Novel Immune Cell-Based Therapies to Eradicate High-Risk Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Adverse genetic risk acute myeloid leukemia (AML) includes a wide range of clinical-pathological entities with extremely poor outcomes; thus, novel therapeutic approaches are needed. Promising results achieved by engineered chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells in other blood neoplasms have paved the way for the development of immune cell-based therapies for adverse genetic risk AML. Among these, adoptive cell immunotherapies with single/multiple CAR-T cells, CAR-natural killer (NK) cells, cytokine-induced killer cells (CIK), and NK cells are subjects of ongoing clinical trials. On the other hand, allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) still represents the only curative option for adverse genetic risk AML patients. Unfortunately, high relapse rates (above 50%) and associated dismal outcomes (reported survival ~10–20%) even question the role of current allo-HSCT protocols and emphasize the urgency of adopting novel effective transplant strategies. We have recently demonstrated that haploidentical allo-HSCT combined with regulatory and conventional T cells adoptive immunotherapy (Treg-Tcon haplo-HSCT) is able to overcome disease-intrinsic chemoresistance, prevent leukemia-relapse, and improve survival of adverse genetic risk AML patients. In this Perspective, we briefly review the recent advancements with immune cell-based strategies against adverse genetic risk AML and discuss how such approaches could favorably impact on patients’ outcomes.

Introduction

High risk (or adverse risk) acute myeloid leukemias (HR-AML) include a number of clinical and biological AML subsets which are usually characterized by poor response to conventional treatments and dismal long-term survival, even when conventional allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) is performed (1). Such AML category is characterized by high-risk cytogenetics [i.e., complex and/or monosomal karyotypes, chromosomes 3, 5, 7, and 17 aberrations) and/or by specific genetic signatures (including mutations in TP53, RUNX1, ASXL1, and FLT3 genes (2)] that confer an aggressive phenotype and often chemoresistance. Moreover, a large proportion of patients affected by secondary AML (sAML) (3) and therapy-related leukemias (tr-AML) (4) converge into the HR-AML category. sAML is characterized by distinct molecular features, frequently involving the aberrant displacement of spliceosomal machinery (SRSF2, SF3B1, U2AF1, and ZRSR2), epigenetic modifiers (ASXL1, EZH2, BCOR, RUNX1), and cell-cycle regulators (TP53) (2). Despite the fact that next-generation sequencing (NGS) analyses have recently shed some light on the genetic complexity of these AML subsets, deep knowledge on leukemogenesis of each specific biological entity is currently lacking. Thus, targeted therapeutic approaches are still missing. While several drugs have been recently approved for the treatment of adult AML, they have only shown to slightly influence the fatal course of HR-AML patients. Such expanding armamentarium includes small molecules (e.g., FLT3 inhibitors, Midostaurin and Gilteritinib; isocitrate-dehydrogenase type 1 and 2/IDH1-2 inhibitors, Ivosidenib and Enasidenib; the Bcl2-inhibitor, Venetoclax) and new-generation cytotoxic treatments, like CPX-351 (5). Indeed, CPX-351 received Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 2019 approval for the treatment of tr-AML or AML with myelodysplasia-related changes (AML-MRC). Furthermore, emerging tailored strategies against mutant TP53 (i.e., APR-246, Pevonedistat) (6–9) are providing encouraging yet preliminary evidences that may support their use in this high-risk setting. Since the achievement of durable remissions and the prevention of disease relapse remain major issues in the treatment of these patients, many research efforts have been directed towards a deeper understanding of mechanisms regulating relapse biology, with a major focus on immune system perturbation.

Immune-based adoptive cell therapies (ACTs) rely on the infusion of immune cells that aim to kill the tumor. These therapeutic platforms are revolutionizing treatment of blood neoplasms (Figure 1) and are challenging traditional drug interventions (10). In recent years, important advances have been made in developing novel effective immunotherapies (immune-checkpoint blockade, ACT, and vaccines) to overcome tumor-induced T-cell exhaustion and immune escape (10). Chimeric antigen receptor T-cells (CAR-T cells) are a form of ACT that has already demonstrated to be an effective treatment of various aggressive cancers, including subsets of advanced leukemias (11–13). Beyond this, a plethora of other immune cell-based approaches are currently under investigation in blood tumors, including CAR-natural killer (NK) cells, cytokine-induced killer cells (CIK), and NK cells, as well as novel forms of CAR-T cells (dual CAR-T and multi-CAR-T cells).

FIGURE 1

Figure 1 Available immune cell-based therapies for high-risk acute myeloid leukemia (HR-AML).

Allo-HSCT and especially HLA haploidentical allo-HSCT (haplo-HSCT) may serve as “discovery platforms” that can help to reveal the complex interplay between AML and the immune microenvironment and to set the base for pioneering studies of AML immune-targeting (Figure 1). However, conventional transplantation strategies have limited impact on HR-AML outcomes, as survival curves rarely exceed 30–35% (14–16). In order to improve such outcomes, novel allo-HSCT strategies that exert more potent antileukemic activity need to be developed. Adoptive immunotherapy with conventional T cells (Tcons) and regulatory T cells (Tregs) is an innovative strategy that has been built to overcome disease chemoresistance and boost T-cell immunity, while preserving host tissues from graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) damaging (17). In particular, Treg infusion in the absence of other forms of immune suppression allows for T cell-mediated killing of leukemic blasts. Thus, such approach resulted in prolonged and stable disease remission in the vast majority of HR-AML patients, as we have preliminarily observed in a proof-of-concept retrospective study (18).

In the present Perspective, we will review molecular mechanisms underlying HR-AML biology that drive disease relapse, as well as the potential impact of the newly developed approaches with target therapies on patients’ outcomes. We will describe immune-based strategies against HR-AML in ongoing trials and discuss how refined transplantation approaches with adoptive immunotherapy might represent the “ultimate” therapeutic option for a definitive eradication of HR-AML.

Molecular Genetics of HR-AML

HR-AML includes many distinct biological entities, often characterized by an aggressive phenotype and intrinsic resistance to conventional treatments (2). HR-AML are not well defined in World Health Organization (WHO) classification, but this definition is widely used in clinical risk-adapted algorithms and also in the evaluation of the results from clinical trials. The major subgroup within this category consists of AML with high-risk cytogenetics, a subset of AML with different pathologic and clinical features that include the following:

- AML with complex karyotype (CK): its definition is not clear yet; however, it might be identified by the presence of ≥3 chromosomal abnormalities not included in defined WHO categories, and not associated with favorable prognosis (2, 19, 20)

- AML with monosomal karyotype (MK): it is defined by the presence of at least two autosomal monosomies or one single autosomal monosomy in combination with at least one structural abnormality (21)

- AML bearing specific chromosomal aberrations: it is defined by the presence of specific genetic abnormalities such as inv(3)(q21.3q26.2) or t(3;3)(q21.3;q26.2); GATA2,MECOM(EVI1); -5 or del(5q); -7; -17/abn(17p) (2)

