Khalaf Kridin1,2
Katja Bieber1
Christian D. Sadik3
Michael P. Schön4,5
Gang Wang6
Karin Loser7
Ralf J. Ludwig1*- 1Lübeck Institute of Experimental Dermatology and Center for Research on Inflammation of the Skin, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
- 2Azrieli Faculty of Medicine, Bar-Ilan University, Safed, Israel
- 3Department of Dermatology, Allergy, and Venereology and Center for Research on Inflammation of the Skin, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
- 4Department of Dermatology, Venereology, and Allergology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
- 5Lower Saxony Institute of Occupational Dermatology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
- 6Department of Dermatology, Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi’an, China
- 7Institute of Immunology, University of Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany
Editorial on the Research Topic
Skin Autoimmunity
The Spectrum of Skin Autoimmune Diseases
According to the revised Witebsky’s criteria by Rose and Bona, a disease is considered of autoimmune origin if (i) it can be transferred by pathogenic T cells or autoantibodies, (ii) it can be induced in experimental animals, or if (iii) autoimmunity is suggested by circumstantial evidence from clinical clues (1). Rather new aspects are the iatrogenic induction of autoimmune side effects or the emergence of cutaneous side effects by new immunomodulating therapies (2, 3). According to the “classical definition”, skin autoimmune diseases include pemphigus and pemphigoid diseases (4, 5). In pemphigus and pemphigoid, autoantibodies bind to specific structural proteins of the skin and either directly or indirectly (through activation of the immune system) induce skin pathology (6). Within this Research Topic, several review articles provide an excellent overview of several pemphigus and pemphigoid diseases. More specifically, paraneoplastic pemphigus, bullous pemphigoid, anti-p200 pemphigoid and lichen planus pemphigoides are reviewed in detail. Within this editorial, we aim to provide an overview of the 68 articles of the Research Topic. Each article of the Research Topic can be directly assessed by the kinks provided in the blue font. To guide the reading, we have classified the articles into the following subheadings:
● “Emerging” autoimmune diseases
● Novel insights into the pathogenesis of skin autoimmune diseases
● New diagnostic approaches in skin autoimmune diseases
● Comorbidity in skin autoimmune diseases
● Epidemiology of skin autoimmune diseases
● Novel treatment targets and therapeutic approaches for skin autoimmune diseases
● Characterization of patient biomaterials and model systems of skin autoimmune diseases
“Emerging” Autoimmune Diseases
In contrast to these more “classical” autoimmune diseases, fulfilling the revised Witebsky’s criteria, there is an increasing evidence for a role of autoreactive T- and/or B-cells in chronic inflammatory skin diseases that have not been considered autoimmune so far (7). As reviewed by Boehncke and Brembilla autoreactive T cells are present in several chronic skin inflammatory diseases that are (so far) not considered to be caused by an aberrant immune response to self-antigens. Among others, autoreactive T cells have been identified in psoriasis and atopic dermatitis (8–10). Overall, these are very intriguing findings, but before fully considering autoimmunity as a significant contributing factor to psoriasis or atopic dermatitis, these findings require functional validation. In addition to T cell-mediated autoimmunity in “non-autoimmune” chronic inflammatory skin diseases, presence of autoantibodies has been described in chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU), as well as in morphea. Yet, again, these findings await functional validation in vivo. The induction of systemic sclerosis, which shares pathogenic features of morphea, in mice immunized with type V collagen (11), however, provides strong evidence for a pathogenic contribution of autoantibodies in morphea and/or systemic sclerosis. In light of the increasing importance of pathogenetic networks of innate and adaptive immune responses (12, 13), this and other observations are highlighted in the review by Schön, where in psoriasis and other autoimmune or autoinflammatory diseases, and their relation to disease pathogenies is highlighted.
