Elizabeth Q. Littauer
Ioanna Skountzou- 1Emory Vaccine Center, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, United States
- 2Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, United States
In 2009, the H1N1 swine flu pandemic highlighted the vulnerability of pregnant women to influenza viral infection. Pregnant women infected with influenza A virus were at increased risk of hospitalization and severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), which is associated with high mortality, while their newborns had an increased risk of pre-term birth or low birth weight. Pregnant women have a unique immunological profile modulated by the sex hormones required to maintain pregnancy, namely progesterone and estrogens. The role of these hormones in coordinating maternal immunotolerance in uterine tissue and cellular subsets has been well researched; however, these hormones have wide-ranging effects outside the uterus in modulating the immune response to disease. In this review, we compile research findings in the clinic and in animal models that elaborate on the unique features of H1N1 influenza A viral pathogenesis during pregnancy, the crosstalk between innate immune signaling and hormonal regulation during pregnancy, and the role of pregnancy hormones in modulating cellular responses to influenza A viral infection at mid-gestation. We highlight the ways in which lung architecture and function is stressed by pregnancy, increasing baseline inflammation prior to infection. We demonstrate that infection disrupts progesterone production and upregulates inflammatory mediators, such as cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) and prostaglandins, resulting in pre-term labor and spontaneous abortions. Lastly, we profile the ways in which pregnancy alters innate and adaptive cellular immune responses to H1N1 influenza viral infection, and the ways in which these protect fetal development at the expense of effective long-term immune memory. Thus, we highlight advancements in the field of reproductive immunology in response to viral infection and illustrate how that knowledge might be used to develop more effective post-infection therapies and vaccination strategies.
Introduction
Influenza viruses are segmented, negative-stranded enveloped RNA viruses that cause respiratory infections, fever, malaise, coughing, and mucus production. Influenza viruses are divided into A, B, C, and D types; while all A, B, and C can be infectious in humans with influenza A viruses (IAVs) causing the most widespread disease, influenza D virus is not known to infection humans (1, 2). Influenza A viruses are further classified by the antigenicity of their surface proteins hemagglutinin (HA) and neuraminidase (NA), which are encoded on individual segments of viral RNA, and define the host range of each virus (1, 3). Through a process unique to influenza and other segmented genome viruses, co-infection of different viral subtypes in human, swine, avian or other animal hosts can result in reassortment leading to antigenically unique novel viruses that may take advantage of an immunologically naïve host species (4). This process of reassortment resulted in the emergence of the four major influenza virus strains causing pandemics; the 1918 H1N1 Spanish influenza, the 1957 H2N2 Asian influenza, the 1968 H3N2 Hong Kong influenza, and the 2009 H1N1/09 swine influenza, that infected up to 50% of the global population and caused a significant increase in mortality (2, 3). While infection can occur year-round, the epidemiology of influenza virus infection is seasonal, causing peak illness in November through March in the Northern Hemisphere and approximately 200,000 hospitalizations and 36,000 deaths annually in the United States (3). Currently, the most common circulating influenza A subtypes are H1N1 and H3N2, which are included in quadrivalent vaccines together with the type B influenza lineages Yamagata and Victoria (5). Due to the wide variety of circulating viruses and the frequency of genetic reassortment between subtypes, vaccination is required annually to provide immune protection during each influenza season although it may not be complete if there is mismatch between predicted strains included in the vaccine and the resultant circulating strains in the following season.
Seasonal influenza infections during the second and third trimester of gestation increase the morbidity of pregnant women with higher hospitalization rates than the general population and mortality (6). Pregnant women have been particularly vulnerable to pandemic influenza viruses showing up to 45% increased morbidity and mortality, and they were at an increased risk of higher cardiopulmonary complications and gestational abnormalities during the four major influenza pandemics in the past 100 years (7–9). While pregnant women typically represent 1% of the American population, during the 2009 H1N1 pandemic they comprised 6.4% of all hospitalizations and 4.3% of all deaths (10, 11). Over half of those women hospitalized for H1N1 influenza virus infection had another pre-existing condition, such as asthma, high blood pressure, and diabetes; women with asthma represented 43.5% of deaths from influenza virus infection during pregnancy, which is part of a larger phenomenon of enhanced viral pathogenesis and severe outcomes among asthmatic adults (11, 12).
Influenza infection-related complications in fetuses and neonates have been associated with increased risk of miscarriage, pre-term birth, stillbirth, neonatal death, and low birth weight (6, 9, 13, 14). Clinical reports of influenza-like illness (ILI) during pregnancy have been correlated with a five-fold increase in perinatal morbidity and mortality (15). The incidence of pre-term birth increased from 7 per 1,000 births to 39 per 1,000 births and the incidence of stillbirth from 6 to 27 stillbirths per 1,000 births in the 2009 pandemic (9, 10, 16). Specifically, pregnant women who tested positive for the 2009 swine-origin H1N1 virus were more likely to deliver low birthweight infants than pregnant women who delivered following ILI that was not caused by the pandemic strain (17). There is historical evidence that the 1918 and 1957 pandemics produced similar clinical outcomes for pregnant women; however, modern diagnostic procedures employed during the 2009 H1N1 pandemic allow for more direct linkage between influenza viral infection of pregnant mothers and poor outcomes for maternal and neonatal health (9).
The mortality rates reported for both women and their newborns led to initiatives by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the World Health Organization (WHO) to increase influenza vaccination coverage in pregnant women (5, 18). Maternal vaccination during the second or third trimester of pregnancy with seasonal trivalent influenza vaccine substantially reduced the incidence of ILI in both mothers and their newborns (19–21) and has not been associated with pre-term delivery or an increase of adverse outcomes for mothers or their infants. In a review of 7 clinical studies, Bratton et al concluded that maternal vaccination reduced the likelihood of stillbirth compared to unvaccinated pregnant mothers (22–24). However, while the conventional intramuscular vaccination has been determined to be reasonably safe for routine use during pregnancy, promoting the transplacental transfer of anti-influenza virus antibodies from mother to fetus, clinical data is inconclusive regarding the efficiency of immune responses to the vaccine when compared to those induced in non-pregnant women (18, 19, 25–27).
Vaccination is widely recommended during pregnancy for the benefit of mother and child; however, vaccination coverage among pregnant women in the United States remains around 50% (6). Research into the specific mechanisms by which H1N1 influenza virus infection causes pregnancy complications and how pregnancy hormones modulate the immune response to infection and vaccination may reveal improved routes of therapy for women infected with influenza A virus during pregnancy. This review will discuss how H1N1 influenza virus infection disrupts maternal lung and placental function as well as the role of pregnancy hormones in shaping the innate and cellular immune responses to H1N1 influenza virus infection.
The Physiology of Influenza A Virus Infection and Immune Responses
Human influenza A virus is typically transmitted through respiratory droplets and inhaled into the nasopharynx. Initial virus infection occurs when hemagglutinin (HA), a surface protein on influenza virions, binds to α2,6-linked sialic acids that are widely expressed on the surface of ciliated airway epithelial cells throughout the upper respiratory tract (28, 29). Viruses are then endocytosed primarily via a clathrin-mediated pathway; upon acidification of the vesicle containing influenza virions, the HA protein is triggered to fuse viral and cellular membranes, releasing the viral genome into the cell (30–32). The eight negative-stranded RNA segments of the viral genome are then translocated to the nucleus, where they replicate using the associated viral RNA-dependent RNA polymerase through a complementary RNA (cRNA) replication intermediate (33). In parallel, viral transcripts are generated using stretches of capped cellular RNA molecules as primers (“cap-snatching”). After translation of the viral transcripts in the cytoplasm, the eight genome segments are packaged into virions which are released from the apical cellular membranes to infect nearby cells and thus result in viral amplification (32, 34). Viruses shed from the nasopharynx may be inhaled further into the lower respiratory tract causing severe pulmonary infections or transmitted through respiratory droplets from the upper respiratory compartment to the next person. People infected with 2009 H1N1 influenza A virus were contagious as early as 12 hours post-inoculation and typically began experiencing symptoms approximately 2 days following infection (35).
