The AHR Signaling Attenuates Autoimmune Responses During the Development of Type 1 Diabetes

The aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AHR) is a ligand-activated transcriptional factor widely expressed in immune cells. Its ligands range from xenobiotics and natural substances to metabolites, which renders it capable of sensing and responding to a variety of environmental cues. Although AHR signaling has long been recognized to be implicated in the pathogenesis of autoimmune disorders, such as rheumatoid arthritis (RA), colitis, and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), its effect on the pathogenesis of type 1 diabetes (T1D) remains less understood. In this review, we intend to summarize its potential implication in T1D pathogenesis and to sort out the related regulatory mechanisms in different types of immune cells. Emerging evidence supports that β cell destruction caused by autoimmune responses can be rectified by AHR signaling. Upon activation by its ligands, AHR not only modulates the development and functionality of immune cells, but also suppresses the expression of inflammatory cytokines, through which AHR attenuates autoimmune responses during the course of T1D development. Since AHR-initiated biological effects vary between different types of ligands, additional studies would be necessary to characterize or de novo synthesize effective and safe ligands aimed to replenish our arsenal in fighting autoimmune responses and β mass loss in a T1D setting.

Introduction

Type 1 diabetes (T1D) is an autoimmune disorder stemming from the destruction of the pancreatic β cells by autoreactive immune cells, which leads to the absolute deficiency of circulating insulin. The pathogenesis underlying T1D is multifactorial, and involves a genetic predisposition coupled with environmental triggers (1, 2). According to the latest International Diabetes Federation (IDF) Diabetes Atlas, the number of young patients under 20-years-old living with T1D worldwide is more than 1.1 million, which is twice the number calculated in the previous atlas (3). Since the increased rate is much higher than the estimated genetic contribution, epigenetic factors, especially environmental triggers, are increasingly gaining more attention (4). For example, certain viral infections and/or improper medications could exacerbate T1D progression by damaging β cells (5, 6), while microorganisms may differentially affect T1D incidence and severity by modulating the intestinal environment and producing metabolic byproducts (7, 8).

The aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AHR) is a ligand-activated transcriptional factor capable of sensing and responding to a variety of environmental cues (9, 10), which could serve as a bridge to link environmental triggers to the pathogenesis of T1D. Indeed, compounds deriving from either exogenous milieu or emerging as endogenous metabolic byproducts could ligate to AHR, thereby eliciting cellular adaptive responses via different signal pathways (11). Particularly, AHR was initially recognized to be activated by the toxic xenobiotics associated with the detoxifying processes (12). However, subsequent studies further revealed that many additional harmless chemical substances could also effectively induce AHR activation to regulate immune responses (13). Moreover, accumulated evidence supports that AHR regulates not only innate immune cells, but also adaptive immune cells, by affecting intrinsic cell signaling events, cytokine secretion profiles, and inter-cellular communication processes.

Although AHR could be a pivotal environmental sensor to regulate immune responses, its role in T1D pathogenesis, however, is less appreciated. We thus in this review intend to summarize its potential involvement in T1D pathogenesis and to sort out the related regulatory mechanisms in different types of immune cells. We also highlight the feasibility of targeting AHR-related pathways to develop therapeutic strategies against T1D in clinical settings.

AHR Structural Properties and Its Expression Patterns in Immune Cells

Aryl hydrocarbon receptor belongs to a family of basic helix-loop-helix/Per-Arnt-Sim (bHLH/PAS) transcription factors. The bHLH motif locates in the N-terminal of the AHR protein, containing a basic-region (b) and a helix-loop-helix region (HLH), which are involved in DNA-binding and protein-protein interaction, respectively. The PAS domain is a stretch of 200–350 amino acids, which allows AHR to have a high affinity to dimerize with its working partner, the aryl hydrocarbon receptor nuclear translocator (ARNT) (9, 14). Moreover, the C-terminal of the AHR protein contains a glutamine-rich (Q-rich) domain, which participates in co-activator recruitment and transactivation (15). As a ligand-dependent transcriptional factor, AHR has been recognized as being capable of modulating target gene expression. Once activated by its cognate ligands, AHR dissociates from its chaperones and translocates into the nucleus, where it forms a heterodimer with ARNT (AHR-ARNT) to transcribe the expression of target genes (16, 17).

In vertebrates, AHR is widely expressed in multiple cell types and is involved in the regulation of fundamental cellular processes, such as cell proliferation, differentiation, and stress responses. Immune cells are particularly enriched with AHR expression. For instance, AHR is highly expressed in Th17 cells and functions as a typical marker for its non-pathogenic population (nTh17) (18). Similarly, AHR expression is essential to support the survival of certain innate immune cells, such as TCRγδ T cells and innate lymphoid cells (ILCs) (19). Furthermore, AHR has been noted to be expressed in regulatory T cells (Tregs), dendritic cells (DCs), macrophages, and ILCs in intestinal mucosa and lamina propria (LP). These lines of evidence indicate that AHR is abundant in immune cells and acts as an important immune regulator.

