Terence Peter Scott1
Louis Hendrik Nel1,2*- 1Global Alliance for Rabies Control, Manhattan, KS, United States
- 2Department of Biochemistry, Genetics and Microbiology, Faculty of Natural and Agricultural Sciences, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa
Lyssaviruses cause the disease rabies, which is a fatal encephalitic disease resulting in approximately 59,000 human deaths annually. The prototype species, rabies lyssavirus, is the most prevalent of all lyssaviruses and poses the greatest public health threat. In Africa, six confirmed and one putative species of lyssavirus have been identified. Rabies lyssavirus remains endemic throughout mainland Africa, where the domestic dog is the primary reservoir – resulting in the highest per capita death rate from rabies globally. Rabies is typically transmitted through the injection of virus-laden saliva through a bite or scratch from an infected animal. Due to the inhibition of specific immune responses by multifunctional viral proteins, the virus usually replicates at low levels in the muscle tissue and subsequently enters the peripheral nervous system at the neuromuscular junction. Pathogenic rabies lyssavirus strains inhibit innate immune signaling and induce cellular apoptosis as the virus progresses to the central nervous system and brain using viral protein facilitated retrograde axonal transport. Rabies manifests in two different forms - the encephalitic and the paralytic form - with differing clinical manifestations and survival times. Disease symptoms are thought to be due mitochondrial dysfunction, rather than neuronal apoptosis. While much is known about rabies, there remain many gaps in knowledge about the neuropathology of the disease. It should be emphasized however, that rabies is vaccine preventable and dog-mediated human rabies has been eliminated in various countries. The global elimination of dog-mediated human rabies in the foreseeable future is therefore an entirely feasible goal.
Introduction
Lyssaviruses are responsible for rabies, which is arguably the deadliest encephalitic disease known. The prototype, rabies lyssavirus (RABV), is thought to be able to infect all terrestrial mammals. Transmission is through virus-laden saliva, typically through the bite of an infected animal, but sometimes through other means such as scratches and in rare occasions, organ transplants and other means (1, 2). The genus Lyssavirus (family Rhabdoviridae) is presently composed of 17 viral species and one putative (3). All lyssaviruses are bullet-shaped particles containing negative sense RNA genomes of approximately 11 000 nucleotides in length. The genome encodes 5 structural proteins, namely the nucleoprotein, phosphoprotein, matrix protein, glycoprotein, and the polymerase (5’-N-P-M-G-L-3’) with a 5’ – 3’ transcriptional bias (4, 5). The N protein encapsidates the viral RNA, and together with the P and L proteins, forms the ribonucleoprotein (RNP) complex, which can initiate viral transcription and replication (6). The M protein condenses the RNP into the characteristic bullet-shape and recruits the RNP to the cellular membrane during replication. The M protein is also essential for the budding of the enveloped virus from the cell and specifically interacts with the G protein – also known as the transmembrane spike protein, which is the primary antigenic determinant (7, 8).
RABV is not only the type species of the genus, but by far poses the most significant public health threat among all the lyssaviruses. The domestic dog is the primary reservoir for RABV in dog-rabies endemic countries, but several other terrestrial mammalian species can maintain transmission – most notably carnivores such as raccoons, skunks, foxes, and jackals.
The Global Burden of Dog Rabies
Globally, an estimated 59,000 people die from dog-mediated rabies every year, of which approximately 40% are children under the age of 15 years (9). Rabies affects the poorest and most underserved communities, with the burden being greatest in developing countries of Africa and Asia (10). However, the disease is seriously underreported for a variety of reasons and remains among the most significant diseases of neglect in the world (11).
By continent, Africa has the second highest burden of rabies, with an estimated 23,500 deaths annually, and has the highest per capita death rate (9). RABV is endemic throughout mainland Africa, with only a handful of island nations having never detected rabies in domestic or wildlife species (e.g., La Réunion, Mayotte, Mauritius) (12).
Of the seventeen recognized lyssavirus species, six confirmed and one putative species have been identified in Africa, namely, RABV, Duvenhage virus (DUVV), Lagos bat lyssavirus (LBV), Mokola lyssavirus (MOKV), Ikoma lyssavirus (IKOV), Shimoni Bat Lyssavirus (SHIBV) and the putative Matlo lyssavirus. Of these, only DUVV (n=3), MOKV (n=2) and RABV have been associated with human fatalities (13). While RABV is only associated with non-volant terrestrial mammals in Africa, DUVV and LBV are both associated with bat reservoirs, while IKOV and MOKV have yet unidentified reservoirs (14, 15).
