Yiling Fang1,2
Yangnan Gu1,2*- 1Department of Plant and Microbial Biology, University of California, Berkeley, CA, United States
- 2Innovative Genomics Institute, University of California, Berkeley, CA, United States
Unlike animals, plants do not have specialized immune cells and lack an adaptive immune system. Instead, plant cells rely on their unique innate immune system to defend against pathogens and coordinate beneficial interactions with commensal and symbiotic microbes. One of the major convergent points for plant immune signaling is the nucleus, where transcriptome reprogramming is initiated to orchestrate defense responses. Mechanisms that regulate selective transport of nuclear signaling cargo and chromatin activity at the nuclear boundary play a pivotal role in immune activation. This review summarizes the current knowledge of how nuclear membrane-associated core protein and protein complexes, including the nuclear pore complex, nuclear transport receptors, and the nucleoskeleton participate in plant innate immune activation and pathogen resistance. We also discuss the role of their functional counterparts in regulating innate immunity in animals and highlight potential common mechanisms that contribute to nuclear membrane-centered immune regulation in higher eukaryotes.
Introduction
The innate immune system in plants and animals arose independently but converged with a similar set of molecular tools for pathogen perception (1, 2). Higher plants possess an enormous number of surface-localized as well as intracellular-distributed immune receptors that recognize a variety of immunological signals associated with pathogen infections. Surface-localized plant immune receptors consist mostly of plasma membrane-anchored receptor kinases and receptor-like proteins that are conceptually analogous to Toll-like receptors in animals. They are referred to as pattern recognition receptors (PRRs) and are able to detect specific microbe-associated molecular patterns (MAMPs, e.g. bacterial flagellin and lipopolysaccharides) or host-derived, damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs, e.g. cutin and apoplastic peptide fragments) through their extracellular leucine-rich repeat domains (3, 4). Once activated, PRRs engage diverse signaling cascades including mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK)-, Ca2+-, and reactive oxygen species (ROS)-mediated signaling to activate pattern-triggered immunity (PTI), a prominent and first layer of active immune response in plants (5–7). However, some pathogens evolved functionally versatile effector proteins, which are delivered into plant cells to target critical immune regulators and compromise PTI signaling, leading to effector-triggered susceptibility (ETS) (8). For example, the effector protein AvrPto from bacterial pathogen Pseudomonas syringae binds PRRs (e.g. FLAGELLIN SENSITIVE 2) and their signaling partner (e.g. BRASSINOSTEROID INSENSITIVE 1-ASSOCIATED KINASE 1) to block PTI signaling (9, 10). To counteract ETS, a group of intracellular immune receptors that belong to the nucleotide-binding, leucine-rich repeat (NLR) superfamily evolved to activate the second layer of plant immunity. Pathogen effectors can be directly or indirectly recognized by cognate NLRs, which activate a strong and robust immune response termed effector-triggered immunity (ETI) (11, 12). Activated plant NLRs are assembled into resistosomes (13, 14), which form permeable calcium channels on the plasma membrane to activate defense (15) or mediate NAD+ cleavage to promote cell death (16–18).
PTI and ETI appear to have distinct early signaling but share many common downstream immune regulators to coordinate transcriptional reprogramming toward defense activation. Recent advances also revealed that PTI and ETI are inter-dependent and mutually enhanced to achieve full resistance against pathogens (19–21). Immune activation in local infected cells or tissues can further induce systemic acquired resistance (SAR), an immune mechanism that primes neighboring and distal cells and tissues for an enhanced and broad-spectrum resistance against future pathogen infection. Induction of SAR relies on phytohormone signaling including salicylic acid (SA) and jasmonic acid (JA) (11, 22). Activation of PTI, ETI, and SAR all requires efficient and highly regulated nucleocytoplasmic exchange of signals. As the major communication interface between the cytoplasm and the nucleus, the nuclear envelope (NE) evolved as a critical platform to integrate, decode, transmit, and respond to immune signals. In this review, we focus on discussing the functions of NE-associated proteins in regulating plant innate immunity and comparing their roles in NE-based immune regulatory mechanisms between plants and animals.
Extensive Involvements of Nucleoporins in Plant Immune Regulation
Nuclear pore complexes (NPC) perforate the double-layered NE and provide physical access for molecules to travel in or out of the nucleus. Each NPC is a mega protein complex and is assembled by 500~1,000 nucleoporin proteins (Nups) of ~40 different kinds (23–25). These nucleoporins build different NPC modules, including the inner ring complex (IRC) and the outer ring complex (ORC) that together form an octagonal symmetric core scaffold, the membrane ring composed by transmembrane nucleoporins that anchors the core scaffold to the nuclear pore membrane, the central channel barrier composed by phenylalanine-glycine (FG)-rich nucleoporins that fills the core scaffold and mediate selective cargo transport, and the nuclear basket and cytoplasmic filaments that extrude from the core scaffold and establish connections with the nucleoplasmic and cytoplasmic contents, respectively (26–28) (Figure 1). Extensive evidence supports that NPC integrity is essential for activating innate immune responses in both plants and animals. Interestingly though, different nucleoporins appear to play distinct roles in immune regulation and show functional specificity.
Figure 1 Summary of the regulatory roles of nuclear membrane-associated proteins in plant immune pathways. Critical plant immune regulators that are subject to regulation by nuclear membrane-associated mechanisms include the NLR-type immune receptor SNC1 that activates effector-triggered immunity (ETI), the critical ETI signaling component EDS1 that acts downstream of SNC1, transcription corepressor TPL and TPRs that work together with SNC1 to activate defense gene expression, cell cycle transcription factor E2Fs that activate ETI in a noncanonical manner, the master regulator of SA-mediated immunity NPR1, the mitogen-activated protein kinase MPK3 that widely participates in various types of plant immune responses including PTI, ETI, and basal resistance, core clock regulator LNKs that are required for basal resistance, and the transcription factor NTL9 that represses defense gene (e.g. PR1) expression. The outer ring complex (ORC) of the nuclear pore complex (NPC) is required for SNC1-mediated immune activation and basal resistance. As components of the central channel barrier, FG nucleoporin Nup98 and Nup88 are required for nuclear accumulation of SNC1, EDS1, NPR1, and MPK3. The membrane nucleoporin CPR5 (part of the NPC membrane ring) gates ETI activation by sequestering cyclin kinase inhibitor SIM/SMR1 and preventing E2F activation. Nup205 is required for the proper expression of LNK family genes and activation of basal resistance. Nup82 and Nup136 are involved in SA-mediated defense activation. Karyopherin-α MOS6 serves as the possible importin adapter for multiple NLR proteins, including SNC1 and TN13. Karyopherin-β KA120 is required for suppressing the nuclear activity of SNC1 and prevents SNC1 autoimmune activation. XPO4 mediates TPR1 nuclear export and negatively regulates SA-mediated immune amplification during ETI. MOS14 is required for proper splicing of NLR genes, including SNC1. The nucleoskeleton protein CRWN1 plays a role in suppressing both SA responses through interacting with transcription factor NTL9 that represses defense gene PR1 expression and interacting with epigenetic regulator PRC2 that facilitates the H3K27me3 of genes promoting SA synthesis.