The Exogenous and Endogenous Ligands for AHR Activation

Aryl hydrocarbon receptor was originally recognized as a receptor for 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD), a xenobiotic toxicant commonly found in industrial leakage, fossil fuel burning, medical waste, and traffic pollution (20, 21). TCDD possesses a high affinity to AHR, and therefore is able to alter the expression pattern of genes in embryonic stem cells (22). In this case, AHR serves as a characteristic receptor to sense small environmental molecules that harbor an aryl hydrocarbon structure (23). However, other than those exogenous xenobiotics, many endogenous and natural compounds are also identified to be potent ligands for AHR (13).

The typical endogenous candidate is a class of metabolic intermediates generated from tryptophan. Among them, kynurenine (Kyn), a tryptophan metabolite catalyzed by the indole 2,3-dioxygenase (IDO) and tryptophan 2,3-dioxygenase (TDO), has been the most studied (24). IDO1 is a rate-limiting enzyme for kynurenine production and is readily induced by inflammatory cytokines such as IFN-γ. Excessive IDO1 activity would exhaust endogenous tryptophan, thereby leading to the attenuated activation and proliferation of antigen-specific T lymphocytes, which serves as a negative feedback mechanism to prevent sustained immune responses (25, 26). Moreover, the amplified Kyn-AHR signaling induces tolerogenic dendritic cells (TolDCs) and regulatory T cells (Tregs), which further repress the ongoing inflammatory responses (27, 28). Therefore, altered IDO1-Kyn axis has been noted in a variety of disorders, such as tumors, neuronal abnormalities, and autoimmune diseases (24).

Diet-derived compounds constitute another category of AHR ligands. They come from fruits and plant-related products, and especially from cruciferous vegetables that are rich with glucosinolates. Following dietary uptake, glucosinolates can be degraded into indole-3-carbinol (I3C), which then undergoes condensation in the acidic stomach environment and drives the generation of 3,3′-diindolylmethane (DIM), indole [3,4-b] carbazole (ICZ), and [2-(indol-3-ylmethy)-indol-3-yl] indol-3-ylmethane (LTr1) (29). By activating AHR, I3C, together with its derivatives, facilitates a gut microenvironment for alerting the hosts to distinguish the nutrients constantly infested from those potentially harmful pathogens (30).

Some natural microbial metabolites can also bind to and activate AHR. For example, resident Escherichia coli utilizes tryptophan in the intestinal lumen to generate AHR ligands such as indole-3-propionic (IPA) and indole-3-aldehyde (IAld), which then promotes intestinal epithelial cells to secrete cytokines and initiate an anti-inflammatory response (31–33). In this case, AHR functions as a gut sensor to adjust the homeostasis of the gut microenvironment for protecting the host from intestinal inflammation.

Collectively, AHR is widely expressed in immune cells and exhibits ligand-dependent properties. The source of AHR ligands is diverse, including not only the xenobiotics but also natural substances and metabolites (Table 1). These discoveries further support that AHR acts as a bridge to closely connect environmental insults with homeostatic immune responses in daily life.

TABLE 1

Table 1. The effect of AHR ligands on different cell types.

AHR Regulates Innate Immune Response During T1D Development

The initiation of an autoimmune response during the course of T1D development is complicated. It is believed that once the immune system loses tolerance to self β cells, the pathogenic process begins. This event, however, happens much earlier than the visualized clinical symptoms, and importantly, autoimmune responses and β cell dysfunction are tangled together to push T1D into an irreversible dead end.

Dendritic cells play an essential role in initiating autoimmune responses against pancreatic β cells. In fact, they are one of the earliest islet infiltrating leukocytes and are critical for the activation of lymphocytes in the early insulitis stage (34). However, AHR was noted as being able to affect their function for antigen presentation and induction of T cell activation. For example, AHR activated by the diet-derived non-toxic endogenous AHR ligand, 2-(1′H-indole, 3′carbonyl) thiazole-4-carboxylic acid methyl ester (ITE), is associated with the induction of tolerogenic DCs, which exhibits a phenotype of decreased CD86 expression, increased CD103 expression, and diminished secretion of inflammatory cytokines, coupled with the capability to induce the generation of Foxp3⁺ Tregs (28). Therefore, those non-toxic endogenous AHR ligands could have the potential to prevent and treat autoimmune disorders (Figure 1).

FIGURE 1

Figure 1. AHR signaling regulates autoimmune responses during the course of T1D development. Upon ligand-initiated activation, AHR dissociates from its chaperones and translocates into the nucleus, where it forms a heterodimer to transcribe genes essential for the development and functionality of different types of immune cells. Therefore, AHR signaling could exhibit a protective effect on the initiation and progression of T1D by acting on the antigen presenting cells (e.g., DCs and Macrophages), gut innate immune cells (ILCs, IELs, and γδT cells) and adaptive immune cells (regulatory T cells, Tr1 cells, Th1 cells, and Th17 cells).

Similar to DCs, macrophages also play a predominant role in T1D initiation and progression by means of antigen presentation or production of inflammatory cytokines to destroy β cells (35). Generally, upon activation, AHR reduces IL-6 expression in macrophages to suppress immoderate inflammatory responses (36). Macrophages also manifest their endocytic function to timely remove the apoptotic cell debris. In T1D susceptible subjects, the accumulation of apoptotic β cells could serve as a significant source of autoantigens and damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs) (37). Indeed, macrophages isolated from NOD mice in a human T1D model could not efficiently remove apoptotic β cells during the course of β mass turnover, which caused apoptotic β cells to undergo a secondary necrosis associated with autoimmune initiation (38). Therefore, blockade of AHR signaling abrogates apoptotic cell induced IL-10 expression in macrophages coupled with a shift of tolerance toward a pro-inflammatory state (39) (Figure 1).

