefore, lymphopenia or lymphocytopenia has been found as a decisive feature of severe cases of COVID-19 (21). In addition, the level of neutrophils is strikingly higher whereas the levels of monocytes, eosinophils, and basophiles have been found to be reduced (22). Importantly, severe cases of COVID-19 are identified as uncontrolled inflammatory response known as cytokine storm where IL-6, IL-1β, IL-10, and IFN-γ have been found to be significantly higher (23). Moreover, patients are identified with the higher level of immunoglobulin G (IgG) and total antibodies (24). Non-survivors are identified as elevated levels of C-reactive proteins, serum ferritin, lactate dehydrogenase, and serum IL-6 as compared with survivors (25). Analysis of the postmortem samples showed the infiltration of lymphocytes and macrophages in the lungs as well as hemophagocytosis in reticuloendothelial organs and bone marrow (26). The SARS-CoV-2-induced lung injury is characterized by diffuse alveolar damages in the pulmonary vessels identified as platelet fibrin microthrombi (27, 28). Altogether, this hyperinflammatory response during COVID-19 suggests the involvement of diverse COVID-19 immunopathologies and host immune responses. Classification of the severity of the disease is crucial for the gradient-based treatment of COVID-19. So far, the radiological imaging of pulmonary systems and other auxiliary examinations are exhibited for the classification of the disease severity (29). However, the blood profiling of the patients is a cost-effective examination of the severe cases.
Cytokine Storm During COVID-19
In addition to T and B cell response, elevated levels of cytokines are associated with the disease severity and mortality during SARS-CoV-2 infection (30). Activation of coagulation pathways as an immune response mechanism against SARS-CoV-2 infection is associated with the hyperactivation of proinflammatory cytokine production and multi organ failures (31). Importantly, some of the crucial cytokines such as CCL7, CXCL10, and IL-1 receptor antagonist are associated with the increased viral load, pulmonary dysfunction and damage, and mortality (32, 33). Severe COVID-19 patients have been shown to exhibit higher levels of IL-2, IL-6, IL-10, IL-1, GSCF, MCP-1, TNF-α, and MIP1A (34, 35). Interestingly, the peak plasma levels of IL-6 have been shown to be less as compared with the patients with hyperinflammatory ARDS, cytokine release syndrome, and sepsis (Figure 1) (36).
Figure 1 Immunopathogenesis of SARS-COV-2 infection. Severe COVID-19 is identified with infiltration of lymphocytes and macrophages in the lungs, lymphopenia or lymphocytopenia where reduction in the number of CD4+, CD8+ T cells, B cells and NK cells occurs. SARS-CoV-2 infection is identified with the lymphocyte activation with increased expression of CD38, CD69 and CD44 activation markers and T cell exhaustion identified as T cell immunoglobulin domain and mucin domain-3 (TIM3), programmed cell death protein-1 (PD1), and killer cell lectin-like receptor subfamily C member 1 (NKG2A) markers. Level of neutrophils is strikingly higher whereas the level of monocytes, eosinophils and basophiles has been found to be reduced. Severe COVID-19 patients have been shown to exhibits higher levels of IL-2, IL-6, IL-10, IL-1, GSCF, MCP-1, TNF-α, MIP1A, IFN-γ, IL-1 and GM-CSF.
T Cell Response During COVID-19
Similar to other respiratory viral infections, lymphocyte response is crucial during SARS-CoV-2 infection. Response of lymphocytes specifically T cells is vital since the cellular immune response is exhibited via T cells which are involved in the direct killing of the virus-infected cells via cytotoxic T lymphocyte CD8+ T cells and CD4+ T cell-mediated CD8+ T cell priming and induction of B cell differentiation into plasma cells to produce virus-specific antibodies (37). Response of both T and B cells during SARS-CoV-2 infection has been detected in the blood approximately 1 week after the onset of symptoms (38). Studies are suggesting that the activation of CD8+ T cells is greater than the CD4+ T cell response which was observed by the higher expression of activation markers HLA-DR and CD38 (39). Response of a high magnitude of CD8+ T cells was observed in the mild cases of COVID-19 which may define the protective role of these cells (40). However, severe cases of COVID-19 have been shown to exhibit the terminally differentiated or exhausted CD8+ T cells with an increased expression of inhibitory receptors including TIM3, PD1, CTLA4, LAG3, CD39, and NKG2A showing the characteristic of T cell dysfunction. However, some reports are suggesting that SARS-CoV-2-infected individuals exhibit functional CD8+ T cells identified by PD-1 (41). These data also suggest the hyperactivation of antigen-specific CD8+ T cells might be the cause of disease severity (42). Interestingly, CD4+ T cell response has been observed against spike glycoprotein in the recovered patients (43) whereas CD8+ T cell response was specifically attributed toward the internal proteins of SARS-CoV-2 (44). The six predominant epitopes have been identified to be involved in the T cell response where three epitopes are from spike and two from membrane proteins and one is from nucleocapsid (45). In addition, a significant CD4+ T cell response was found to be specific against spike, nsp3, nsp4, ORF3s, ORF7a, nsp12, and ORF8 (46).