Specifically, CK AML have been recently proposed to be further divided into typical and atypical cases by the presence (or the absence, respectively) of 5q, 7q, and/or 17p losses (22). Typical CK AML category bears TP53 mutations (almost absent within the atypical subgroup) more frequently and, thus, it is associated with poorer outcomes (compared to atypical cases). On the other hand, atypical CK AMLs are characterized by different mutational onco-prints and more frequently display mutations of RAS pathway–associated genes, NPM1 and/or FLT3 genes (22). Functional transcriptomic analyses of CK AML highlighted an elevated genomic instability with aberrant activation of DNA damage response and cell-cycle checkpoint pathways (23, 24). Although at very initial stages, genomic analyses of MK AML cases have consistently demonstrated that abnormalities involving chromosomes 5 [-5, or del(5q)], 7 (-7), and 17 (-17/abn(17p) are frequent in this setting, and strongly coupled to TP53 pathogenic mutations (25). However, other molecular pathways are implicated in MK AML pathogenesis and rely on a peculiar mutational signature targeting NOTCH1 (rarely reported in AML), BCOR/BCORL1, or RUNX1 genes (25). Interestingly, MK AML (as well as CK AML) are commonly associated with a catastrophic mutational phenomenon, namely, chromothripsis, that is promoted by clustered genomic rearrangements that result in multiple oncogenic hits and tumor-suppressors’ inactivation (26). Eventually, such genomic events lead to the development of a highly proliferative disease. Specific aberrations involving chromosomes 3, 5, and 7 also clustered within HR-AML category. While chromosomes 5 and 7 aberrations are a common cytogenetic feature of trAML (4) and sAML that developed from previous myelodysplasia or myeloproliferative neoplasms (27), abnormalities involving chromosome 3 [inv(3)(q21.3q26.2) or t(3;3)(q21.3;q26.2); GATA2,MECOM(EVI1)] could be related to a distinct (usually de novo) clinical-biological entity (2, 28). TP53 mutations and aberrant RAS pathway activity (NRAS, KRAS, PTPN11, NF1) are common features of trAML (27), as well as of EVI1-rearranged (EVI-r) AML (28, 29). Importantly, the latter is characterized by typical morphologic features (dysplastic megakaryocytes, multilineage dysplasia, and normal/elevated blood platelet counts) and driven by distinct molecular programs (like MECOM and IKZF1). EVI-r AML is associated with very poor overall survival (OS) (28, 29).

Furthermore, the 2017 European LeukemiaNet (ELN) adverse-risk category (2) also comprises specific WHO-defined genetic entities, which include wild-type NPM1 and FLT3-ITD^high, mutated RUNX1, and mutated ASXL1. The molecular pathogenesis of each distinct genetic entity is very poorly understood, and future studies are needed to investigate such biological complexity.

Ongoing Adoptive Cell Therapies

The ability of leukemic blasts to evade immune surveillance has been recognized as a major mechanism of leukemia relapse after allo-HSCT (30). The novel use of immune therapeutics that aims to redirect the immune system against malignant blasts is now considered a new powerful tool to eradicate leukemia. Indeed, novel cellular immunotherapies with chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells for B-lymphoproliferative disorders have recently achieved promising results (31) and generated great enthusiasm in the scientific community. As a matter of fact, a great number of studies are now emerging with the goal to provide similar effective treatments for various hematologic neoplasms. Cell therapy for AML is more complex than for lymphoid malignancies because myeloid leukemia-specific targets still need to be well identified. Many adoptive cell strategies are under investigation (Table 1) and are object of several clinical trials (45).

TABLE 1

Table 1 | Selected published studies of immune cell-based strategies other than allogeneic transplantation for high-risk acute myeloid leukemia (HR-AML).

Natural Killer (NK) Cells Adoptive Immunotherapies

NK-cells are a subset of peripheral blood lymphocytes that are innately able to kill malignant cells through different mechanisms based on the balance between activatory and inhibitory signals. Interaction between major histocompatibility complex class I (MHC-I) molecules with killer immunoglobulin receptors (KIRs) on NK cells plays a major role in regulating NK cell function and activity. NK-cells kill leukemia cells when a mismatch between KIRs and their ligand on target cells is present (46). Such activity was demonstrated in T cell-depleted HLA-haploidentical transplant setting by the Perugia group and referred to as “NK cell alloreactivity” (47). The absence of any sort of pharmacologic immune suppression in TCD haplo-HSCT allowed for leukemia killing by alloreactive NK cells. On the other hand, the use of conventional immune suppressives to prevent GvHD in other transplant platforms may limit NK cell alloreactivity and its clinical effect (48). Further, NK cells may be dysfunctional and fail to kill AML blasts in case of abnormal phenotype, decreased degranulation level, and low INF-gamma and TNF-alfa production (32, 49, 50). For many years, NK cell adoptive transfer has been investigated as a possible approach to treat HR-AML. Studies showed donor-derived allogeneic NK-cells achieved durable complete remission in ~33% of HR-AML patients. Such studies proved infusion of a high number of NK-cells to be safe and well-tolerated. Indeed, donor NK cells appear not to cause any GvHD (33–35, 51). Moreover, donor NK-cells are able to persist and expand in vivo after infusion. On the other hand, while promising, allogeneic NK cell adoptive transfer has still limited efficacy, with generally low overall response rate. To overcome such limitations and boost NK cell in vivo function, different protocols and schemes that aim to generate and activate NK-cells are under evaluation and further studies are needed to establish the most effective approach.

Cytokine-Induced Killer (CIK) Cells

CIK cells derived from cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTL) that are in vitro activated by anti-CD3, OKT3, INF-gamma and subsequently expanded with IL-2. Other than T cell markers, they express surface protein similar to NK-cells, such as CD56, the inhibitory NK receptors, and the natural killer group 2 member D (NKG2D) receptor, one of the most important receptors involved in NK-mediated cancer cell killing (45). In clinical trials, CIK cells have been generated both from autologous and allogeneic lymphocytes and have been infused in combination or not with different strategies of allo-HSCT. Even if the results of early trials were disappointing (37), last studies are more encouraging (36, 38, 39, 52, 53). CIK cell transfer resulted in stable complete remission in ~60% of patients with AML. No significant infusion-related toxicities and a very low rate of acute GvHD were observed after CIK cell infusions. No studies focused on HR-AML, so that the efficacy in this setting still remains to be determined.

