ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Hum. Neurosci.

Sec. Motor Neuroscience

Volume 19 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2025.1571106

This article is part of the Research TopicMethods in motor neuroscienceView all 3 articles

EEG Dynamical Features during Variable-Intensity Cycling Exercise in Parkinson's Disease

Provisionally accepted
  • 1University of Tehran, Tehran, Tehran, Iran
  • 2Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, Utrecht, Netherlands, Netherlands
  • 3Djavad Mowafaghian Centre for Brain Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
  • 4Pacific Parkinson's Research Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
  • 5Division of Neurology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
  • 6University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

1.Abstract1.1. BackgroundExercise is increasingly recognized as a beneficial intervention for Parkinson's disease (PD), yet the optimal type and intensity of exercise remain unclear. This study investigated the relationship between exercise intensity and neural responses in PD patients, using electroencephalography (EEG) to explore potential neural markers that could be ultimately used to guide exercise intensity.1.2. MethodEEG data were collected from 14 PD patients (5 females) and 8 healthy controls (HC) performing stationary pedaling exercises at 60 RPM with resistance adjusted to target heart rates of 30%, 40%, 50%, 60%, and 70% of maximum heart rate. Subjects pedaled for 3 minutes at each intensity level in a counterbalanced order. Canonical Time-series Characteristics (Catch-22) features and Multi-set Canonical Correlation Analysis (MCCA) were utilized to identify common profiles of EEG features at increasing exercise intensity across subjects.1.3. ResultsWe identified a statistically significant MCCA component demonstrating a monotonic relationship with pedaling intensity. We have discovered nine features which show significant trends across intensity (p-value<0.01), and the dominant feature in this component was Periodicity Wang (p-value<0.0001), related to the autocorrelation of the EEG. Analysis revealed a consistent trend across features: six features increased with intensity, indicating heightened rhythmic engagement and sustained neural activation, while three features decreased, suggesting reduced variability and enhanced predictability in neural responses. Notably, PD patients exhibited more rigid, consistent response patterns compared to healthy controls (HC), who showed greater flexibility and variability in their neural adaptation across intensities.1.4. ConclusionThis study highlights the feasibility of using EEG-derived features to track exercise intensity in PD patients, identifying specific neural markers correlating with varying intensity levels. PD subjects demonstrate less inter-subject variability in motor responses to increasing intensity. Our results suggest that EEG biomarkers can be used to assess differing brain involvement with the same exercise of increasing intensity, potentially useful for guiding targeted therapeutic strategies and maximizing the neurological benefits of exercise in PD.

Keywords: EEG, pedaling, parkinson's, Catch-22 features, MCCA

Received: 05 Feb 2025; Accepted: 09 Apr 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Alizadeh, Arasteh, Mirian, Sacheli, Murray, Appel-Cresswell and McKeown. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Martin J. McKeown, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Research integrity at Frontiers

94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good

Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.


Find out more