The release of viral RNA within the cell activates innate immune signaling pathways, especially toll-like receptors (TLRs) and retinoic-acid-inducible gene 1 (RIG1), which induce the expression of the pro-inflammatory cytokines interferon-α (IFN-α) and interferon-β (IFN-β) (36, 37). The secretion of these cytokines activates the surrounding epithelial cells to express antiviral genes that hamper viral entry and replication and recruit innate immune cells to the site of infection (37–39). Natural killer (NK) cells and neutrophils kill infected cells, and additional cytokines expressed by activated airway epithelium and innate immune cells induce fever and mucus production, which in turn results in coughing and rhinorrhea to shed the virus and cellular debris from the lungs and the nasopharynx (38, 40). These infection-induced responses are the hallmark of influenza illness symptomatology, and in clinically vulnerable populations, chest congestion due to viral infection and the ensuing immune response can lead to bronchitis, pneumonia, and secondary bacterial infections (41–43). Viral clearance finally occurs around 8 to 10 days after the onset of symptoms when the adaptive immune response mounts virus-specific clearing of infected tissue (38, 44). Viral antigen is taken up and processed by dendritic cells which migrate upon activation to draining mediastinal lymph nodes and prime naïve resident T cells to respond to the infection (45). Humoral memory is developed when naïve B cells are primed by soluble antigen and costimulated by CD4+ T follicular helper (TFH) cells to mature into plasmablasts that will then traffic to the site of the infection and secrete virus-specific neutralizing antibodies (46). Ultimately, following costimulatory help from CD4+ T cells, CD8+ cytotoxic T lymphocytes will traffic to the lungs and eradicate virus-infected cells (38, 46, 47). Upon resolution of disease, alveolar macrophages clear cellular debris, and basal stem cells regenerate airway epithelium to restore healthy tissue (48, 49). In animal models for influenza viral pathogenesis, it was demonstrated that virus-specific CD103+ CD8+ tissue resident memory (TRM) T cells in the lungs could provide rapid response upon the next infection and memory B cells persisted in the mediastinal lymph nodes to secrete virus-neutralizing antibody into circulation upon restimulation (50–52).
Research into the specific mechanisms of H1N1 influenza A virus binding, entry, RNA replication, transmission, and induction of the host immune system has been extensive since the 1918 Spanish influenza pandemic; however, investigations into how these mechanisms manifest in disease in immunologically unique populations, such as infants, the elderly, HIV+ or asthmatic patients, and pregnant women have been limited.
Hormonal Regulation of Pregnancy and Immune Signaling Are Delicately Balanced to Protect Fetal Development
Female reproduction is regulated predominately via estrogen, progesterone, luteinizing hormone (LH), and follicular stimulating hormone (FSH). Estrogen receptors (ERs) and progesterone receptors (PGRs) are typically expressed within the cytosol and translocated to the nucleus upon ligand binding to induce a suite of genes encoding immunomodulators, regulators for tissue remodeling, mammary gland development, metabolism, lung physiology and function (53–55). LH and FSH are synthesized in the anterior pituitary gland and coordinate the decidualization of the uterine endometrium as well as the release of oocytes from mature ovarian follicles into the uterus for fertilization (56). A fertilized oocyte develops into a blastocyst, and then the outer layer of the blastocyst forms a polarized structure called the trophectoderm (57). The trophoctoderm layer implants in the uterine wall to become syncytiotrophoblasts that secrete human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) and develop into fetal placental chorionic villi (57). Placental hCG expression signals the maternal corpus luteum to produce progesterone, which maintains the appropriate thickness and vascularization of the endometrium to support embryonic growth (56).
Insufficient progesterone production has been associated with infertility and recurrent spontaneous abortions, indicating that variations in progesterone levels as a result of infectious disease are not well tolerated by maternal physiology and may result in miscarriage or pre-term birth (58–60). Sex hormones play a crucial role in organizing endometrial granulated lymphocytes (EGLs) in the innermost layer of epithelial tissue in the uterus and populations of uterine natural killer (NK) cells, dendritic cells, macrophages, and memory and regulatory T cells are tightly controlled throughout the first, second, and third trimesters of pregnancy (56, 61, 62). Estrogens are expressed in several major forms, mainly estradiol (E2) and estriol (E3); each can have biphasic effects in stimulating pro-inflammatory signaling via mitogen-associated protein kinases (MAPKs) and NK activation at low concentrations or enhancing the expression of PD-L1 on T cells and the synthesis of TGF- β and IL-10 at high concentrations (62). Progesterone receptors are expressed broadly on most immune cell subsets and are produced in higher levels in females (62–64). In the uterus, progesterone induces the transition of naïve Th0 cells into IL-4, IL-5, and IL-6 secreting Th2 memory cells upon antigen recognition; these Th2 cells are critical for coordinating immune tolerant cytokine crosstalk between the maternal and fetal sides of the placenta and preventing intrauterine NK cell activation against fetal trophoblasts (61). The expression of IL-4 and IL-6 then promotes hCG secretion from the corpus luteum, which in turn releases more progesterone, creating a positive feedback loop for the amplification of hormone-mediated Th2 polarization (61). This phenomenon has been shown to be important for maintaining immune tolerance, and recurrent miscarriage is associated with a predominance of Th1 memory cells in the endometrium (65). Estrogens have also been implicated in inducing CD4+ CD25+ T regulatory cells (Tregs) and are critical for maintaining tolerance within the maternal-fetal interface (66). Progesterone also upregulates the activity of uterine Tregs, which act as suppressors of inflammatory immune subsets, particularly NK cells and macrophages resident to the endometrium (62, 64). In this way, estrogens and progesterone coordinate an environment in which both uterine epithelial cells and innate immune cells resident to uterine tissue will tolerate the implantation of a fertilized oocyte and the development of a placenta and fetus.
The structure and cellular composition of placenta is critical to maintaining fetal growth and development as well as protection from inflammation. Fetal placenta develops from the cells in the implanted blastocyst as it transitions into the trophoblast which differentiates into cytotrophoblasts and synciotrophoblasts. Both cell types contribute to the development of chorionic villi that form an interface with the uterine decidua (57). Here, maternal blood makes direct contact with fetal cells, allowing for gas, nutrient, and waste exchange but also providing a potential door for entry of bacteria, viruses, and parasites to a fetus with an undeveloped immune system (67). Few pathogens can cross the placental barrier from the mother to the fetus. TORCH pathogens [Toxoplasma gondii; other pathogens including, human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), varicella zoster virus (VZV), malaria-causing Plasmodium species, Listeria monocytogenes, Treponema pallidum, parvoviruses B19, enteroviruses, and recently, Zika virus; rubella virus; cytomegalovirus (CMV); and herpes simplex virus 1 and 2 (HSV)] are associated with fetal and neonatal morbidity and mortality from CNS abnormalities, microcephaly, blindness, deafness, premature birth or low birth weight (67, 68). However, there is limited evidence that influenza A virus crosses the maternal-fetal barrier. Despite the demonstrated ability of the 2009 pandemic strain to infect fetal trophoblasts, the development of chorionic villitis and the widespread reports of increased risk of maternal and fetal mortality, there were few conclusive cases of vertical transmission via the placenta (69, 70). Thus, poor fetal outcomes during pregnancy are likely due to indirect exposure to maternal inflammatory cytokine expression and dysregulation of pregnancy-supportive hormones.
In addition to preventing pathogen entry into the fetal bloodstream, it is also critical that cytokines that make it across the placental syncytiotrophoblast layer into the fetal circulatory system do not cause inflammation or immune cell activation that interrupts fetal growth and development (71, 72). Clinical reports of maternal inflammation and infection during pregnancy have been associated, although inconclusively, with the development of autism, bipolar disorders, and schizophrenia in children born to mothers infected with influenza A virus during pregnancy (73–75). Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) isolated from healthy pregnant women and co-cultured with 2009 pandemic influenza A virus subtype H1N1 or circulating rhinovirus strains (HRV43 and HRV1B) had significantly reduced IFN-α and IFN-γ responses, indicating increased susceptibility to severe outcomes of viral infection during pregnancy (76, 77) A shift away from inflammatory Th1 cytokines (TNF-α, IFN-γ, IL-2) can limit potential cytotoxic damage to the fetus and placenta (61, 62). Sex hormones coordinate this shift by activating transcriptional factors via transmembrane and intracellular receptors which activate a suite of anti-abortive, pro-pregnancy genes (63). For example, progesterone activates progesterone-induced binding factor (PIBF) in lymphocytes, which in turn promotes the synthesis of IL-3, IL-4, and IL-10, while reducing the expression of IL-12 (78, 79). PIBF also inhibits NK cell degranulation, and decreased PIBF expression is linked to recurrent spontaneous abortions (79, 80). Thus, hormone-mediated suppression of inflammatory cytokine production and cellular activation is critical to successful pregnancy in the short-term by protecting the placenta from inflammation that could trigger pre-term birth or neurodevelopment damage; however, proper inflammatory signals must still be activated to recruit innate immune cells and CD8+ T cells in order to clear virus-infected tissue.
While pre-term birth and low birth weight neonates have been well-documented outcomes of the 2009 H1N1 influenza virus infection in pregnant women, a mechanism for this phenotype is unclear, though placental transmission of inflammatory cytokines, dysregulated hormone signaling, and oxygen deprivation due to maternal respiratory distress have all been implicated (62, 81, 82). The effect of the hormonal millieu during pregnancy on innate immune responses is complicated, and ex vivo modeling of a single subset of cells may not depict the entire story of hormonal, cytokine and immune cell signaling between lung, fetus, and placenta in an infected pregnant woman. Clinical samples from pregnant women are limited to blood, post-partum placenta, and post-mortem tissues, leaving research questions about maternal lung function and immune responses to non-fatal influenza viral infection unanswered.