Innate lymphoid cells, originating from common lymphoid progenitors (CLPs), are recently discovered innate complements of T lymphocytes. Based on the difference in transcriptional factor, biological function, and cytokine profiling, ILCs are generally divided into ILC1, ILC2, ILC3, natural killer cells (NK), and LTi (40). ILCs diffusely exist in intestinal mucosa and LP, where they produce cytokines, such as IL-17A and IL-22, to maintain the barrier function and protect from pathogenic infection (41). Recent studies highlight the interrelationship between gut barrier integrity and autoimmune T1D. There is evidence that the pancreatic endocrine cells could cross-talk with gut microbiota through secretion of antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) induced by microbiota metabolites in NOD mice, which exerts an immunoregulatory function to halt the ongoing pancreatic inflammation (42). Indeed, impaired intestinal barrier would exacerbate the T1D process. For instance, colonic infection of young NOD mice by a bacterial pathogen disrupts the intestinal epithelial barrier and promotes invasive insulitis (43). Notably, AHR is found to be highly expressed in intestinal ILCs and necessary for the gut microenvironment remodeling. The population of ILCs specializes in the production of large amounts of IL22 and has often been called ILC22. Specifically, AHR could drive the development of ILC22 cells and the formation of postnatally developed cryptopatches and isolated lymphoid follicles (but not embryonically formed Peyer’s patches) via the induction of Notch, by which it promotes IL-22 secretion and surveillance of extracellular pathogens to support mucosal epithelial cell survival, proliferation, and anti-microbial function (41, 44). AHR could also maintain the viability of intraepithelial lymphocytes (IELs) as evidenced by the excessive microbial loads and vulnerability of epithelial cells following AHR deficiency, thereby leading to the over-activation of the local immune system (45). Therefore, the AHR-ILCs axis is essential to maintain gut integrity, which may impact T1D development via a crosstalk between the gut and pancreas (Figure 1).

AHR Suppresses Effector T Cell Function During T1D Development

T cells are the main effectors responsible for β cell destruction, especially in the advanced stage. However, the T1D-prone NOD mice show reduced activity of AHR (low affinity AHR^d genotype) as compared to that of B6 mice (high affinity AHR^b genotype). TCDD, which increases Foxp3⁺ T cell proportion via activating AHR, could prevent diabetes development in NOD mice (46). Similarly, the exogenous AHR affinitive ligand, 10-chloro-7H-benzimidazo [2,1-a]benzo[de]isoquinolin-7-one (10-CI-BBQ), exhibits protection against T1D in NOD mice by inhibiting the formation of disease-associated CD4⁺ Nrp1⁺ Foxp3^– RORγt⁺ cells. Notably, such an effect relies on AHR activation but is independent of Foxp3⁺ regulatory T cells (47). Th1-related cytokines, such as IFN-γ and TNF-α, are thought to be the major effective molecules leading to β cell death (48), while T cells deficient in AHR produce more IFN-α, IFN-γ, and IL-12 (49). Although the exact role of Th17 in T1D development is under debate, emerging evidence suggests that the IL-23-induced pathogenic Th17 cells contribute more to T1D pathogenesis than the conventional Th17 cells, and AHR serves as a characteristic marker of the latter (50, 51). In human T cells, it was also found that AHR activation in the presence of TGF-β induces functional Treg cells to suppress pathogenic responder T cells, which is consistent with the results from mouse studies (52). Altogether, AHR could suppress effector T cell function through directly acting on effector T cell subsets or indirectly inducing Treg cells (Figure 1).

The Mechanisms Underlying AHR Regulation of Immune Cells

As a transcriptional factor, AHR is efficient to modulate the expression of lineage specific transcriptional factors in immune cells. For example, AHR favors Treg induction and development by directly binding to the Foxp3 promoter upon TCDD-induced activation (53). AHR is also highly expressed in Th17 cells and is essential for its differentiation and effector function. Specifically, RORγt, a downstream target of AHR, functions as a critical transcriptional factor for IL-17 producing cells (54). AHR can also form a complex with RORγt to enhance the transcription of IL-22, which is of great importance for the function of many innate immune cells including ILC3s, γδT cells, and LTi-like cells (55). These types of RORγt⁺ cells are abundantly located in the mucosal linings of the body (e.g., intestine and lung) to maintain the defensive barrier function via secreting IL-22. In the absence of AHR, RORγt⁺ ILCs are susceptible to apoptosis and they produce a lesser amount of IL-22 (55, 56). Other than RORγt, the synergistic effect is also observed in type 1 regulatory T cells (Tr1 cells), which are Foxp3 negative and produce high levels of interleukin 10 (IL-10), and are decreased in adult-onset T1D patients (57–59). C-Maf is a transcription factor encoded by the Maf (musculoaponeurotic fibrosarcoma) gene. In addition to serving as an oncogene, c-Maf has noted to be involved in cell differentiation processes. Specifically, c-Maf transactivates the expression of IL-10 and IL-21, which are crucial for Tr1 induction (60). IL-27, an essential cytokine for Tr1 development, possesses the ability to activate AHR, which then couples with c-Maf to promote IL-10 expression, thereby ameliorating autoimmune responses in an EAE setting (61).

The signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT) family consists of seven members (STAT1-4, STAT5a, STAT5b, and STAT6) that are indispensable for the functionality of immune cells. Mutations with gain of function in human STAT1 and STAT3 are related to T1D susceptibility by perturbing the equilibrium between Th1, Th17, and regulatory T cells (62). AHR has also been found to repress STAT1 phosphorylation by forming an AHR-STAT1 complex, thereby reducing the transcription of IFN-γ (49). Specifically, 6-formylindolo[3,2-b]carbazole (FICZ) facilitates naïve T cell differentiation toward Th17 cell lineage, during which activated AHR interacts with STAT1 to restrain its activity, leading to the stabilization of Th17 identity while repressing Th1 program (63). Similarly, LPS stimulation enhances AHR expression in macrophages, which in turn forms a complex with either nuclear factor-kappa B (NF-κB) or STAT1 to inhibit IL-6 transcription, by which AHR signaling alleviates inflammatory responses (36). Upon LPS-stimulated activation, AHR also promotes IL-10 transcription by activating the Src-STAT3 pathway to attenuate the secretion of other inflammatory cytokines in macrophages (64).

Taken together, AHR signaling significantly regulates the development and functionality of immune cells either by directly binding to the downstream target genes, or by forming a complex with other transcriptional factors to control the expression of critical genes necessary for autoimmune responses during the course of T1D development (Figure 2).

FIGURE 2

Figure 2. The mechanisms underlying AHR signaling regulation of immune cells. AHR signaling regulates the development and functionality of immune cells either by directly binding to the downstream target genes, or by forming a complex with other transcriptional factors to control the expression of critical genes necessary for autoimmune responses during the course of T1D development.

Conclusive Remarks and Perspectives

Although AHR signaling has long been recognized to be implicated in the pathogenesis of autoimmune disorders, such as rheumatoid arthritis (RA), colitis, and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) (39, 65, 66), its effect on T1D pathogenesis remains less understood. Given the fact that AHR is widely expressed in innate immune cells (e.g., DCs, macrophages, ILCs, IELs, and iNKTs), effector T cells (e.g., Th1 and Th17 cells), and anti-inflammatory cells (e.g., tolerogenic DCs, Tr1, and Tregs), we thus in the present review discussed its potential role in T1D pathogenesis. In general, T1D development involves β cell destruction resulting from excessive activation of autoreactive immune cells along with repressed activity of regulatory cells. Emerging evidence supports that β cell destruction caused by this disrupted immune homeostasis can be finely rectified by AHR signaling. Upon activation by its ligands, AHR not only modulates the development and functionality of immune cells, but also suppresses the expression of inflammatory cytokines, through which AHR attenuates autoimmune responses during the course of T1D development. In line with the observation, IDO1, an important enzyme for endogenous AHR ligand production, is also implicated in T1D pathogenesis. For example, a chimeric protein constituted by proinsulin and cholera toxin B subunit (CTB-INS) is able to promote IDO1 expression, which then enhances tryptophan degradation to modulate tolerogenic properties in DCs, thereby halting T1D progression in NOD mice (67).

It is worthy of note that we did not discuss the possible implication of AHR signaling in β cell viability and functionality. However, there is feasible evidence that Arnt (also called HIF-1β) forms a heterodimer with AHR to affect β cell homeostasis. Specifically, β cells deficient in Arnt manifest impaired glucose stimulated Ca²⁺ signaling and insulin secretion (GSIS), which has been confirmed by studies in human islets using an Arnt siRNA (68). Similarly, Arnt-/- islet grafts exhibit increased β cell apoptosis along with a reduced β mass following transplantation (69). Furthermore, HIF-1α, another partner of Arnt, is up-regulated in infiltrated islets, which then transcribes the expression of anti-apoptotic genes in β cells to prevent T1D progression in NOD mice (70–72). However, it is quite possible that AHR would compete with HIF-1α to form a heterodimer with Arnt, and therefore, the exact regulatory mechanism underlying AHR signaling in β cells demands further studies.

In general, AHR acts as a molecular sensor by employing various exogenous and endogenous ligands to respond to the external and/or internal signals. These unique properties render it a druggable target to rectify altered immune homeostasis in the setting of autoimmune disorders. Indeed, mice supplemented with I3C, an AHR ligand, are protected from DSS-induced colitis (45). Since phytochemicals such as polyphenols and glucosinolates are enriched in grains, and cruciferous vegetables are abundant with I3C, a diet formulated with those components could be a good approach to prevent pathogen invasion and enhance immune homeostasis (55). Similarly, the indole derivatives could be applied to improve insulin sensitivity and alleviate chronic inflammation through AHR signaling (73).

In summary, accumulated evidence supports that AHR signaling negatively regulates the initiation and progression of autoimmune responses in T1D setting. AHR possesses a variety of exogenous and endogenous ligands, and the resulting biological effect varies depending on the ligand employed. These unique properties rendered it a viable therapeutic target. However, additional studies are needed to characterize or de novo synthesize effective and safe ligands aimed to replenish our arsenal in fighting autoimmune responses and β mass loss in a T1D setting.