B Cell Response During COVID-19
In patients of COVID-19, B cell response has been found to be elicited against nucleocapsid protein which concomitantly exhibited with T follicular helper cell response after 1 week of onset of symptoms (47). Strikingly, antibody response against spike glycoprotein was observed 4–8 days after the onset of symptoms (38, 48). Neutralizing antibody response against spike glycoprotein was found to be generated after 2 to 3 weeks (49). A subset of individuals has been found to be incapable of developing long-lasting antibody response and therefore might be prone to the reinfections (50, 51). Importantly, SARS-CoV-2 infection has been shown to be involved in antibody-dependent enhancement of infection mediated by IgG receptors FcγRIIA and FcγRIIIA (52). Strikingly, despite of the presence of the anti-SARS-CoV-2 RBD antibody of serum neutralization activity, effector B cell response is linked with poor clinical outcome and disease severity of the COVID-19 patients (53). The B cell response during SARS-CoV-2 infection mimic the patients reported with active autoimmune processes and human systemic lupus erythematosus (54). In spite of productive humoral response marked by higher antibody-secreting cells (ASCs), expansion was associated with the more severe infections in a subset of COVID-19 patients; neutralizing antibodies were found to provide ineffective protection against SARS-CoV-2 infection (55).
Lymphopenia in Severe COVID-19
Lymphopenia or lymphocytopenia has been found as the key immunopathological characteristic of severe COVID-19 cases where 20% of the severe cases showed a low T cell count (56). More specifically, CD8+ T cells remains low as a result of COVID-19-associated lymphopenia (57). In addition, the level of memory TH cells identified as triple-positive cells (CD3+CD4+ and CD45RO+) has been found to be reduced (58). The probable reason for the lymphopenia has been suggested via four ways, namely, SARS-CoV-2 directly infecting the lymphocytes causing lymphocyte programmed cell death, damage to the lymphoid organs, hyperinflammation-mediated lymphocyte dysfunction probably via TNF-α and IL-6, and metabolic molecule-mediated lymphocyte dysfunction (59). All of the probable mechanisms result in lymphopenia, and therefore, admitted patients may be immediately subjected to T cell count which suggests the severity of the case (60).
Memory T Cell Response During SARS-CoV-2 Infection
Although neutralizing antibody response is important for protection against SARS-CoV-2 infection, long-term protection is required from the onset of infection during reexposure of infection and therefore is crucial for designing effective vaccine candidates for COVID-19 which aims to generate robust memory response upon reexposure. Memory T and B cell responses are the most vital immunological responses, which provide long-term protection against any infections. Recovered COVID-19 patients have been shown to exhibit robust and broad memory CD4+ and CD8+ T cell responses (45, 61). Human peripheral CD4+ T cells can be classified based on their activity during antigen reexposure where naïve cells can be characterized as CCR7+ and CD45RA+ cells, and central and effector memory cells are characterized as CCR7+ CD45RA- and CCR7- CD45RA-, respectively. Recovered convalescent patients who were recently discharged from the hospital and 2 to 4 weeks after being declared virus-free have been shown to exhibit persistent memory CD4+ T cell response as well as effector memory-circulating T follicular helper (cTfh) cells (47, 62). Unlike SARS-CoV infection, where memory CD8+ T cell response was found to be higher as compared with the memory CD4+ T cell response which persists for more than 6 years (63, 64), SARS-CoV-2-infected recovered patients showed memory CD4+ T cells in all patients where memory CD8+ T cells are present in 70% individuals, suggesting that memory response in severe cases is predominated by CD4+ Tm cells (45). In addition, all memory T cell responses have been observed against structural proteins of SARS-CoV after 9 and 11 years of recovery (65).
Generation of Antigen-Primed T Cells During Natural COVID-19 Infection
Antigen-primed T cells are crucial to effectively countering the SARS-CoV-2 infection mediated by both CD4+ and CD8+ Teff cells (66). T cell response investigated against nucleocapsid (N) protein has been shown to exhibit robust IFN-γ response after 17 years of SARS-CoV infection against N peptides. Interestingly, PBMCs collected from these individuals elicited a similar response against N peptides from SARS-CoV-2. SARS-CoV-2-infected individuals exhibit N protein-specific T cell repertoires which are the part of individuals with a history of SARS-CoV infection (67). Prominently, T cell response has been investigated in COVID-19 patients 6 months after the infection. IFN-γ ELISPOT analysis revealed the presence of predominant antigen-specific CD4+ T cells with robust IL-2 expression (68). However, CD8+ response was found to be half as compared to the CD4+ T cell response which is mostly seen against non-spike proteins (68, 69). The level of T cell response can be strongly correlated with the magnitude of peak antibody level specific against spike and RBD (68). These data suggest that infection with betacoronaviruses induces long-lasting T cell-mediated immunity that will prevent COVID-19 survivors to be infected from forthcoming severe infections.