Rodent models, particularly mice, are a commonly accepted experimental tool for preclinical research studies due to their hemochorial placental structures, recapitulation of influenza viral pathogenesis seen in humans, and their cost effectiveness over multiple time points (29). One approach for the elucidation of these mechanisms is to expose healthy non-pregnant female mice to low doses of sex hormones comparable to birth control or high doses comparable to those of pregnancy. Pazos et al. implanted female C57BL/6 mice with degradable 17β-estradiol (E2 in mice) pellets to yield serum E2 levels of third trimester pregnancy and infected them with H1N1 PR8 virus; mice implanted with E2 exhibited reduced type I IFN signaling and impaired CD8+ T cell function compared to infected non-implanted female mice (83). Robinson et al proposed that 17β-estradiol has protective effect during pregnancy; ovariectomized and E2-implanted female C57BL/6 mice infected with H1N1 PR8 influenza virus exhibited enhanced recruitment of neutrophils and virus-specific T cells, which promote viral clearance (84). In contrast, studies involving pregnant mice demonstrated that while individual expression of estrogen or progesterone may limit inflammation, the condition of pregnancy resulted in elevated inflammatory responses to influenza virus infection compared to the immune responses of infected non-pregnant female mice (85–87). Pregnant mice infected with a mouse-adapted, 2009 H1N1 influenza virus expressed elevated levels of IL-1α, IL-6, granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF), monocyte chemotactic protein (MCP-1), CXCL1, and RANTES and experienced more severe pathology and mortality when compared to non-pregnant mice (88). These cytokines were highly expressed in humans who died as a result of 2009 H1N1 influenza A virus (87, 89). These differences in immune responses between hormone-treated mice and pregnant mice infected with influenza virus highlights how immune and endocrine crosstalk between mother, fetus, and placenta has far-reaching consequences beyond classical reproductive tissues and complicates our understanding of typical H1N1 viral pathogenesis.
The genetic background of mouse strain is also significant in the selection of a pregnant mouse model. C57BL/6 mice classically tend toward Th1-type immune responses while mice with BALB/c genetic backgrounds tend toward Th2-type immune responses (90, 91). Differences in genetic background have been shown to cause variability in viral pathogenesis, inflammatory cytokine response, pulmonary microRNA expression, alveolar macrophage viability following intranasal infection with 2009 H1N1 pandemic influenza virus strains (92–94). Strain differences also affect the physiological response to influenza viral infection during pregnancy. Recent findings in C57BL/6 mice have highlighted that pregnancy significantly enhances lung function by increasing respiratory compliance and total lung capacity and that influenza virus infection does not alter lung tidal volume, minute ventilation, diffusing capacity, and compliance as shown in non-pregnant infected mice. The authors observed less inflammation in the lungs of infected pregnant mice and suggested that this is a protective mechanism against maternal respiratory damage during pregnancy (95). However, we and others have shown in the BALB/c mouse model that pregnancy increases lung inflammation and expression of stress-induced prostaglandins (PGs) and cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) prior to infection and that IAV infection enhances immunopathology in the lungs of pregnant mice relative to non-pregnant mice (86–88). Oxidative stress interferes with lipid raft clustering and has been shown to inhibit the ability of PIBF to bind its transmembrane receptor and IL-4R to induce the STAT6 signaling pathway; this interference reduces the sensitivity of cells to PIBF (96, 97). Thus, influenza viral infection and subsequent oxidative stress may interfere with the unique lung and mucosal physiology tightly regulated by sex hormones toward successful pregnancy and fetal development.
Humoral Immune Responses Following Infection and Vaccination During Pregnancy
The natural outcome of infection is the development of immunological memory to prevent re-infection and future cellular damage. As discussed previously, soluble viral antigen released from infected cells in the lungs primes naive B cells in the proximal draining lymph nodes by binding to the B cell receptor (BCR), crosslinking several BCRs in the process and amplifying an activation signal (46, 98–100). Additional costimulation by CD4+ helper T cells responding to processed viral antigen in MHC class II proteins on the B cell's surface is required to fully activate B cells and provides a second activation signal, resulting in clonal proliferation and amplification of antibodies specific for influenza viral antigens (46). Selection for B cells with BCRs with highest affinity for the viral antigen occurs in the germinal centers found in secondary lymphoid tissues such as the spleen. In the latter, cells undergo somatic hypermutation, a process by which DNA encoding hypervariable Ig regions is broken by activation-induced deaminase (AID) and uracil-DNA glycosylase (UNG) and repaired by MSH2/6 and REV1. The accumulating mutations may result in the generation of antibodies with an increased affinity to viral antigens (101, 102). Immunoglobulin class switching increases the range of functions by recombining antibody variable regions encoding specificity for influenza viral proteins with constant regions encoding receptors for various innate immune cells and intercellular trafficking (102). Ultimately, most antibody-secreting cells (ASCs) will undergo apoptosis following viral clearance. Only a small percentage of these high-specificity B cell clones will become plasma cells that secrete low levels of antibody into the serum for months, or memory cells that reside in the bone marrow, and can be reactivated to provide antibody responses to a subsequent infection (46, 103).
This system-wide coordination of B cell activation and survival in response to foreign antigen delicately balances the pregnant mother's serum antibody levels to both provide the benefits of transplacental immunity to the fetus and avoid the development of fetal-reactive antibodies. The competing priorities of fetal antigen tolerance and the production of antibodies that can be transplacentally conferred to the fetus to promote neonatal immunity are tightly regulated by pregnancy hormones. Clinical evidence has long documented that the symptoms of autoimmune diseases arising from the generation of antibodies against self-antigen tend to recede during pregnancy and resurge after parturition and breastfeeding, indicating that pregnancy hormones play a role in coordinating immune tolerance at the local uterine and systemic level (62, 64). The development of autoimmune disorders such as multiple sclerosis, rheumatoid arthritis, and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), which are more prevalent in women, have been linked to the effects of estrogen on B cell activation and function (104). Estradiol (E2) has been shown to upregulate Bcl-2, inducing survival of autoreactive B cells and changing signaling thresholds required to induce apoptosis (105, 106). In contrast, progesterone has been established as negative regulator of B cell lymphopoiesis (107–109). Reduced expansion of B cells within a pregnant mother may help establish allotolerance to the fetus by preventing antibody recognition of fetal antigen, which might result in inflammation, lymphocyte cytotoxicity, and complement activation (63). Healthy pregnancy has been shown to suppress B cell lymphopoiesis in BALB/c mice, which could be reversed by the exogenous addition of IL-7 (107, 110, 111). These data suggest that pregnancy may reduce or redirect activated B cells during their migration to the lungs or bone marrow. Differential recruitment of IgA+ plasmablasts to the murine mammary glands after parturition and during nursing has been demonstrated, but specific homing receptors have not been identified, suggesting a role of local chemoattractants such as E-selectin (112, 113). In this way, maintaining immunological tolerance to fetal antigen that reaches the maternal circulatory system may require that B cell activation be altered in order to prevent the proliferation of anti-fetal antibodies.
Understanding how pregnancy impacts the development of immune memory is of clinical significance. Immunization has been reported to reduce hospitalization and ILI of pregnant women and their newborns during the flu season with no record of increased adverse events due to vaccination between this group and the unvaccinated population (21, 23, 114, 115). Clinical trials of seasonal trivalent inactivated influenza vaccination (TIV) in Bangladesh showed improved transplacental transfer of influenza-specific antibodies from mother to child (116). However, there are mixed results in how pregnancy affects humoral immunity following vaccination. Schlaudecker et al. reported that pregnant women seroconverted at the same rate as non-pregnant women following TIV but generated lower geometric mean titers (GMTs) against H1N1 (A/California) and H3N2 (A/Perth) viruses (26). Serological analysis from a cohort of influenza A virus (IAV) vaccinated healthy pregnant and non-pregnant women in California showed similar seroconversion rates and numbers of plasmablasts (18). Thus, while influenza vaccination during pregnancy has been demonstrated to be safe and to reduce the incidence of influenza-induced hospitalization and pre-term birth, further research into antibody functionality and expression is still needed.
Pregnancy hormones may coordinate the down-regulation of class-switching or post-translational modifications (i.e., glycosylation, fucosylation, sialylation, etc.) of the antigen-binding (Fab) or receptor binding (Fc) regions of antibodies in order to attenuate potentially inflammatory or anti-fetal immune responses. There have been reports that pregnant women infected with H1N1 pandemic virus in Shenyang, China in 2009 produced an imbalanced proportion of anti-H1N1 IgG1, IgG2, IgG3, and IgG4 antibody subtypes compared with infected non-pregnant women in the same hospital (117). Interestingly, IgG1 is preferentially transported from maternal circulation across the placenta compared to other IgG classes, especially IgG2, although this phenomenon has not been directly linked to influenza infection and vaccination (118–120). While preferential transport from mother to fetus is linked to neonatal Fc receptor (FcRn) expression on placental syncytiotrophoblasts, how pregnancy shifts expression from virus-specific IgG2 to IgG1 requires further investigation.
Antibody isotype classes and generation of specificity are governed by the class-switching of Ig genes and somatic hypermutation of their variable chain-encoding regions (102, 121). Variability is induced primarily by activation-induced cytidine deaminase (AID) and uracil-DNA glycosylase (UNG) that selectively damage DNA and repair it randomly (102, 121, 122). B cells that have complementarity-determining regions (CDRs) that bind best to antigen are selected for by T follicular helper cells (Tfhs) and clonally amplified to flood the circulatory system with virus neutralizing antibodies (123, 124). Estrogen and progesterone seem to work in opposition to each other on the regulation of AID: estrogen receptors bind the HoxC4 promoter to induce AID activation, while progesterone receptors can bind directly to the AID promoter to inhibit activation (125–127). Glucocorticoids have also been described as negative regulators of AID activation (128). These phenomena are typically described in the context of autoimmune disease regulation and have not been described in the multi-hormonal environment of pregnancy.
Asymmetric glycosylation, or the single glycosylation of one side rather than both sides of the Fab or Fc antibody chains, can result in fine-tuned interactions with antigen and Fc receptors, and these binding affinities are important for antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC) (129, 130). Pregnancy has been shown to increase the serum and placental concentrations of asymmetrically glycosylated IgG and may provide an explanation for the reduced avidity and virus-binding capability following viral infection during pregnancy (131, 132). Human and murine placental expression of IL-6 has been shown to induce asymmetrical glycosylation of IgG from hybridomas (133, 134). Trophoblast-produced asymmetric antibodies have been documented throughout the placenta (132, 135). However, whether these signaling effects can extend outside the uterus has yet to be determined and would be a major finding in maternal immunity. By reducing binding specificity for antibody effector cells via asymmetric glycosylation, the maternal immune system may be able to mitigate the negative effects of any anti-fetal antibodies that may have developed while still maintaining a population of semi-functional or selectively-functional antibodies that can neutralize pathogens and non-self-entities (131).
Conclusions
Influenza viral illness causes significant socioeconomic and clinical burden each year (136). While most research focused on the consequences of influenza A (H1N1) virus infection during pregnancy, there is evidence that influenza B virus can also cause significant maternal and fetal complications following mid-gestation infection (137, 138). It remains unclear if seasonal type A (H3N2) virus infection during pregnancy causes similar poor clinical outcomes compared to the severity of complications following type A (H1N1) or type B virus infection during pregnancy (138–141). Lastly, the recently identified highly neurotropic avian H7N9 and H5N1 influenza A reassortants, which could potentially cause pandemics, have been shown to cause severe disease during pregnancy (142–147). The knowledge gained through research of the 2009 pandemic swine-derived influenza A (H1N1) virus may provide the clinical and research community with an improved capacity for the early detection of a novel pandemic virus entering a naïve pregnant population. These studies we have reviewed demonstrate the vulnerability of pregnant women to infectious diseases and the fact that neonatal health is directly dependent on maternal health, doubles the significance of research that results in improved therapies and treatment strategies.
Respiratory infection during pregnancy is of broad interest. While influenza A virus has generated some of the highest morbidity rates following maternal infection, coronavirus outbreaks have also been associated with similar outcomes in mothers and neonates following mid-gestation infection. Infection with severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) coronavirus and Middle Eastern respiratory syndrome (MERS) coronavirus have been associated with spontaneous abortion, fetal growth retardation, and maternal and neonatal mortality (148–150). Mid-gestation infection with respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) has been described in rare severe adult cases and has also been associated with pre-term birth and low birth weight in a cohort in Nepal (151, 152). High rates of mortality among infants and toddlers infected with RSV highlights the need for improved understanding of maternal immunity to RSV infection and vaccination during pregnancy, and there is hope that vaccination of mothers during pregnancy can provide passive immunity that will protect the fetus for months after birth (153). None of the previously mentioned viruses were transmitted transplacentally to fetuses, and yet respiratory infection during pregnancy induced significant maternal illness, pre-term labor, low birth weight, or spontaneous abortion.
Early antiviral therapy following H1N1 influenza A virus infection during pregnancy has been shown to significantly reduce pre-term birth, hospitalization in intensive care units (ICUs), and maternal death (11, 154). Seasonal H1N1 influenza A virus induced increased levels of cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) and prostaglandin-F2α in the lungs and placenta, providing a mechanism for lung immunopathology and pre-term labor in pregnant mice (88). The anti-inflammatory potential of COX-2 inhibitor therapy has already been proposed for decreasing disease severity caused by the highly pathogenic avian influenza strains H5N1 and H7N9 (155, 156). In addition, COX inhibitor treatment has demonstrated to attenuate the lung expression of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) and keratinocyte-derived (KC) cytokines elevated in pregnant mice infected by H1N1 A/Brisbane/59/2007 and H1N1 A/California/07/2009 (157, 158). However, while non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) have been shown to be safe during pregnancy, COX-2 specific inhibitors may induce pre-term labor and musculoskeletal defects (159–161). Viral load was negatively associated with progesterone concentration, and reduced progesterone expression was correlated with pre-term labor in influenza virus-infected pregnant mice (88). Administration of progesterone to female mice following influenza A(H1N1) virus infection reduced immunopathological changes and improved lung epithelial cell regeneration, although it did not reduce viral load (162, 163). Hence, limiting viral replication should be one of many aims for anti-influenza therapy during pregnancy, including the limiting of immunopathology caused by cytokine dysregulation and promoting the healing of damaged airway epithelium following viral clearance.
The connections between viral pathogenesis and reproductive endocrinology makes the field of infectious disease in pregnant women complicated, exciting, and clinically significant. Investigations into the immunological components of infertility, recurrent miscarriage, and preeclampsia have yielded a wealth of information regarding the requirements of immune tolerance and rejection, and this information can provide a platform for understanding healthy pregnancy and how inflammation and hormonal dysregulation will impact maternal health and fetal development. Development of accurate animal pregnancy models across a range of species in coordination with broader clinical sampling from influenza-infected or -vaccinated pregnant women will provide an effective platform for validation of experimental studies and improved therapeutics and treatment for pregnant women and their offspring.
Author Contributions
All authors listed have made a substantial, direct and intellectual contribution to the work, and approved it for publication.
Funding
Funding for this research was provided through Centers of Excellence for Influenza Research and Surveillance (HHSN272201400004C).
Conflict of Interest Statement
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
References
1. Webster RG, Bean WJ, Gorman OT, Chambers TM, Kawaoka Y. Evolution and ecology of influenza A viruses. Microbiol Rev. (1992) 56:152–79.
2. Kidd M. Influenza viruses: update on epidemiology, clinical features, treatment and vaccination. Curr Opin Pulm Med. (2014) 20:242–6. doi: 10.1097/MCP.0000000000000049
3. Taubenberger JK, Kash JC. Influenza virus evolution, host adaptation, and pandemic formation. Cell Host Microbe (2010) 7:440–51. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2010.05.009
4. Tao H, Steel J, Lowen AC. Intrahost dynamics of influenza virus reassortment. J Virol. (2014) 88:7485–92. doi: 10.1128/JVI.00715-14
5. Hannoun C. The evolving history of influenza viruses and influenza vaccines. Expert Rev Vacc. (2013) 12:1085–94. doi: 10.1586/14760584.2013.824709
6. Cantu J, Tita AT. Management of influenza in pregnancy. Am J Perinatol. (2013) 30:99–103. doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1331033
7. Longman RE, Johnson TR. Viral respiratory disease in pregnancy. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. (2007) 19:120–5. doi: 10.1097/GCO.0b013e328028fdc7
8. Jamieson DJ, Honein MA, Rasmussen SA, Williams JL, Swerdlow DL, Biggerstaff MS, et al. H1N1 2009 influenza virus infection during pregnancy in the USA. Lancet (2009) 374:451–8. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61304-0
9. Rasmussen SA, Jamieson DJ, Uyeki TM. Effects of influenza on pregnant women and infants. Am J Obstet Gynecol. (2012) 207:S3–8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2012.06.068
10. Creanga AA, Johnson TF, Graitcer SB, Hartman LK, Al-Samarrai T, Schwarz AG, et al. Severity of 2009 pandemic influenza A (H1N1) virus infection in pregnant women. Obstet Gynecol. (2010) 115:717–26. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181d57947
11. Siston AM, Rasmussen SA, Honein MA, Fry AM, Seib K, Callaghan WM, et al. Pandemic 2009 influenza A(H1N1) virus illness among pregnant women in the United States. JAMA (2010) 303:1517–25. doi: 10.1001/jama.2010.479
12. Mortensen E, Louie J, Pertowski C, Cadwell BL, Weiss E, Acosta M, et al. Epidemiology and outcomes of adults with asthma who were hospitalized or died with 2009 pandemic influenza A (H1N1)–California, 2009. Influenza Other Respir Viruses (2013) 7:1343–9. doi: 10.1111/irv.12120
13. Jamieson AM, Yu S, Annicelli CH, Medzhitov R. Influenza virus-induced glucocorticoids compromise innate host defense against a secondary bacterial infection. Cell Host Microbe. (2010) 7:103–14. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2010.01.010
14. Vrekoussis T, Kalantaridou SN, Mastorakos G, Zoumakis E, Makrigiannakis A, Syrrou M, et al. The role of stress in female reproduction and pregnancy: an update. Ann N Y Acad Sci. (2010) 1205:69–75. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2010.05686.x
15. Memoli MJ, Harvey H, Morens DM, Taubenberger JK. Influenza in pregnancy. Influenza Other Respir Viruses (2013) 7:1033–9. doi: 10.1111/irv.12055
16. Pierce M, Kurinczuk JJ, Spark P, Brocklehurst P, Knight M. Ukoss Perinatal outcomes after maternal 2009/H1N1 infection: national cohort study. BMJ (2011) 342:d3214. doi: 10.1136/bmj.d3214
17. Mendez-Figueroa H, Raker C, Anderson BL. Neonatal characteristics and outcomes of pregnancies complicated by influenza infection during the 2009 pandemic. Am J Obstet Gynecol. (2011) 204:S58–63. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2011.02.058
18. Kay AW, Blish CA. Immunogenicity and clinical efficacy of influenza vaccination in pregnancy. Front Immunol. (2015) 6:289. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2015.00289
19. Omer SB, Bednarczyk R, Madhi SA, Klugman KP. Benefits to mother and child of influenza vaccination during pregnancy. Hum Vaccin Immunother. (2012) 8:130–7. doi: 10.4161/hv.8.1.18601
20. Dabrera G, Zhao H, Andrews N, Begum F, Green H, Ellis J, et al. Effectiveness of seasonal influenza vaccination during pregnancy in preventing influenza infection in infants, England, 2013/14. Euro Surveill. (2014) 19:20959. doi: 10.2807/1560-7917.ES2014.19.45.20959
21. Takeda S, Hisano M, Komano J, Yamamoto H, Sago H, Yamaguchi K. Influenza vaccination during pregnancy and its usefulness to mothers and their young infants. J Infect Chemother. (2015) 21:238–46. doi: 10.1016/j.jiac.2015.01.015
22. Bednarczyk RA, Adjaye-Gbewonyo D, Omer SB. Safety of influenza immunization during pregnancy for the fetus and the neonate. Am J Obstet Gynecol. (2012) 207:S38–46. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2012.07.002
23. Ahrens KA, Louik C, Kerr S, Mitchell AA, Werler MM. Seasonal influenza vaccination during pregnancy and the risks of preterm delivery and small for gestational age birth. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. (2014) 28:498–509. doi: 10.1111/ppe.12152
24. Bratton KN, Wardle MT, Orenstein WA, Omer SB. Maternal influenza immunization and birth outcomes of stillbirth and spontaneous abortion: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Infect Dis. (2015) 60:e11–19. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciu915
25. Adegbola R, Nesin M, Wairagkar N. Immunogenicity and efficacy of influenza immunization during pregnancy: recent and ongoing studies. Am J Obstet Gynecol. (2012) 207:S28–32. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2012.07.001
26. Schlaudecker EP, Mcneal MM, Dodd CN, Ranz JB, Steinhoff MC. Pregnancy modifies the antibody response to trivalent influenza immunization. J Infect Dis. (2012) 206:1670–3. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jis592
27. Kay AW, Bayless NL, Fukuyama J, Aziz N, Dekker CL, Mackey S, et al. Pregnancy does not attenuate the antibody or plasmablast response to inactivated influenza vaccine. J Infect Dis. (2015) 212:861–70. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiv138
28. Salomon R, Webster RG. The influenza virus enigma. Cell (2009) 136:402–10. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2009.01.029
29. Van Riel D, Den Bakker MA, Leijten LM, Chutinimitkul S, Munster VJ, De Wit E, et al. Seasonal and pandemic human influenza viruses attach better to human upper respiratory tract epithelium than avian influenza viruses. Am J Pathol. (2010) 176:1614–8. doi: 10.2353/ajpath.2010.090949
30. Lakadamyali M, Rust MJ, Zhuang X. Endocytosis of influenza viruses. Microbes Infect. (2004) 6:929–36. doi: 10.1016/j.micinf.2004.05.002
31. Leung HS, Li OT, Chan RW, Chan MC, Nicholls JM, Poon LL. Entry of influenza A Virus with a alpha2,6-linked sialic acid binding preference requires host fibronectin. J Virol. (2012) 86:10704–13. doi: 10.1128/JVI.01166-12
32. Luo M. Influenza virus entry. Adv Exp Med Biol. (2012) 726:201–21. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4614-0980-9_9
33. Gu W, Gallagher GR, Dai W, Liu P, Li R, Trombly MI, et al. Influenza A virus preferentially snatches noncoding RNA caps. RNA (2015b) 21:2067–75. doi: 10.1261/rna.054221.115
34. Watanabe T, Watanabe S, Kawaoka Y. Cellular networks involved in the influenza virus life cycle. Cell Host Microbe. (2010) 7:427–39. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2010.05.008
35. Canini L, Carrat F. Population modeling of influenza A/H1N1 virus kinetics and symptom dynamics. J Virol. (2011) 85:2764–70. doi: 10.1128/JVI.01318-10
36. Hsu AC, Parsons K, Barr I, Lowther S, Middleton D, Hansbro PM, et al. Critical role of constitutive type I interferon response in bronchial epithelial cell to influenza infection. PLoS ONE (2012) 7:e32947. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0032947
37. Kuiken T, Riteau B, Fouchier RA, Rimmelzwaan GF. Pathogenesis of influenza virus infections: the good, the bad and the ugly. Curr Opin Virol. (2012) 2:276–86. doi: 10.1016/j.coviro.2012.02.013
38. Fukuyama S, Kawaoka Y. The pathogenesis of influenza virus infections: the contributions of virus and host factors. Curr Opin Immunol. (2011) 23:481–6. doi: 10.1016/j.coi.2011.07.016
39. Yamaya M, Nadine LK, Ota C, Kubo H, Makiguchi T, Nagatomi R, et al. Magnitude of influenza virus replication and cell damage is associated with interleukin-6 production in primary cultures of human tracheal epithelium. Respir Physiol Neurobiol. (2014) 202:16–23. doi: 10.1016/j.resp.2014.07.010
40. Schultz-Cherry S. Role of NK cells in influenza infection. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol. (2015) 386:109–20. doi: 10.1007/82_2014_403
41. Taubenberger JK, Morens DM. The pathology of influenza virus infections. Annu Rev Pathol. (2008) 3:499–522. doi: 10.1146/annurev.pathmechdis.3.121806.154316
42. Liderot K, Ahl M, Ozenci V. Secondary bacterial infections in patients with seasonal influenza A and pandemic H1N1. Biomed Res Int. (2013) 2013:376219. doi: 10.1155/2013/376219
43. Mccullers JA. The co-pathogenesis of influenza viruses with bacteria in the lung. Nat Rev Microbiol. (2014) 12:252–62. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro3231
44. De Serres G, Rouleau I, Hamelin ME, Quach C, Skowronski D, Flamand L, et al. Contagious period for pandemic (H1N1) 2009. Emerg Infect Dis. (2010) 16:783–8. doi: 10.3201/eid1605.091894
45. La Gruta NL, Turner SJ. T cell mediated immunity to influenza: mechanisms of viral control. Trends Immunol. (2014) 35:396–402. doi: 10.1016/j.it.2014.06.004
46. Chiu C, Ellebedy AH, Wrammert J, Ahmed R. B cell responses to influenza infection and vaccination. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol. (2015) 386:381–98. doi: 10.1007/82_2014_425
47. Bot A, Reichlin A, Isobe H, Bot S, Schulman J, Yokoyama WM, et al. Cellular mechanisms involved in protection and recovery from influenza virus infection in immunodeficient mice. J Virol. (1996) 70:5668–72.
48. Hogan BL, Barkauskas CE, Chapman HA, Epstein JA, Jain R, Hsia CC, et al. Repair and regeneration of the respiratory system: complexity, plasticity, and mechanisms of lung stem cell function. Cell Stem Cell (2014) 15:123–38. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2014.07.012
49. Grabiec AM, Hussell T. The role of airway macrophages in apoptotic cell clearance following acute and chronic lung inflammation. Semin Immunopathol. (2016) 38:409–23. doi: 10.1007/s00281-016-0555-3
50. Boyden AW, Frickman AM, Legge KL, Waldschmidt TJ. Primary and long-term B-cell responses in the upper airway and lung after influenza A virus infection. Immunol Res. (2014) 59:73–80. doi: 10.1007/s12026-014-8541-0
51. Laidlaw BJ, Zhang N, Marshall HD, Staron MM, Guan T, Hu Y, et al. CD4+ T cell help guides formation of CD103+ lung-resident memory CD8+ T cells during influenza viral infection. Immunity (2014) 41:633–45. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2014.09.007
52. Pichyangkul S, Yongvanitchit K, Limsalakpetch A, Kum-Arb U, Im-Erbsin R, Boonnak K, et al. Tissue distribution of memory T and B cells in rhesus monkeys following influenza a infection. J Immunol. (2015) 195:4378–86. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1501702
53. Mulac-Jericevic B, Conneely OM. Reproductive tissue selective actions of progesterone receptors. Reproduction (2004) 128:139–46. doi: 10.1530/rep.1.00189
54. Wetendorf M, Demayo FJ. Progesterone receptor signaling in the initiation of pregnancy and preservation of a healthy uterus. Int J Dev Biol. (2014) 58:95–106. doi: 10.1387/ijdb.140069mw
55. Sathish V, Martin YN, Prakash YS. Sex steroid signaling: implications for lung diseases. Pharmacol Ther. (2015) 150:94–108. doi: 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2015.01.007
56. Wira CR, Rodriguez-Garcia M, Patel MV. The role of sex hormones in immune protection of the female reproductive tract. Nat Rev Immunol. (2015) 15:217–30. doi: 10.1038/nri3819
57. James JL, Carter AM, Chamley LW. Human placentation from nidation to 5 weeks of gestation. Part I: What do we know about formative placental development following implantation? Placenta (2012) 33:327–34. doi: 10.1016/j.placenta.2012.01.020
58. Balogh A, Ditroi F, Lampe G. Serum progesterone levels in early imminent abortion. Acta Physiol Hung. (1985) 65:275–9.
59. Darland NW. Infertility associated with luteal phase defect. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. (1985) 14:212–7. doi: 10.1111/j.1552-6909.1985.tb02229.x
60. Young SL, Lessey BA. Progesterone function in human endometrium: clinical perspectives. Semin Reprod Med. (2010) 28:5–16. doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1242988
61. Saito S. Cytokine network at the feto-maternal interface. J Reprod Immunol. (2000) 47:87–103. doi: 10.1016/S0165-0378(00)00060-7
62. Robinson DP, Klein SL. Pregnancy and pregnancy-associated hormones alter immune responses and disease pathogenesis. Horm Behav. (2012) 62:263–71. doi: 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2012.02.023
63. Druckmann R, Druckmann MA. Progesterone and the immunology of pregnancy. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. (2005) 97:389–96. doi: 10.1016/j.jsbmb.2005.08.010
64. Tan IJ, Peeva E, Zandman-Goddard G. Hormonal modulation of the immune system - A spotlight on the role of progestogens. Autoimmun Rev. (2015) 14:536–42. doi: 10.1016/j.autrev.2015.02.004
65. Szekeres-Bartho J, Polgar B. PIBF: the double edged sword. Pregnancy and tumor Am J Reprod Immunol. (2010) 64:77–86. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0897.2010.00833.x
66. Tai P, Wang J, Jin H, Song X, Yan J, Kang Y, et al. Induction of regulatory T cells by physiological level estrogen. J Cell Physiol. (2008) 214:456–64. doi: 10.1002/jcp.21221
67. Coyne CB, Lazear HM. Zika virus - reigniting the TORCH. Nat Rev Microbiol. (2016) 14:707–15. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro.2016.125
68. Adams Waldorf KM, Mcadams RM. Influence of infection during pregnancy on fetal development. Reproduction (2013) 146:R151–162. doi: 10.1530/REP-13-0232
69. Komine-Aizawa S, Suzaki A, Trinh QD, Izumi Y, Shibata T, Kuroda K, et al. H1N1/09 influenza A virus infection of immortalized first trimester human trophoblast cell lines. Am J Reprod Immunol. (2012) 68:226–32. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0897.2012.01172.x
70. Meijer WJ, Wensing AM, Bruinse HW, Nikkels PG. High rate of chronic villitis in placentas of pregnancies complicated by influenza A/H1N1 infection. Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol. (2014) 2014:768380. doi: 10.1155/2014/768380
71. Bastek JA, Weber AL, Mcshea MA, Ryan ME, Elovitz MA. Prenatal inflammation is associated with adverse neonatal outcomes. Am J Obstet Gynecol. (2014) 210:450 e451–10. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2013.12.024
72. Goeden N, Velasquez J, Arnold KA, Chan Y, Lund BT, Anderson GM, et al. Maternal inflammation disrupts fetal neurodevelopment via increased placental output of serotonin to the fetal brain. J Neurosci. (2016) 36:6041–9. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2534-15.2016
73. Brown AS, Derkits EJ. Prenatal infection and schizophrenia: a review of epidemiologic and translational studies. Am J Psychiatry (2010) 167:261–80. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2009.09030361
74. Parboosing R, Bao Y, Shen L, Schaefer CA, Brown AS. Gestational influenza and bipolar disorder in adult offspring. JAMA Psychiatry (2013) 70:677–85. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2013.896
75. Zerbo O, Qian Y, Yoshida C, Fireman BH, Klein NP, Croen LA. Association between influenza infection and vaccination during pregnancy and risk of autism spectrum disorder. JAMA Pediatr. (2017) 171:e163609. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2016.3609
76. Forbes RL, Gibson PG, Murphy VE, Wark PA. Impaired type I and III interferon response to rhinovirus infection during pregnancy and asthma. Thorax (2012a) 67:209–14. doi: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2011-200708
77. Forbes RL, Wark PA, Murphy VE, Gibson PG. Pregnant women have attenuated innate interferon responses to 2009 pandemic influenza A virus subtype H1N1. J Infect Dis. (2012b) 206:646–53. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jis377
78. Szekeres-Bartho J, Faust Z, Varga P, Szereday L, Kelemen K. The immunological pregnancy protective effect of progesterone is manifested via controlling cytokine production. Am J Reprod Immunol. (1996) 35:348–51. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0897.1996.tb00492.x
79. Raghupathy R, Al-Mutawa E, Al-Azemi M, Makhseed M, Azizieh F, Szekeres-Bartho J. Progesterone-induced blocking factor (PIBF) modulates cytokine production by lymphocytes from women with recurrent miscarriage or preterm delivery. J Reprod Immunol. (2009) 80:91–9. doi: 10.1016/j.jri.2009.01.004
80. Faust Z, Laskarin G, Rukavina D, Szekeres-Bartho J. Progesterone-induced blocking factor inhibits degranulation of natural killer cells. Am J Reprod Immunol. (1999) 42:71–5.
81. Raj RS, Bonney EA, Phillippe M. Influenza, immune system, and pregnancy. Reprod Sci. (2014) 21:1434–51. doi: 10.1177/1933719114537720
82. Meijer WJ, Van Noortwijk AG, Bruinse HW, Wensing AM. Influenza virus infection in pregnancy: a review. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. (2015) 94:797–819. doi: 10.1111/aogs.12680
83. Pazos MA, Kraus TA, Munoz-Fontela C, Moran TM. Estrogen mediates innate and adaptive immune alterations to influenza infection in pregnant mice. PLoS ONE (2012b) 7:e40502. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0040502
84. Robinson DP, Hall OJ, Nilles TL, Bream JH, Klein SL. 17beta-estradiol protects females against influenza by recruiting neutrophils and increasing virus-specific CD8 T cell responses in the lungs. J Virol. (2014) 88:4711–20. doi: 10.1128/JVI.02081-13
85. Chan KH, Zhang AJ, To KK, Chan CC, Poon VK, Guo K, et al. Wild type and mutant 2009 pandemic influenza A (H1N1) viruses cause more severe disease and higher mortality in pregnant BALB/c mice. PLoS ONE (2010) 5:e13757. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0013757
86. Marcelin G, Aldridge JR, Duan S, Ghoneim HE, Rehg J, Marjuki H, et al. Fatal outcome of pandemic H1N1 2009 influenza virus infection is associated with immunopathology and impaired lung repair, not enhanced viral burden, in pregnant mice. J Virol. (2011) 85:11208–19. doi: 10.1128/JVI.00654-11
87. Kim HM, Kang YM, Song BM, Kim HS, Seo SH. The 2009 pandemic H1N1 influenza virus is more pathogenic in pregnant mice than seasonal H1N1 influenza virus. Viral Immunol. (2012) 25:402–10. doi: 10.1089/vim.2012.0007
88. Littauer EQ, Esser ES, Antao OQ, Vassilieva EV, Compans RW, Skountzou I. H1N1 influenza virus infection results in adverse pregnancy outcomes by disrupting tissue-specific hormonal regulation. PLoS Pathog. (2017) 13:e1006757. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1006757
89. Gao R, Bhatnagar J, Blau DM, Greer P, Rollin DC, Denison AM, et al. Cytokine and chemokine profiles in lung tissues from fatal cases of 2009 pandemic influenza A (H1N1): role of the host immune response in pathogenesis. Am J Pathol. (2013) 183:1258–68. doi: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2013.06.023
90. Watanabe H, Numata K, Ito T, Takagi K, Matsukawa A. Innate immune response in Th1- and Th2-dominant mouse strains. Shock (2004) 22:460–6. doi: 10.1097/01.shk.0000142249.08135.e9
91. Sellers RS, Clifford CB, Treuting PM, Brayton C. Immunological variation between inbred laboratory mouse strains: points to consider in phenotyping genetically immunomodified mice. Vet Pathol. (2012) 49:32–43. doi: 10.1177/0300985811429314
92. Otte A, Gabriel G. 2009 pandemic H1N1 influenza A virus strains display differential pathogenicity in C57BL/6J but not BALB/c mice. Virulence (2011) 2:563–6. doi: 10.4161/viru.2.6.18148
93. Preusse M, Schughart K, Pessler F. Host genetic background strongly affects pulmonary microrna expression before and during influenza a virus infection. Front Immunol. (2017) 8:246. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2017.00246
94. Califano D, Furuya Y, Metzger DW. Effects of influenza on alveolar macrophage viability are dependent on mouse genetic strain. J Immunol. (2018) 201:134–44. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1701406
95. Vermillion MS, Nelson A, Vom Steeg LG, Loube JM, Mitzner W, Klein SL. Pregnancy preserves pulmonary function following influenza virus infection in C57BL/6 mice. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. (2018) 315:L517–25. doi: 10.1152/ajplung.00066.2018
96. De La Haba C, Palacio JR, Palkovics T, Szekeres-Bartho J, Morros A, Martinez P. Oxidative stress effect on progesterone-induced blocking factor (PIBF) binding to PIBF-receptor in lymphocytes. Biochim Biophys Acta (2014) 1838:148–57. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamem.2013.08.006
97. Liu M, Chen F, Liu T, Chen F, Liu S, Yang J. The role of oxidative stress in influenza virus infection. Microbes Infect. (2017) 19:580–6. doi: 10.1016/j.micinf.2017.08.008
98. Niiro H, Clark EA. Regulation of B-cell fate by antigen-receptor signals. Nat Rev Immunol. (2002) 2:945–56. doi: 10.1038/nri955
99. Batista FD, Harwood NE. The who, how and where of antigen presentation to B cells. Nat Rev Immunol. (2009) 9:15–27. doi: 10.1038/nri2454
100. Harwood NE, Batista FD. Early events in B cell activation. Annu Rev Immunol. (2010) 28:185–210. doi: 10.1146/annurev-immunol-030409-101216
101. Shulman Z, Gitlin AD, Targ S, Jankovic M, Pasqual G, Nussenzweig MC, et al. T follicular helper cell dynamics in germinal centers. Science (2013) 341:673–7. doi: 10.1126/science.1241680
102. Matthews AJ, Zheng S, Dimenna LJ, Chaudhuri J. Regulation of immunoglobulin class-switch recombination: choreography of noncoding transcription, targeted DNA deamination, and long-range DNA repair. Adv Immunol. (2014) 122:1–57. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-800267-4.00001-8
103. Chu VT, Berek C. The establishment of the plasma cell survival niche in the bone marrow. Immunol Rev. (2013) 251:177–88. doi: 10.1111/imr.12011
104. Assad S, Khan HH, Ghazanfar H, Khan ZH, Mansoor S, Rahman MA, et al. Role of sex hormone levels and psychological stress in the pathogenesis of autoimmune diseases. Cureus (2017) 9:e1315. doi: 10.7759/cureus.1315
105. Bynoe MS, Grimaldi CM, Diamond B. Estrogen up-regulates Bcl-2 and blocks tolerance induction of naive B cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. (2000) 97:2703–8. doi: 10.1073/pnas.040577497
106. Grimaldi CM, Cleary J, Dagtas AS, Moussai D, Diamond B. Estrogen alters thresholds for B cell apoptosis and activation. J Clin Invest. (2002) 109:1625–33. doi: 10.1172/JCI0214873
107. Medina KL, Smithson G, Kincade PW. Suppression of B lymphopoiesis during normal pregnancy. J Exp Med. (1993) 178:1507–15. doi: 10.1084/jem.178.5.1507
108. Pazos M, Sperling RS, Moran TM, Kraus TA. The influence of pregnancy on systemic immunity. Immunol Res. (2012a) 54:254–61. doi: 10.1007/s12026-012-8303-9
109. Zhang LCK, Li MQ, Li DJ, Yao XY. Mouse endometrial stromal cells and progesterone inhibit the activation and regulate the differentiation and antibody secretion of mouse B cells. Int J Clin Exp Pathol. (2014) 7:123–33.
110. Bosco N, Ceredig R, Rolink A. Transient decrease in interleukin-7 availability arrests B lymphopoiesis during pregnancy. Eur J Immunol. (2008) 38:381–90. doi: 10.1002/eji.200737665
111. Clark MR, Mandal M, Ochiai K, Singh H. Orchestrating B cell lymphopoiesis through interplay of IL-7 receptor and pre-B cell receptor signalling. Nat Rev Immunol. (2014) 14:69–80. doi: 10.1038/nri3570
112. Kruse AMM, Hallmann R, Butcher EC. Evidence of specialized leukocyte-vascular homing interactions at the maternal/fetal interface. Eur J Immunol. (1999) 29, 1116–26. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1521-4141(199904)29:04<1116::AID-IMMU1116>3.0.CO;2-4
113. Tanneau Gm HSOL, Chevaleyre CC, Salmon HP. Differential recruitment of T- and IgA B-lymphocytes in the developing mammary gland in relation to homing receptors and vascular addressins. J Histochem Cytochem. (1999) 47:1581–92. doi: 10.1177/002215549904701210
114. Omer SB, Goodman D, Steinhoff MC, Rochat R, Klugman KP, Stoll BJ, et al. Maternal influenza immunization and reduced likelihood of prematurity and small for gestational age births: a retrospective cohort study. PLoS Med. (2011) 8:e1000441. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000441
115. Ludvigsson JF, Zugna D, Cnattingius S, Richiardi L, Ekbom A, Ortqvist A, et al. Influenza H1N1 vaccination and adverse pregnancy outcome. Eur J Epidemiol. (2013) 28:579–88. doi: 10.1007/s10654-013-9813-z
116. Steinhoff MC, Omer SB, Roy E, Arifeen SE, Raqib R, Altaye M, et al. Influenza immunization in pregnancy–antibody responses in mothers and infants. N Engl J Med. (2010) 362:1644–6. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc0912599
117. Zheng R, Qin X, Li Y, Yu X, Wang J, Tan M, et al. Imbalanced anti-H1N1 immunoglobulin subclasses and dysregulated cytokines in hospitalized pregnant women with 2009 H1N1 influenza and pneumonia in Shenyang, China. Hum Immunol. (2012) 73:906–11. doi: 10.1016/j.humimm.2012.06.005
118. Malek A, Sager R, Zakher A, Schneider H. Transport of immunoglobulin G and its subclasses across the in vitro-perfused human placenta. Am J Obstet Gynecol. (1995) 173:760–7. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(95)90336-4
119. Malek A. Ex vivo human placenta models: transport of immunoglobulin G and its subclasses. Vaccine (2003) 21:3362–4. doi: 10.1016/S0264-410X(03)00333-5
120. Malek A. Role of IgG antibodies in association with placental function and immunologic diseases in human pregnancy. Expert Rev Clin Immunol. (2013) 9:235–49. doi: 10.1586/eci.12.99
121. Hwang JK, Alt FW, Yeap LS. Related mechanisms of antibody somatic hypermutation and class switch recombination. Microbiol Spectr (2015) 3:MDNA3-0037-2014. doi: 10.1128/microbiolspec.MDNA3-0037-2014
122. Muramatsu M, Kinoshita K, Fagarasan S, Yamada S, Shinkai Y, Honjo T. Class switch recombination and hypermutation require activation-induced cytidine deaminase (AID), a potential RNA editing enzyme. Cell (2000) 102:553–63. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)00078-7
123. Gitlin AD, Shulman Z, Nussenzweig MC. Clonal selection in the germinal centre by regulated proliferation and hypermutation. Nature (2014) 509:637–40. doi: 10.1038/nature13300
124. Shulman Z, Gitlin AD, Weinstein JS, Lainez B, Esplugues E, Flavell RA, et al. Dynamic signaling by T follicular helper cells during germinal center B cell selection. Science (2014) 345:1058–62. doi: 10.1126/science.1257861
125. Pauklin S, Petersen-Mahrt SK. Progesterone inhibits activation-induced deaminase by binding to the promoter. J Immunol. (2009) 183:1238–44. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.0803915
126. Pauklin S, Sernandez IV, Bachmann G, Ramiro AR, Petersen-Mahrt SK. Estrogen directly activates AID transcription and function. J Exp Med. (2009) 206:99–111. doi: 10.1084/jem.20080521
127. Mai T, Zan H, Zhang J, Hawkins JS, Xu Z, Casali P. Estrogen receptors bind to and activate the HOXC4/HoxC4 promoter to potentiate HoxC4-mediated activation-induced cytosine deaminase induction, immunoglobulin class switch DNA recombination, and somatic hypermutation. J Biol Chem. (2010) 285:37797–810. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M110.169086
128. Benko AL, Olsen NJ, Kovacs WJ. Glucocorticoid inhibition of activation-induced cytidine deaminase expression in human B lymphocytes. Mol Cell Endocrinol. (2014) 382:881–7. doi: 10.1016/j.mce.2013.11.001
129. Shatz W, Chung S, Li B, Marshall B, Tejada M, Phung W, et al. Knobs-into-holes antibody production in mammalian cell lines reveals that asymmetric afucosylation is sufficient for full antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity. MAbs (2013) 5:872–81. doi: 10.4161/mabs.26307
130. Caaveiro JM, Kiyoshi M, Tsumoto K. Structural analysis of Fc/FcgammaR complexes: a blueprint for antibody design. Immunol Rev. (2015) 268:201–21. doi: 10.1111/imr.12365
131. Gutierrez G, Gentile T, Miranda S, Margni RA. Asymmetric antibodies: a protective arm in pregnancy. Chem Immunol Allergy (2005) 89:158–68. doi: 10.1159/000087964
132. Gu J, Lei Y, Huang Y, Zhao Y, Li J, Huang T, et al. Fab fragment glycosylated IgG may play a central role in placental immune evasion. Hum Reprod. (2015a) 30:380–91. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deu323
133. Gutierrez G, Malan Borel I, Margni RA. The placental regulatory factor involved in the asymmetric IgG antibody synthesis responds to IL-6 features. J Reprod Immunol. (2001) 49:21–32. doi: 10.1016/S0165-0378(00)00074-7
134. Miranda S, Gentile T, Margni R. Enhancement of in vitro hsp72 expression by placental IL-6. Am J Reprod Immunol. (2001) 46:358–65. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0897.2001.d01-24.x
135. Li J, Korteweg C, Qiu Y, Luo J, Chen Z, Huang G, et al. Two ultrastructural distribution patterns of immunoglobulin G in human placenta and functional implications. Biol Reprod. (2014b) 91:128. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod.114.122614
136. Gasparini R, Amicizia D, Lai PL, Panatto D. Clinical and socioeconomic impact of seasonal and pandemic influenza in adults and the elderly. Hum Vaccin Immunother. (2012) 8:21–8. doi: 10.4161/hv.8.1.17622
137. Kim JC, Kim HM, Kang YM, Ku KB, Park EH, Yum J, et al. Severe pathogenesis of influenza B virus in pregnant mice. Virology (2014) 448:74–81. doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2013.10.001
138. Regan AK, Moore HC, Sullivan SG, NDEK Effler PV. Epidemiology of seasonal influenza infection in pregnant women and its impact on birth outcomes. Epidemiol Infect. (2017) 145:2930–9. doi: 10.1017/S0950268817001972
139. Mackenzie JS, Williams K, Papadimitriou J. Influenza A virus and its influence on the outcome of pregnancy in the mouse. Dev Biol Stand. (1977) 39:489–96.