Pathophysiology
Viral Entry, Spread and Proliferation
The most common method of viral entry is through the injection of virus-containing saliva into the muscle tissue or other peripheral tissue through the bite of an infected animal (Figure 1). After inoculation, RABV typically infects muscle cells — thought to be facilitated through the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor — and replicates therein at a low rate (16). The virus remains localized to the inoculation site for variable periods — which may contribute to the variable incubation period characteristic of rabies (17). In contrast, in the case of higher titers of inoculum, RABV can infect motor endplates without the need for the initial replication in the muscle (18). RABV gains entry into the peripheral nervous system (PNS) via motor endplates at the neuromuscular junction, but the exact means of virus internalization remains poorly understood.
Figure 1 Key insights of Rabies lyssavirus (RABV) entry, spread and proliferation, and some important functionalities of each RABV protein. IFN, Interferon; CNS, Central nervous system; PNS, Peripheral nervous system; RNP, Ribonucleoprotein complex.
RABV travels through the PNS towards the CNS via microtubule dependent retrograde fast axonal transport (19, 20). The virus travels from neuron to neuron, replicates, and continues its progression towards the CNS and the brain (21). This neuronal spread is facilitated by the p75NTR receptor, which is non-essential for infection, but facilitates directed and more rapid transport of RABV to the CNS (22). The L protein manipulates microtubules for improved transport efficiency (23), while the M protein facilitates the depolymerization of microtubules resulting in improved viral transcription and replication efficiency (24) (Figure 1). While retrograde transport occurs at an approximate rate of 50 – 100mm per day in humans [with species-dependent variation (20, 25)], evidence also suggests that RABV undergoes active, G protein-dependent anterograde transport in peripheral neurons - such as Dorsal Route Ganglion (DRG) neurons — at a rate three times faster than that of retrograde transport (25). However, the significance of this anterograde transport mechanism is unclear, but recent evidence signifies its importance in the spread of RABV through the PNS (including to non-neuronal organs) after centrifugal spread from the CNS (26), contrasting previous evidence that suggested that RABV spreads by both axonal and trans-synaptic transport exclusively in the retrograde direction (21, 27). Once in the CNS, RABV continues to spread via retrograde axonal transport thought to be facilitated by metabotropic glutamate receptor subtype 2, which is a cellular entry receptor that is abundant throughout the central nervous system (CNS) (28). The virus reaches the brainstem and subsequently the brain, where it proliferates and clinical symptoms manifest. It spreads to the salivary glands along terminal axons via anterograde transport (29) where it continues to proliferate and is subsequently shed in the saliva for transmission to another host. RABV can spread to peripheral, non-neuronal organs anterograde transport, and can be detected in these sites after the onset of clinical symptoms (21, 26).
Symptoms, Disease Progression, Prevention, and Treatment
Rabies presents with a wide variety of clinical manifestations that vary depending on multiple factors, many of which remain unknown. However, the species of lyssavirus or the strain of RABV influences the presentation of differing clinical symptoms. For example, bat RABV infections more commonly present with tremors and involuntary twitching/jerking (myoclonus), while dog strains more frequently present with classical hydrophobia and aerophobia (30). Moreover, the presentation of symptoms localized to the wound were more common in bat rabies exposures than in dog-rabies exposures (30). Two forms of rabies can manifest, namely encephalitic (furious or classical) and paralytic (dumb) rabies. The encephalitic form of rabies is more common and presents in approximately 80% of patients, of which between 50 – 80% present with the classic symptoms such as hydrophobia and aerophobia – symptoms that are unique to rabies (31, 32). However, the remaining symptoms are common to many encephalitic diseases, especially in African countries where diseases such as cerebral malaria are endemic and can result in misdiagnosis of rabies (33). Encephalitic rabies typically progresses to severe flaccid paralysis, coma and death caused by multiple organ failure, in contrast to paralytic rabies which manifests with prominent muscle weakness early in the course of illness (31). While there remains a gap in the understanding of the causes for the manifestation of these two different forms of rabies, it is known that the anatomical site of the exposure is unrelated (34). Initially rabies symptoms were thought to be caused by large-scale neuronal cell death, but neuronal apoptosis is only stimulated during infection with low pathogenicity strains (35, 36). Rather, symptoms are thought to be due to neuronal cell dysfunction (35, 37–41), partly induced by the increased production of Nitric Oxide (NO) via inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) in neurons and macrophages (42–44). Elevated levels of NO produced by iNOS leads to mitochondrial dysfunction and as a result, axonal swelling (44, 45) — a pathology that is associated with the onset of symptoms (41, 46), and hypothetically explains the development of encephalitic symptoms (47). Another mechanism behind neurological dysfunction and the onset of neurological symptoms has been demonstrated to be reliant upon a host-derived mechanism that results in the loss of axons and dendrites as a means to prevent the spread of the virus (48).