Novel Insights Into the Pathogenesis of Skin Autoimmune Diseases
A complex interaction of genetics and environmental factors is one of the key underlying pathogenic mechanisms in skin autoimmune diseases. The high number of submissions reporting on genetic associations in autoimmune skin diseases underscores this. The genetics and transcriptomics in pemphigus and pemphigoid are reviewed by Olbrich et al. Targeted genetic analysis identified novel gene polymorphisms in endemic pemphigus foliaceus, namely within cell death pathways and the soluble CR1. While most genetic studies focus on the nuclear genome, few address the impact of the mitochondrial genome on complex phenotypes. This highly interesting topic has been addressed by Russlies et al., who report on polymorphisms in the mitochondrial genome that are associated with bullous pemphigoid.
In addition to genetics, several articles also specifically address certain cell types in skin autoimmune diseases. Cao et al. allude to the role of regulatory immune cells in pemphigus and pemphigoid. Here, with a focus on pemphigus and pemphigoid, they review the impact of different types of regulatory T and B cells. Rauschenberger et al. present data on the crosstalk between skin infiltrating T cells and keratinocytes. Costa et al. focus on the contribution of mononuclear phagocyte activation in the context of psoriasis. Based on the determination of molecular markers of monocyte/phagocyte activation in inflamed skin and the serum of patients, they conclude that mononuclear phagocytes are activated in psoriasis and thus may contribute to disease pathogenesis. Interestingly, similar findings were made in patients with bullous pemphigoid by Riani et al. Neubert et al. also focus on the contribution of innate immune cells in the pathogenesis of chronic skin inflammation: Neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) may be formed after neutrophil activation. NETs are important for host defense, but may also contribute to the pathogenesis of several chronic inflammatory (skin) diseases, such as rheumatoid arthritis, psoriasis, or systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Interestingly, some of these diseases may be triggered or aggravated by light exposure. Based on these findings, the authors investigated the impact of UVA on NET formation.
Another set of articles within the Research Topic focus on the role of cytokines in the pathogenesis of chronic skin inflammation: Buhl and Wenzel highlight the importance of the different isoforms IL-36, especially in psoriasis. The contribution of IL-36 in (pustular) psoriasis is underscored by the induction of pustular psoriasis in carriers of a missense mutation of the IL-36Ra. Le Jan et al. identified inflammasome activation in patients with bullous pemphigoid. Increased expression of IL-1β was induced by IL-17/-23 and led to an increased release of proteases from macrophages. Increased IL-1β expression was, however, predominantly found in patients with erythema and urticarial lesions. Thus, determination of IL-1β concentrations may allow to stratify patients in personalized treatment approaches.
Further articles focused on the pathogenesis of chronic inflammatory skin diseases: Liu et al. report on the effects of TIPE2, a members of the tumor necrosis factor-α induced protein-8 family, in mouse models of psoriasis and autoimmune uveitis. Interestingly, in TIPE2-deficient mice opposing effects were observed: While TIPE2-deficiency alleviated clinical disease manifestation in Aldara-induced psoriasiform dermatitis, development of experimental autoimmune uveitis was exacerbated. In his article, Arneth performed a systematic literature search on SLE and summarizes the evidence that SLE is a disease caused by a disorder of DNA degradation and elimination. While the review by Günther covers a similar topic, she points toward the type I interferon signature in lupus as well as environmental triggers of the disease. Two articles provide insights into the pathogenesis of pemphigoid diseases: Hiroyasu et al. summarize the contribution of proteases to pemphigoid disease pathogenesis. Jegodzinski et al. investigated the impact of the G protein-coupled receptor 15 (GPR15) on experimental pemphigoid disease. Of note, they identified GPR15 as one (of the few) anti-inflammatory molecule in pemphigoid diseases.
New Diagnostic Approaches in Skin Autoimmune Diseases
The molecular-based diagnosis of pemphigus and pemphigoid, with more detailed insights into mucous membrane pemphigoid, is also reviewed within this Research Topic. In addition to serology, novel non-invasive methods have been developed for the diagnosis of a variety of chronic inflammatory and autoimmune skin diseases. Among these are imaging systems such as optical coherence tomography, as well as non-invasive sampling methods such as plucked hairs and tape-stripping from skin. All of these are used for the diagnosis of disease. Recently, diagnostic developments have also focused on the development biomarkers to predict disease outcome and/or response to treatment (14). As an example, Nesmond et al. identified IL17RA and IL17RC expression on monocytes to be associated with disease activity in bullous pemphigoid.