Chimeric Antigen Receptor (CAR) T and NK Cells

CAR-T cells are genetically engineered T cells to express a variable heavy and light chains (V_HL) on cell surface with high specificity for malignant cell antigens (54). Despite the great enthusiasm that followed the CAR-T cell success in the treatment of acute B-lymphoblastic leukemia/lymphoma (B-ALL/LBL) and forms of B-cell lymphoma, generation of CAR-T cells against myeloid leukemic blasts is challenging because of the absence of leukemia-specific target antigens. In fact, AML antigens are often widely expressed by other hemopoietic cells or tissues. While in vitro studies and xenografts demonstrated the effectiveness of anti-CD33 and anti-CD123 CAR-T cells (42, 55), clinical efficacy on AML is still to be confirmed. CD33 is a transmembrane receptor expressed on >90% of blasts, but unfortunately also on multilineage hematopoietic progenitors and myelomonocytic precursors. It was still validated as therapeutic target based on the efficacy of gemtuzumab ozogamicin, a drug-conjugated monoclonal antibody against CD33. Preliminary data of anti-CD33 CAR-T cells are not encouraging (41). CD123 is a transmembrane subunit of the IL-3 receptor expressed on 100% of AML cells, and its expression is increased in FLT3-mutated AML. In vitro ed in vivo (xenograft) preliminary data showed an increased cytokine release and decreased tumor burden using anti-CD123 CAR-T cells. FLT3 receptor is typically expressed on myeloid blasts, independent of FLT3 mutational status. Anti-FLT3 CAR-T cells showed in vitro ed in vivo promising antileukemic effect (56, 57). Moreover, these seem to be less toxic on normal hematopoiesis than the anti-CD33 counterpart. Many other potential targets are now under evaluation. Lewis antigen (LeY) is overexpressed on myeloid blasts in comparison to normal tissues. A trial of autologous CAR-T cells targeting LeY showed a biological response (~60% of patients), but relapse occurred within 2 years (40). An ongoing clinical trial (NCT03222674) evaluates the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of multi-CAR-T cell therapy that targets different AML surface antigens (Muc1/CLL1/CD33/CD38/CD56/CD123) in patients with relapsed/refractory AML. Another phase I study (NCT04156256) evaluates the safety and tolerability of CD123-CD33 dual CAR-T in patients with relapsed and/or refractory AMLs.

In alternative to CAR-T cells, CAR-NK cell therapy ideally combines the specific targeting provided by CARs with the NK cell ability to kill AML blasts in the absence of relevant systemic toxicity. Indeed, CAR-NK cells showed promising results with no important toxicity in lymphoma patients (58). Mouse preclinical models suggest that CD123 CAR-NK cells may be effective in AML (59). Clinical-grade CAR-NK cells can be manufactured from multiple sources (e.g., peripheral blood mononuclear cells, umbilical cord blood, hematopoietic progenitors, induced pluripotent stem cells), including the recently introduced CAR NK-92 cells, which consist of a modified CAR-engineered form of the NK-92 cell line. Such cell line represents an easily manageable and cost-effective tool for large-scale production of CAR-NK cells. Conversely, few drawbacks should be taken into account when using such strategy for CAR-NK cell manufacturing: i) failure of an in vivo expansion, due to lethal irradiation before infusion; ii) lack of NK-cell activating molecules (CD16 and NKp44); iii) potential in vivo tumorigenicity (60). The first-in-human clinical trial using CD33 CAR-NK cells derived from engineered NK-92 cells on three relapse/refractory extramedullary AML patients had no encouraging results (1/3 reached a transitory complete remission of 4 months) (44). Other trials with CD33 CAR-NK cells are under investigation (NCT02892695, NCT02944162). Such studies will help to clarify whether combinatorial strategies can provide antileukemic activity in the absence of relevant toxicity. While there was no specific focus on HR-AML in these preliminary studies and no clear studies showed HR-AML to be particularly sensitive to immune killing, the development of an effective anti-AML CAR-T or CAR-NK cell approach might provide a potent tool for reducing relapse in this high-risk disease.

Other Adoptive Cell Therapies in the Near Future

T cells can be engineered to target different tumor-associated antigens that are frequently expressed in advanced AML blasts and other hematological neoplasms. Preliminary results of such tumor-associated antigen lymphocyte therapy (TAA-T) for different relapsed hematologic malignancies after allo-HSCT (11 patient, Hodgkin’s lymphoma n=2, B-ALL n=3, AML n=5, and 1 HR-AML post 2^nd allo-HSCT) showed that 80% of patients (4/5) with AML achieved a stable complete remission (61). This study also suggested TAA-T to be safe and tolerable (only one patient showed a liver GvHD; no cytokine release syndrome or neurotoxicity was observed). These preliminary promising data suggest that TAA-T therapy may be a feasible option for preemptive treatment of relapse after allo-HSCT for HR-AML, but further clinical studies are needed to ascertain its feasibility and efficacy in this setting. T-cell receptor (TCR)-modified T-cell therapy is a novel emerging strategy using the anti-tumor effect of genetically modifying T cells through the transduction of TCR genes against several cancer antigens (62, 63). The impact of this therapy against specific leukemic antigens is still under investigation. This therapy seems also very safe (64). The in vitro and in vivo preliminary studies on B-malignancies are very promising (65).

Allo-HSCT Strategies: Is There Room for the Cure of High-Risk Acute Myeloid Leukemias?

Allo-HSCT is the only treatment modality that can provide a long-term survival benefit for HR-AML (Table 2), although current conventional transplantation strategies have scarce effect on HR-AML outcomes, with a maximum 2-year OS of 30–35% and a higher relapse rate when compared to other cytogenetic risk categories (14–16).

TABLE 2

Table 2 Selected published strategies of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) for high-risk acute myeloid leukemia (HR-AML).

HLA-Matched Allo-HSCT

A multicenter study of HLA-matched allo-HSCT that employed various immunosuppressive strategies for GvHD prophylaxis (cyclosporine A, tacrolimus, and T-cell depletion) compared a total of 584 patients carrying HR-AML in first complete remission (CR1) from 151 transplantation centers. It showed a median 3-year OS of 45% (range 38–52%), 37% (range 31–44%), and 31% (range 22–41%) in patients undergoing matched sibling donor (MSD), HLA-well-matched and partially-matched unrelated donor (MUD) transplantation, respectively. Myeloablative or reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) regimens were used. Cumulative incidence (CI) of relapse at 3 years was 37% for MSD, 40% for well-MUD, and 24% for partially-MUD, while 3-year relapse-free survival (RFS) was 42, 34, and 29%, respectively. No significant differences in relapse were observed among the various cytogenetic subsets (66). Another retrospective multicenter study that involved more than 500 transplantation centers reported outcomes of 1,342 patients with CK-AML. Increased risk of relapse correlated with age, secondary AML, active disease at transplant, and the presence of deletion/monosomy 5. High tumor burden before transplant negatively impacted on post-transplantation outcomes. Indeed, 2-year CI of relapse for patients in CR and with active disease at transplantation was 47 and 64%, respectively. A very short OS at 2 years post-transplantation was observed in a subgroup of patients carrying deletion or monosomy 7 and deletion or monosomy 5 (29 and 20% respectively vs 42% in control groups without 7 and 5 deletion/monosomy). No significant survival benefit was observed between fully myeloablative conditioning and RIC regimen for patients with CK AML (34 and 28%). RFS rate was 39.9, 33, and 18.3% for patients ages <40, 40 to 60, and >60 years, respectively (14). Such studies demonstrate that the high relapse incidence after transplant in HR-AML patients is the major limitation of the procedure. Such outcomes urge the development of novel transplantation approaches.