The survival time for patients manifesting paralytic rabies is approximately 41% longer than that of patients with encephalitic rabies (30, 49), yet the incubation periods for both forms remain similar – ranging from 2 weeks to several months. For most cases, the incubation period is 2 – 3 months in humans, but some exceptional cases have been documented with an incubation period of more than a year and even up to 8 years (50, 51). There is no known accepted treatment for rabies after the onset of clinical symptoms. Palliative care is recommended for rabies patients, which is aimed to reduce suffering and may temporarily prolong survival time, but in all but the most exceptional circumstances, the victim succumbs to the disease (32, 50). However, effective pre- and post-exposure prophylaxis exists for those viruses that fall within lyssavirus phylogroup 1 [RABV, European bat lyssavirus-1 and -2, Bokeloh bat lyssavirus, DUVV, Australian bat lyssavirus, Aravan lyssavirus, Khujand lyssavirus, Irkut lyssavirus, Taiwan bat lyssavirus, Gannoruwa bat lyssavirus (GBLV)]. Experimental evidence suggests that the vaccines are not effective against phylogroup 2 (LBV, MOKV, SHIBV) or phylogroup 3 lyssaviruses (IKOV, West Caucasian bat lyssavirus, Lleida bat lyssavirus) (50, 52–56).
Immune Response and Immune Evasion
Upon initial infection, the innate immune response is triggered in the periphery and evidence suggests that this response is partially effective against even the most pathogenic strains, with some viral particles being eliminated (57). However, further clearance is not achieved as pathogenic strains poorly stimulate and inhibit the activation and maturation of dendritic cells, resulting in a poorer antibody immune response (58–60). This prevention of the maturation of DCs is achieved through the inhibition of the interferon (IFN) autocrine feedback loop that is dependent on JAK-STAT signaling, which is specifically inhibited by the P protein (61).
The ability of lyssaviruses to evade the immune response is directly correlated to its pathogenicity, with pathogenic strains inducing a minimal response and successfully evading immune clearance (18). All the RABV proteins are multifunctional, with roles in viral entry, replication and spread, as well as in the sequestration of the immune system – either directly or indirectly (62). This ability is reliant solely on the immune-suppressive capabilities of viral proteins - primarily being the P, G and N proteins. The P protein is typically involved in sequestering the innate immune response by inhibiting the production of multiple antiviral products such as MxA, OAS1 and IFN-stimulated gene products (62). Furthermore, the P protein inhibits type I IFN responses and subsequent innate and adaptive immune responses through the inhibition of various IFN-related signaling pathways (63–67). The evasion of IFN responses in infected neurons is likely to be essential for the spread of RABV through the PNS, enabling the virus to reach the brainstem and eventually the salivary glands for spread to a new host (57). Similarly, the N is also predominantly involved in the sequestration of the innate response, primarily through the inhibition of RIG-I activation (68–70). Apoptosis in macrophages, T cells (including infiltrating T cells in the CNS) and microglia plays an important role in immune evasion and is stimulated by the G protein of pathogenic strains (71, 72), which appears to assist in the effective infiltration, replication and spread of the virus in the CNS (36, 73, 74).
Discussion
While rabies has arguably been recognized for thousands of years, there remain many gaps in scientific knowledge of the disease and its causal agents. The rapid detection of 10 novel lyssaviruses in the past two decades raises multiple public health concerns, with their broader distribution and possible public health impact being yet unknown (13, 75). While information relating to many of the lyssavirus species remains poor, studies suggest that sustained spillover events from non-RABV lyssaviruses are likely to be rare, as almost all lyssaviruses – except for RABV and ABLV – are restricted to a single host species (76). However, many lyssavirus species have only a single, or few, isolates, including the novel GBLV which has a recent common ancestor with ABLV (56). In addition, host shifts in areas where RABV is endemic are likely to remain undetected due to poor surveillance (76). While host shift events remain rare, their impact can be devastating. North America alone is endemic for multiple terrestrial RABV variants, each being resultant of a host shift event (77). While host shift events may be geographically restricted, the potential for the translocation of the virus through human means remains a distinct possibility and risk (78–81). For example, the largest epizootic in recorded history resulted from the human-mediated translocation of a raccoon from the south-east of the United States to the north-eastern states (82). Further evidence suggests that raccoon rabies was enzootic at low levels for many years before its detection, natural spread, and subsequent human translocation (83). The raccoon RABV variant now accounts for nearly 75% of all terrestrial rabies cases in the USA and resulted in a significant increase in the number of human exposures in those areas where it is endemic (84). Thus, despite the rabies-related viruses not posing a significant health threat at present, continued efforts need to be made to ensure public health safety based on the limited knowledge and surveillance data available.
Despite the availability of an effective prophylactic treatment before the onset of symptoms, there remains no cure once rabies symptoms manifest. In addition, the majority of immunopathological knowledge available pertains to RABV, with limited studies being available for the rabies-related lyssaviruses. Therefore, there is a need for continued investigation into the mechanisms of infection, disease progression, host biology and a better understanding of bat immunology. Over and above, there is a dire need for improved global surveillance for all lyssaviruses. Given the significant public health threat posed by dog-mediated RABV, such surveillance data should play a critical role in the elimination of the disease from those dog populations where it is still rampant due to a failure to effectively break transmission through mass vaccination.