Lymphocyte Response Against COVID-19-Vaccinated Individuals
Considering the crucial role of T cell-mediated immunity during SARS-CoV-2 infection, it is imperative to understand the T cell response during COVID-19 vaccination. A replication-deficient simian adenoviral vector-based vaccine, ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 (AZD1222), has been shown to induce discrete clusters of populations of lymphocyte (70). These clusters were identified as Ki-67+ as proliferating population and CD69+ as activated population for both CD4+ and CD8+ T cells. Interestingly, terminally differentiating T cells identified as CD57+ and KLRG1+ were not detected showing a reduced low cytotoxicity response upon AZD1222 vaccination. Upon vaccination, anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike IgG1 and IgG3 responses have been detected at day 14 that further increased by day 28. However, by day 56, these responses were found to be similar to those by day 14. Importantly, IgG1 responses were detected in half, whereas IgG3 was detected in almost all the recruited vaccinated individuals (71). Similar to the COVID-19 patients, T cell responses were measured in AZD1222-vaccinated individuals using IFN-γ ELISpot assay which was peaked at day 14. Spike-specific cytokine response measured by intracellular cytokine staining (ICS) showed that CD4+ T cell response is heavily responsive toward secretion of Th1 cytokines specifically IL-2 and IFN-γ (Figure 2). Assessment of combination of cytokines shows that these responses are primarily dominated by monofunctional IFN-γ CD8+ T cells (71).
Figure 2 T cell response during COVID-19 and vaccinated individuals. Both CD4+ (marked by IL-2 expression) and CD8+ T (marked by IFN-γ expression) cell response are peaked at 14 days from the onset of infection. However, after 6 months of COVID-19 infection CD8+ T cell response becomes half of the CD4+ T cell response. SARS-CoV specific T cell response is seen after 17 years that may suggests the persistence of antigen specific memory T cells. Similarly, T cell response are seen in COVID-19 vaccinated individuals which are prominently observed in day 0 to day 28.
Considering the emergence of newer SARS-CoV-2 variants including Omicron, the efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines is crucial to be explored (72). Prominently, sera collected from the second dose of BNT162b2-vaccinated individuals show neutralizing Abs response against several of the emerging SARS-CoV-2 variants (73). Importantly, detection of IFN-γ, IL-12p70, and IL-2 but not IL-4 or IL-5 showed the promising TH1 response along with the absence of deleterious TH2 immune response (74). Likewise, the mRNA-1273 vaccine has been shown to elicit strong CD4 cytokine response specifically type 1 helper T cells (75). Importantly, no correlation of T cell response has been found in these vaccinated individuals toward common cold coronaviruses (CCCs). These vaccines show enhanced T cell response toward peptides derived from SARS-CoV-2 spike as well as toward HCoV-NL63 spike peptides (76).
Conclusions
Severe COVID-19 cases are associated with the macrophage and lymphocyte infiltration to the lungs, which results in lung injury via activation of lymphocytes and hyperinflammatory responses. The T cell response is crucial as compared with the B cell response due to inability of antibody-mediated neutralization of SARS-CoV-2 and its level of reduction in long-term protection. Memory CD4+ T cell response is higher as compared with the memory CD8+ T cell response which might be linked with the compromised long-lasting protection. Considering the presence of memory T cell responses against structural proteins of SARS-CoV after 9 and 11 years of recovery, long-term protection against COVID-19 depends upon the presence of antigen-specific memory T cell response against SARS-CoV-2 which is predominated by CD4+ T cells. However, lymphopenia has been also reported in various severe infections, which results in compromised immune response and death. COVID-19-vaccinated individuals show presence of antigen-specific CD4+ and CD8+ T cells observed on day 0 to day 28. However, the level of these cells in COVID-19-vaccinated individuals defines the long-term protection against forthcoming outbreaks of SARS-CoV-2.