Haplo-HSCT

The recent advancements in T-cell manipulation and in GvHD prophylaxis make haplo-HSCT a valuable transplantation strategy to overcome intrinsic chemotherapy resistance of high-risk leukemias. Haplo-HSCT procedures can be mainly divided in two major categories: T-cell depleted (TCD) peripheral-blood stem cells (PBSCs) haplo-HSCT and unmanipulated haplo-HSCT.

Unmanipulated haplo-HSCT relies on pharmacologic GvHD prophylaxis, and it is now adopted worldwide. The use of G-CSF-primed grafts (67, 77), post-transplant high-dose cyclophosphamide (PT-Cy) in combination with other immunosuppressive drugs (78, 79), and post-transplant rapamycin (80), are different approaches that have been tested in this setting. While such strategies help to keep non-relapse mortality (NRM) acceptable, disease relapse remains a major concern, especially when non-myeloablative conditioning regimens are used (81). A study of unmanipulated G-CSF-primed haplo-HSCT showed a 1-year CI of NRM of 36% and a CI of relapse of 21% at 1 year and 28% at 5 years respectively, with a 3-year probability of OS and RFS in 44 and 30%, respectively, in high-risk patients (> second CR or active disease) with hematologic malignancies (including HR-AML) (67). Haplo-HSCT with PT-Cy is now the most widely adopted haplo-HSCT platform, thanks to acceptable rates of acute and chronic GvHD, low NRM, no need of graft manipulation and contained costs. On the other hand, relapse rates are still disappointing in HR-AML patients. In fact, subanalyses showing outcomes of patients with adverse genetic risk AML reported relapse rates up to 50% (14). Because of such limitation and with the goal of reducing leukemia relapse, high-intensity myeloablative conditioning regimens have been employed. Chiusolo P et al. (68) and Devillier R et al. (69) showed a CI of AML relapse of 24% at 4 years and 25% at 2 years, respectively. Further studies will be needed to evaluate if such strategies are effective in subsets of HR-AML patients.

T-Cell Depleted Haplo-HSCT

In the last 20 years, several strategies of ex vivo T-cell depletion (TCD) have been tested to improve outcomes of acute leukemia patients who underwent haplo-HSCT. While traditional TCD procedure based on positive selection of CD34+ cells was associated with delayed immune reconstitution and increased risk of NRM (70, 82), more recent strategies are directed towards the preservation of immune subsets that improve post-transplant immune recovery for more effective anti-infective and antileukemic activities (82). Among these, αβ T-cell-depleted haplo-HSCT appears to be an effective platform for the treatment of HR-AML. In αβ T-cell-depleted haplo-HSCT the graft is manipulated to eliminate T cells that express αβ T cell receptor and which are demonstrated to be the main T cell population responsible for alloreactions that cause GvHD. In the studies by Shelikhova L et al. (71) and Maschan M et al. (72), children with primary refractory or relapsed AML who underwent αβ T-cell-depleted haplo-HSCT reached hematologic complete remission, despite 9/22 of them carried adverse-risk cytogenetics. However, the relapse rate and OS at 2 years after allo-HSCT were 42 and 52%, respectively. In different studies by Locatelli F et al. (73) and Bertaina A et al. (74), αβ T-cell and B-cell-depleted haplo-HSCT proved to be a safe and suitable approach in high-risk acute leukemias (HR-AL) in children. Indeed, it achieved a 5-year probability of chronic GvHD-free/relapse-free (GRFS) survival of 71% in HR-AL patients (73). A novel TCD haplo-HCT platform employs grafts that have been selectively depleted of naive T-cells. Indeed, depletion of naïve T cells (T_N) from PBSC preserves hematopoietic engraftment and allows for the transfer of donor-derived memory T cells, that can confer immunity against pathogens with low risk of GvHD (75). This approach has demonstrated to improve outcomes of HR-AL patients (the 2-year relapse rate was 21% and the 2-year RFS was 70%) in a single-arm trial (75). Thus, such approaches are promising, but relapse rates still reduce outcomes of HR-AL patients.

Haploidentical HSCT Combined With Regulatory and Conventional T-Cells Adoptive Immunotherapy

We have recently demonstrated that haplo-HSCT combined with regulatory and conventional T-cells adoptive immunotherapy (Treg-Tcon haplo-HSCT) is able to overcome disease-intrinsic chemoresistance (18, 76). We enrolled 50 AML patients in the study; 40% of them (20/50) had HR-AML. An “age-adapted” myeloablative conditioning based on total body irradiation (TBI) for patients up to the age of 50 years and total marrow/total lymphoid irradiation (TMLI) for patients aged 51–65 years was followed by thiotepa, fludarabine, and cyclophosphamide. No pharmacological GvHD prophylaxis was given. Two millions/kg donor regulatory T cells were given at day −4 to allow for their alloantigen-specific in vivo expansion. One million/kg conventional T cells were given at day −1 and were followed by the infusion of a “megadose” of purified CD34+ hematopoietic progenitor cells at day 0. Fifteen/50 patients developed grade ≥2 acute GvHD (aGvHD). Moderate/severe cGvHD occurred in only one patient. Only two patients relapsed (4%). Consequently, at a median follow-up of 29 months, the probability of moderate/severe cGvHD/relapse-free survival was 75% (18, 76). TMLI allowed to safely extend the powerful effect of a myeloablative conditioning to older (>60 years old) patients. Further, when looking at the different genetic signatures of the enrolled AML patients, we found that HR-AML did not have a higher risk of relapse in comparison to more favorable subgroups. Indeed 17 of the 20 HR-AML patients are alive and leukemia-free despite many of them had detectable disease at transplant. Such results demonstrate HR-AML to be sensible to immune-mediated killing. Indeed, the absence of pharmacologic immune suppression in Treg/Tcon haplo-HSCT could have favored a potent GvL effect that was exerted across all the AML subsets and that was not limited by disease burden and previous refractoriness to chemotherapeutic agents. ELN AML genetic risk stratification is considered to retain outcome prediction after allo-HSCT (83). However, our study showed that effect was lost after Treg/Tcon haplo-HSCT in a single series of 50 AML patients. While larger multicentric studies are needed to support such conclusion, the potent GvL activity of Treg/Tcon haplo-HSCT appears to be an effective tool for the treatment of such unfavorable AML.

Discussion

HR-AMLs are usually characterized by a very poor response to conventional treatments and to conventional allo-HSCT. Indeed, relapse rates are high (often above 50%) and result in very low survival (often below 10–20%). Thus, novel effective strategies are needed. Recent studies on new adoptive cell strategies (CAR-T cells, CAR-NK cells, CIKs, activated NK cells) bring new hopes for the treatment of such unfavorable diseases. Indeed, immune-cell-based therapies may represent a powerful tool to successfully treat chemoresistant HR-AML. NK cell adoptive immunotherapies are a promising therapeutic, but their efficacy is still limited and fine-tuning of the approach is still required for larger clinical use (32–35). The more recently introduced CAR-T- and CAR-NK-cell-based treatments demonstrated high potency in pilot studies and hold great promise (40–44). The growing body of clinical studies and broader use of these agents in different settings and against novel targets will provide key information on their ability to eradicate HR-AML. Furthermore, we have recently demonstrated that Treg-Tcon haplo-HSCT is able to overcome HR-AML intrinsic chemoresistance, prevent relapse, and improve survival (18, 76). This study strongly suggests that HR-AMLs are sensitive to antileukemic immunity. The introduction of new immune therapeutics that strengthen immune activity against leukemia and the development of transplantation approaches that favor unopposed GvL might help to develop powerful tools for an effective treatment of HR-AML.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/supplementary material. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Ethics Statement

All procedures were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional research committee. The patients/participants provided their written informed consent to participate in this study.