The Arabidopsis SUPPRESSOR OF NPR1-1, CONSTITUTIVE 1 (SNC1) gene encodes an NLR protein that undergoes nuclear translocation for immune signaling, and enhanced nuclear accumulation of SNC1 leads to autoimmune activation (29, 30). Elegant genetic studies showed that several conserved ORC scaffolding nucleoporins, including MOS3 (MODIFIER OF SNC1 3)/Nup96, Nup160, and Seh1, are required for SNC1-mediated autoimmune induction as well as basal resistance against P. syringae (31, 32) (Figure 1). In animals, Nup96 was shown to be important for both innate and adaptive immune pathways. Defects in Nup96 were reported to impair interferon-γ-mediated induction of major histocompatibility complexes (MHC I and MHC II), which are essential for antigen presentation. Mutations in Nup96 also diminished MHC-dependent T cell proliferation in mice (33). Although molecular mechanisms behind Nup96-dependent immune regulation remain largely obscure in both animals and plants, the ORC is essential for the proper assembly of the NPC core scaffold and bulk mRNA export (34–36). It is conceivable that loss of ORC nucleoporins may lead to major structural and functional defects in the NPC, which compromise nucleocytoplasmic exchange of critical immune signals and the newly transcribed immune-related mRNA population.
The FG nucleoporins that contain intrinsically disordered FG-rich regions distribute along the central channel of the NPC and form the molecular barrier to enable selective cargo transport. At least six FG nucleoporins have been reported to play a role in regulating the innate immune response in Arabidopsis (37). Among them, Nup98, a conserved FG nucleoporin, has been characterized in detail. Arabidopsis encodes two Nup98 paralogs, Nup98a and Nup98b, both of which interact with a conserved non-FG nucleoporin Nup88/MOS7. A partial loss of function mutation in Arabidopsis Nup88 (mos7-1) results in compromised resistance against both bacterial and fungal pathogens. The mos7-1 mutation specifically attenuates the nuclear accumulation of a series of important plant immune regulators, including a key ETI signaling protein ENHANCED DISEASE SUSCEPTIBILITY 1 (EDS1), the master regulator of SA-mediated defense response NONEXPRESSOR OF PATHOGENESIS-RELATED GENES 1 (NPR1), MITOGEN-ACTIVATED PROTEIN KINASE 3 (MPK3), and SNC1, but not other nuclear proteins such as histone protein and transcription factor CELL DIVISION CYCLE 5 (CDC5) and TGA2 (38, 39) (Figure 1). It was hypothesized that the mos7-1 mutation disrupts the Nup98-Nup88 interaction, which alters the NPC permeability and leads to disruption of the nuclear transport of immune-related cargoes. Consistent with this hypothesis, both nup98a and nup98b mutants are more susceptible to the fungal pathogen Botrytis cinerea than WT plants (39), suggesting a specialized function of Nup98 in plant immunity. In line with the observation in Arabidopsis, a rice Nup98 homolog, APIP12, was shown to be important for basal resistance against the rice blast fungus Magnaporthe oryzae. Notably, an M. oryzae effector AvrPiz-t evolved to specifically target APIP12 to enhance pathogen virulence (40), highlighting its functional significance in basal defense activation. Knocking out APIP12 results in an increase in lesion density associated with M. oryzae infection. In Drosophila, Nup98 was reported to play a role in defense against RNA viral infection. However, rather than functioning at the NPC, DmNup98 is re-located from the NPC to the nucleoplasm upon viral infection and directly binds promoters of antiviral genes to facilitate their expression (41).
Both Nup98 and Nup96 discussed above are functionally conserved nucleoporins and are encoded by the same gene and post-translationally processed into two proteins in animals and fungi (42, 43). However, in plants, except Chlamydomonas reinhardtii and Physcomitrella patens, Nup98 and Nup96 are encoded by separate genes, which are, more often than not, located on different chromosomes. Arabidopsis encodes one Nup96 and two Nup98 proteins as mentioned above, and Oryza sativa encodes one Nup96 and three AtNup98a-like proteins, including APIP12. Duplication of Nup98 likely occurred from mosses as Physcomitrella patens contains two copies of Nup98, one encoded with Nup96 and the other located on a separate chromosome. Therefore, it appears that Nup98 not only separated from Nup96 but also gradually expanded in the plant lineage during evolution. Although Arabidopsis Nup98 paralogs were reported to be functionally redundant in regulating flowering time and starch degradation (44, 45), the duplication of Nup98 may potentially drive differential assembly of the NPC and allow specific regulation of immune-related cargo transport under distinct environmental/stress conditions. Indeed, Arabidopsis Nup98a and Nup98b display partially different expression patterns under various developmental and pathological contexts (e-Northern Expression Browser in bar.utoronto.ca) (46). However, whether different Nup98 paralogs are collaboratively or differentially incorporated into the NPC awaits future investigation.
In addition to Nup98 and Nup96, a recent study by de Leone et al. reported that perturbing the IRC nucleoporin Nup205 attenuates plant immunity by affecting the expression of a core clock gene family NIGHT LIGHT-INDUCIBLE AND CLOCK-REGULATED (LNK) during pathogen infection (47) (Figure 1). This finding is consistent with the emerging concept that the circadian rhythm is integrated with plant immune regulatory pathways (48, 49) and underscores a role of the NPC in this process. The nucleoporin’s influence on clock genes was also observed in Drosophila. Two interacting nuclear basket nucleoporins, Tpr (Megator) and Nup153, set the pace of the clock in Drosophila by regulating the protein ubiquitylation/stability and nuclear translocation of the core oscillator PERIOD and TIMELESS (50, 51). Though the roles of Tpr and Nup153 during immune activation in flies are not clear, they appear to be involved in the insertion of HIV-1 DNA into the human genome region that is close to the nuclear pore, a location known to associate with transcriptionally active chromatin (52). Consistently, depletion of Tpr inhibited HIV gene expression in infected cells (53). Additionally, the HIV-1 capsid is physically associated with Nup153, which is required to facilitate the viral import into the nucleus (53, 54).