Author Contributions
TS: Conception, preparation of first draft, editing and final review. LN: Conception, editing and final review. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher’s Note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to credit the ‘Dog and man’ image to ‘Freepik from Flaticon.com’. The ‘Rabies virus’ image, adapted under Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, is owned by the authors.
References
1. Zhang J, Lin J, Tian Y, Ma L, Sun W, Zhang L, et al. Transmission of Rabies Through Solid Organ Transplantation: A Notable Problem in China. BMC Infect Dis (2018) 18(1):273. doi: 10.1186/s12879-018-3112-y
2. World Health Organization. WHO Expert Consultation on Rabies. Third Report. In: World Health Organization Technical Report Series, vol. 1012. Geneva: World Health Organization (2018). Available at: http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/272364/9789241210218-eng.pdf?ua=1.
3. Walker PJ, Blasdell KR, Calisher CH, Dietzgen RG, Kondo H, Kurath G, et al. ICTV Virus Taxonomy Profile: Rhabdoviridae. J General Virol (2018) 99:447–8. doi: 10.1099/jgv.0.001020
4. Tordo N, Poch O, Ermine A, Keith G, Rougeon F. Walking Along the Rabies Genome: Is the Large G-L Intergenic Region a Remnant Gene? Proc Natl Acad Sci USA (1986) 83(11):3914–8. doi: 10.1073/pnas.83.11.3914.
5. Finke S, Cox JHJH, Conzelmann KKK. Differential Transcription Attenuation of Rabies Virus Genes by Intergenic Regions: Generation of Recombinant Viruses Overexpressing the Polymerase Gene. J Virol (2000) 74(16):7261–9. doi: 10.1128/JVI.74.16.7261-7269.2000
6. Yang J, Hooper DC, Wunner WH, Koprowski H, Dietzschold B, Fu ZF. The Specificity of Rabies Virus RNA Encapsidation by Nucleoprotein. Virol (1998) 242(1):107–17. doi: 10.1006/viro.1997.9022
7. Benmansour A, Leblois H, Coulon P, Tuffereau C, Gaudin Y, Flamand A, et al. Antigenicity of Rabies Virus Glycoprotein. J Virol (1991) 65(8):4198. doi: 10.1128/jvi.65.8.4198-4203.1991
8. Mebatsion T, Weiland F, Conzelmann K-K. Matrix Protein of Rabies Virus is Responsible for the Assembly and Budding of Bullet-Shaped Particles and Interacts With the Transmembrane Spike Glycoprotein G. J Virol (1999) 73(1):242. doi: 10.1128/JVI.73.1.242-250.1999
9. Hampson K, Coudeville L, Lembo T, Sambo M, Kieffer A, Attlan M, et al. Estimating the Global Burden of Endemic Canine Rabies. PloS Negl Trop Dis (2015) 9(4):e0003709. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0003709
10. Nel LH. Factors Impacting the Control of Rabies. Microbiol Spectr (2013) 1(2):1–12. doi: 10.1128/microbiolspec.OH-0006-2012
11. Nel LH. Discrepancies in Data Reporting for Rabies, Africa. Emerg Infect Dis (2013) 19(4):529–33. doi: 10.3201/eid1904.120185
12. Andriamandimby SF, Héraud J, Ramiandrasoa R, Ratsitorahina M, Rasambainarivo JH, Dacheux L, et al. Surveillance and Control of Rabies in La Reunion, Mayotte, and Madagascar. Vet Res (2013) 44(77):1–9. doi: 10.1186/1297-9716-44-77
13. Markotter W, Coertse J. Bat Lyssaviruses. Rev Sci Tech (2018) 37(2):385–400. doi: 10.20506/rst.37.2.2809
14. Marston D, Horton D, Ngeleja C. Ikoma Lyssavirus, Highly Divergent Novel Lyssavirus in an African Civet. Emerg Infect (2012) 18(4):664–7. doi: 10.3201/eid1804.111553
15. McMahon WC, Coertse J, Kearney T, Keith M, Swanepoel LH, Markotter W. Surveillance of the Rabies-Related Lyssavirus, Mokola in Non-Volant Small Mammals in South Africa. Onderstepoort J Vet Res (2021) 88(1):a1911. doi: 10.4102/ojvr.v88i1.1911