Author Contributions

RL and AMar contributed equally to the figures and writing. AMan, SB, and EH reviewed the manuscript. AV provided guidance, and AP wrote the manuscript and provided critical review. SH and LR provided critical review. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.

Funding

These studies were supported by the grant from the “Associazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro (AIRC)”, START-UP Grant n. 20456 to AP.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s Note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

1. Schiller GJ. High-Risk Acute Myelogenous Leukemia: Treatment Today and Tomorrow. Hematol Am Soc Hematol Educ Prog (2013) 2013:201–8. doi: 10.1182/asheducation-2013.1.201

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Dohner H, Estey E, Grimwade D, Amadori S, Appelbaum FR, Büchner T, et al. Diagnosis and Management of AML in Adults: ELN Recommendations From an International Expert Panel. Blood (2017) 129(4):424–47. doi: 10.1182/blood-2016-08-733196

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Arber DA, Orazi A, Hasserjian R, Thiele J, Borowitz MJ, Le Beau MM, et al. The 2016 Revision to the World Health Organization Classification of Myeloid Neoplasms and Acute Leukemia. Blood (2016) 127(20):2391–405. doi: 10.1182/blood-2016-03-643544

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Boddu P, Kantarjian HM, Garcia-Manero G, Ravandi F, Verstovsek S, Jabbour E, et al. Treated Secondary Acute Myeloid Leukemia: A Distinct High-Risk Subset of AML With Adverse Prognosis. Blood Adv (2017) 1(17):1312–23. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2017008227

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Lancet JE, Uy GL, Cortes JE, Newell LF, Lin TL, Ritchie EK, et al. CPX-351 (Cytarabine and Daunorubicin) Liposome for Injection Versus Conventional Cytarabine Plus Daunorubicin in Older Patients With Newly Diagnosed Secondary Acute Myeloid Leukemia. J Clin Oncol (2018) 36(26):2684–92. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2017.77.6112

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Zhang Q, Bykov VJN, Wiman KG, Zawacka-Pankau J. APR-246 Reactivates Mutant P53 by Targeting Cysteines 124 and 277. Cell Death Dis (2018) 9(5):439. doi: 10.1038/s41419-018-0463-7

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Cluzeau T, Sebert M, Rahmé R, Cuzzubbo S, Walter-Petrich A, Lehmann-Che J, et al. APR-246 Combined With Azacitidine (AZA) in TP53 Mutated Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS) and Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML). A Phase 2 Study by the Groupe Francophone Des Myélodysplasies (GFM). Blood (2019) 134(Supplement_1):677. doi: 10.1182/blood-2019-125579

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Maslah N, Salomao N, Drevon L, Verger E, Partouche N, Ly P, et al. Synergistic Effects of PRIMA-1^met (APR-246) and 5-Azacitidine in TP53-Mutated Myelodysplastic Syndromes and Acute Myeloid Leukemia. Haematologica (2020) 105(6):1539–51. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2019.218453

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Sowrds RT, Coutre S, Maris MB, Zeidner JF, Foran JM, Cruz J, et al. Pevonedistat, a First-in-Class NEDD8-Activating Enzyme Inhibitor, Combined With Azacytidine in Patients With AML. Blood (2018) 131(13):1415–24. doi: 10.1182/blood-2017-09-805895

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Restifo NP, Dudley ME, Rosenberg SA. Adoptive Immunotherapy for Cancer: Harnessing the T Cell Response. Nat Rev Immunol (2012) 12(4):269–81. doi: 10.1038/nri3191

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Maude SL, Frey N, Shaw PA, Aplenc R, Barrett DM, Bunin NJ, et al. Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cells for Sustained Remissions in Leukemia. N Engl J Med (2014) 371(16):1507–17. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1407222

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Kalos M, Levine BL, Porter DL, Katz S, Grupp SA, Bagg A, et al. T Cells With Chimeric Antigen Receptors Have Potent Antitumor Effects and Can Establish Memory in Patients With Advances Leukemia. Sci Transl Med (2011) 3(95):95ra73. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3002842

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Porter DL, Hwang W-T, Frey NV, Lacey SF, Shaw PA, Loren AW, et al. Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cells Persist and Induce Sustained Remissions in Relapsed Refractory Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia. Sci Transl Med (2015) 7(303):303ra139. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aac5415

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Ciurea SO, Labopin M, Socie G, Volin L, Passweg J, Chevallier P, et al. Relapse and Survival After Transplantation for Complex Karyotype Acute Myeloid Leukemia: A Report From the Acute Leukemia Working Party of the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation and the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center. Cancer (2018) 124(10):2134–41. doi: 10.1002/cncr.31311

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Pasquini MC, Zhang MJ, Medeiros BC, Armand P, Hu ZH, Nishihori T, et al. Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation Outcomes in Monosomal Karyotype Myeloid Malignancies. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant (2016) 22(2):248–57. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2015.08.024

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Middeke JM, Herold S, Rücker-Braun E, Berdel WE, Stelljes M, Kaufmann M, et al. TP53 Mutation in Patients With High-Risk Acute Myeloid Leukaemia Treated With Allogeneic Haematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation. Br J Haematol (2016) 172(6):914–22. doi: 10.1111/bjh.13912

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Martelli MF, Di Ianni M, Ruggeri L, Pierini A, Falzetti F, Carotti A, et al. “Designed” Grafts for HLA-Haploidentical Stem Cell Transplantation. Blood (2014) 123:967–73. doi: 10.1182/blood-2013-10-531764

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Marra A, Ruggeri L, Carotti A, Venanzi A, Falzetti F, Terenzi A, et al. HLA-Haploidentical Transplantation With Regulatory and Conventional T Cell Immunotherapy Eradicates Acute Myeloid Leukemia With High-Risk Cytogenetics. Eur Hematol Assoc (EHA) Congress (2020), EHA–3473.