Although the structure and composition of the NPC are highly conserved among eukaryotes, plants have evolved several specific nucleoporins, which, interestingly, all appear to play a role in plant immune responses. Constitutive Expressor of Pathogenesis-Related Genes 5 (CPR5), a plant unique nucleoporin localized in the NPC membrane module, is involved in gating ETI activation in Arabidopsis. CPR5 switches from oligomer to monomer upon NLR immunoreceptor activation and releases the cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors SIAMESE and SIAMESE-RELATED 1 to trigger a noncanonical activation of cell cycle transcription factor E2Fs that can drive defense gene expression (55–57) (Figure 1). CPR5 was recently found to interact with PLANT NUCLEAR ENVELOPE TRANSMEMBRANE 1 (PNET1), a novel plant nucleoporin that also exists in animals (58). Interestingly, the function of the human PNET1 homolog has also been linked with the cell cycle and was found to promote the proliferation of lung cancer cells (59). Cell cycle regulators are involved in both effector-triggered cell death in plants and apoptosis in mammals (60, 61). Because both CPR5 and PNET1 connect with cell cycle regulatory pathways, the interaction between these two proteins would be interesting for further investigation to reveal the interplay between the cell cycle and immune pathway at the nuclear pore. Another angiosperm-specific nucleoporin, Nup82, interacts with its homolog Nup136 at the nuclear basket. They are redundantly required for SA-dependent immune responses. The nup82 nup136 double mutant plants are impaired in benzothiadiazole (an analog of SA)-induced resistance to P. syringae (62). It is worth noting that the NPC nuclear basket is intimately associated with the nucleoskeleton (63) and that mutations in nucleoskeleton genes also cause altered SA responses in Arabidopsis (64). The influence of nucleoskeleton on plant immune will be further discussed later.
The Role of Nuclear Transport Receptors and Their Cargo Specificity in Modulating Plant Immunity
The selective transport of macromolecules through the NPC mainly depends on karyopherin proteins, a superfamily of nuclear transport receptors (NTRs), including importins and exportins. Karyopherin-α, also known as importin-α, is an adaptor protein that connects nuclear localization signal (NLS)-containing protein cargo with a karyopherin-β protein (65). Karyopherin-β proteins are capable of directly interacting with FG nucleoporins and mediate the translocation of the importin-α/cargo complex across the NPC (66, 67). Karyopherin-β can also directly interact with some cargo molecules and mediate their nuclear shuttling independent of a karyopherin-α (68–70). Depending on the transport direction, karyopherin-βs are categorized into importins and exportins. The karyopherin-β family was thought to be established before the divergence of eukaryotic life and has been largely maintained since. In contrast, importin-α proteins diverged early in eukaryotes, evolved within lineages, and have expanded dramatically with the complexity of organisms (71). Accumulating evidence suggests that different karyopherins may have evolved to mediate the transport of specific cargo populations and thus participate in regulating distinct cellular processes (65, 69, 72). Multiple karyopherin-β proteins in Arabidopsis have been reported to function in plant immune regulation, and this role seems mostly attributed to their cargo specificity.
Proximity-labeling proteomics identified transcription corepressors TOPLESS (TPL) and TPL-RELATED proteins (TPRs), which are negative regulators of defense activation, as specific cargo of Exportin-4 (XPO4) in Arabidopsis. XPO4 facilitates the nuclear export of TPR1 in the presence of high levels of SA to negatively regulate the SA-mediated immune amplification (Figure 1). Consistently, loss of XPO4 dramatically enhances cpr5-dependent autoimmune activation in Arabidopsis (73). Intriguingly, xpo4 single mutants are compromised in basal resistance and NLR-mediated immune activation, suggesting distinct regulatory roles of this exportin at multiple levels of plant immune induction.
Mutations in another karyopherin-β, KA120, leads to a typical NLR-dependent auto-immune response in the absence of pathogens. KA120 is required to restrict the nuclear activity of SNC1 and is essential to prevent SNC1 autoactivation in the nucleus (Figure 1). Overexpression of KA120 efficiently suppresses SNC1-dependent autoimmunity and knocking down SNC1 partially rescues the ka120-associated autoimmune phenotype (74). However, whether SNC1 is a direct cargo of KA120 is yet to be determined. The human homolog of KA120, importin-11 (IPO11), has not been reported to be directly involved in immune regulation. However, IPO11 was found to be a tumor suppressor by maintaining the protein level of Phosphatase and Tensin Homologue (PTEN) (75). Loss of IPO11 leads to degradation of PTEN, and deletion, mutation, and suppression of PTEN are often associated with cancers in various tissues (76).
MOS14 is a predicted importin that transports serine/arginine-rich (SR) proteins (77), which are required for the recognition of splice sites and spliceosome assembly. The loss-of-function mos14 mutation alters the splicing pattern of multiple NLR genes, including SNC1, which leads to compromised immunity (78) (Figure 1). Aside from importing SR proteins, the human homolog of MOS14, TNPO3, is also responsible for HIV nuclear import. TNPO3 can interact with the HIV1 integrase, which facilitates host integration of HIV-1 DNA, and disrupting this integrase-TNPO3 interaction can block HIV nuclear import (79, 80).
XPO1 is a conserved exportin across the eukaryotes that binds the leucine-rich nuclear export signal (NES) to mediate protein nuclear export. In animals, XPO1 can interact with NF-κB, a protein complex that is important to activate immune response during infection. The nuclear export of NF-κB is an essential step for preventing autoimmune diseases by controlling the level of activated NF-κB in the nucleus (81). In Arabidopsis, XPO1 is required for maintaining the nucleocytoplasmic balance of EDS1, which is important for ETI activation (82). Recently, Zhang etal. (83) reported that XPO1 is a susceptibility factor in Arabidopsis and Nicotiana benthamiana for resistance against the turnip mosaic virus (TuMV). XPO1 promotes TuMV infection by mediating the nuclear export of the viral replicase to facilitate its accumulation in the viral replication complexes outside of the nucleus. XPO1 also exports other sumoylated host factors to attenuate host immune responses (83).
Besides karyopherin-βs, certain importin-αs also show a specific role in immune regulation. For example, importin-α3/MOS6 has been implicated as a specific import adapter for SNC1 (84) (Figure 1). Loss of MOS6, but not any of the other eight importin-αs encoded by Arabidopsis, partially suppresses the autoimmune phenotype induced by SNC1. Moreover, SNC1 preferably interacts with MOS6 among all importin-αs in coimmunoprecipitation assays performed using a heterologous transient expression system (84). However, SNC1 harbors only weakly predicted NLS sequences, and whether these sequences are required for SNC1-MOS6 interaction is not clear. MOS6 also interacts with another NLR protein TIR-NB13 (TN13), implying a specialized function of MOS6 in mediating the nuclear transport of NLR proteins (85).
In animals, targeting NTRs has been used therapeutically to alleviate symptoms or enhance immunity. For example, importin-α3 is responsible for transporting the transcription factor NF-κB into the nucleus to coordinate expression of inflammatory genes, and vitamin D supplementation can reduce the airway hyperresponsiveness and allergic airway inflammation in ovalbumin-sensitized and -challenged mice by downregulating the protein level of importin-α3 (86, 87). Inhibiting human XPO1 can enhance innate immunity by increasing nuclear accumulation of p62, which promotes expression of innate immune-related genes. This eventually leads to reduced Kaposi’s sarcoma-associated herpesvirus (KSHV) lytic replication (88). Therefore, NTRs play a vital role in selectively maintaining the protein homeostasis and activity of key immune regulatory proteins in both plants and animals. We envision that targeted chemical or genetic manipulation of functionally specialized plant NTRs may enable us to specifically modulate nuclear transport kinetics and signaling strength to achieve desired plant immune outcomes without affecting the bulk nuclear transport.