Comorbidity in Skin Autoimmune Diseases
With the availability of (relatively) effective treatments for chronic skin inflammation (15–17), comorbid diseases, mostly metabolic and cardiovascular, now significantly contributes to the morbidity of patients with skin autoimmune diseases. For example, an increased prevalence was noted in psoriasis inpatients well over 50 years ago (18). Several decades later, an increased prevalence of coronary artery calcification and myocardial infarction in patients was demonstrated in imaging and epidemiologic studies (19, 20). Within this Research Topic Cugno et al. review the evidence for the prothrombotic state in CSU and bullous pemphigoid. Of note, inflammation and the prothrombotic state may form a vicious circle, whereby each pathway sustains and promotes the activation of the other. This has been compellingly reviewed in this Research Topic by Liu et al.
In addition to the metabolic and cardiovascular comorbidity of patients with autoimmune skin diseases, a high prevalence of neurologic disease has been noted in bullous pemphigoid patients (21, 22). Mechanistically, the expression of one of the major BP autoantigens, BP180 in the brain has been linked to this clinical association (23). Herein, Wang et al. demonstrate that in patients with stroke, autoantibodies against BP180 were more prevalent compared to healthy controls. This suggests that autoantibodies against BP180 are relatively common after stroke. Consequently, clinical manifestation of bullous pemphigoid could emerge after stroke. However, epitope spreading may be needed because in multiple sclerosis and Alzheimer’s disease, which are also associated with bullous pemphigoid, recognize different epitopes of BP180 than those bound by bullous pemphigoid patients (23).
Epidemiology of Skin Autoimmune Diseases
During the last years, evidence has accumulated that bullous pemphigoid may be triggered by certain medications. More specifically, use of checkpoint inhibitors and dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP4i) is significantly associated with bullous pemphigoid (24). Within the Research Topic, the association of bullous pemphigoid with DPP4i use is reviewed. This topic is also addressed in a cross-sectional study comparing the prevalence of bullous pemphigoid autoantibodies in patients with type II diabetes treated with or without DPP4i. Here, the authors demonstrated that BP180NC16A autoantibodies were more prevalent in those diabetics treated with DPP4i. Analysis of different DPP4i showed that the increased prevalence of anti-BP180-NC16A was observed only for some, but not all DPP4i. Regarding checkpoint inhibitor-induced bullous pemphigoid, the Research Topic includes one interesting case report: A patient suffering from metastatic melanoma was treated with nivolumab, leading to a partial remission. After approximately 5 months, anti- thyroid peroxidase autoantibodies and hypothyroidism developed. At the same time, bullous pemphigoid was diagnosed. Relating to bullous pemphigoid, intriguingly only LAD-1 autoantibodies were detected. This case reports is in line with previous cases that, however, so far had only reported on Japanese patients presenting with LAD-1-only bullous pemphigoid. Another important, so far neglected field of research in bullous pemphigoid, are insights into demographics and clinical data from the USA. This has been addressed by Lee et al. in this article collection. They demonstrate female predominance in both bullous pemphigoid and mucous membrane pemphigoid. Furthermore, a large number of bullous pemphigoid and mucous membrane pemphigoid presented with other autoimmune diseases; most commonly thyroid disease. Another important aspect of this study is the notion of severe limitations of daily activities imposed by these diseases in the patients. A significant decrease in the quality of life and an inverse correlation with disease activity is also reported for pemphigus patients. One article addresses the impact of airborne pollution with dermatomyositis, underscoring the importance of the environment modulating the susceptibility to develop autoimmune disease (25, 26).
Novel Treatment Targets and Therapeutic Approaches for Skin Autoimmune Diseases
Despite recent advances in the treatment of autoimmune skin diseases there is still a high medical need to develop new treatments that are more effective and safer, as well as induce long-term remissions. This need is for example reflected by pemphigus. Here, the combination of systemic corticosteroids with the anti-CD20 antibody rituximab is far more effective and induces dramatically less adverse events compared to treatment with systemic corticosteroids (albeit at a higher dose) alone (27). Yet, the time to remission still requires 180 days (27) and, as documented by Mohamad et al. in this Research Topic, relapses are frequent, even during tapering of the corticosteroid dose. One possible approach to meet this medical need may be the use of (modified) preparations of high dose intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIG) as highlighted by Hoffman and Enk.