Future Perspectives
The number of SARS-CoV-2 infection is continuously rising with the emergence of more mutant strains. A comprehensive understanding of immunological response is crucial for the development of effective immunotherapy and vaccines. Considering the inability of complete protection mediated by antibody response, understanding of memory cell response during SARS-CoV-2 infection is crucial for developing the effective vaccine for long-term protection. Therefore, more clinical studies are required that focus on the memory T cell response during COVID-19 and its associated pathophysiology in natural infection and vaccinated individuals. Therefore, it is really important to look at the specificity of the currently developed vaccine candidates for its effectiveness and protection. Majority of the currently developed vaccines are based on the spike glycoprotein; however, we should also focus on the importance of other structural and non-structural proteins for the development of effective COVID-19 vaccine. Emergence of SARS-CoV-2 variants imposes imperative concerns for COVID-19 vaccination due to their vaccine breakthrough cases. Therefore, the ideal vaccine may focus on the protection against various predominant SARS-CoV-2 variants and be able to induce effective memory T cell generation for long-term protection.
Author Contributions
SS and SK conceived the idea. SK, VM, and SS collected the data, devised the initial draft, and reviewed the final draft. SS, SK, VM, and AT finalized the draft for submission. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher’s Note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Acknowledgments
The authors are grateful to the Vice Chancellor, King George’s Medical University (KGMU) Lucknow, for the encouragement for this work. The authors have no other relevant affiliations or financial involvement with any organization or entity with a financial interest in or financial conflict with the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript apart from those disclosed.
References
1. Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) Pandemic. World Health Organization (WHO). Available at: https://www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-2019 (Accessed on 27 Oct 2021).
2. Gorbalenya AE, Baker SC, Baric RS, de Groot RJ, Drosten C, Gulyaeva AA, et al. (Coronaviridae Study Group of the International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses). The Species Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome-Related Coronavirus: Classifying 2019-Ncov and Naming it SARS-CoV-2. Nat Microbiol (2020) 5(4):536–44. doi: 10.1038/s41564-020-0695-z
3. Transmission of SARS-CoV-2: Implications for Infection Prevention Precautions. World Health Organization (WHO). Available at: https://www.who.int/news-room/commentaries/detail/transmission-of-sars-cov-2-implications-for-infection-prevention-precautions (Accessed on 27 Oct 2021).
4. Kumar S, Saxena SK. Structural and Molecular Perspectives of SARS-CoV-2. Methods (2021) 195:23–8. doi: 10.1016/j.ymeth.2021.03.007
5. Kumar S, Nyodu R, Maurya VK, Saxena SK. Morphology, Genome Organization, Replication, and Pathogenesis of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Coronavirus Dis 2019 (COVID-19) (2020) 30:23–31. doi: 10.1007/978-981-15-4814-7_3
6. Hoffmann M, Kleine-Weber H, Schroeder S, Krüger N, Herrler T, Erichsen S, et al. SARS-CoV-2 Cell Entry Depends on ACE2 and TMPRSS2 and Is Blocked by a Clinically Proven Protease Inhibitor. Cell (2020) 181(2):271–80.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2020.02.052
7. V’kovski P, Kratzel A, Steiner S, Stalder H, Thiel V. Coronavirus Biology and Replication: Implications for SARS-CoV-2. Nat Rev Microbiol (2021) 19(3):155–70. doi: 10.1038/s41579-020-00468-6
8. Yan R, Zhang Y, Li Y, Xia L, Guo Y, Zhou Q. Structural Basis for the Recognition of SARS-CoV-2 by Full-Length Human ACE2. Science (2020) 367(6485):1444–8. doi: 10.1126/science.abb2762
9. Zhang L, Lin D, Sun X, Curth U, Drosten C, Sauerhering L, et al. Crystal Structure of SARS-CoV-2 Main Protease Provides a Basis for Design of Improved α-Ketoamide Inhibitors. Science (2020) 368(6489):409–12. doi: 10.1126/science.abb3405