The Nuclear Lamina Is an Emerging Player in Nuclear Membrane-Associated Immune Regulation
Lamin and lamin-like proteins together with other proteins associated with the nucleoskeleton form a dense fibrous protein meshwork that is located beneath the inner nuclear membrane (INM) and called the nuclear lamina (NL). NL components not only regulate nuclear structure and mechanics but also play essential roles in a variety of cellular processes, including cellular signaling, gene transcription, epigenetic regulation, cell cycle progression, and cell differentiation (89–91). Lamins and nuclear matrix constituent proteins (NMCPs) are the major constituent of the nucleoskeleton in animals and plants respectively. Lamins and NMCPs share a similar domain architecture with a central coiled-coil rod domain flanked by a short N-terminal head and a long C-terminal tail domain that contains an NLS sequence (92). However, lamins and NMCPs are likely to have evolved independently as part of the nucleoskeleton, as the origin of NMCPs occurred with the divergence of Charophyta (93). In Arabidopsis, NMCPs are also known as CROWED NUCLEI (CRWN) proteins, including CRWN1, CRWN2, CRWN3, and CRWN4 (94, 95). Both lamins and CRWNs have been reported to play a role in regulating immune responses.
In Arabidopsis, mutations in CRWN1 result in accumulation of JA, up-regulated JA-responsive gene expression, and enhanced resistance against necrotrophic pathogen B. cinerea. Interestingly, crwn1 mutants also display compromised PTI but intact basal resistance against the hemibiotrophic bacterial pathogen P. syringae, suggesting a complicated role of CRWN1 in regulating plant responses against different types of pathogens (96). Adding more complexity, higher-order crwn mutants, including crwn1 crwn2 and crwn1 crwn4, showed significantly enhanced SA-mediated transcriptional response, enhanced resistance against P. syringae, as well as activation of other abiotic stress responses (64). Consistently, a recent study showed that loss of NMCP genes in liverwort Marchantia polymorpha activates both biotic and abiotic transcriptome responses (97). These studies suggest that the nucleoskeleton integrity is critical for maintaining the homeostasis of plant stress responses. In the Arabidopsis crwn1 crwn2 double mutant, the levels of histone H3 lysine 27 trimethylation (H3K27me3), which is often linked to transcriptional repression, are reduced near SAR DEFICIENT 1 (SARD1) and CALMODULIN BINDING PROTEIN 60-LIKE.G (CBP60g), two genes that encode critical transcription factors to promote SA biosynthesis, providing a potential mechanism for the enhanced SA responses in crwn mutants (98). Consistently, it was demonstrated that CRWN1 is physically associated with Polycomb Repressive Complex 2 (PRC2), which mediates H3K27me3 modification (99) (Figure 1). In addition, the carboxyl terminus of CRWN1 interacts with and enhances the DNA-binding activity of NAC WITH TRANSMEMBRANE MOTIF1-LIKE9 (NTL9), a transcription factor involved in repressing the expression of the PATHOGENESIS-RELATED1 (PR1) gene (100) (Figure 1). These findings reveal a critical and previously underappreciated role for the nucleoskeleton in regulating plant immunity at the epigenetic and transcriptional level.
In animals, lamin A/C plays a prominent role in multiple functional aspects of immune cells, including cell development and differentiation, nuclear permeability, and cell migration (101). For example, neutrophils can reduce the nuclear stiffness by almost completely losing their lamin A/C during differentiation (102, 103). This generates lobed nuclei in neutrophils, which facilitate neutrophils passing through narrow spaces during migration (104). On the other hand, overaccumulation of lamin A/C in adipose tissue macrophages promotes NF-κB nuclear translocation and increases the expression of proinflammatory genes that lead to the activation of innate immune response (105). Intriguingly, P. syringae infection led to a decline of the CRWN1 protein level within hours, and SA treatment also triggered rapid proteosome-dependent degradation of CRWN1 in Arabidopsis, potentially facilitating defense activation (100). These studies suggest that modulating nucleoskeleton dynamics may be a convergent strategy to orchestrate immune activities in eukaryotes.
Conclusions and Future Perspective
Although not located at the frontline of host-microbe interactions, the nucleus is one of the most critical downstream convergent points for immune signaling. As the boundary of the nucleus, NE-associated core molecular machinery and mechanisms, including structurally and functionally conserved nucleoporins, nuclear transport receptors, and nucleoskeletal proteins, are intimately involved in coordinating immune activation and amplitude in plants (Summarized in Figure 1). Future investigations will further advance our understanding of critical questions that remain in the field, such as how nucleoporins may regulate different immune pathways and defense responses by differentially affecting the NPC function, what is the immune-related substrate spectrum of NTRs and how it is determined and regulated at the molecular level, and how other components of the nuclear lamina may influence chromatin activity at the biochemical and epigenetic level to determine defense gene expression. Moreover, we currently have very little information about how integral plant NE proteins, a population of transmembrane proteins with a variety of prominent functions and activities at the NE (e.g. calcium transport, mechanosensation, and chromatin organization), may participate in plant immune regulation. Recently, PNET2, a conserved INM transmembrane protein in Arabidopsis, was shown to interact with CRWN1 and play a role in regulating higher order chromatin architecture at the nuclear periphery and coordinating the activation of plant stress responses including immunity (106). A more comprehensive understanding of the plant NE protein composition and subsequent detailed functional investigation of NE proteins will provide new insight into the NE-centered immune regulatory mechanism in plants.
Author Contributions
YF and YG wrote the article. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.
Funding
This work was supported by the Arnon Graduate Fellowship (to YF) and the USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture (HATCH project CA-B-PLB-0243-H), the National Science Foundation (MCB-2049931), Hellman Fellows Fund, and startup funds from Innovative Genomics Institute and University of California Berkeley (to YG).
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher’s Note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Acknowledgments
We apologize to colleagues whose research could not be cited due to space limitations.