Google Scholar

19. Mrózek K. Cytogenetic, Molecular Genetic, and Clinical Characteristics of Acute Myeloid Leukemia With a Complex Karyotype. Semin Oncol (2008) 35:365–77. doi: 10.1053/j.seminoncol.2008.04.007

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Grimwade D, Hills RK, Moorman AV, Walker H, Chatters S, Goldstone AH, et al. Refinement of Cytogenetic Classification in Acute Myeloid Leukemia: Determination of Prognostic Significance of Rare Recurring Chromosomal Abnormalities Among 5876 Younger Adult Patients Treated in the United Kingdom Medical Research Council Trials. Blood (2010) 116:354–65. doi: 10.1182/blood-2009-11-254441

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Breems DA, Van Putten WL, De Greef GE, Van Zelderen-Bhola SL, Gerssen-Schoorl KB, Mellink CH, et al. Monosomal Karyotype in Acute Myeloid Leukemia: A Better Indicator of Poor Prognosis Than a Complex Karyotype. J Clin Oncol (2008) 26:4791–7. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.16.0259

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

22. Mrozek K, Esifeld AK, Kohlschmidt J, Carroll AJ, Walker CJ, Nicolet D, et al. Complex Karyotype in De Novo Acute Myeloid Leukemia: Typical and Atypical Subtypes Differ Molecularly and Clinically. Leukemia (2019) 33:1620–34. doi: 10.1038/s41375-019-0390-3

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Cavelier C, Didier C, Prade N, Mansat-De Mas V, Manenti S, Recher C, et al. Constitutive Activation of the DNA Damage Signaling Pathway in Acute Myeloid Leukemia With Complex Karyotype: Potential Importance for Checkpoint Targeting Therapy. Cancer Res (2009) 69(22):8652–61. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-09-0939

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

24. Moison C, Lavallée V-P, Thiollier C, Lehnertz B, Boivin I, Mayotte N, et al. Complex Karyotype AML Displays G2/M Signature and Hypersensitivity to PLK1 Inhibition. Blood Adv (2019) 3(4):552–63. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2018028480

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

25. Leung GMK, Zhang C, Ng NKL, Yang N, Lam SSY, Au CH, et al. Distinct Mutation Spectrum, Clinical Outcome and Therapeutic Responses of Typical Complex/Monosomy Karyotype Acute Myeloid Leukemia Carrying TP53 Mutations. Am J Hematol (2019) 94(6):650–7. doi: 10.1002/ajh.25469

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

26. Rucker FG, Dolnik A, Blätte TJ, Teleanu V, Ernst A, Thol F, et al. Chromotripsis Linked to TP53 Alteration, Cell Cycle Impairment, and Dismal Outcome in Acute Myeloid Leukemia With Complex Karyotype. Haematologica (2018) 103(1):e17–20. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2017.180497

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

27. McNerney ME, Godley LA, Le Beau MM. Therapy-Related Myeloid Neopalsms: When Genetics and Environment Collide. Nat Rev Cancer (2017) 17(9):513–27. doi: 10.1038/nrc.2017.60

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

28. Lavallée V-P, Gendron P, Lemieux S, D'Angelo G, Hébert J, Sauvageau G. EVI1-Rearranged Acute Myeloid Leukemias are Characterized by Distinct Molecular Alterations. Blood (2015) 125(1):140–3. doi: 10.1182/blood-2014-07-591529

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

29. Lugthart S, Groschel S, Berloo HB, Kayser S, Valk PJM, Van Zelderen-Bhola SL, et al. Clinical, Molecular, and Prognostic Significance of WHO Type Inv(3)(Q21q26.2)/T(3;3)(Q21;Q26.2) and Various Other 3q Abnormalities in Acute Myeloid Leukemia. J Clin Oncol (2010) 28(24):3890–8. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2010.29.2771

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

30. Vago L, Perna SK, Zanussi M, Mazzi B, Barlassina C, Stanghellini MT, et al. Loss of Mismatched HLA in Leukemia After Stem-Cell Transplantation. N Engl J Med (2009) 361(5):478–88. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0811036

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

31. Khalil DN, Smith EL, Brentjens RJ, Wolchok JD. The Future of Cancer Treatment: Immunomodulation, CARs and Combination Immunotherapy. Nat Rev Clin Oncol (2016) 13(6):394. doi: 10.1038/nrclinonc.2016.65

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

32. Curti A, Ruggeri L, Parisi S, Bontadini A, Dan E, Motta MR, et al. Larger Size of Donor Alloreactive NK Cell Repertoire Correlates With Better Response to NK Cell Immunotherapy in Elderly Acute Myeloid Leukemia Patients. Clin Cancer Res (2016) 22(8):1914–21. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-15-1604

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

33. Fehniger TA, Miller JS, Stuart RK, Cooley S, Salhotra A, Curtsinger J, et al. A Phase 1 Trial of CNDO-109-Activated Natural Killer Cells in Patients With High-Risk Acute Myeloid Leukemia. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant (2018) 24(8):1581–9. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2018.03.019

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

34. Ciurea SO, Schafer JR, Bassett R, Denman CJ, Cao K, Willis D, et al. Phase 1 Clinical Trial Using Mbil21 Ex Vivo-Expanded Donor-Derived NK Cells After Haploidentical Transplantation. Blood (2017) 130(16):1857–68. doi: 10.1182/blood-2017-05-785659

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

35. Stern M, Passweg JR, Meyer-Monard S, Esser R, Tonn T, Soerensen J, et al. Preemptive Immunotherapy With Purified Natural Killer Cells After Haploidentical SCT: A Prospective Phase II Study in Two Centers. Bone Marrow Transplant (2013) 48(3):433–8. doi: 10.1038/bmt.2012.162

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

36. Introna M, Pievani A, Borleri G, Capelli C, Algarotti A, Micò C, et al. Repeated Infusions of Donor-Derived Cytokine-Induced Killer Cells in Patients Relapsing After Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation: A Phase I Study. Haematologica (2007) 92(7):952–9. doi: 10.3324/haematol.11132

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

37. Introna M, Borleri G, Conti E, Franceschetti M, Barbui AM, Broady R, et al. Feasibility and Safety of Adoptive Immunotherapy With CIK Cells After Cord Blood Transplantation. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant (2010) 16(11):1603–7. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2010.05.015

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

38. Rettinger E, Huenecke S, Bonig H, Merker M, Jarisch A, Soerensen J, et al. Interleukin-15-Activated Cytokine-Induced Killer Cells May Sustain Remission in Leukemia Patients After Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation: Feasibility, Safety and First Insights on Efficacy. Haematologica (2016) 101(4):e153–6. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2015.138016

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

39. Linn YC, Yong H-X, Niam M, Lim T-J, Chu S, Choong A, et al. A Phase I/II Clinical Trial of Autologous Cytokine-Induced Killer Cells as Adjuvant Immunotherapy for Acute and Chronic Myeloid Leukemia in Clinical Remission. Cytotherapy (2012) 14(7):851–9. doi: 10.3109/14653249.2012.694419

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

40. Ritchie DS, Neeson PJ, Khot A, Peinert S, Tai T, Tainton K, et al. Persistence and Efficacy of Second Generation CAR T Cell Against the LeY Antigen in Acute Myeloid Leukemia. Mol Ther (2013) 21(11):2122–9. doi: 10.1038/mt.2013.154

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

41. Wang QS, Wang Y, Lv H-Y, Han Q-W, Fan H, Guo B, et al. Treatment of CD33-Directed Chimeric Antigen Receptor-Modified T Cells in One Patient With Relapsed and Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia. Mol Ther (2015) 23(1):184–9. doi: 10.1038/mt.2014.164