10. Kang S, Yang M, Hong Z, Zhang L, Huang Z, Chen X, et al. Crystal Structure of SARS-CoV-2 Nucleocapsid Protein RNA Binding Domain Reveals Potential Unique Drug Targeting Sites. Acta Pharm Sin B (2020) 10(7):1228–38. doi: 10.1016/j.apsb.2020.04.009
11. Krafcikova P, Silhan J, Nencka R, Boura E. Structural Analysis of the SARS-CoV-2 Methyltransferase Complex Involved in RNA Cap Creation Bound to Sinefungin. Nat Commun (2020) 11(1):3717. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-17495-9
12. Wheatley AK, Juno JA, Wang JJ, Selva KJ, Reynaldi A, Tan HX, et al. Evolution of Immune Responses to SARS-CoV-2 in Mild-Moderate COVID-19. Nat Commun (2021) 12(1):1162. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-21444-5
13. Cox RJ, Brokstad KA. Not Just Antibodies: B Cells and T Cells Mediate Immunity to COVID-19. Nat Rev Immunol (2020) 20(10):581–2. doi: 10.1038/s41577-020-00436-4
14. Sherina N, Piralla A, Du L, Wan H, Kumagai-Braesch M, Andréll J, et al. Persistence of SARS-CoV-2-Specific B and T Cell Responses in Convalescent COVID-19 Patients 6-8 Months After the Infection. Med (N Y) (2021) 2(3):281–95.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.medj.2021.02.001
15. Kabir R, Mahmud I, Chowdhury MTH, Vinnakota D, Jahan SS, Siddika N, et al. COVID-19 Vaccination Intent and Willingness to Pay in Bangladesh: A Cross-Sectional Study. Vaccines (Basel) (2021) 9(5):416. doi: 10.3390/vaccines9050416
16. Chowdhury MTH, Hoque Apu E, Nath SK, Noor AE, Podder CP, Mahmud I, et al. Exploring the Knowledge, Awareness and Practices of COVID-19 Among Dentists in Bangladesh: A Cross-Sectional Investigation. J Oral Res (2021) 10(3):1–12. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-56753/v1
17. Yuki K, Fujiogi M, Koutsogiannaki S. COVID-19 Pathophysiology: A Review. Clin Immunol (2020) 215:108427. doi: 10.1016/j.clim.2020.108427
18. Cao X. COVID-19: Immunopathology and Its Implications for Therapy. Nature Reviews. Immunology (2020) 20(5):269–70. doi: 10.1038/s41577-020-0308-3
19. Yang X, Yu Y, Xu J, Shu H, Xia J, Liu H, et al. Clinical Course and Outcomes of Critically Ill Patients With SARS-CoV-2 Pneumonia in Wuhan, China: A Single-Centered, Retrospective, Observational Study. Lancet Respir Med (2020) 8(5):475–81. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(20)30079-5
20. Yang L, Liu S, Liu J, Zhang Z, Wan X, Huang B, et al. COVID-19: Immunopathogenesis and Immunotherapeutics. Signal Transduct Target Ther (2020) 5(1):128. doi: 10.1038/s41392-020-00243-2
21. Zhao Q, Meng M, Kumar R, Wu Y, Huang J, Deng Y, et al. Lymphopenia Is Associated With Severe Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Infections: A Systemic Review and Meta-Analysis. Int J Infect Dis (2020) 96:131–5. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2020.04.086
22. Sun DW, Zhang D, Tian RH, Li Y, Wang YS, Cao J, et al. The Underlying Changes and Predicting Role of Peripheral Blood Inflammatory Cells in Severe COVID-19 Patients: A Sentinel? Clin Chim Acta (2020) 508:122–9. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2020.05.027
23. Costela-Ruiz VJ, Illescas-Montes R, Puerta-Puerta JM, Ruiz C, Melguizo-Rodríguez L. SARS-CoV-2 Infection: The Role of Cytokines in COVID-19 Disease. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev (2020) 54:62–75. doi: 10.1016/j.cytogfr.2020.06.001
24. Hou H, Wang T, Zhang B, Luo Y, Mao L, Wang F, et al. Detection of IgM and IgG Antibodies in Patients With Coronavirus Disease 2019. Clin Transl Immunol (2020) 9(5):e01136. doi: 10.1002/cti2.1136
25. Poggiali E, Zaino D, Immovilli P, Rovero L, Losi G, Dacrema A, et al. Lactate Dehydrogenase and C-Reactive Protein as Predictors of Respiratory Failure in CoVID-19 Patients. Clin Chim Acta (2020) 509:135–8. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2020.06.012
26. Gustine JN, Jones D. Immunopathology of Hyperinflammation in COVID-19. Am J Pathol (2021) 191(1):4–17. doi: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2020.08.009