References
2. Jones JD, Vance RE, Dangl JL. Intracellular Innate Immune Surveillance Devices in Plants and Animals. Science (2016) 354(6316):aaf6395. doi: 10.1126/science.aaf6395
3. Couto D, Zipfel C. Regulation of Pattern Recognition Receptor Signalling in Plants. Nat Rev Immunol (2016) 16:537–52. doi: 10.1038/nri.2016.77
4. Boutrot F, Zipfel C. Function, Discovery, and Exploitation of Plant Pattern Recognition Receptors for Broad-Spectrum Disease Resistance. Annu Rev Phytopathol (2017) 55:257–86. doi: 10.1146/annurev-phyto-080614-120106
5. Bigeard J, Colcombet J, Hirt H. Signaling Mechanisms in Pattern-Triggered Immunity (PTI). Mol Plant (2015) 8:521–39. doi: 10.1016/j.molp.2014.12.022
6. Hou S, Liu Z, Shen H, Wu D. Damage-Associated Molecular Pattern-Triggered Immunity in Plants. Front Plant Sci (2019) 10:646. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2019.00646
7. Wang W, Feng B, Zhou JM, Tang D. Plant Immune Signaling: Advancing on Two Frontiers. J Integr Plant Biol (2020) 62:2–24. doi: 10.1111/jipb.12898
8. Toruno TY, Stergiopoulos I, Coaker G. Plant-Pathogen Effectors: Cellular Probes Interfering With Plant Defenses in Spatial and Temporal Manners. Annu Rev Phytopathol (2016) 54:419–41. doi: 10.1146/annurev-phyto-080615-100204
9. Shan L, He P, Li J, Heese A, Peck SC, Nurnberger T, et al. Bacterial Effectors Target the Common Signaling Partner BAK1 to Disrupt Multiple MAMP Receptor-Signaling Complexes and Impede Plant Immunity. Cell Host Microbe (2008) 4:17–27. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2008.05.017
10. Xiang T, Zong N, Zou Y, Wu Y, Zhang J, Xing W, et al. Pseudomonas Syringae Effector AvrPto Blocks Innate Immunity by Targeting Receptor Kinases. Curr Biol (2008) 18:74–80. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2007.12.020
11. Zhang J, Coaker G, Zhou JM, Dong X. Plant Immune Mechanisms: From Reductionistic to Holistic Points of View. Mol Plant (2020) 13:1358–78. doi: 10.1016/j.molp.2020.09.007
12. Zhou JM, Zhang Y. Plant Immunity: Danger Perception and Signaling. Cell (2020) 181:978–89. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2020.04.028
13. Wang J, Hu M, Wang J, Qi J, Han Z, Wang G, et al. Reconstitution and Structure of a Plant NLR Resistosome Conferring Immunity. Science (2019) 364(6435):eaav5870. doi: 10.1126/science.aav5870
14. Wang J, Wang J, Hu M, Wu S, Qi J, Wang G, et al. Ligand-Triggered Allosteric ADP Release Primes a Plant NLR Complex. Science (2019) 364(6435):eaav5868. doi: 10.1126/science.aav5868
15. Bi G, Su M, Li N, Liang Y, Dang S, Xu J, et al. The ZAR1 Resistosome Is a Calcium-Permeable Channel Triggering Plant Immune Signaling. Cell (2021) 184:3528–3541 e3512. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2021.05.003
16. Horsefield S, Burdett H, Zhang X, Manik MK, Shi Y, Chen J, et al. NAD(+) Cleavage Activity by Animal and Plant TIR Domains in Cell Death Pathways. Science (2019) 365:793–9. doi: 10.1126/science.aax1911
17. Wan L, Essuman K, Anderson RG, Sasaki Y, Monteiro F, Chung EH, et al. TIR Domains of Plant Immune Receptors Are NAD(+)-Cleaving Enzymes That Promote Cell Death. Science (2019) 365:799–803. doi: 10.1126/science.aax1771
18. Duxbury Z, Wang S, Mackenzie CI, Tenthorey JL, Zhang X, Huh SU, et al. Induced Proximity of a TIR Signaling Domain on a Plant-Mammalian NLR Chimera Activates Defense in Plants. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA (2020) 117:18832–9. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2001185117
19. Ngou BPM, Ahn HK, Ding P, Jones JDG. Mutual Potentiation of Plant Immunity by Cell-Surface and Intracellular Receptors. Nature (2021) 592:110–5. doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-03315-7
20. Yuan M, Jiang Z, Bi G, Nomura K, Liu M, Wang Y, et al. Pattern-Recognition Receptors Are Required for NLR-Mediated Plant Immunity. Nature (2021) 592:105–9. doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-03316-6
21. Yuan M, Ngou BPM, Ding P, Xin XF. PTI-ETI Crosstalk: An Integrative View of Plant Immunity. Curr Opin Plant Biol (2021) 62:102030. doi: 10.1016/j.pbi.2021.102030
22. Spoel SH, Dong X. How do Plants Achieve Immunity? Defence Without Specialized Immune Cells. Nat Rev Immunol (2012) 12:89–100. doi: 10.1038/nri3141
23. Alber F, Dokudovskaya S, Veenhoff LM, Zhang W, Kipper J, Devos D, et al. The Molecular Architecture of the Nuclear Pore Complex. Nature (2007) 450:695–701. doi: 10.1038/nature06405
24. Tamura K, Hara-Nishimura I. The Molecular Architecture of the Plant Nuclear Pore Complex. J Exp Bot (2013) 64:823–32. doi: 10.1093/jxb/ers258
25. Kim SJ, Fernandez-Martinez J, Nudelman I, Shi Y, Zhang W, Raveh B, et al. Integrative Structure and Functional Anatomy of a Nuclear Pore Complex. Nature (2018) 555:475–82. doi: 10.1038/nature26003
26. Knockenhauer KE, Schwartz TU. The Nuclear Pore Complex as a Flexible and Dynamic Gate. Cell (2016) 164:1162–71. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2016.01.034
27. Beck M, Hurt E. The Nuclear Pore Complex: Understanding Its Function Through Structural Insight. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol (2017) 18:73–89. doi: 10.1038/nrm.2016.147
28. Hampoelz B, Andres-Pons A, Kastritis P, Beck M. Structure and Assembly of the Nuclear Pore Complex. Annu Rev Biophys (2019) 48:515–36. doi: 10.1146/annurev-biophys-052118-115308
29. Mang HG, Qian W, Zhu Y, Qian J, Kang HG, Klessig DF, et al. Abscisic Acid Deficiency Antagonizes High-Temperature Inhibition of Disease Resistance Through Enhancing Nuclear Accumulation of Resistance Proteins SNC1 and RPS4 in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell (2012) 24:1271–84. doi: 10.1105/tpc.112.096198
30. Xu F, Cheng YT, Kapos P, Huang Y, Li X. P-Loop-Dependent NLR SNC1 can Oligomerize and Activate Immunity in the Nucleus. Mol Plant (2014) 7:1801–4. doi: 10.1093/mp/ssu097
