Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Hum. Neurosci.

Sec. Speech and Language

Volume 19 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2025.1528388

Morphosyntactic production and processing skills in relation to age effects and lexical-phonological levels among children with cochlear implants and typically-hearing peers: a focus on vowel nasality

Provisionally accepted
  • 1 University of Mons, Mons, Belgium
  • 2 Free University of Brussels, Brussels, Belgium
  • 3 Rehabilitation center 'Comprendre et parler', Brussels, Belgium
  • 4 Fonds National de la Recherche Scientifique (FNRS), Brussels, Belgium

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Introduction: Significant variability in the language performance of children with CI is widely recognized in the literature, particularly concerning morphosyntactic (MS) skills. The perceptual limitations of the CI, which can lead to phonological difficulties, may be responsible for this increased vulnerability in grammatical abilities. In this context, the present study focuses on the morphophonemic processing of items distinguished by nasal and oral vowels in the French language -the feature of vowel nasality being known as challenging for the CI population. Links between these performances with chronological/auditory ages and phonological and grammatical production skills will also be explored. Method: Nineteen children with cochlear implants (CI) and forty-seven children with typical hearing (TH) were assessed for phonological skills through a picture-naming task, perceptual skills through a task involving the sentence/word-picture matching task with word target containing nasal versus oral vowels, and morphosyntactic production skills through narrative productions. Various measures of linguistic complexity (MLU, verbs/utterances) and lexical diversity (D index) were evaluated among our groups and linked to perceptual and productive phonological performances. Chronological and auditory ages as well as phonological accuracy and vocabulary levels as been studied as covariates. Results: Children with cochlear implants (CI) displayed significantly lower morphosyntactic (MS) performance compared to peers with typical hearing of the same chronological age, particularly in measures such as MLUm, complexity of function words, and processing of morphemes carried by nasal and oral vowels. However, when controlling for auditory age or phonological/lexical levels, these differences were no longer significant, suggesting a potential for compensation when similar auditory or linguistic experiences are achieved. Despite this, CI users showed distinct patterns of function word use, with fewer complex forms and more frequent errors, likely reflecting the perceptual challenges linked to CI. Additionally, a specific strong relationship between MS skills and phonological accuracy was observed in the CI group, potentially accounting for the marked inter-individual variability in MS development.The perceptual limitations of the CI have a significant impact on the linguistic development of children with CI and contribute to the widely documented variability in performance.

    Keywords: Cochlear Implants1, morphosyntactic skills2, phonological skills3, nasal vowels4, Language development5, lexical skills6

    Received: 14 Nov 2024; Accepted: 10 Feb 2025.

    Copyright: © 2025 Fagniart, Charlier, Delvaux, Harmegnies, Huberlant, Piccaluga and Huet. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: Sophie Fagniart, University of Mons, Mons, Belgium

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

    Research integrity at Frontiers

    Man ultramarathon runner in the mountains he trains at sunset

    94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good

    Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.


    Find out more