27. Rapkiewicz AV, Mai X, Carsons SE, Pittaluga S, Kleiner DE, Berger JS, et al. Megakaryocytes and Platelet-Fibrin Thrombi Characterize Multi-Organ Thrombosis at Autopsy in COVID-19: A Case Series. EClinicalMedicine (2020) 24:100434. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2020.100434
28. Borczuk AC, Salvatore SP, Seshan SV, Patel SS, Bussel JB, Mostyka M, et al. COVID-19 Pulmonary Pathology: A Multi-Institutional Autopsy Cohort From Italy and New York City. Mod Pathol (2020) 33(11):2156–68. doi: 10.1038/s41379-020-00661-1
29. Verity R, Okell LC, Dorigatti I, Winskill P, Whittaker C, Imai N, et al. Estimates of the Severity of Coronavirus Disease 2019: A Model-Based Analysis. Lancet Infect Dis (2020) 20(6):669–77. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30243-7
30. Del Valle DM, Kim-Schulze S, Huang HH, Beckmann ND, Nirenberg S, Wang B, et al. An Inflammatory Cytokine Signature Predicts COVID-19 Severity and Survival. Nat Med (2020) 26(10):1636–43. doi: 10.1038/s41591-020-1051-9
31. Jose RJ, Manuel A. COVID-19 Cytokine Storm: The Interplay Between Inflammation and Coagulation. Lancet Respir Med (2020) 8(6):e46–7. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(20)30216-2
32. Vaninov N. In the Eye of the COVID-19 Cytokine Storm. Nat Rev Immunol (2020) 20(5):277. doi: 10.1038/s41577-020-0305-6
33. Elrobaa IH, New KJ. COVID-19: Pulmonary and Extra Pulmonary Manifestations. Front Public Health (2021) 9:711616. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.711616
34. Noroozi R, Branicki W, Pyrc K, Łabaj PP, Pospiech E, Taheri M, et al. Altered Cytokine Levels and Immune Responses in Patients With SARS-CoV-2 Infection and Related Conditions. Cytokine (2020) 133:155143. doi: 10.1016/j.cyto.2020.155143
35. Costela-Ruiz VJ, Illescas-Montes R, Puerta-Puerta JM, Ruiz C, Melguizo-Rodríguez L. SARS-CoV-2 Infection: The Role of Cytokines in COVID-19 Disease. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev (2020) 54:62–75. doi: 10.1016/j.cytogfr.2020.06.001
36. Leisman DE, Ronner L, Pinotti R, Taylor MD, Sinha P, Calfee CS, et al. Cytokine Elevation in Severe and Critical COVID-19: A Rapid Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis, and Comparison With Other Inflammatory Syndromes. Lancet Respir Med (2020) 8(12):1233–44. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(20)30404-5
37. Swadling L. Maini MK. T Cells in COVID-19 - United in Diversity. Nat Immunol (2020) 21(11):1307–8. doi: 10.1038/s41590-020-0798-y
38. Tay MZ, Poh CM, Rénia L, MacAry PA, Ng LFP. The Trinity of COVID-19: Immunity, Inflammation and Intervention. Nat Rev Immunol (2020) 20(6):363–74. doi: 10.1038/s41577-020-0311-8
39. Chen Z, John Wherry E. T Cell Responses in Patients With COVID-19. Nat Rev Immunol (2020) 20(9):529–36. doi: 10.1038/s41577-020-0402-6
40. De Biasi S, Meschiari M, Gibellini L, Bellinazzi C, Borella R, Fidanza L, et al. Marked T Cell Activation, Senescence, Exhaustion and Skewing Towards TH17 in Patients With COVID-19 Pneumonia. Nat Commun (2020) 11(1):3434. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-23957/v1
41. Rha MS, Jeong HW, Ko JH, Choi SJ, Seo IH, Lee JS, et al. PD-1-Expressing SARS-CoV-2-Specific CD8+ T Cells Are Not Exhausted, But Functional in Patients With COVID-19. Immunity (2021) 54(1):44–52.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2020.12.002
42. Kang CK, Han GC, Kim M, Kim G, Shin HM, Song KH, et al. Aberrant Hyperactivation of Cytotoxic T-Cell as a Potential Determinant of COVID-19 Severity. Int J Infect Dis (2020) 97:313–21. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2020.05.106
43. Braun J, Loyal L, Frentsch M, Wendisch D, Georg P, Kurth F, et al. SARS-CoV-2-Reactive T Cells in Healthy Donors and Patients With COVID-19. Nature (2020) 587(7833):270–4. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2598-9
44. Mathew D, Giles JR, Baxter AE, Oldridge DA, Greenplate AR, Wu JE, et al. Deep Immune Profiling of COVID-19 Patients Reveals Distinct Immunotypes With Therapeutic Implications. Science (2020) 369(6508):eabc8511. doi: 10.1126/science.abc8511
45. Peng Y, Mentzer AJ, Liu G, Yao X, Yin Z, Dong D, et al. Broad and Strong Memory CD4+ and CD8+ T Cells Induced by SARS-CoV-2 in UK Convalescent Individuals Following COVID-19. Nat Immunol (2020) 21(11):1336–45. doi: 10.1038/s41590-020-0782-6