31. Zhang Y, Li X. A Putative Nucleoporin 96 Is Required for Both Basal Defense and Constitutive Resistance Responses Mediated by Suppressor of Npr1-1,Constitutive 1. Plant Cell (2005) 17:1306–16. doi: 10.1105/tpc.104.029926
32. Wiermer M, Cheng YT, Imkampe J, Li M, Wang D, Lipka V, et al. Putative Members of the Arabidopsis Nup107-160 Nuclear Pore Sub-Complex Contribute to Pathogen Defense. Plant J (2012) 70:796–808. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2012.04928.x
33. Faria AM, Levay A, Wang Y, Kamphorst AO, Rosa ML, Nussenzveig DR, et al. The Nucleoporin Nup96 Is Required for Proper Expression of Interferon-Regulated Proteins and Functions. Immunity (2006) 24:295–304. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2006.01.014
34. Harel A, Orjalo AV, Vincent T, Lachish-Zalait A, Vasu S, Shah S, et al. Removal of a Single Pore Subcomplex Results in Vertebrate Nuclei Devoid of Nuclear Pores. Mol Cell (2003) 11:853–64. doi: 10.1016/S1097-2765(03)00116-3
35. Walther TC, Alves A, Pickersgill H, Loiodice I, Hetzer M, Galy V, et al. The Conserved Nup107-160 Complex Is Critical for Nuclear Pore Complex Assembly. Cell (2003) 113:195–206. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(03)00235-6
36. Parry G, Ward S, Cernac A, Dharmasiri S, Estelle M. The Arabidopsis SUPPRESSOR OF AUXIN RESISTANCE Proteins Are Nucleoporins With an Important Role in Hormone Signaling and Development. Plant Cell (2006) 18:1590–603. doi: 10.1105/tpc.106.041566
37. Li X, Gu Y. Structural and Functional Insight Into the Nuclear Pore Complex and Nuclear Transport Receptors in Plant Stress Signaling. Curr Opin Plant Biol (2020) 58:60–8. doi: 10.1016/j.pbi.2020.10.006
38. Cheng YT, Germain H, Wiermer M, Bi D, Xu F, Garcia AV, et al. Nuclear Pore Complex Component MOS7/Nup88 Is Required for Innate Immunity and Nuclear Accumulation of Defense Regulators in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell (2009) 21:2503–16. doi: 10.1105/tpc.108.064519
39. Genenncher B, Wirthmueller L, Roth C, Klenke M, Ma L, Sharon A, et al. Nucleoporin-Regulated MAP Kinase Signaling in Immunity to a Necrotrophic Fungal Pathogen. Plant Physiol (2016) 172:1293–305. doi: 10.1104/pp.16.00832
40. Tang M, Ning Y, Shu X, Dong B, Zhang H, Wu D, et al. The Nup98 Homolog APIP12 Targeted by the Effector AvrPiz-T Is Involved in Rice Basal Resistance Against Magnaporthe Oryzae. Rice (NY) (2017) 10:5. doi: 10.1186/s12284-017-0144-7
41. Panda D, Pascual-Garcia P, Dunagin M, Tudor M, Hopkins KC, Xu J, et al. Nup98 Promotes Antiviral Gene Expression to Restrict RNA Viral Infection in Drosophila. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA (2014) 111:E3890–9. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1410087111
42. Fontoura BM, Blobel G, Matunis MJ. A Conserved Biogenesis Pathway for Nucleoporins: Proteolytic Processing of a 186-Kilodalton Precursor Generates Nup98 and the Novel Nucleoporin, Nup96. J Cell Biol (1999) 144:1097–112. doi: 10.1083/jcb.144.6.1097
43. Rosenblum JS, Blobel G. Autoproteolysis in Nucleoporin Biogenesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA (1999) 96:11370–5. doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.20.11370
44. Jiang S, Xiao L, Huang P, Cheng Z, Chen F, Miao Y, et al. Nucleoporin Nup98 Participates in Flowering Regulation in a CONSTANS-Independent Mode. Plant Cell Rep (2019) 38:1263–71. doi: 10.1007/s00299-019-02442-w
45. Xiao L, Jiang S, Huang P, Chen F, Wang X, Cheng Z, et al. Two Nucleoporin98 Homologous Genes Jointly Participate in the Regulation of Starch Degradation to Repress Senescence in Arabidopsis. BMC Plant Biol (2020) 20:292. doi: 10.1186/s12870-020-02494-1
46. Toufighi K, Brady SM, Austin R, Ly E, Provart NJ. The Botany Array Resource: E-Northerns, Expression Angling, and Promoter Analyses. Plant J (2005) 43:153–63. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2005.02437.x
47. de Leone MJ, Hernando CE, Romanowski A, Careno DA, Soverna AF, Sun H, et al. Bacterial Infection Disrupts Clock Gene Expression to Attenuate Immune Responses. Curr Biol (2020) 30:1740–47.e1746. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2020.02.058
48. Wang W, Barnaby JY, Tada Y, Li H, Tor M, Caldelari D, et al. Timing of Plant Immune Responses by a Central Circadian Regulator. Nature (2011) 470:110–4. doi: 10.1038/nature09766
49. Zhou M, Wang W, Karapetyan S, Mwimba M, Marques J, Buchler NE, et al. Redox Rhythm Reinforces the Circadian Clock to Gate Immune Response. Nature (2015) 523:472–6. doi: 10.1038/nature14449
50. Jang AR, Moravcevic K, Saez L, Young MW, Sehgal A. Drosophila TIM Binds Importin Alpha1, and Acts as an Adapter to Transport PER to the Nucleus. PLoS Genet (2015) 11:e1004974. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1004974
51. Szabo A, Papin C, Cornu D, Chelot E, Lipinszki Z, Udvardy A, et al. Ubiquitylation Dynamics of the Clock Cell Proteome and TIMELESS During a Circadian Cycle. Cell Rep (2018) 23:2273–82. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2018.04.064
52. Wong RW, Mamede JI, Hope TJ. Impact of Nucleoporin-Mediated Chromatin Localization and Nuclear Architecture on HIV Integration Site Selection. J Virol (2015) 89:9702–5. doi: 10.1128/JVI.01669-15
53. Lelek M, Casartelli N, Pellin D, Rizzi E, Souque P, Severgnini M, et al. Chromatin Organization at the Nuclear Pore Favours HIV Replication. Nat Commun (2015) 6:6483. doi: 10.1038/ncomms7483
54. Matreyek KA, Yucel SS, Li X, Engelman A. Nucleoporin NUP153 Phenylalanine-Glycine Motifs Engage a Common Binding Pocket Within the HIV-1 Capsid Protein to Mediate Lentiviral Infectivity. PLoS Pathog (2013) 9:e1003693. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1003693
55. Wang S, Gu Y, Zebell SG, Anderson LK, Wang W, Mohan R, et al. A Noncanonical Role for the CKI-RB-E2F Cell-Cycle Signaling Pathway in Plant Effector-Triggered Immunity. Cell Host Microbe (2014) 16:787–94. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2014.10.005