17. Charlton KM, Nadin-Davis S, Casey GA, Wandeler AI. The Long Incubation Period in Rabies: Delayed Progression of Infection in Muscle at the Site of Exposure. Acta Neuropathol (1997) 94(1):73–7. doi: 10.1007/s004010050674
18. Shankar V, Dietzschold B, Koprowski H. Direct Entry of Rabies Virus Into the Central Nervous System Without Prior Local Replication. J Virol (1991) 65(5):2736–8. doi: 10.1128/jvi.65.5.2736-2738.1991
19. Lycke E, Tsiang H. Rabies Virus Infection of Cultured Rat Sensory Neurons. J Virol (1987) 61(9):2733–41. doi: 10.1128/jvi.61.9.2733-2741.1987
20. Tsiang H, Ceccaldi PE, Lycke E. Rabies Virus Infection and Transport in Human Sensory Dorsal Root Ganglia Neurons. J Gen Virol (1991) 72:1191–4. doi: 10.1099/0022-1317-72-5-1191
21. Ugolini G. Rabies Virus as a Transneuronal Tracer of Neuronal Connections. Adv Virus Res (2011) 79:165–202. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-387040-7.00010-X
22. Gluska S, Zahavi E, Chein M, Gradus T, Bauer a, Finke S, et al. Rabies Virus Hijacks and Accelerates the P75ntr Retrograde Axonal Transport Machinery. PloS Pathog (2014) 10(8):e1004348. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1004348
23. Bauer A, Nolden T, Nemitz S, Perlson E, Finke S. A Dynein Light Chain 1 Binding Motif in Rabies Virus Polymerase L Protein Plays a Role in Microtubule Reorganization and Viral Primary Transcription. J Virol (2015) 89(18):9591–600. doi: 10.1128/JVI.01298-15
24. Gu J-Y, Liao M, Zan J, Liu S, Sun D-N, Mo K-K, et al. Rabies Virus Infection Induces Microtubule Depolymerization to Facilitate Viral RNA Synthesis by Upregulating Hdac6. Front Cell Infect Microbiol (2017) 7:1–12. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2017.00146
25. Bauer A, Nolden T, Schröter J, Römer-Oberdörfer A, Gluska S, Perlson E, et al. Anterograde Glycoprotein Dependent Transport of Newly Generated Rabies Virus in Dorsal Root Ganglion Neurons. J Virol (2014) 88(October):14172–83. doi: 10.1128/JVI.02254-14
26. Potratz M, Zaeck LM, Weigel C, Klein A, Freuling CM, Müller T, et al. Neuroglia Infection by Rabies Virus After Anterograde Virus Spread in Peripheral Neurons. Acta Neuropathol Commun (2020) 8(1):1–15. doi: 10.1186/s40478-020-01074-6
27. Kelly RM, Strick PL. Rabies as a Transneuronal Tracer of Circuits in the Central Nervous System. J Neurosci Methods (2000) 103(1):63–71. doi: 10.1016/S0165-0270(00)00296-X
28. Wang J, Wang Z, Liu R, Shuai L, Wang X, Luo J, et al. Metabotropic Glutamate Receptor Subtype 2 Is a Cellular Receptor for Rabies Virus. PloS Pathog (2018) 14(7):e1007189. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1007189.g001
29. Charlton KM, Casey GA, Campbell JB. Experimental Rabies in Skunks: Mechanisms of Infection of the Salivary Glands. Can J Comp Med (1983) 47:363–9.
30. Udow SJ, Marrie RA, Jackson AC. Clinical Features of Dog-And Bat-Acquired Rabies in Humans (2013). Available at: https://academic.oup.com/cid/article/57/5/689/312724.
31. Jackson AC. Human Rabies: A 2016 Update. Curr Infect Dis Rep (2016) 18(11):38. doi: 10.1007/s11908-016-0540-y
32. Jackson AC. Chapter 8 - Human Disease. In: Fooks AR, Jackson AC, editors. Rabies (Fourth Edition), 4th ed. Boston: Academic Press (2020). p. 277–302. Available at: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B978012818705000008X.