Author Contributions

TY and FS wrote the manuscript and prepared the figures. CY, FW, and JL collected and analyzed the information. PY, FX, and SZ reviewed the manuscript. C-YW and QY supervised the conception and writing of the manuscript. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.

Funding

This work was supported by the Ministry of Science and Technology (2016YFC1305002 and 2017YFC1309603), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81530024, 91749207, 81920108009, 81770823, 81670729, and 81873656), NHC Drug Discovery Program (2017ZX09304022-07), the Integrated Innovative Team for Major Human Diseases Program of Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, and the Innovative Funding for Translational Research from Tongji Hospital.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

1. Wållberg M, Cooke A. Immune mechanisms in type 1 diabetes. Trends Immunol. (2013) 34:583–91. doi: 10.1016/j.it.2013.08.005

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Stankov K, Benc D, Draskovic D. Genetic and epigenetic factors in etiology of diabetes mellitus type 1. Pediatrics. (2013) 132:1112–22. doi: 10.1542/peds.2013-1652

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Saeedi P, Petersohn I, Salpea P, Malanda B, Karuranga S, Unwin N, et al. Global and regional diabetes prevalence estimates for 2019 and projections for 2030 and 2045: results from the international diabetes federation diabetes Atlas, 9(th) edition. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. (2019) 157:107843. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2019.107843

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Xia Y, Xie Z, Huang G, Zhou Z. Incidence and trend of type 1 diabetes and the underlying environmental determinants. Diabetes Metab Res Rev. (2019) 35:e3075. doi: 10.1002/dmrr.3075

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Nielsen PR, Kragstrup TW, Deleuran BW, Benros ME. Infections as risk factor for autoimmune diseases – a nationwide study. J Autoimmun. (2016) 74:176–81. doi: 10.1016/j.jaut.2016.05.013

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Hu Y, Jin P, Peng J, Zhang X, Wong FS, Wen L. Different immunological responses to early-life antibiotic exposure affecting autoimmune diabetes development in NOD mice. J Autoimmun. (2016) 72:47–56. doi: 10.1016/j.jaut.2016.05.001

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Kriegel MA, Sefik E, Hill JA, Wu H-J, Benoist C, Mathis D. Naturally transmitted segmented filamentous bacteria segregate with diabetes protection in nonobese diabetic mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. (2011) 108:11548–53. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1108924108

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Hansen CHF, Krych L, Nielsen DS, Vogensen FK, Hansen LH, Sørensen SJ, et al. Early life treatment with vancomycin propagates Akkermansia muciniphila and reduces diabetes incidence in the NOD mouse. Diabetologia. (2012) 55:2285–94. doi: 10.1007/s00125-012-2564-7

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Gu YZ, Hogenesch JB, Bradfield CA. The PAS superfamily: sensors of environmental and developmental signals. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol. (2000) 40:519–61. doi: 10.1146/annurev.pharmtox.40.1.519

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Burbach KM, Poland A, Bradfield CA. Cloning of the Ah-receptor cDNA reveals a distinctive ligand-activated transcription factor. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. (1992) 89:8185–9. doi: 10.1073/pnas.89.17.8185

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Shinde R, McGaha TL. The Aryl hydrocarbon receptor: connecting immunity to the microenvironment. Trends Immunol. (2018) 39:1005–20. doi: 10.1016/j.it.2018.10.010

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Mandal PK. Dioxin: a review of its environmental effects and its aryl hydrocarbon receptor biology. J Comp Physiol B. (2005) 175:221–30. doi: 10.1007/s00360-005-0483-3

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Cella M, Colonna M. Aryl hydrocarbon receptor: linking environment to immunity. Semin Immunol. (2015) 27:310–4. doi: 10.1016/j.smim.2015.10.002

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Ema M, Sogawa K, Watanabe N, Chujoh Y, Matsushita N, Gotoh O, et al. cDNA cloning and structure of mouse putative Ah receptor. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. (1992) 184:246–53. doi: 10.1016/0006-291x(92)91185-s

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Kumar MB, Ramadoss P, Reen RK, Vanden Heuvel JP, Perdew GH. The Q-rich subdomain of the human Ah receptor transactivation domain is required for dioxin-mediated transcriptional activity. J Biol Chem. (2001) 276:42302–10. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M104798200

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

16. McGuire J, Whitelaw ML, Pongratz I, Gustafsson JA, Poellinger L. A cellular factor stimulates ligand-dependent release of hsp90 from the basic helix-loop-helix dioxin receptor. Mol Cell Biol. (1994) 14:2438–46. doi: 10.1128/mcb.14.4.2438

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Denison MS, Nagy SR. Activation of the aryl hydrocarbon receptor by structurally diverse exogenous and endogenous chemicals. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol. (2003) 43:309–34. doi: 10.1146/annurev.pharmtox.43.100901.135828

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

18. de Lima KA, Donate PB, Talbot J, Davoli-Ferreira M, Peres RS, Cunha TM, et al. TGFβ1 signaling sustains aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AHR) expression and restrains the pathogenic potential of T(H)17 cells by an AHR-independent mechanism. Cell Death Dis. (2018) 9:1130. doi: 10.1038/s41419-018-1107-7