56. Gu Y, Zebell SG, Liang Z, Wang S, Kang BH, Dong X. Nuclear Pore Permeabilization Is a Convergent Signaling Event in Effector-Triggered Immunity. Cell (2016) 166:1526–1538 e1511. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2016.07.042
57. Gu Y. The Nuclear Pore Complex: A Strategic Platform for Regulating Cell Signaling. New Phytol (2018) 219:25–30. doi: 10.1111/nph.14756
58. Tang Y, Huang A, Gu Y. Global Profiling of Plant Nuclear Membrane Proteome in Arabidopsis. Nat Plants (2020) 6(7):838–47. doi: 10.1038/s41477-020-0700-9
59. Fujitomo T, Daigo Y, Matsuda K, Ueda K, Nakamura Y. Critical Function for Nuclear Envelope Protein TMEM209 in Human Pulmonary Carcinogenesis. Cancer Res (2012) 72:4110–8. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-12-0159
60. Polager S, Ginsberg D. P53 and E2f: Partners in Life and Death. Nat Rev Cancer (2009) 9:738–48. doi: 10.1038/nrc2718
61. Zebell SG, Dong X. Cell-Cycle Regulators and Cell Death in Immunity. Cell Host Microbe (2015) 18:402–7. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2015.10.001
62. Tamura K, Fukao Y, Hatsugai N, Katagiri F, Hara-Nishimura I. Nup82 Functions Redundantly With Nup136 in a Salicylic Acid-Dependent Defense Response of Arabidopsis Thaliana. Nucleus (2017) 8:301–11. doi: 10.1080/19491034.2017.1279774
63. Mermet S, Voisin M, Mordier J, Dubos T, Tutois S, Tuffery P, et al. Evolutionary Conserved Protein Motifs Drive Attachment of the Plant Nucleoskeleton at Nuclear Pores. bioRxiv (2021). doi: 10.1101/2021.03.20.435662
64. Choi J, Strickler SR, Richards EJ. Loss of CRWN Nuclear Proteins Induces Cell Death and Salicylic Acid Defense Signaling. Plant Physiol (2019) 179:1315–29. doi: 10.1104/pp.18.01020
65. Pumroy RA, Cingolani G. Diversification of Importin-Alpha Isoforms in Cellular Trafficking and Disease States. Biochem J (2015) 466:13–28. doi: 10.1042/BJ20141186
66. Percipalle P, Clarkson WD, Kent HM, Rhodes D, Stewart M. Molecular Interactions Between the Importin Alpha/Beta Heterodimer and Proteins Involved in Vertebrate Nuclear Protein Import. J Mol Biol (1997) 266:722–32. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1996.0801
67. Bayliss R, Littlewood T, Stewart M. Structural Basis for the Interaction Between FxFG Nucleoporin Repeats and Importin-Beta in Nuclear Trafficking. Cell (2000) 102:99–108. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)00014-3
68. Lee BJ, Cansizoglu AE, Suel KE, Louis TH, Zhang Z, Chook YM. Rules for Nuclear Localization Sequence Recognition by Karyopherin Beta 2. Cell (2006) 126:543–58. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2006.05.049
69. Chook YM, Suel KE. Nuclear Import by Karyopherin-Betas: Recognition and Inhibition. Biochim Biophys Acta (2011) 1813:1593–606. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2010.10.014
70. Guo L, Fare CM, Shorter J. Therapeutic Dissolution of Aberrant Phases by Nuclear-Import Receptors. Trends Cell Biol (2019) 29:308–22. doi: 10.1016/j.tcb.2018.12.004
71. Goto C, Tamura K, Fukao Y, Shimada T, Hara-Nishimura I. The Novel Nuclear Envelope Protein KAKU4 Modulates Nuclear Morphology in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell (2014) 26:2143–55. doi: 10.1105/tpc.113.122168
72. Mackmull MT, Klaus B, Heinze I, Chokkalingam M, Beyer A, Russell RB, et al. Landscape of Nuclear Transport Receptor Cargo Specificity. Mol Syst Biol (2017) 13:962. doi: 10.15252/msb.20177608
73. Xu F, Jia M, Li X, Tang Y, Jiang K, Bao J, et al. Exportin-4 Coordinates Nuclear Shuttling of TOPLESS Family Transcription Corepressors to Regulate Plant Immunity. Plant Cell (2021) 33:697–713. doi: 10.1093/plcell/koaa047
74. Jia M, Shen X, Tang Y, Shi X, Gu Y. A Karyopherin Constrains Nuclear Activity of the NLR Protein SNC1 and Is Essential to Prevent Autoimmunity in Arabidopsis. Mol Plant (2021) 14:1733–44. doi: 10.1016/j.molp.2021.06.011
75. Chen M, Nowak DG, Narula N, Robinson B, Watrud K, Ambrico A, et al. The Nuclear Transport Receptor Importin-11 Is a Tumor Suppressor That Maintains PTEN Protein. J Cell Biol (2017) 216:641–56. doi: 10.1083/jcb.201604025
76. Vanhaesebroeck B, Stephens L, Hawkins P. PI3K Signalling: The Path to Discovery and Understanding. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol (2012) 13:195–203. doi: 10.1038/nrm3290
77. Kataoka N, Bachorik JL, Dreyfuss G. Transportin-SR, A Nuclear Import Receptor for SR Proteins. J Cell Biol (1999) 145:1145–52. doi: 10.1083/jcb.145.6.1145
78. Xu S, Zhang Z, Jing B, Gannon P, Ding J, Xu F, et al. Transportin-SR Is Required for Proper Splicing of Resistance Genes and Plant Immunity. PLoS Genet (2011) 7:e1002159. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1002159
79. Christ F, Thys W, De Rijck J, Gijsbers R, Albanese A, Arosio D, et al. Transportin-SR2 Imports HIV Into the Nucleus. Curr Biol (2008) 18:1192–202. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2008.07.079
80. Demeulemeester J, Blokken J, De Houwer S, Dirix L, Klaassen H, Marchand A, et al. Inhibitors of the Integrase-Transportin-SR2 Interaction Block HIV Nuclear Import. Retrovirology (2018) 15:5. doi: 10.1186/s12977-018-0389-2
81. Lee SH, Hannink M. The N-Terminal Nuclear Export Sequence of IkappaBalpha Is Required for RanGTP-Dependent Binding to CRM1. J Biol Chem (2001) 276:23599–606. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M011197200
82. Garcia AV, Blanvillain-Baufume S, Huibers RP, Wiermer M, Li G, Gobbato E, et al. Balanced Nuclear and Cytoplasmic Activities of EDS1 Are Required for a Complete Plant Innate Immune Response. PLoS Pathog (2010) 6:e1000970. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1000970
83. Zhang M, Gong P, Ge L, Chang Z, Cheng X, Zhou X, et al. Nuclear Exportin 1 Facilitates Turnip Mosaic Virus Infection by Exporting the Sumoylated Viral Replicase and by Repressing Plant Immunity. New Phytol (2021) 232(3):1382–98. doi: 10.1111/nph.17657