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

42. Tasian SK, Kenderian SS, Shen F, Ruella M, Shestova O, Kozlowski M, et al. Optimized Depletion of Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cells in Murine Xenograft Models of Human Acute Myeloid Leukemia. Blood (2017) 129(17):2395–407. doi: 10.1182/blood-2016-08-736041

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

43. Murad JM, Baumeister SH, Werner L, Daley H, Trébéden-Negre H, Reder J, et al. Manufacturing Development and Clinical Production of NKG2D Chimeric Antigen Receptor-Expressing T Cells for Autologous Adoptive Cell Therapy. Cytotherapy (2018). doi: 10.1016/j.jcyt.2018.05.001

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

44. Tang X, Yang L, Li Z, Nalin AP, Dai H, Xu T, et al. First-in-Man Clinical Trial of CAR NK-92 Cells: Safety Test of CD33-CAR NK-92 Cells in Patients With Relapsed and Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia. Am J Cancer Res (2018) 8(6):1083–9.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

45. Hansrivijit P, Gale RP, Barrett J, Ciurea SO. Cellular Therapy for Acute Myeloid Leukemia – Current Status and Future Prospects. Blood Rev (2019) 37:1100578. doi: 10.1016/j.blre.2019.05.002

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

46. Stringaris K, Barrett AJ. The Importance of Natural Killer Cell Killer Immunoglobulin- Like Receptor-Mismatch in Transplant Outcomes. Curr Opin Hematol (2017) 24(6):489–95. doi: 10.1097/MOH.0000000000000384

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

47. Ruggeri L, Capanni M, Urbani E, Perruccio K, Shlomchik WD, Tosti A, et al. Effectiveness of Donor Natural Killer Cell Alloreactivity in Mismatched Hematopoietic Transplants. Science (2002) 295(5562):2097–100. doi: 10.1126/science.1068440

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

48. Shimoni A, Labopin M, Lorentino F, Van Lint MT, Koc Y, Gülbas Z, et al. Killer Cell Immunoglobulin-Like Receptor Ligand Mismatching and Outcome After Haploidentical Transplantation With Post-Transplant Cyclophosphamide. Leukemia (2019) 33(1):230–9. doi: 10.1038/s41375-018-0170-5

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

49. Costello RT, Sivori S, Marcenaro E, Lafage-Pochitaloff M, Mozziconacci M-J, Reviron D, et al. Defective Expression and Function of Natural Killer Cell-Triggering Receptors in Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia. Blood (2002) 99(10):3661–7. doi: 10.1182/blood.V99.10.3661

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

50. Stringaris K, Sekine T, Khoder A, Alsuliman A, Razzaghi B, Sargeant R, et al. Leukemia-Induced Phenotypic and Functional Defects in Natural Killer Cells Predict Failure to Achieve Remission in Acute Myeloid Leukemia. Haematologica (2014) 99(5):836–47. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2013.087536

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

51. Miller JS, Soignier Y, Panoskaltsis-Mortari A, McNearney SA, Yun GH, Fautsch SK, et al. Successful Adoptive Transfer and In Vivo Expansion of Human Haploidentical NK Cells in Patients With Cancer. Blood (2005) 105(8):3051–7. doi: 10.1182/blood-2004-07-2974

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

52. Benyunes MC, Massumoto C, York A, Higuchi CM, Buckner CD, Thompson JA, et al. Interleukin-2 With or Without Lymphokine-Activated Killer Cells as Consolidative Immunotherapy After Autologous Bone Marrow Transplantation for Acute Myelogenous Leukemia. Bone Marrow Transplant (1993) 12(2):159–63.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

53. Wang H, Cao F, Li J, Li Y, Liu X, Wang L, Liu Z, et al. Homing of Cytokine-Induced Killer Cells During the Treatment of Acute Promyelocytic Leukemia. Int J Hematol (2014) 100(2):165–70. doi: 10.1007/s12185-014-1618-7

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

54. Fan M, Li M, Gao L, Geng S, Wang J, Wang Y, et al. Chimeric Antigen Receptors for Adoptive T Cell Therapy in Acute Myeloid Leukemia. J Hematol Oncol (2017) 10(1):151. doi: 10.1186/s13045-017-0519-7

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

55. Mardiros A, Dos Santos C, McDonald T, Brown CE, Wang X, Budde LE, et al. T Cells Expressing CD123-Specific Chimeric Antigen Receptors Exhibit Specific Cytolytic Effector Functions and Antitumor Effects Against Human Acute Myeloid Leukemia. Blood (2013) 122(18):3138–48. doi: 10.1182/blood-2012-12-474056

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

56. Jetani H, Garcia-Cadenas I, Nerreter T, Thomas S, Rydzek J, Meijide JB, et al. CAR T-Cells Targeting FLT3 Have Potent Activity Against FLT3-ITD+ AML and Act Synergistically With the FLT3-Inhibitor Crenolanib. Leukemia (2018) 32(5):1168–79. doi: 10.1038/s41375-018-0009-0

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

57. Sommer C, Cheng HY, Nguyen D, Dettling D, Yeung YA, Sutton J, et al. Allogeneic FLT3 CAR T Cells With and Off-Switch Exhibit Potent Activity Against AML and Can Be Depleted to Expedite Bone Marrow Recovery. Mol Ther (2020) 28(10):2237–51. doi: 10.1016/j.ymthe.2020.06.022

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

58. Liu E, Marin D, Banerjee P, Macapinlac HA, Thompson P, Basar R, et al. Use of CAR-Transduced Natural Killer Cells in CD19-Positive Lymphoid Tumors. N Engl J Med (2020) Feb 6382(6):545–53.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

59. Kerbauy LN, Ang S, Liu E, Banerjee PP, Wu Y, Shaim H, et al. Cord Blood NK Cells Engineered to Express a Humanized CD123-Targeted Chimeric Antigen Receptor (CAR) and IL-15 as Off-the-Shelf Therapy for Acute Myeloid Leukemia. Blood (2017) 130:4453. doi: 10.1182/blood.V130.Suppl_1.4453.4453

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

60. Xie G, Dong H, Liang Y, Dongjoo Ham J, Rizwan R, Chen J. CAR-NK Cells: A Promising Cellular Immunotherapy for Cancer. Ebiomedicine (2020) 59:102975. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2020.102975

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

61. Williams KM, Hanley P, Grant M, Fortiz MF, Stanojevic M, Ismail M, et al. Complete Remissions Post Infusion of Multiple Tumor Antigen Specific T Cells for the Treatment of High Risk Leukemia and Lymphoma Patients After HCT. Blood (2017) 130:4516. doi: 10.1016/j.jcyt.2017.03.013

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

62. Ping Y, Liu C, Zhang Y. T-Cell Receptor-Engineered T Cells for Cancer Treatment: Current Status and Future Directions. Protein Cell (2018) 9(3):254–66. doi: 10.1007/s13238-016-0367-1