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Li S, Bostick JW, Ye J, Qiu J, Zhang B, Urban JF Jr., et al. Aryl hydrocarbon receptor signaling cell intrinsically inhibits intestinal group 2 innate lymphoid cell function. Immunity. (2018) 49:915–28.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2018.09.015

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Esser C. Biology and function of the aryl hydrocarbon receptor: report of an international and interdisciplinary conference. Arch Toxicol. (2012) 86:1323–9. doi: 10.1007/s00204-012-0818-2

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Reggiani G. Medical problems raised by the TCDD contamination in Seveso, Italy. Arch Toxicol. (1978) 40:161–88. doi: 10.1007/bf00364649

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

22. Wang Q, Chen J, Ko C-I, Fan Y, Carreira V, Chen Y, et al. Disruption of aryl hydrocarbon receptor homeostatic levels during embryonic stem cell differentiation alters expression of homeobox transcription factors that control cardiomyogenesis. Environ Health Perspect. (2013) 121:1334–43. doi: 10.1289/ehp.1307297

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Denison MS, Soshilov AA, He G, DeGroot DE, Zhao B. Exactly the same but different: promiscuity and diversity in the molecular mechanisms of action of the aryl hydrocarbon (dioxin) receptor. Toxicol Sci. (2011) 124:1–22. doi: 10.1093/toxsci/kfr218

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

24. Opitz CA, Litzenburger UM, Sahm F, Ott M, Tritschler I, Trump S, et al. An endogenous tumour-promoting ligand of the human aryl hydrocarbon receptor. Nature. (2011) 478:197–203. doi: 10.1038/nature10491

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

25. Jaronen M, Quintana FJ. Immunological relevance of the coevolution of IDO1 and AHR. Front Immunol. (2014) 5:521. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2014.00521

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

26. Nguyen NT, Hanieh H, Nakahama T, Kishimoto T. The roles of aryl hydrocarbon receptor in immune responses. Int Immunol. (2013) 25:335–43. doi: 10.1093/intimm/dxt011

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

27. Mezrich JD, Fechner JH, Zhang X, Johnson BP, Burlingham WJ, Bradfield CA. An interaction between kynurenine and the aryl hydrocarbon receptor can generate regulatory T cells. J Immunol. (2010) 185:3190–8. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.0903670

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

28. Quintana FJ, Murugaiyan G, Farez MF, Mitsdoerffer M, Tukpah A-M, Burns EJ, et al. An endogenous aryl hydrocarbon receptor ligand acts on dendritic cells and T cells to suppress experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. (2010) 107:20768–73. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1009201107

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

29. Sønderby IE, Geu-Flores F, Halkier BA. Biosynthesis of glucosinolates–gene discovery and beyond. Trends Plant Sci. (2010) 15:283–90. doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2010.02.005

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

30. Kiss EA, Vonarbourg C, Kopfmann S, Hobeika E, Finke D, Esser C, et al. Natural aryl hydrocarbon receptor ligands control organogenesis of intestinal lymphoid follicles. Science. (2011) 334:1561–5. doi: 10.1126/science.1214914

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

31. Li G, Young KD. Indole production by the tryptophanase TnaA in Escherichia coli is determined by the amount of exogenous tryptophan. Microbiol. (2013) 159(Pt 2):402–10. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.064139-0

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

32. Rothhammer V, Mascanfroni ID, Bunse L, Takenaka MC, Kenison JE, Mayo L, et al. Type I interferons and microbial metabolites of tryptophan modulate astrocyte activity and central nervous system inflammation via the aryl hydrocarbon receptor. Nat Med. (2016) 22:586–97. doi: 10.1038/nm.4106

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

33. Alexeev EE, Lanis JM, Kao DJ, Campbell EL, Kelly CJ, Battista KD, et al. Microbiota-derived indole metabolites promote human and murine intestinal homeostasis through regulation of interleukin-10 receptor. Am J Pathol. (2018) 188:1183–94. doi: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2018.01.011

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

34. Saxena V, Ondr JK, Magnusen AF, Munn DH, Katz JD. The countervailing actions of myeloid and plasmacytoid dendritic cells control autoimmune diabetes in the nonobese diabetic mouse. J Immunol. (2007) 179:5041–53. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.179.8.5041

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

35. Unanue E, Byersdorfer C, Carrero J, Levisetti M, Lovitch S, Pu Z, et al. Antigen presentation: lysoyme, autoimmune diabetes, and Listeria–what do they have in common? Immunol Res. (2005) 32:267–92. doi: 10.1385/IR:32:1-3:267

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

36. Kimura A, Naka T, Nakahama T, Chinen I, Masuda K, Nohara K, et al. Aryl hydrocarbon receptor in combination with Stat1 regulates LPS-induced inflammatory responses. J Exp Med. (2009) 206:2027–35. doi: 10.1084/jem.20090560

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

37. Vives-Pi M, Rodríguez-Fernández S, Pujol-Autonell I. How apoptotic β-cells direct immune response to tolerance or to autoimmune diabetes: a review. Apoptosis. (2015) 20:263–72. doi: 10.1007/s10495-015-1090-8