46. Grifoni A, Weiskopf D, Ramirez SI, Mateus J, Dan JM, Moderbacher CR, et al. Targets of T Cell Responses to SARS-CoV-2 Coronavirus in Humans With COVID-19 Disease and Unexposed Individuals. Cell (2020) 181(7):1489–501.e15. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2020.05.015
47. Gong F, Dai Y, Zheng T, Cheng L, Zhao D, Wang H, et al. Peripheral CD4+ T Cell Subsets and Antibody Response in COVID-19 Convalescent Individuals. J Clin Invest (2020) 130(12):6588–99. doi: 10.1172/JCI141054
48. Tan YJ, Goh PY, Fielding BC, Shen S, Chou CF, Fu JL, et al. Profiles of Antibody Responses Against Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus Recombinant Proteins and Their Potential Use as Diagnostic Markers. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol (2004) 11(2):362–71. doi: 10.1128/cdli.11.2.362-371.2004
49. Wajnberg A, Amanat F, Firpo A, Altman DR, Bailey MJ, Mansour M, et al. Robust Neutralizing Antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 Infection Persist for Months. Science (2020) 370(6521):1227–30. doi: 10.1126/science.abd7728
50. Goldman JD, Wang K, Roltgen K, Nielsen SCA, Roach JC, Naccache SN, et al. Reinfection With SARS-CoV-2 and Failure of Humoral Immunity: A Case Report. medRxiv (2020) 2020.09.22.20192443. doi: 10.1101/2020.09.22.20192443
51. Townsend JP, Hassler HB, Wang Z, Miura S, Singh J, Kumar S, et al. The Durability of Immunity Against Reinfection by SARS-CoV-2: A Comparative Evolutionary Study. Lancet Microbe (2021) 2(12):e666–75. doi: 10.1016/S2666-5247(21)00219-6
52. Maemura T, Kuroda M, Armbrust T, Yamayoshi S, Halfmann PJ, Kawaoka Y. Antibody-Dependent Enhancement of SARS-CoV-2 Infection Is Mediated by the IgG Receptors Fcγriia and Fcγriiia But Does Not Contribute to Aberrant Cytokine Production by Macrophages. mBio (2021) 12(5):e0198721. doi: 10.1128/mBio.01987-21
53. Zohar T, Loos C, Fischinger S, Atyeo C, Wang C, Slein MD, et al. Compromised Humoral Functional Evolution Tracks With SARS-CoV-2 Mortality. Cell (2020) 183(6):1508–19.e12. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2020.10.052
54. Woodruff MC, Ramonell RP, Nguyen DC, Cashman KS, Saini AS, Haddad NS, et al. Extrafollicular B Cell Responses Correlate With Neutralizing Antibodies and Morbidity in COVID-19. Nat Immunol (2020) 21(12):1506–16. doi: 10.1038/s41590-020-00814-z
55. Varnaitė R, García M, Glans H, Maleki KT, Sandberg JT, Tynell J, et al. Expansion of SARS-CoV-2-Specific Antibody-Secreting Cells and Generation of Neutralizing Antibodies in Hospitalized COVID-19 Patients. J Immunol (2020) 205(9):2437–46. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.2000717
56. Zhao Q, Meng M, Kumar R, Wu Y, Huang J, Deng Y, et al. Lymphopenia Is Associated With Severe Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Infections: A Systemic Review and Meta-Analysis. Int J Infect Dis (2020) 96:131–5. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2020.04.086
57. Westmeier J, Paniskaki K, Karaköse Z, Werner T, Sutter K, Dolff S, et al. Impaired Cytotoxic CD8+ T Cell Response in Elderly COVID-19 Patients. mBio (2020) 11(5):e02243–20. doi: 10.1128/mBio.02243-20
58. Mahmoudi S, Rezaei M, Mansouri N, Marjani M, Mansouri D. Immunologic Features in Coronavirus Disease 2019: Functional Exhaustion of T Cells and Cytokine Storm. J Clin Immunol (2020) 40(7):974–6. doi: 10.1007/s10875-020-00824-4
59. Vabret N, Britton GJ, Gruber C, Hegde S, Kim J, Kuksin M, et al. Immunology of COVID-19: Current State of the Science. Immunity (2020) 52(6):910–41. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2020.05.002
60. Tan L, Wang Q, Zhang D, Ding J, Huang Q, Tang YQ, et al. Lymphopenia Predicts Disease Severity of COVID-19: A Descriptive and Predictive Study. Signal Transduct Target Ther (2020) 5(1):33. doi: 10.1038/s41392-020-0148-4
61. Cañete PF, Vinuesa CG. COVID-19 Makes B Cells Forget, But T Cells Remember. Cell (2020) 183(1):13–5. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2020.09.013
62. Sekine T, Perez-Potti A, Rivera-Ballesteros O, Strålin K, Gorin JB, Olsson A, et al. Robust T Cell Immunity in Convalescent Individuals With Asymptomatic or Mild COVID-19. Cell (2020) 183(1):158–68.e14. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2020.08.017