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

63. Johnson LA, Morgan RA, Dudley ME, Cassard L, Yang JC, Hughes MS, et al. Gene Therapy With Human and Mouse T-Cell Receptors Mediates Cancer Regression and Targets Normal Tissues Expressing Cognate Antigen. Blood (2009) 114(3):535–46. doi: 10.1182/blood-2009-03-211714

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

64. Chapuis AG, Ragnarsson GB, Nguyen HN, Chaney CN, Pufnock JS, Schmitt TM, et al. Transferred WT1-Reactive CD8+ T Cells Can Mediate Antileukemic Activity and Persist in Post-Transplant Patients. Sci Transl Med (2013) 5(174):174ra27. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3004916

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

65. Jahn L, Hombrink P, Hagedoorn RS, Kester MG, van der Steen DM, Rodriguez T, et al. TCR-Based Therapy for Multiple Myeloma and Other B-Cell Malignancies Targeting Intracellular Transcription Factor BOB1. Blood (2017) 129:1284–95. doi: 10.1182/blood-2016-09-737536

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

66. Gupta V, Tallman MS, He W, Logan BR, Copelan E, Gale RP, et al. Comparable Survival After HLA-Well-Matched Unrelated or Matched Sibling Donor Transplantation for Acute Myeloid Leukemia in First Remission With Unfavorable Cytogenetics at Diagnosis. Blood (2010) 116(11):1839–48. doi: 10.1182/blood-2010-04-278317

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

67. Di Bartolomeo P, Santarone S, De Angelis G, Picardi A, Cudillo L, Cerretti R, et al. Haploidentical, Unmanipulated, G-CSF-Primed Bone Marrow Transplantation for Patients With High-Risk Hematologic Malignancies. Blood (2013) 121(5):849–57. doi: 10.1182/blood-2012-08-453399

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

68. Chiusolo P, Bug G, Olivieri A, Brune M, Mordini N, Alessandrino PE, et al. A Modified Post-Transplant Cyclophosphamide Regimen, for Unmanipulated Haploidentical Marrow Transplantation, in Acute Myeloid Leukemia: A Multicenter Study. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant (2018) 24(6):1243–9. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2018.01.031

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

69. Devillier R, Legrand F, Rey J, Castagna L, Fürst S, Granata A, et al. HLA-Matched Sibling Versus Unrelated Versus Haploidentical Related Donor Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation for Patients Aged Over 60 Years With Acute Myeloid Leukemia: A Single-Center Donor Comparison. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant (2018) 24(7):1449–54. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2018.02.002

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

70. Ciurea SO, Mulanovich V, Saliba RM, Bayraktar UD, Jiang Y, Bassett R, et al. Improved Early Outcomes Using a T Cell Replete Graft Compared With T Cell Depleted Haploidentical Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant (2012) 18:1835–44. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2012.07.003

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

71. Shelikhova L, Ilushina M, Shekhovtsova Z, Shasheleva D, Khismatullina R, Kurnikova E, et al. αβ T Cell-Depleted Haploidentical Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation Without Antithymocyte Globulin in Children With Chemorefractory Acute Myelogenous Leukemia. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant (2019) 25(5):e179–82. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2019.01.023

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

72. Maschan M, Shelikhova L, Ilushina M, Shekhovtsova Z, Khismatullina R, Kurnikova E, et al. Outcome of αβ T Cell-Depleted Transplantation in Children With High-Risk Acute Myeloid Leukemia, Grafted in Remission. Bone Marrow Transplant (2020) 55(1):256–9. doi: 10.1038/s41409-019-0531-3

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

73. Locatelli F, Merli P, Pagliara D, Li Pira G, Falco M, Pende D, et al. Outcome of Children With Acute Leukemia Given HLA-Haploidentical HSCT After αβ T-Cell and B-Cell Depletion. Blood (2017) 130(5):677–85. doi: 10.1182/blood-2017-04-779769

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

74. Bertaina A, Zecca M, Buldini B, Sacchi N, Algeri M, Saglio F, et al. Unrelated Donor vs HLA-Haploidentical α/β T-Cell and B-Cell-Depleted HSCT in Children With Acute Leukemia. Blood (2018) 132(24):2594–607. doi: 10.1182/blood-2018-07-861575

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

75. Bleakley M, Heimfeld S, Loeb KR, Jones LA, Chaney C, Seropian S, et al. Outcomes of Acute Leukemia Patients Transplanted With Naïve T Cell-Depleted Stem Cell Grafts. J Clin Investig (2015) 125(7):2677–89. doi: 10.1172/JCI81229

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

76. Pierini A, Ruggeri L, Carotti A, Falzetti F, Saldi S, Terenzi A, et al. Haploidentical Age-Adapted Myeloablative Transplant and Regulatory and Effector T Cells for Acute Myeloid Leukemia. Blood Adv (2021) 5):1199–208. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2020003739

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

77. Huang XJ, Liu DH, Liu KY, Xu LP, Chen H, Han W, et al. Treatment of Acute Leukemia With Unmanipulated HLA-Mismatched/Haploidentical Blood and Bone Marrow Transplantation. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant (2009) 15:257–65. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2008.11.025

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

78. Sugita J. HLA-Haploidentical Stem Cell Transplantation Using Posttransplant Cyclophosphamide. Int J Hematol (2019) 110:30–8. doi: 10.1007/s12185-019-02660-8

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

79. Raiola AM, Dominietto A, Ghiso A, Di Grazia C, Lamparelli T, Gualandi F, et al. Unmanipulated Haploidentical Bone Marrow Transplantation and Posttransplantation Cyclophosphamide for Hematologic Malignancies After Myeloablative Conditioning. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant (2013) 19:117–22. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2012.08.014

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

80. Peccatori J, Forcina A, Clerici D, Crocchiolo R, Vago L, Stanghellini MT, et al. Sirolimus-Based Graft-Versus-Host Disease Prophylaxis Promotes the In Vivo Expansion of Regulatory T Cells and Permits Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplantation From Haploidentical Donors. Leukemia (2015) 29:396–405. doi: 10.1038/leu.2014.180

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

81. Brunstein CG, Fuchs EJ, Carter SL, Karanes C, Costa LJ, Wu J, et al. Alternative Donor Transplantation After Reduced Intensity Conditioning: Results of Parallel Phase 2 Trials Using Partially HLA-Mismatched Related Bone Marrow or Unrelated Double Umbilical Cord Blood Grafts. Blood (2011) 118(2):282–8. doi: 10.1182/blood-2011-03-344853

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

82. Aversa F, Pierini A, Ruggeri L, Martelli MF, Velardi A. The Evolution of T Cell Depleted Haploidentical Transplantation. Front Immunol (2019) 10:2769. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.02769

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

83. Grimm J, Jentzsch M, Bill M, Goldmann K, Schulz J, Niederwieser D, et al. Prognostic Impact of the ELN2017 Risk Classification in Patients With AML Receiving Allogeneic Transplantation. Blood Adv (2020) 4(16):3864–74. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2020001904

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar