
94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.
Find out more
EDITORIAL article
Front. Hum. Neurosci.
Sec. Brain Imaging and Stimulation
Volume 19 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2025.1611543
This article is part of the Research TopicAdvances in Brain Imaging and Stimulation Methods for Cognitive Function Investigation Volume IIView all 5 articles
The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
The quest for high spatiotemporal resolution in brain imaging has driven remarkable advances. For instance, multimodal approaches integrating electroencephalography (EEG) with functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) or near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) now enable simultaneous mapping of hemodynamic and electrophysiological correlates of cognition (Gao et al., 2022). Meanwhile, innovations in network neuroscience, such as whole-brain connectivity analyses, have unlocked personalized targeting strategies for non-invasive neuromodulation (Cash and Zalesky, 2024). In the realm of neuromodulation, non-invasive techniques like transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) continue to dominate due to their safety and reversibility. A systematic review in this collection, Effects of transcranial direct current stimulation on modulating executive functions in healthy populations, highlights tDCS-mediated enhancements in executive functions (e.g., working memory and inhibitory control) through prefrontal cortex modulation. However, effect variability tied to stimulation parameters and interindividual differences underscores the need for precision protocols. Similarly, a pooled analysis of transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS) Side effects of non-invasive taVNS reaffirms its safety profile while advocating for rigorous dose optimization and longitudinal monitoring.The synergy between imaging and stimulation holds transformative potential for cognitive disorders. A pivotal study in this Topic, Effect of continuous theta burst stimulation on the glymphatic system and cognition in cerebral small vessel disease, demonstrates how continuous theta burst stimulation (cTBS) modulates glymphatic clearance and default-mode network connectivity, improving information processing speed and executive function in patients. Such findings and neuroimaging biomarkers (e.g., functional connectivity strength) offer objective metrics for evaluating therapeutic efficacy. However, clinical translation demands careful navigation of neuroplasticity and ethical risks. A study in this Research Topic, The safety and efficacy of applying a high-current temporal interference electrical stimulation in humans, addressed this issue, evaluating and safety and efficiency of a proposed high-current temporal interference electrical stimulation. Personalized neuromodulation protocols must balance innovation with ethical responsibility to mitigate unintended consequences. Moreover, the application of imaging biomarkers for early diagnosis (e.g., functional connectivity anomalies in Alzheimer's disease) requires standardized, reproducible methodologies across multicenter datasets. Despite progress being achieved in this field, there are some critical gaps that warrant researchers' attention. 1. Multimodal data integration. How can we unify structural, functional, and metabolic imaging data to build cross-scale models of cognition? Machine learning and radiomics approaches may offer solutions (Hua et al., 2025). The coupling and interaction among different modalities of data might also carry interesting process information (Zeng et al., 2024). 2. Dynamic brain imaging in naturalistic contexts and wearable intervention devices. Capturing neural dynamics during real-world cognitive tasks remains technically challenging, necessitating advances in portable devices and real-time analytics. Meanwhile, wearable intervention devices can enable broader utility (Qi et al., 2025). 3. Validating causal mechanisms. Combining neuromodulation with pre-post imaging (e.g., TMS-EEG or tDCS-fMRI) can strengthen causal inferences (Bergmann and Hartwigsen, 2021). For example, studies pairing TMS with event-related potentials (ERPs) in this Topic reveal neuroplasticity markers in traumatic brain injury recovery.The four studies in this collection exemplify the diversity and utility of modern brain imaging and stimulation tools, spanning methodological refinement, clinical validation, and safety assessment. Moving forward, research must prioritize standardization (aligned with FAIR principles), interdisciplinary collaboration (e.g., engineering and cognitive science), and ethical frameworks to ensure responsible innovation. By addressing these challenges, we move closer to the ultimate goal of decoding cognition to enable precision interventions, paving the way for individualized therapies in neuropsychiatric disorders.
Keywords: brain imaging, Brain Stimulation, Cognitive Function, Neuromodulation, multimodal integration
Received: 14 Apr 2025; Accepted: 16 Apr 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Xu, He, Huang and Yuan. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Mengze Xu, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China
Zhen Yuan, University of Macau, Taipa, 999078, Macau Region, China
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Supplementary Material
Research integrity at Frontiers
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.