Corrigendum: Coagulation Factor X Regulated by CASC2c Recruited Macrophages and Induced M2 Polarization in Glioblastoma Multiforme

Zhang, Yan; Feng, Jianbo; Fu, Haijuan; Liu, Changhong; Yu, Zhibin; Sun, Yingnan; She, Xiaoling; Li, Peiyao; Zhao, Chunhua; Liu, Yang; Liu, Tao; Liu, Qiang; Liu, Qing; Li, Guiyuan; Wu, Minghua

doi:10.3389/fimmu.2020.00934

CORRECTION article

Front. Immunol. , 29 May 2020

Sec. Cancer Immunity and Immunotherapy

Volume 11 - 2020 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2020.00934

Corrigendum: Coagulation Factor X Regulated by CASC2c Recruited Macrophages and Induced M2 Polarization in Glioblastoma Multiforme

This article is a correction to:

Coagulation Factor X Regulated by CASC2c Recruited Macrophages and Induced M2 Polarization in Glioblastoma Multiforme
1. Read original article

$\nYan Zhang,$ Yan Zhang^1,2

Jianbo Feng^1,2

Haijuan Fu^1,2

Changhong Liu^1,2

Zhibin Yu^1,2

Yingnan Sun¹

Xiaoling She³

Peiyao Li^1,2

Chunhua Zhao^1,2

Yang Liu^1,2

Tao Liu^1,2

Qiang Liu⁴

Qing Liu⁵

Guiyuan Li^1,2

Minghua Wu^1,2^*

¹Hunan Provincial Tumor Hospital and the Affiliated Tumor Hospital of Xiangya Medical School, Central South University, Changsha, China
²The Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis of the Chinese Ministry of Health, The Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Cancer Invasion of the Chinese Ministry of Education, Cancer Research Institute, Central South University, Changsha, China
³The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China
⁴The Third Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China
⁵The Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China

A Corrigendum on
Coagulation Factor X Regulated by CASC2c Recruited Macrophages and Induced M2 Polarization in Glioblastoma Multiforme

by Zhang, Y., Feng, J., Fu, H., Liu, C., Yu, Z., Sun, Y., et al. (2018). Front. Immunol. 9:1557. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.01557

In Figure 4G the authors mistakenly used the wrong image. The fully corrected Figure 4 appears below.

FIGURE 4

Figure 4. (G) The proportion of M1 macrophages decreased and M2 macrophages increased when THP-1 cells were treated with U251-FX cell supernatants compared with U251-CON.

The authors apologize for this error and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.

Keywords: tumor-associated macrophages, polarization, glioblastoma multiforme, extracellular signal-related kinase 1/2, AKT

Citation: Zhang Y, Feng J, Fu H, Liu C, Yu Z, Sun Y, She X, Li P, Zhao C, Liu Y, Liu T, Liu Q, Liu Q, Li G and Wu M (2020) Corrigendum: Coagulation Factor X Regulated by CASC2c Recruited Macrophages and Induced M2 Polarization in Glioblastoma Multiforme. Front. Immunol. 11:934. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.00934

Received: 16 March 2020; Accepted: 22 April 2020;
Published: 29 May 2020.

Edited and reviewed by: Catherine Sautes-Fridman, INSERM U1138 Centre de Recherche des Cordeliers, France

Copyright © 2020 Zhang, Feng, Fu, Liu, Yu, Sun, She, Li, Zhao, Liu, Liu, Liu, Liu, Li and Wu. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Minghua Wu, d3VtaW5naHVhNTU0QGFsaXl1bi5jb20=

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Corrigendum: Coagulation Factor X Regulated by CASC2c Recruited Macrophages and Induced M2 Polarization in Glioblastoma Multiforme

94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good

94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good