140. Stanwell-Smith R, Parker AM, Chakraverty P, Soltanpoor N, Simpson CN. Possible association of influenza A with fetal loss: investigation of a cluster of spontaneous abortions and stillbirths. Commun Dis Rep CDR Rev. (1994) 4:R28–32.
141. Puig-Barbera J, Natividad-Sancho A, Trushakova S, Sominina A, Pisareva M, Ciblak MA, et al. Epidemiology of hospital admissions with influenza during the 2013/2014 Northern hemisphere influenza season: results from the global influenza hospital surveillance network. PLoS ONE (2016) 11:e0154970. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0154970
142. Xu L, Bao L, Deng W, Qin C. Highly pathogenic avian influenza H5N1 virus could partly be evacuated by pregnant BALB/c mouse during abortion or preterm delivery. Virol J. (2011) 8:342. doi: 10.1186/1743-422X-8-342
143. Jang H, Boltz D, Mcclaren J, Pani AK, Smeyne M, Korff A, et al. Inflammatory effects of highly pathogenic H5N1 influenza virus infection in the CNS of mice. J Neurosci. (2012) 32:1545–59. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5123-11.2012
144. Guo Q, Zhao D, Dong F, Liu S, Chen Y, Jin J, et al. Delivery of fetus death with misoprostol in a pregnant woman with H7N9 avian influenza A virus pneumonia and ARDS. Crit Care (2014) 18:589. doi: 10.1186/s13054-014-0589-7
145. Qi X, Cui L, Xu K, Wu B, Tang F, Bao C, et al. Avian influenza A(H7N9) virus infection in pregnant woman, China, 2013. Emerg Infect Dis. (2014) 20:333–4. doi: 10.3201/eid2002.131109
146. Siegers JY, Short KR, Leijten LM, De Graaf M, Spronken MI, Schrauwen EJ, et al. Novel avian-origin influenza A (H7N9) virus attachment to the respiratory tract of five animal models. J Virol. (2014) 88:4595–9. doi: 10.1128/JVI.03190-13
147. Liu S, Sha J, Yu Z, Hu Y, Chan TC, Wang X, et al. Avian influenza virus in pregnancy. Rev Med Virol. (2016) 26:268–84. doi: 10.1002/rmv.1884
148. Wong SF, Chow KM, Leung TN, Ng WF, Ng TK, Shek CC, et al. Pregnancy and perinatal outcomes of women with severe acute respiratory syndrome. Am J Obstet Gynecol. (2004) 191:292–7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2003.11.019
149. Alserehi H, Wali G, Alshukairi A, Alraddadi B. Impact of middle east respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) on pregnancy and perinatal outcome. BMC Infect Dis. (2016) 16:105. doi: 10.1186/s12879-016-1437-y
150. Malik A, El Masry KM, Ravi M, Sayed F. Middle east respiratory syndrome coronavirus during pregnancy, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates, 2013. Emerg Infect Dis. (2016) 22:515–7. doi: 10.3201/eid2203.151049
151. Wheeler SM, Dotters-Katz S, Heine RP, Grotegut CA, Swamy GK. Maternal effects of respiratory syncytial virus infection during pregnancy. Emerg Infect Dis. (2015) 21:1951–5. doi: 10.3201/eid2111.150497
152. Chu HY, Katz J, Tielsch J, Khatry SK, Shrestha L, Leclerq SC, et al. Clinical presentation and birth outcomes associated with respiratory syncytial virus infection in pregnancy. PLoS ONE (2016) 11:e0152015. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0152015
153. Munoz FM. Respiratory syncytial virus in infants: is maternal vaccination a realistic strategy? Curr Opin Infect Dis. (2015) 28:221–4. doi: 10.1097/QCO.0000000000000161
154. Yates L, Pierce M, Stephens S, Mill AC, Spark P, Kurinczuk JJ, et al. Influenza A/H1N1v in pregnancy: an investigation of the characteristics and management of affected women and the relationship to pregnancy outcomes for mother and infant. Health Technol Assess. (2010) 14:109–82. doi: 10.3310/hta14340-02
155. Lee SM, Gai WW, Cheung TK, Peiris JS. Antiviral effect of a selective COX-2 inhibitor on H5N1 infection in vitro. Antiviral Res. (2011) 91:330–4. doi: 10.1016/j.antiviral.2011.07.011
156. Li C, Li C, Zhang AJ, To KK, Lee AC, Zhu H, et al. Avian influenza A H7N9 virus induces severe pneumonia in mice without prior adaptation and responds to a combination of zanamivir and COX-2 inhibitor. PLoS ONE (2014a) 9:e107966. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0107966
157. Carey MA, Bradbury JA, Seubert JM, Langenbach R, Zeldin DC, Germolec DR. Contrasting effects of cyclooxygenase-1 (COX-1) and COX-2 deficiency on the host response to influenza A viral infection. J Immunol. (2005) 175:6878–84. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.175.10.6878
158. Carey MA, Bradbury JA, Rebolloso YD, Graves JP, Zeldin DC, Germolec DR. Pharmacologic inhibition of COX-1 and COX-2 in influenza A viral infection in mice. PLoS ONE (2010) 5:e11610. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0011610
159. Chan VS. A mechanistic perspective on the specificity and extent of COX-2 inhibition in pregnancy. Drug Saf. (2004) 27:421–6. doi: 10.2165/00002018-200427070-00001
160. Daniel S, Matok I, Gorodischer R, Koren G, Uziel E, Wiznitzer A, et al. Major malformations following exposure to nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs during the first trimester of pregnancy. J Rheumatol. (2012) 39:2163–9. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.120453
161. Berard A, Sheehy O, Girard S, Zhao JP, Bernatsky S. Risk of preterm birth following late pregnancy exposure to NSAIDs or COX-2 inhibitors. Pain (2018) 159:948–55. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001163
162. Hall OJ, Limjunyawong N, Vermillion MS, Robinson DP, Wohlgemuth N, Pekosz A, et al. Progesterone-based therapy protects against influenza by promoting lung repair and recovery in females. PLoS Pathog. (2016) 12:e1005840. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1005840
Keywords: pregnancy, H1N1 influenza virus infection, animal models, sex hormones, maternal immune response
Citation: Littauer EQ and Skountzou I (2018) Hormonal Regulation of Physiology, Innate Immunity and Antibody Response to H1N1 Influenza Virus Infection During Pregnancy. Front. Immunol. 9:2455. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.02455
Received: 26 June 2018; Accepted: 04 October 2018;
Published: 29 October 2018.
Edited by:
Julia Szekeres-Bartho, University of Pécs, HungaryReviewed by:
Phil Stumbles, Telethon Kids Institute, AustraliaJanos Minarovits, University of Szeged, Hungary
Copyright © 2018 Littauer and Skountzou. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Ioanna Skountzou, iskount@emory.edu