In bullous pemphigoid several polymorphisms in genes encoding for cytokines have been described (28), some of which have been functionally validated in pemphigoid disease animal models (29–31). Herein, polymorphisms within IL8 were observed when contrasting patients and controls. The IL8 polymorphisms also translated into an increased mRNA expression of the cytokine. Over the last years evidence has accumulated that points toward the presence of IgE autoantibodies on pemphigoid diseases (32, 33). The pathogenic relevance of IgE in pemphigoid has been demonstrated in experimental bullous pemphigoid, where the disease was induced by injecting anti-COL17 IgE into mice humanized for (parts of) COL17 and the IgE receptor (34). In clinical settings, treatment of bullous pemphigoid patients with the anti-IgE antibody omalizumab has been reported to have beneficial effects. Within the Research Topic, Jafari et al. also report on the successful treatment outcome in 2 bullous pemphigoid patients after omalizumab. They furthermore provide insights into molecular changes that are associated with clinical improvement of the disease. Of note, down-regulation of FcϵRI, as well as IgE in lesional skin and on circulating basophils were observed to be associated with clinical improvement.
In addition to cytokines and potentially IgE autoantibodies, the activation of the complement system is of key importance to mediate skin inflammation and subepidermal blistering in pemphigoid diseases (35). This has already led to clinical trials investigating the safety and efficacy of complement-targeting biologics in pemphigoid diseases (36, 37). This topic is reviewed in detail in the Research Topic. In addition, Zheng et al. here provide compelling evidence that the central hub of complement activation, the C5a/C5aR1 is also critical for the pathogenesis of psoriasis. In the Aldara-induced psoriasiform dermatitis model, as well as in the IL-23-induced model of psoriasis genetic or pharmacological inhibition of the C5aR1 significantly ameliorated the onset of clinical disease. Mechanistically, this seems to be linked to the migration and differentiation of plasmacytoid dendritic cells.
Lichen planus is a chronic relapsing inflammatory disorder of the skin and mucous membranes. The disease is characterized by band-like T cell infiltrates along the dermal-epidermal junction and apoptosis of basal keratinocytes (38). More recently, compelling data has emerged that documents the presence of desmogelin 3- and COL17-specific, autoreactive T cells in lichen planus. Characterization of the T cell response in lichen planus showed a polarization toward Th1 and Th17 cells. In addition, IL-17-producing cells were found to be present in the skin of lichen planus patients (39). Herein, Solimani et al. follow-up on these observations and report the treatment outcomes of 3 lichen planus patients treated with anti-IL17 (secukinumab). In all 3 patients, a favorable clinical outcome was observed, that was accompanied by a reduced dermal T cell infiltrate. In addition to targeting T cell-derived cytokines, modulation of T cell metabolism is an alternative, but promising approach to treat chronic skin inflammation.
One major focus of the articles submitted to the Research Topic was inhibition of Janus kinases (JAK). Based on elaborate pre-clinical work that encompassed genetic studies, transcriptomics as well as use of pre-clinical model systems of chronic skin inflammatory diseases the JAK pathway was identified as a potential therapeutic target for several chronic inflammatory skin diseases (40, 41). In the review by Szilveszter et al., the various tyrosine kinase signaling pathways and their role in autoimmune and inflammatory skin diseases is presented in detail. The focus is on ongoing preclinical trials and clinical studies using small-molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitors in chronic inflammatory diseases. The reviews by Solimani et al. and by Howell et al. focus on the immunological basis and current stage of development of JAK inhibitors in chronic inflammatory indications in dermatology. However, as proposed by Ehrchen et al., insights into the mode of action of “old” drugs, such as glucocorticoids may lead to the identification of novel therapeutic targets.