33. Mallewa M, Fooks A, Banda D. Rabies Encephalitis in Malaria-Endemic Area, Malawi, Africa. Emerg Infect Dis (2007) 13(1):136–9. doi: 10.3201/eid1301.060810
34. Tirawatnpong S, Hemachudha T, Manutsathit S, Shuangshoti S, Phanthumchinda K, Phanuphak P. Regional Distribution of Rabies Viral Antigen in Central Nervous System of Human Encephalitic and Paralytic Rabies. J Neurol Sci (1989) 92(1):91–9. doi: 10.1016/0022-510X(89)90178-0
35. Li X-Q, Sarmento L, Fu ZF. Degeneration of Neuronal Processes After Infection With Pathogenic, But Not Attenuated, Rabies Viruses. J Virol (2005) 79(15):10063–8. doi: 10.1128/JVI.79.15.10063-10068.2005
36. Fernandes ER, de Andrade HF, Lancellotti CLP, Quaresma JAS, Demachki S, da Costa Vasconcelos PF, et al. In Situ Apoptosis of Adaptive Immune Cells and the Cellular Escape of Rabies Virus in CNS From Patients With Human Rabies Transmitted by Desmodus Rotundus. Virus Res (2011) 156(1–2):121–6. doi: 10.1016/j.virusres.2011.01.006
37. Fu ZF, Jackson AC. Neuronal Dysfunction and Death in Rabies Virus Infection. J Neurovirol (2005) 11(1):101–6. doi: 10.1080/13550280590900445
38. Scott CA, Rossiter JP, Andrew RD, Jackson AC. Structural Abnormalities in Neurons Are Sufficient to Explain the Clinical Disease and Fatal Outcome of Experimental Rabies in Yellow Fluorescent Protein-Expressing Transgenic Mice. J Virol (2008) 82(1):513–21. doi: 10.1128/JVI.01677-07
39. Yan X, Prosniak M, Curtis MT, Weiss ML, Faber M, Dietzschold B, et al. Silver-Haired Bat Rabies Virus Variant Does Not Induce Apoptosis in the Brain of Experimentally Infected Mice. J Neurovirol (2001) 7(6):518–27. doi: 10.1080/135502801753248105
40. Guigoni C, Coulon P. Rabies Virus Is Not Cytolytic for Rat Spinal Motoneurons In Vitro. J Neurovirol (2002) 8(4):306–17. doi: 10.1080/13550280290100761
41. Gholami A, Kassis R, Real E, Delmas O, Guadagnini S, Larrous F, et al. Mitochondrial Dysfunction in Lyssavirus-Induced Apoptosis. J Virol (2008) 82(10):4774–84. doi: 10.1128/JVI.02651-07
42. Shin T, Weinstock D, Castro MD, Hamir AN, Wampler T, Walter M, et al. Immunohistochemical Localization of Endothelial and Inducible Nitric Oxide Synthase Within Neurons of Cattle With Rabies. J Vet Med Sci (2004) 66(5):539–41. doi: 10.1292/jvms.66.539
43. Van Dam A-M, Bauer J, Man-A-Hing WKH, Marquette C, Tilders FJH, Berkenbosch F. Appearance of Inducible Nitric Oxide Synthase in the Rat Central Nervous System After Rabies Virus Infection and During Experimental Allergic Encephalomyelitis But Not After Peripheral Administration of Endotoxin. J Neurosci Res (1995) 40(2):251–60. doi: 10.1002/jnr.490400214
44. Hooper DC, Ohnishi ST, Kean R, Numagami Y, Dietzschold B, Koprowski H. Local Nitric Oxide Production in Viral and Autoimmune Diseases of the Central Nervous System. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA (1995) 92(12):5312–6. doi: 10.1073/pnas.92.12.5312
45. Koprowski H, Zheng YM, Heber-Katz E, Fraser N, Rorke L, Fu ZF, et al. In Vivo Expression of Inducible Nitric Oxide Synthase in Experimentally Induced Neurologic Diseases. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA (1993) 90(7):3024–7. doi: 10.1073/pnas.90.7.3024
46. Jackson AC, Kammouni W, Zherebitskaya E, Fernyhough P. Role of Oxidative Stress in Rabies Virus Infection of Adult Mouse Dorsal Root Ganglion Neurons. J Virol (2010) 84(9):4697–705. doi: 10.1128/JVI.02654-09
47. Jackson AC. Diabolical Effects of Rabies Encephalitis. J Neurovirol (2016) 22(1):8–13. doi: 10.1007/s13365-015-0351-1
48. Sundaramoorthy V, Green D, Locke K, O’Brien CM, Dearnley M, Bingham J. Novel Role of SARM1 Mediated Axonal Degeneration in the Pathogenesis of Rabies. PloS Pathog (2020) 16(2):1–20. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1008343
49. Hemachudha T, Laothamatas J, Rupprecht CE. Human Rabies: A Disease of Complex Neuropathogenetic Mechanisms and Diagnostic Challenges. Lancet (2002) 1(June):101–9. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(02)00041-8
50. WHO. WHO Expert Consultation on Rabies, Third Report. In: WHO Technical Report Series, 3rd, vol. 931. Geneva: World Health Organization (2018). p. 195.