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

38. O’Brien BA, Geng X, Orteu CH, Huang Y, Ghoreishi M, Zhang Y, et al. A deficiency in the in vivo clearance of apoptotic cells is a feature of the NOD mouse. J Autoimmun. (2006) 26:104–15. doi: 10.1016/j.jaut.2005.11.006

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

39. Shinde R, Hezaveh K, Halaby MJ, Kloetgen A, Chakravarthy A, da Silva Medina T, et al. Apoptotic cell-induced AhR activity is required for immunological tolerance and suppression of systemic lupus erythematosus in mice and humans. Nat Immunol. (2018) 19:571–82. doi: 10.1038/s41590-018-0107-1

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

40. Vivier E, Artis D, Colonna M, Diefenbach A, Di Santo JP, Eberl G, et al. Innate Lymphoid Cells: 10 Years On. Cell. (2018) 174:1054–66. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2018.07.017

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

41. Lee JS, Cella M, McDonald KG, Garlanda C, Kennedy GD, Nukaya M, et al. AHR drives the development of gut ILC22 cells and postnatal lymphoid tissues via pathways dependent on and independent of Notch. Nat Immunol. (2011) 13:144–51. doi: 10.1038/ni.2187

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

42. Miani M, Le Naour J, Waeckel-Enée E, Verma SC, Straube M, Emond P, et al. Gut microbiota-stimulated innate lymphoid cells support β-Defensin 14 expression in pancreatic endocrine cells, preventing autoimmune diabetes. Cell Metab. (2018) 28:557–72.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2018.06.012

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

43. Lee AS, Gibson DL, Zhang Y, Sham HP, Vallance BA, Dutz JP. Gut barrier disruption by an enteric bacterial pathogen accelerates insulitis in NOD mice. Diabetologia. (2010) 53:741–8. doi: 10.1007/s00125-009-1626-y

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

44. Zenewicz LA, Flavell RA. IL-22 and inflammation: leukin’ through a glass onion. Eur J Immunol. (2008) 38:3265–8. doi: 10.1002/eji.200838655

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

45. Li Y, Innocentin S, Withers DR, Roberts NA, Gallagher AR, Grigorieva EF, et al. Exogenous stimuli maintain intraepithelial lymphocytes via aryl hydrocarbon receptor activation. Cell. (2011) 147:629–40. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2011.09.025

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

46. Kerkvliet NI, Steppan LB, Vorachek W, Oda S, Farrer D, Wong CP, et al. Activation of aryl hydrocarbon receptor by TCDD prevents diabetes in NOD mice and increases Foxp3+ T cells in pancreatic lymph nodes. Immunotherapy. (2009) 1:539–47. doi: 10.2217/imt.09.24

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

47. Ehrlich AK, Pennington JM, Wang X, Rohlman D, Punj S, Löhr CV, et al. Activation of the Aryl hydrocarbon receptor by 10-Cl-BBQ prevents insulitis and effector T cell development independently of Foxp3+ regulatory T cells in nonobese diabetic mice. J Immunol. (2016) 196:264–73. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1501789

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

48. Campbell IL, Kay TW, Oxbrow L, Harrison LC. Essential role for interferon-gamma and interleukin-6 in autoimmune insulin-dependent diabetes in NOD/Wehi mice. J Clin Invest. (1991) 87:739–42. doi: 10.1172/JCI115055

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

49. Rodríguez-Sosa M, Elizondo G, López-Durán RM, Rivera I, Gonzalez FJ, Vega L. Over-production of IFN-gamma and IL-12 in AhR-null mice. FEBS Lett. (2005) 579:6403–10. doi: 10.1016/j.febslet.2005.10.023

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

50. Bellemore SM, Nikoopour E, Schwartz JA, Krougly O, Lee-Chan E, Singh B. Preventative role of interleukin-17 producing regulatory T helper type 17 (Treg 17) cells in type 1 diabetes in non-obese diabetic mice. Clin Exp Immunol. (2015) 182:261–9. doi: 10.1111/cei.12691

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

51. Bellemore SM, Nikoopour E, Krougly O, Lee-Chan E, Fouser LA, Singh B. Pathogenic T helper type 17 cells contribute to type 1 diabetes independently of interleukin-22. Clin Exp Immunol. (2016) 183:380–8. doi: 10.1111/cei.12735

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

52. Gandhi R, Kumar D, Burns EJ, Nadeau M, Dake B, Laroni A, et al. Activation of the aryl hydrocarbon receptor induces human type 1 regulatory T cell-like and Foxp3(+) regulatory T cells. Nat Immunol. (2010) 11:846–53. doi: 10.1038/ni.1915

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

53. Quintana FJ, Basso AS, Iglesias AH, Korn T, Farez MF, Bettelli E, et al. Control of T(reg) and T(H)17 cell differentiation by the aryl hydrocarbon receptor. Nature. (2008) 453:65–71. doi: 10.1038/nature06880

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

54. Baricza E, Tamási V, Marton N, Buzás EI, Nagy G. The emerging role of aryl hydrocarbon receptor in the activation and differentiation of Th17 cells. Cell Mol Life Sci. (2016) 73:95–117. doi: 10.1007/s00018-015-2056-2