As highlighted by Zeidler et al., pruritus is a highly prevalent in chronic autoimmune diseases, and often is one of the key factors contributing to patient morbidity (42). Of note, and highlighted herein, IL-31 may be one of the key drivers of pruritus. The potential importance of targeting IL-31 to alleviate itch and certain chronic inflammatory skin diseases is highlighted by several clinical trials that have and are evaluating the safety and efficacy of anti-IL-31 treatment (43, 44).
In addition to the above articles, CCR2-A in chronic cutaneous lupus erythematosus, neutrophil extracellular traps in Schnitzler’s Syndrome and the skin barrier in pemphigus and pemphigoid have emerged as potential targets and treatment approaches.
Characterization of Patient Biomaterials and Model Systems of Skin Autoimmune Diseases
Clinical and molecular characterization of patients and biomaterials, as well as model systems are an important pilar to understand pathogenetic pathways and identify novel therapeutic targets. As an example for an in-depth characterization of patient samples is the description of a protocol that allows the identification of autoreactive B cell subpopulations in the peripheral blood in patients with pemphigus. Another use of patient-derived biomaterial is its’ functional evaluation, exemplified by the Walter et al., who contrasted the signaling in keratinocytes after binding of either anti-Dsg 1 or anti-Dsg 3 IgG binding. This work demonstrates that pathogenic pathways in pemphigus differ depending on the autoantibodies. Therefore, exact determination of the autoantibody profile in pemphigus patients by the respective serological test systems (45, 46) is the key to personalized treatment approaches in pemphigus.
Several articles of this Research Topic described novel animal models or provided in-depth reviews: In most pemphigus patients, autoantibodies against Dsg 1 and/or 3 are present (5), while non-Dsg autoantibodies are found in a minority of patients (47). This may be one of the main reasons, why most pemphigus animal models mirror the immune response against Dsg 1 and/or 3 (48). Only recently, Lotti et al. described a pemphigus mouse model that is based on the transfer of lymphocytes from mice immunized with desmocollin into immunodeficient mice. In addition to this novel pemphigus mouse model, new findings in scurfy mice are described, namely the development of mixed connective tissue disease, and mouse models of Sjögren’s Syndrome are reviewed. Demeyer et al. report on the development of atopic-like dermatitis in ageing MALT1-deficient mice. Given further validation, this new model of atopic dermatitis may be useful to decipher pathogenic pathways in atopic dermatitis.
Concluding Remarks
Overall, the field of skin autoimmunity has become a major focus, both in research and clinical practice. This is also reflected by the 68 submissions to the Research Topic that provides state-of-the art reviews, as well as novel insights into skin autoimmune diseases. Overall, each novel insight into the pathogenesis of these severe disease provides clues to better treat and diagnose affected individuals.
Author Contributions
All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.
Funding
This work supported the Excellence Cluster “Precision Medicine in Chronic Inflammation” (EXC 2167) from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft. KK received support from the Alexander von Humboldt Foundation (Humboldt Research Fellowship for Postdoctoral Researchers).
Conflict of Interest
MS has received honoraria from AbbVie, Biogen, Almirall, Leo, Novartis, UCB, Janssen, Leo. RL has received honoraria and/or research grants from the following companies: Admirx, Almirall, Amryth, ArgenX, Biotest, Biogen, Euroimmun, Incyte, Immungenetics, Lilly, Novartis, UCB Pharma, Topadur, True North Therapeutics and Tx Cell.