51. Boland TA, McGuone D, Jindal J, Rocha M, Cumming M, Rupprecht CE, et al. Phylogenetic and Epidemiologic Evidence of Multiyear Incubation in Human Rabies. Ann Neurol (2014) 75(1):155–60. doi: 10.1002/ana.24016
52. Malerczyk C, Freuling C, Gniel D, Giesen A, Selhorst T, M??ller T. Cross-Neutralization of Antibodies Induced by Vaccination With Puri Fied Chick Embryo Cell Vaccine (PCECV) Against Different Lyssavirus Species. Hum Vaccines Immunother (2014) 10(10):2799–804. doi: 10.4161/21645515.2014.972741
53. Horton DL, Banyard AC, Marston DA, Wise E, Selden D, Nunez A, et al. Antigenic and Genetic Characterization of a Divergent African Virus, Ikoma Lyssavirus. J Gen Virol (2014) 95(PART 5):1025–32. doi: 10.1099/vir.0.061952-0
54. Ceballos NA, Morón SV, Berciano JM, Nicolás O, López CA, Juste J, et al. Novel Lyssavirus in Bat, Spain. Emerg Infect Dis (2013) 19(5):793–5. doi: 10.3201/eid1905.121071
55. Hu S-C, Hsu C-L, Lee M-S, Wu C-H, Lee S-H, Ting L-J, et al. Lyssavirus in Japanese Pipistrelle, Taiwan. Emerg Infect Dis (2018) 24(4):2016–9. doi: 10.3201/eid2404.171696
56. Gunawardena PS, Marston DA, Ellis RJ, Wise EL, Karawita AC, Breed AC, et al. Lyssavirus in Indian Flying Foxes, Sri Lanka. Emerg Infect Dis (2016) 22(8):1456–9. doi: 10.3201/eid2208.151986
57. Lafon M. Chapter 11 - Immunology. In: Fooks AR, Jackson AC, editors. Rabies (Fourth Edition), 4th ed. Boston: Academic Press (2020). p. 379–99. Available at: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B978012818705000011X.
58. Gnanadurai CW, Yang Y, Huang Y, Li Z, Leyson CM, Cooper TL, et al. Differential Host Immune Responses After Infection With Wild-Type or Lab-Attenuated Rabies Viruses in Dogs. PloS Negl Trop Dis (2015) 9(8):1–15. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0004023
59. Yang Y, Huang Y, Gnanadurai CW, Cao S, Liu X, Cui M, et al. The Inability of Wild-Type Rabies Virus to Activate Dendritic Cells Is Dependent on the Glycoprotein and Correlates With Its Low Level of the De Novo-Synthesized Leader RNA. J Virol (2015) 89:2157–69. doi: 10.1128/JVI.02092-14
60. Chen C, Zhang C, Li H, Wang Z, Yuan Y, Zhou M, et al. TLR4 Regulates Rabies Virus-Induced Humoral Immunity Through Recruitment of Cdc2 to Lymph Organs. J Virol (2021) 95(24):e00829-21. doi: 10.1128/JVI.00829-21
61. Faul EJ, Wanjalla CN, Suthar MS, Gale M, Wirblich C, Schnell MJ. Rabies Virus Infection Induces Type I Interferon Production in an IPS-1 Dependent Manner While Dendritic Cell Activation Relies on IFNAR Signaling. PloS Pathog (2010) 6(7):e1001016. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1001016
62. Scott TP, Nel LH. Subversion of the Immune Response by Rabies Virus. Viruses (2016) 8(231):1–26. doi: 10.3390/v8080231
63. Wiltzer L, Larrous F, Oksayan S, Ito N, Marsh GA, Wang LF, et al. Conservation of a Unique Mechanism of Immune Evasion Across the Lyssavirus Genus. J Virol (2012) 86(18):10194–9. doi: 10.1128/JVI.01249-12
64. Brzozka K, Finke S, Conzelmann K-K. Identification of the Rabies Virus Alpha/Beta Interferon Antagonist: Phosphoprotein P Interferes With Phosphorylation of Interferon Regulatory Factor 3. J Virol (2005) 79(12):7673–81. doi: 10.1128/JVI.79.12.7673-7681.2005
65. Brzózka K, Finke S, Conzelmann K-KKK. Inhibition of Interferon Signaling by Rabies Virus Phosphoprotein P: Activation-Dependent Binding of STAT1 and STAT2. J Virol (2006) 80(6):2675. doi: 10.1128/JVI.80.6.2675-2683.2006
66. Rieder M, Brzózka K, Pfaller CK, Cox JH, Stitz L, Conzelmann K-K. Genetic Dissection of Interferon-Antagonistic Functions of Rabies Virus Phosphoprotein: Inhibition of Interferon Regulatory Factor 3 Activation Is Important for Pathogenicity. J Virol (2011) 85(2):842–52. doi: 10.1128/JVI.01427-10
67. Vidy A, El Bougrini J, Chelbi-alix MK, Blondel D. The Nucleocytoplasmic Rabies Virus P Protein Counteracts Interferon Signaling by Inhibiting Both Nuclear Accumulation and DNA Binding of STAT1. J Virol (2007) 81(8):4255–63. doi: 10.1128/JVI.01930-06
68. Masatani T, Ito N, Shimizu K, Ito Y, Nakagawa K, Sawaki Y, et al. Rabies Virus Nucleoprotein Functions to Evade Activation of the RIG-I-Mediated Antiviral Response. J Virol (2010) 84(8):4002–12. doi: 10.1128/JVI.02220-09
