
95% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.
Find out more
ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Hum. Neurosci.
Sec. Speech and Language
Volume 19 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2025.1566274
The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Purpose: To determine the acoustic properties most indicative of dysprosody severity in patients with Parkinson's disease using an automated acoustic assessment procedure.Method: 108 read speech recordings of 68 speakers with PD (45 male, 23 female, aged 65.0±9.8 years) made with active Levodopa treatment. 40 of the patients were additionally recorded without Levodopa treatment to increase the range dysprosody severity in the sample. Four human clinical experts independently assessed the patients' recordings in terms of dysprosody severity. Separately, a speech processing pipeline extracted the acoustic properties of prosodic relevance from automatically identified portions of speech used as utterance proxies. Five machine learning models were trained on 75% of speech portions and the perceptual evaluations of the speaker's dysprosody severity in a 10-fold cross-validation procedure. They were evaluated regarding their ability to predict the perceptual assessments of recordings excluded during training. The models' performances were assessed by their ability to accurately predict clinical experts' dysprosody severity assessments.Results: The acoustic predictors of importance spanned several acoustic domains of prosodic relevance, with the variability in fo change between intonational turning points and the average first Mel-frequency cepstral coefficient at these points being the two top predictors.While predominant in the literature, variability in utterance-wide fo was found to be only the fifth strongest predictor.Conclusions: Human expert raters' assessments of dysprosody can be approximated by the automated procedure, affording application in clinical settings where an experienced expert is unavailable. Variability in pitch does not adequately describe the level of dysprosody due to Parkinson's disease.
Keywords: Automatic acoustic assessment, dysprosody, Parkinson's disease, Dysarthria, Prosody
Received: 24 Jan 2025; Accepted: 04 Apr 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Nylén. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Fredrik Nylén, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Research integrity at Frontiers
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.