The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
References
1. Rose NR, Bona C. Defining criteria for autoimmune diseases (Witebsky’s postulates revisited). Immunol Today (1993) 14:426–30. doi: 10.1016/0167-5699(93)90244-F
2. Sondermann W, Herz S, Sody E, Körber A. Dermatological complications of therapy with biologics in inflammatory autoimmune diseases. J Dtsch Dermatol Ges (2019) 17:1029–37. doi: 10.1111/ddg.13964
3. Kähler KC, Hassel JC, Heinzerling L, Loquai C, Thoms KM, Ugurel S, et al. Side effect management during immune checkpoint blockade using CTLA-4 and PD-1 antibodies for metastatic melanoma - an update. J Dtsch Dermatol Ges (2020) 18:582–609. doi: 10.1111/ddg.14128
4. Schmidt E, Zillikens D. Pemphigoid diseases. Lancet (2013) 381:320–32. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61140-4
5. Schmidt E, Kasperkiewicz M, Joly J. Pemphigus. Lancet (2019) 394:882–94. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)31778-7
6. Ludwig RJ, Vanhoorelbeke K, Leypoldt F, Kaya Z, Bieber KM, McLachlan S, et al. Mechanisms of autoantibody-induced pathology. Front Immunol (2017) 8:603. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2017.00603
7. Schempp CM, Schauer F, Huhn CK, Venhoff N, Finzel S. Skin inflammation associated with arthritis, synovitis and enthesitis. Part 2: rheumatoid arthritis, reactive arthritis, Reiter’s syndrome, Lyme borreliosis, dermatomyositis and lupus erythematosus. J Dtsch Dermatol Ges (2019) 17:167–81. doi: 10.1111/ddg.13761
8. Arakawa A, Siewert K, Stöhr J, Besgen P, Kim SM, Rühl G, et al. Melanocyte antigen triggers autoimmunity in human psoriasis. J Exp Med (2015) 212:2203–12. doi: 10.1084/jem.20151093
9. Lande R, Botti E, Jandus C, Dojcinovic D, Fanelli G, Conrad C, et al. The antimicrobial peptide LL37 is a T-cell autoantigen in psoriasis. Nat Commun (2014) 5:5621. doi: 10.1038/ncomms6621
10. Heratizadeh A, Mittermann I, Balaji H, Wichmann K, Niebuhr M, Valenta R, et al. The role of T-cell reactivity towards the autoantigen α-NAC in atopic dermatitis. Br J Dermatol (2011) 164:316–24. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2010.10090.x
11. Teodoro WR, de Jesus Queiroz ZA, Dos Santos LA, Catanozi S, Dos Santos Filho A, Bueno C, et al. Proposition of a novel animal model of systemic sclerosis induced by type V collagen in C57BL/6 mice that reproduces fibrosis, vasculopathy and autoimmunity. Arthritis Res Ther (2019) 21:278. doi: 10.1186/s13075-019-2052-2
12. Lauffer F, Eyerich K, Boehncke WH, Asadullah K, Beissert S, Ghoreschi K, et al. Cytokines of the IL-17 family in psoriasis. J Dtsch Dermatol Ges (2020) 18:675–81. doi: 10.1111/ddg.14124
13. Schön MP, Erpenbeck L. The Interleukin-23/Interleukin-17 Axis Links Adaptive and Innate Immunity in Psoriasis. Front Immunol (2018) 9:1323. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.01323
14. West J, Ogston S, Berg J, Palmer C, Fleming C, Kumar V, et al. HLA-Cw6-positive patients with psoriasis show improved response to methotrexate treatment. Clin Exp Dermatol (2017) 42:651–5. doi: 10.1111/ced.13100
15. Papp K, Thaçi D, Marcoux D, Weibel L, Philipp S, Ghislain PD, et al. Efficacy and safety of adalimumab every other week versus methotrexate once weekly in children and adolescents with severe chronic plaque psoriasis: a randomised, double-blind, phase 3 trial. Lancet (2017) 390:40–9. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)31189-3
16. Thaçi D, Simpson EL, Beck LA, Bieber T, Blauvelt A, Papp K, et al. Efficacy and safety of dupilumab in adults with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis inadequately controlled by topical treatments: a randomised, placebo-controlled, dose-ranging phase 2b trial. Lancet (2016) 387:40–52. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00388-8