84. Ludke D, Roth C, Kamrad SA, Messerschmidt J, Hartken D, Appel J, et al. Functional Requirement of the Arabidopsis Importin-Alpha Nuclear Transport Receptor Family in Autoimmunity Mediated by the NLR Protein SNC1. Plant J (2021) 105:994–1009. doi: 10.1111/tpj.15082
85. Roth C, Ludke D, Klenke M, Quathamer A, Valerius O, Braus GH, et al. The Truncated NLR Protein TIR-NBS13 Is a MOS6/IMPORTIN-Alpha3 Interaction Partner Required for Plant Immunity. Plant J (2017) 92:808–21. doi: 10.1111/tpj.13717
86. Fagerlund R, Kinnunen L, Kohler M, Julkunen I, Melen K. NF-{Kappa}B Is Transported Into the Nucleus by Importin {Alpha}3 and Importin {Alpha}4. J Biol Chem (2005) 280:15942–51. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M500814200
87. Agrawal T, Gupta GK, Agrawal DK. Vitamin D Supplementation Reduces Airway Hyperresponsiveness and Allergic Airway Inflammation in a Murine Model. Clin Exp Allergy (2013) 43:672–83. doi: 10.1111/cea.12102
88. Meng W, Gao SJ. Targeting XPO1 Enhances Innate Immune Response and Inhibits KSHV Lytic Replication During Primary Infection by Nuclear Stabilization of the P62 Autophagy Adaptor Protein. Cell Death Dis (2021) 12:29. doi: 10.1038/s41419-020-03303-1
89. Gruenbaum Y, Margalit A, Goldman RD, Shumaker DK, Wilson KL. The Nuclear Lamina Comes of Age. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol (2005) 6:21–31. doi: 10.1038/nrm1550
90. Burke B, Stewart CL. The Nuclear Lamins: Flexibility in Function. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol (2013) 14:13–24. doi: 10.1038/nrm3488
91. Pawar S, Kutay U. The Diverse Cellular Functions of Inner Nuclear Membrane Proteins. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol (2021) 13(9):a040477. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a040477
92. Ciska M, Moreno Diaz de la Espina S. The Intriguing Plant Nuclear Lamina. Front Plant Sci (2014) 5:166. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2014.00166
93. Ciska M, Hikida R, Masuda K, Moreno Diaz de la Espina S. Evolutionary History and Structure of Nuclear Matrix Constituent Proteins, the Plant Analogues of Lamins. J Exp Bot (2019) 70:2651–64. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erz102
94. Wang H, Dittmer TA, Richards EJ. Arabidopsis CROWDED NUCLEI (CRWN) Proteins Are Required for Nuclear Size Control and Heterochromatin Organization. BMC Plant Biol (2013) 13:200. doi: 10.1186/1471-2229-13-200
95. Blunt EL, Shandler JA, Hughes EJ, Sussman H, Christopherson RC, Richards EJ. Coordination of NMCP1- and NMCP2-Class Proteins Within the Plant Nucleoskeleton. Mol Biol Cell (2020) 31:2948–58. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E19-08-0464
96. Jarad M, Mariappan K, Almeida-Trapp M, Mette MF, Mithofer A, Rayapuram N, et al. The Lamin-Like LITTLE NUCLEI 1 (LINC1) Regulates Pattern-Triggered Immunity and Jasmonic Acid Signaling. Front Plant Sci (2019) 10:1639. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2019.01639
97. Wang N, Karaaslan ES, Faiss N, Berendzen KW, Liu C. Characterization of a Plant Nuclear Matrix Constituent Protein in Liverwort. Front Plant Sci (2021) 12:670306. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2021.670306
98. Choi J, Richards EJ. The Role of CRWN Nuclear Proteins in Chromatin-Based Regulation of Stress Response Genes. Plant Signal Behav (2020) 15:1694224. doi: 10.1080/15592324.2019.1694224
99. Mikulski P, Hohenstatt ML, Farrona S, Smaczniak C, Stahl Y, Kalyanikrishna, et al. The Chromatin-Associated Protein PWO1 Interacts With Plant Nuclear Lamin-Like Components to Regulate Nuclear Size. Plant Cell (2019) 31:1141–54. doi: 10.1105/tpc.18.00663
100. Guo T, Mao X, Zhang H, Zhang Y, Fu M, Sun Z, et al. Lamin-Like Proteins Negatively Regulate Plant Immunity Through NAC WITH TRANSMEMBRANE MOTIF1-LIKE9 and NONEXPRESSOR OF PR GENES1 in Arabidopsis Thaliana. Mol Plant (2017) 10:1334–48. doi: 10.1016/j.molp.2017.09.008
101. Saez A, Herrero-Fernandez B, Gomez-Bris R, Somovilla-Crespo B, Rius C, Gonzalez-Granado JM. Lamin a/C and the Immune System: One Intermediate Filament, Many Faces. Int J Mol Sci (2020) 21(17):6109. doi: 10.3390/ijms21176109
102. Yabuki M, Miyake T, Doi Y, Fujiwara T, Hamazaki K, Yoshioka T, et al. Role of Nuclear Lamins in Nuclear Segmentation of Human Neutrophils. Physiol Chem Phys Med NMR (1999) 31:77–84.
103. Olins AL, Zwerger M, Herrmann H, Zentgraf H, Simon AJ, Monestier M, et al. The Human Granulocyte Nucleus: Unusual Nuclear Envelope and Heterochromatin Composition. Eur J Cell Biol (2008) 87:279–90. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcb.2008.02.007
104. Hoffmann K, Sperling K, Olins AL, Olins DE. The Granulocyte Nucleus and Lamin B Receptor: Avoiding the Ovoid. Chromosoma (2007) 116:227–35. doi: 10.1007/s00412-007-0094-8
105. Kim Y, Bayona PW, Kim M, Chang J, Hong S, Park Y, et al. Macrophage Lamin a/C Regulates Inflammation and the Development of Obesity-Induced Insulin Resistance. Front Immunol (2018) 9:696. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.00696
Keywords: nuclear envelope (NE), nuclear pore complex (NPC), nuclear transport receptors (NTRs), nucleoskeletal proteins, innate immune system, plant Immunity, nucleocytoplasmic continuum, nuclear lamina
Citation: Fang Y and Gu Y (2021) Regulation of Plant Immunity by Nuclear Membrane-Associated Mechanisms. Front. Immunol. 12:771065. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.771065
Received: 05 September 2021; Accepted: 18 November 2021;
Published: 06 December 2021.
Edited by:
Bostjan Kobe, The University of Queensland, AustraliaReviewed by:
Mary Christie, The University of Sydney, AustraliaSusan Breen, University of Warwick, United Kingdom
Copyright © 2021 Fang and Gu. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Yangnan Gu, Z3V5YW5nbmFuQGJlcmtlbGV5LmVkdQ==