69. Ito N, Mita T, Shimizu K, Ito Y, Masatani T, Nakagawa K, et al. Amino Acid Substitution at Position 95 in Rabies Virus Matrix Protein Affects Viral Pathogenicity. J Vet Med Sci (2011) 73(10):1363–6. doi: 10.1292/jvms.11-0151
70. Masatani T, Ito N, Ito Y, Nakagawa K, Abe M, Yamaoka S, et al. Importance of Rabies Virus Nucleoprotein in Viral Evasion of Interferon Response in the Brain. Microbiol Immunol (2013) 57(7):511–7. doi: 10.1111/1348-0421.12058
71. Suja MS, Mahadevan A, Madhusudana SN, Shankar SK. Role of Apoptosis in Rabies Viral Encephalitis: A Comparative Study in Mice, Canine, and Human Brain With a Review of Literature. Patholog Res Int (2011) 2011:374286. doi: 10.4061/2011/374286
72. Jackson AC, Randle E, Lawrance G, Rossiter JP. Neuronal Apoptosis Does Not Play an Important Role in Human Rabies Encephalitis. J Neurovirol (2008) 14(5):368–75. doi: 10.1080/13550280802216502
73. Lafon M. Modulation of the Immune Response in the Nervous System by Rabies Virus. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol (2005) 289:239–58. doi: 10.1007/3-540-27320-4_11
74. Kasempimolporn S, Tirawatnapong T, Saengseesom W, Nookhai S, Sitprija V. Immunosuppression in Rabies Virus Infection Mediated by Lymphocyte Apoptosis. Jpn J Infect Dis (2001) 54(4):144–7.
75. Fooks AR, Banyard AC, Horton DL, Johnson N, McElhinney LM, Jackson AC. Current Status of Rabies and Prospects for Elimination. Lancet (2014) 384(9951):1389–99. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62707-5
76. Marston DA, Banyard AC, McElhinney LM, Freuling CM, Finke S, de Lamballerie X, et al. The Lyssavirus Host-Specificity Conundrum — Rabies Virus — the Exception Not the Rule. Curr Opin Virol (2018) 28:68–73. doi: 10.1016/j.coviro.2017.11.007
77. Velasco-Villa A, Reeder SA, Orciari LA, Yager PA, Franka R, Blanton JD, et al. Enzootic Rabies Elimination From Dogs and Reemergence in Wild Terrestrial Carnivores, United States. Emerg Infect Dis (2008) 14(12):1849–54. doi: 10.3201/eid1412.080876
78. Singh AJ, Chipman RB, Fijter S, Gary R, Haskell MG, Kirby J, et al. Translocation of a Stray Cat Infected With Rabies From North Carolina to a Terrestrial Rabies-Free County in Ohio, 2017. Morb Mortal Wkly Rep (2018) 67(42):1174. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6742a2
79. Curry P, Kostiuk D, Werker D, Baikie M, Ntiamoah W, Atherton F, et al. Rabies: Translocated Dogs From Nunavut and the Spread of Rabies. Canada Commun Dis Rep (2016) 42(6):121. doi: 10.14745/ccdr.v42i06a02
80. Nadin-Davis S, Buchanan T, Nituch L, Fehlner-Gardiner C. A Long-Distance Translocation Initiated an Outbreak of Raccoon Rabies in Hamilton, Ontario, Canada. PloS Negl Trop Dis (2020) 14(3):e0008113. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0008113
81. Tao X-Y, Tang Q, Li H, Mo Z-J, Zhang H, Wang D-M, et al. Molecular Epidemiology of Rabies in Southern People’s Republic of China. Emerg Infect Dis (2009) 15(8):1192. doi: 10.3201/eid1508.081551
82. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Update: Raccoon Rabies Epizootic—United States and Canada, 1999. Morb Mortal Wkly Rep (2000) 49(2):31–5.
83. Rupprecht CE, Smith JS. Raccoon Rabies: The Re-Emergence of an Epizootic in a Densely Populated Area. Semin Virol (1994) 5(2):155–64. doi: 10.1006/smvy.1994.1016
Keywords: Rabies, lyssavirus, encephalitis, zoonosis, immune evasion, pathophysiology
Citation: Scott TP and Nel LH (2021) Lyssaviruses and the Fatal Encephalitic Disease Rabies. Front. Immunol. 12:786953. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.786953
Received: 30 September 2021; Accepted: 17 November 2021;
Published: 02 December 2021.
Edited by:
Willias Masocha, Kuwait University, KuwaitReviewed by:
Guanghui Wu, Animal and Plant Health Agency (United Kingdom), United KingdomSi’Ana Coggins, Henry M Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine (HJF), United States
Copyright © 2021 Scott and Nel. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Louis Hendrik Nel, bG91aXMubmVsQHVwLmFjLnph; bG91aXMubmVsQHJhYmllc2FsbGlhbmNlLm9yZw==