17. Joly P, Roujeau JC, Benichou J, Picard C, Dreno B, Delaporte E, et al. A comparison of oral and topical corticosteroids in patients with bullous pemphigoid. N Engl J Med (2002) 346:321–7. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa011592
18. McDonald CJ, Calabresi P. Occlusive vascular disease in psoriatic patients. N Engl J Med (1973) 288:912. doi: 10.1056/NEJM197304262881715
19. Ludwig RJ, Herzog C, Rostock A, Ochsendorf FR, Zollner TM, Thaci D, et al. Psoriasis: a possible risk factor for development of coronary artery calcification. Br J Dermatol (2007) 156:271–6. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2006.07562.x
20. Gelfand JM, Neimann AL, Shin DB, Wang X, Margolis DJ, Troxel AB. Risk of myocardial infarction in patients with psoriasis. JAMA (2006) 296:1735–41. doi: 10.1001/jama.296.14.1735
21. Papakonstantinou E, Limberg MM, Gehring M, Kotnik N, Kapp A, Gibbs BF, et al. Neurological Disorders are Associated with Bullous Pemphigoid. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol (2019). doi: 10.1111/jdv.15444
22. Milani-Nejad N, Zhang M, Kaffenberger J. The association between bullous pemphigoid and neurological disorders: a systematic review. Eur J Dermatol (2017) 27:472–81. doi: 10.1684/ejd.2017.3066
23. Tuusa J, Lindgren O, Tertsunen HM, Nishie W, Kokkonen N, Huilaja L, et al. BP180 Autoantibodies Target Different Epitopes in Multiple Sclerosis or Alzheimer’s Disease than in Bullous Pemphigoid. J Invest Dermatol (2019) 139:293–9. doi: 10.1016/j.jid.2018.09.010
24. Kridin K, Ludwig RJ. The Growing Incidence of Bullous Pemphigoid: Overview and Potential Explanations. Front Med (Lausanne) (2018) 5:220. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2018.00220
25. Jaster R, Gupta Y, Rohde S, Ehlers L, Nizze H, Vorobyev A, et al. Impact of diet and genes on murine autoimmune pancreatitis. J Cell Mol Med (2020) 24:8862–70. doi: 10.1111/jcmm.15540
26. Vorobyev A, Gupta Y, Sezin T, Koga H, Bartsch YC, Belheouane M, et al. Gene-diet interactions associated with complex trait variation in an advanced intercross outbred mouse line. Nat Commun (2019) 10:4097. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-11952-w
27. Joly P, Maho-Vaillant M, Prost-Squarcioni C, Hebert V, Houivet E, Calbo S, et al. First-line rituximab combined with short-term prednisone versus prednisone alone for the treatment of pemphigus (Ritux 3): a prospective, multicentre, parallel-group, open-label randomised trial. Lancet (2017) 389:2031–40. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736
28. Ludwig RJ, Schmidt E. Cytokines in autoimmune bullous skin diseases. Epiphenomena or contribution to pathogenesis? G Ital Dermatol Venereol (2009) 144:339–49.
29. Hirose M, Kasprick K, Beltisou F, Schulze Dieckhoff KSFS, Samavedam UK, Hundt JES E, et al. Reduced skin blistering in experimental epidermolysis bullosa acquisita after anti-TNF treatment. Mol Med (2017) 22:918–26. doi: 10.2119/molmed.2015.00206
30. Sadeghi H, Lockmann A, Hund AC, Samavedam UK, Pipi E, Vafia K, et al. Caspase-1-Independent IL-1 Release Mediates Blister Formation in Autoantibody-Induced Tissue Injury through Modulation of Endothelial Adhesion Molecules. J Immunol (2015) 194:3656–63. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1402688
31. Chakievska L, Holtsche MM, Künstner A, Goletz S, Petersen BS, Thaci D, et al. IL-17A is functionally relevant and a potential therapeutic target in bullous pemphigoid. J Autoimmun (2018). doi: 10.1016/j.jaut.2018.09.003
32. Oya K, Watanabe R, Konishi R, Inoue S, Nakamura Y, Ishitsuka Y, et al. Possible involvement of IgE antibody in epidermolysis bullosa acquisita: detection and correlation. Eur J Dermatol (2019) 29:210–2.
