ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Hum. Neurosci.
Sec. Motor Neuroscience
Volume 19 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2025.1566566
This article is part of the Research TopicMethods in motor neuroscienceView all 3 articles
Koopman-Based Linearization of Preparatory EEG Dynamics in Parkinson's Disease During Galvanic Vestibular Stimulation
Provisionally accepted- 1University of Lethbridge, Lethbridge, Alberta, Canada
- 2University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
- 3University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- 4University of Tehran, Tehran, Tehran, Iran
- 5University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands, Netherlands
- 6Sharif University of Technology, Tehran, Tehran, Iran
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Parkinson's Disease (PD) is a prevalent neurodegenerative disorder that impacts both motor and nonmotor functions. Complementary therapies, such as Galvanic Vestibular Stimulation (GVS), have shown potential as non-invasive alternatives or adjuncts to traditional Levodopa treatment; however, the mechanisms underlying their efficacy remain poorly understood. For instance, GVS may influence ongoing brain dynamics and/or activate underactive brain regions in PD, thereby enhancing motor function. In this study, we utilized a Deep Koopman model to analyze EEG data from healthy controls (n=18) and participants with PD (n=18) during the preparatory phase of an overlearned squeeze task. The task was performed under varying conditions, including medication states (off/on) and stimulation settings (Sham, GVS1, GVS2). The Koopman framework enabled linearization and dimensionality reduction of complex EEG signals, facilitating predictive modeling and control strategies within a simplified three-dimensional latent space. Our results demonstrated that the Koopman model effectively captured key EEG dynamics. Eigenvalue analyses revealed no significant differences in latent-space dynamics between the PD and control groups. However, examination of the transformation from the raw EEG data to the latent space identified distinct spatial pattern differences between groups. Notably, under GVS and medication conditions, the EEG patterns in PD participants shifted closer to those observed in healthy controls. Additionally, in PD subjects, a stronger alignment of spatial patterns during the preparatory phase with those of healthy controls was associated with faster subsequent movements. These group-specific spatial transformation patterns during motor planning are particularly relevant in PD, where voluntary movement pathways are disrupted due to basal ganglia dysfunction, with complex projections to scalp-based EEG recordings. Our findings support the hypothesis that GVS may activate brain regions typically underactive during motor preparation, potentially compensating for impaired neural circuits in PD. In addition, we demonstrate that a hypothetical Linear Quadratic Regulator (LQR) controller could be used to move PD-related dynamics toward that of healthy subjects. The Deep Koopman framework thus offers a robust approach for detecting EEG effects of non-invasive brain stimulation and for informing the design of targeted therapeutic interventions.
Keywords: Parkinson's disease, motor control, galvanic vestibular stimulation, Koopman operator theory, Deep neural network
Received: 25 Jan 2025; Accepted: 17 Apr 2025.
Copyright: Ā© 2025 Kia, Mirian, Soori, Saedi, Arasteh, Faramarzi, Chinchani, Lee, Luczak and McKeown. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Martin J McKeown, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, V6T 1Z2, British Columbia, Canada
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.