
95% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.
Find out more
ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Hum. Neurosci.
Sec. Cognitive Neuroscience
Volume 19 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2025.1542422
This article is part of the Research Topic Unlocking Potential: Cognitive Rehabilitation for Individuals with Acquired Brain Injuries View all 4 articles
The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
INTRODUCTION: This randomized clinical trial (RCT) compared the efficacy of two cognitive rehabilitation (CR) protocols—Strategic Memory Advanced Reasoning Training (SMART) and Study of Cognitive Rehabilitation Effectiveness (SCORE)—in improving higher-order cognitive functions among active-duty service members (ADSMs) with mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) and varying levels of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms. The study also examined the relationship between PTSD symptom severity and cognitive outcomes.METHODS: A total of 148 ADSMs with mTBI and persistent cognitive complaints were randomized to receive either SMART (20 hours over 4 weeks) or SCORE (60 hours over 6 weeks). High-level cognitive abilities were assessed with the Test of Strategic Learning and the Visual Selective Learning Task, and PTSD symptoms were measured using the PTSD Checklist (PCL-M). PTSD symptoms were accounted for as a covariate in all analyses. Outcomes were measured at baseline, post-treatment, and at 3-month follow-up.RESULTS: Both SMART and SCORE groups showed significant improvements in complex memory and strategic learning, with no between-group differences in overall cognitive gains. Notably, SMART participants achieved these outcomes in one-third of the treatment hours. SMART also demonstrated greater immediate gains in fluency of high-level interpretations compared to SCORE (p = 0.04), reflecting enhanced possibility thinking. PTSD symptom severity was negatively correlated with performance on cognitive measures; however, the cognitive gains were comparable regardless of baseline PTSD symptoms.DISCUSSION: SMART is an efficient and effective CR protocol for improving higher-order cognitive abilities in ADSMs with mTBI, achieving comparable outcomes to SCORE in sixty percent fewer treatment hours. Also of note, training-based cognitive gains were consistent across PTSD severity levels, suggesting CR is a potentially reliable tool for populations with mTBI plus concomitant PTSD. By promoting rapid cognitive improvement and adaptability, this study supports the potential for SMART to enhance the operational readiness of warfighters. Future research should explore hybrid delivery models and integration with PTSD-focused interventions to optimize accessibility and outcomes.
Keywords: cognitive training and brain training, Active duty service members, brain plasticity, Executive Function, Randomized control trial (RCT), Mild Traumatic Brain Injury (mTBI), Post traumatic stress disorder (PSTD), Military health
Received: 09 Dec 2024; Accepted: 07 Apr 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Venza, Spence, Zientz, Devlin, Bailie, Darr, Babakhanyan and Chapman. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Erin Venza, Center for BrainHealth, The University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, United States
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Research integrity at Frontiers
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.