33. Messingham KN, Crowe TP, Fairley JA. The Intersection of IgE Autoantibodies and Eosinophilia in the Pathogenesis of Bullous Pemphigoid. Front Immunol (2019) 10:2331. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.02331
34. Lin L, Hwang BJ, Culton DA, Li N, Burette S, Koller BH, et al. Eosinophils Mediate Tissue Injury in the Autoimmune Skin Disease Bullous Pemphigoid. J Invest Dermatol (2018) 138:1032–43. doi: 10.1016/j.jid.2017.11.031
35. Edwards G, Diercks GFH, Seelen MAJ, Horvath B, van Doorn MBA, Damman J. Complement Activation in Autoimmune Bullous Dermatoses: A Comprehensive Review. Front Immunol (2019) 10:1477. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.01477
36. Lee J, Werth VP, Hall RP, Eming R, Fairley JA, Fajgenbaum DC, et al. Perspective from the 5th International Pemphigus and Pemphigoid Foundation scientific conference. Front Med (Lausanne) (2018) 5:306. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2018.00306
37. Bieber K, Ludwig RJ. Drug Development in Pemphigoid Diseases. Acta Derm Venereol (2020) 100:adv00055. doi: 10.2340/00015555-3400
38. Arnold DL, Krishnamurthy K. Lichen Planus. StatPearls. Treasure Island (FL: StatPearls Publishing (2020).
39. Schmidt T, Solimani F, Pollmann R, Stein R, Schmidt A, Stulberg I, et al. TH1/TH17 cell recognition of desmoglein 3 and bullous pemphigoid antigen 180 in patients with lichen planus.[letter]. J Allergy Clin Immunol (2018) 142(2):669–72.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2018.02.044
40. Xing L, Dai Z, Jabbari A, Cerise JE, Higgins CA, Gong W, et al. Alopecia areata is driven by cytotoxic T lymphocytes and is reversed by JAK inhibition. Nat Med (2014) 20:1043–9. doi: 10.1038/nm.3645
41. Dand N, Mucha S, Tsoi LC, Mahil SK, Stuart PE, Arnold A, et al. Exome-wide association study reveals novel psoriasis susceptibility locus at TNFSF15 and rare protective alleles in genes contributing to type I IFN signalling. Hum Mol Genet (2017) 26:4301–13.
42. Schröder L, Hertl M, Chatzigeorgakidis E, Phan NQ, Ständer S. [Chronic pruritus in autoimmune dermatoses : results of a comparative survey]. Hautarzt (2012) 63:558–66. doi: 10.1007/s00105-011-2319-2
43. Silverberg JI, Pinter A, Pulka G, Poulin Y, Bouaziz JD, Wollenberg A, et al. Phase 2B randomized study of nemolizumab in adults with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis and severe pruritus. J Allergy Clin Immunol (2020) 145:173–82. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2019.08.013
44. Nemoto O, Furue M, Nakagawa H, Shiramoto M, Hanada R, Matsuki S, et al. The first trial of CIM331, a humanized antihuman interleukin-31 receptor A antibody, in healthy volunteers and patients with atopic dermatitis to evaluate safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetics of a single dose in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Br J Dermatol (2016) 174:296–304. doi: 10.1111/bjd.14207
45. Witte M, Zillikens D, Schmidt. Diagnosis of Autoimmune Blistering Diseases. Front Med (2018) 5:296. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2018.00296
46. Saschenbrecker S, Karl I, Komorowski L, Probst C, Dähnrich C, Fechner K, et al. Serological Diagnosis of Autoimmune Bullous Skin Diseases. Front Immunol (2019) 10:1974. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.01974
47. Sinha AA, Sajda T. The evolving story of autoantibodies in Pemphigus vulgaris: development of the “super compensation hypothesis”. Front Med (2018) 5:218. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2018.00218
Keywords: skin, autoimmunity, pemphigus, pemphigoid, psoriasis, alopecia aerata (AA)
Citation: Kridin K, Bieber K, Sadik CD, Schön MP, Wang G, Loser K and Ludwig RJ (2021) Editorial: Skin Autoimmunity. Front. Immunol. 12:627565. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.627565
Received: 09 November 2020; Accepted: 01 March 2021;
Published: 25 March 2021.
Edited by:
Raphaela Goldbach-Mansky, National Institutes of Health (NIH), United StatesReviewed by:
Takashi Hashimoto, Osaka City University, JapanCopyright © 2021 Kridin, Bieber, Sadik, Schön, Wang, Loser and Ludwig. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Ralf J. Ludwig, ralf.ludwig@uksh.de