63. Oh HL, Chia A, Chang CX, Leong HN, Ling KL, Grotenbreg GM, et al. Engineering T Cells Specific for a Dominant Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus CD8 T Cell Epitope. J Virol (2011) 85(20):10464–71. doi: 10.1128/JVI.05039-11
64. Janice Oh HL, Ken-En Gan S, Bertoletti A, Tan YJ. Understanding the T Cell Immune Response in SARS Coronavirus Infection. Emerg Microbes Infect (2012) 1(9):e23. doi: 10.1038/emi.2012.26
65. Ng OW, Chia A, Tan AT, Jadi RS, Leong HN, Bertoletti A, et al. Memory T Cell Responses Targeting the SARS Coronavirus Persist Up to 11 Years Post-Infection. Vaccine (2016) 34(17):2008–14. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2016.02.063
66. Brunk F, Moritz A, Nelde A, Bilich T, Casadei N, Fraschka SAK, et al. SARS-CoV-2-Reactive T-Cell Receptors Isolated From Convalescent COVID-19 Patients Confer Potent T-Cell Effector Function. Eur J Immunol (2021) 51(11):2651–64. doi: 10.1002/eji.202149290
67. Le Bert N, Tan AT, Kunasegaran K, Tham CYL, Hafezi M, Chia A, et al. SARS-CoV-2-Specific T Cell Immunity in Cases of COVID-19 and SARS, and Uninfected Controls. Nature (2020) 584(7821):457–62. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2550-z
68. Zuo J, Dowell AC, Pearce H, Verma K, Long HM, Begum J, et al. Robust SARS-CoV-2-Specific T Cell Immunity is Maintained at 6 Months Following Primary Infection. Nat Immunol (2021) 22(5):620–6. doi: 10.1038/s41590-021-00902-8
69. Matyushenko V, Isakova-Sivak I, Kudryavtsev I, Goshina A, Chistyakova A, Stepanova E, et al. Detection of Ifnγ-Secreting CD4+ and CD8+ Memory T Cells in COVID-19 Convalescents After Stimulation of Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells With Live SARS-CoV-2. Viruses (2021) 13(8):1490. doi: 10.3390/v13081490
70. Lineburg KE, Neller MA, Ambalathingal GR, Le Texier L, Raju J, Swaminathan S, et al. Rapid Whole-Blood Assay to Detect SARS-CoV-2-Specific Memory T-Cell Immunity Following a Single Dose of AstraZeneca ChAdOx1-S COVID-19 Vaccine. Clin Transl Immunol (2021) 10(8):e1326. doi: 10.1002/cti2.1326
71. Ewer KJ, Barrett JR, Belij-Rammerstorfer S, Sharpe H, Makinson R, Morter R, et al. T Cell and Antibody Responses Induced by a Single Dose of ChAdOx1 Ncov-19 (AZD1222) Vaccine in a Phase 1/2 Clinical Trial. Nat Med (2021) 27(2):270–8. doi: 10.1038/s41591-020-01194-5
72. Saxena SK, Kumar S, Ansari S, Paweska JT, Maurya VK, Tripathi AK, et al. Characterization of the Novel SARS‐CoV‐2 Omicron (B.1.1.529) Variant of Concern and Its Global Perspective. J Med Virol (2022) 1–7. doi: 10.1002/jmv.27524
73. Liu J, Liu Y, Xia H, Zou J, Weaver SC, Swanson KA, et al. BNT162b2-Elicited Neutralization of B.1.617 and Other SARS-CoV-2 Variants. Nature (2021) 596(7871):273–5. doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-03693-y
74. Sahin U, Muik A, Derhovanessian E, Vogler I, Kranz LM, Vormehr M, et al. COVID-19 Vaccine BNT162b1 Elicits Human Antibody and TH1 T Cell Responses. Nature (2020) 586(7830):594–9. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2814-7
75. Anderson EJ, Rouphael NG, Widge AT, Jackson LA, Roberts PC, Makhene M, et al. Safety and Immunogenicity of SARS-CoV-2 mRNA-1273 Vaccine in Older Adults. N Engl J Med (2020) 383(25):2427–38. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2028436
Keywords: SARS-CoV-2, COVID-19, T cell response, B cell response, immunopathogenesis, cytokine storm, memory T cell response
Citation: Kumar S, Saxena SK, Maurya VK and Tripathi AK (2022) Progress and Challenges Toward Generation and Maintenance of Long-Lived Memory T Lymphocyte Responses During COVID-19. Front. Immunol. 12:804808. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.804808
Received: 29 October 2021; Accepted: 13 December 2021;
Published: 17 February 2022.
Edited by:
Jin-Hwan Han, Merck, United StatesReviewed by:
Russell Kabir, Anglia Ruskin University, United KingdomCopyright © 2022 Kumar, Saxena, Maurya and Tripathi. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Shailendra K. Saxena, shailen@kgmcindia.edu
†These authors have contributed equally to this work and share first authorship