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

55. Qiu J, Heller JJ, Guo X, Chen ZM, Fish K, Fu Y-X, et al. The aryl hydrocarbon receptor regulates gut immunity through modulation of innate lymphoid cells. Immunity. (2012) 36:92–104. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2011.11.011

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

56. Tumanov AV, Koroleva EP, Guo X, Wang Y, Kruglov A, Nedospasov S, et al. Lymphotoxin controls the IL-22 protection pathway in gut innate lymphoid cells during mucosal pathogen challenge. Cell Host Microbe. (2011) 10:44–53. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2011.06.002

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

57. Groux H, O’Garra A, Bigler M, Rouleau M, Antonenko S, de Vries JE, et al. A CD4+ T-cell subset inhibits antigen-specific T-cell responses and prevents colitis. Nature. (1997) 389:737–42. doi: 10.1038/39614

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

58. Pot C, Apetoh L, Kuchroo VK. Type 1 regulatory T cells (Tr1) in autoimmunity. Semin Immunol. (2011) 23:202–8. doi: 10.1016/j.smim.2011.07.005

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

59. Chujo D, Nguyen T-S, Foucat E, Blankenship D, Banchereau J, Nepom GT, et al. Adult-onset type 1 diabetes patients display decreased IGRP-specific Tr1 cells in blood. Clin Immunology. (2015) 161:270–7. doi: 10.1016/j.clim.2015.08.014

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

60. Imbratta C, Hussein H, Andris F, Verdeil G. c-MAF, a swiss army knife for tolerance in lymphocytes. Front Immunol. (2020) 11:206. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.00206

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

61. Apetoh L, Quintana FJ, Pot C, Joller N, Xiao S, Kumar D, et al. The aryl hydrocarbon receptor interacts with c-Maf to promote the differentiation of type 1 regulatory T cells induced by IL-27. Nat Immunol. (2010) 11:854–61. doi: 10.1038/ni.1912

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

62. Fabbri M, Frixou M, Degano M, Fousteri G. Type 1 diabetes in STAT protein family mutations: regulating the Th17/Treg equilibrium and beyond. Diabetes. (2019) 68:258–65. doi: 10.2337/db18-0627

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

63. Kimura A, Naka T, Nohara K, Fujii-Kuriyama Y, Kishimoto T. Aryl hydrocarbon receptor regulates Stat1 activation and participates in the development of Th17 cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. (2008) 105:9721–6. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0804231105

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

64. Zhu J, Luo L, Tian L, Yin S, Ma X, Cheng S, et al. Aryl hydrocarbon receptor promotes IL-10 expression in inflammatory macrophages through Src-STAT3 signaling pathway. Front Immunol. (2018) 9:2033. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.02033

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

65. Nguyen NT, Nakahama T, Kishimoto T. Aryl hydrocarbon receptor and experimental autoimmune arthritis. Semin Immunopathol. (2013) 35:637–44. doi: 10.1007/s00281-013-0392-6

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

66. Monteleone I, Pallone F, Monteleone G. Aryl hydrocarbon receptor and colitis. Semin Immunopathol. (2013) 35:671–5. doi: 10.1007/s00281-013-0396-2

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

67. Abram DM, Fernandes LGR, Ramos Filho ACS, Simioni PU. The modulation of enzyme indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase from dendritic cells for the treatment of type 1 diabetes mellitus. Drug Des Devel Ther. (2017) 11:2171–8. doi: 10.2147/dddt.S135367

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

68. Pillai R, Paglialunga S, Hoang M, Cousteils K, Prentice KJ, Bombardier E, et al. Deletion of ARNT/HIF1β in pancreatic beta cells does not impair glucose homeostasis in mice, but is associated with defective glucose sensing ex vivo. Diabetologia. (2015) 58:2832–42. doi: 10.1007/s00125-015-3768-4

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

69. Lalwani A, Stokes RA, Lau SM, Gunton JE. Deletion of ARNT (Aryl hydrocarbon receptor nuclear translocator) in β-cells causes islet transplant failure with impaired β-cell function. PLoS One. (2014) 9:e98435. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0098435

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

70. Chan WK, Yao G, Gu YZ, Bradfield CA. Cross-talk between the aryl hydrocarbon receptor and hypoxia inducible factor signaling pathways. Demonstration of competition and compensation. J Biol Chem. (1999) 274:12115–23. doi: 10.1074/jbc.274.17.12115

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

71. Vorrink SU, Domann FE. Regulatory crosstalk and interference between the xenobiotic and hypoxia sensing pathways at the AhR-ARNT-HIF1α signaling node. Chem Biol Interact. (2014) 218:82–8. doi: 10.1016/j.cbi.2014.05.001

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

72. Lalwani A, Warren J, Liuwantara D, Hawthorne WJ, O’Connell PJ, Gonzalez FJ, et al. β Cell Hypoxia-Inducible Factor-1α Is required for the prevention of type 1 diabetes. Cell Rep. (2019) 27:2370–84.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2019.04.086

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

73. Laurans L, Venteclef N, Haddad Y, Chajadine M, Alzaid F, Metghalchi S, et al. Genetic deficiency of indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase promotes gut microbiota-mediated metabolic health. Nat Med. (2018) 24:1113–20. doi: 10.1038/s41591-018-0060-4

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar