The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.
ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Hum. Neurosci.
Sec. Motor Neuroscience
Volume 19 - 2025 |
doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2025.1518230
Differences in the movement phase condition and sensory inputs on temporal synchronization and continuation during bilateral foot-tapping tasks
Provisionally accepted- 1 Physical Therapy Course, Department of Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medical Science and Welfare, Tohoku Bunka Gakuen University, Sendai, Japan
- 2 Department of Medical Physiology, School of Medicine, Kyorin University, Tokyo, Japan
- 3 Graduate Course of Health and Social Services, Kanagawa University of Human Services, Yokosuka, Kanagawa, Japan
- 4 Department of Human Neurophysiology, School of Medicine, Fukushima Medical University, Fukushima, Fukushima, Japan
- 5 Graduate School of Health and Environmental Science, Tohoku Bunka Gakuen University, Sendai, Japan
In the sensorimotor synchronization (synchronized and continuous tapping) task, subjects move their limbs in synchrony with an isochronous tone presented at various tempos and continue tapping at the same pace after the tones have ceased. We investigated the ability of bilateral lower limb motor control for performing this task as a crucial metric for examining motor coordination relevant to human locomotion, such as walking. Here, sensory information such as auditory and tactile inputs is considered to improve the accuracy of sensorimotor synchronization. In this study, we explored the change in tapping variability of rhythmic motor control of the bilateral lower limb with different movement phase conditions in the presence or absence of sensory information. Thirty-three healthy volunteers performed three types of foot-tapping tasks: synchronization-continuation (SC-tap), airtapping (A-tap), and a combination of both (SCA-tap). Participants were instructed to tap the foot- switch (or perform a similar movement in the A-tap) in synchrony with the tones presented at fixed interstimulus intervals (ISIs) between 500 and 4800 ms. Taps were performed with either unilateral foot or, in the case of bilateral movements, with both feet, either simultaneously (in-phase) or alternately for bilateral movements (antiphase). The synchronizing tapping error and the inter-tap interval (ITI) were evaluated. The coefficient of variation (CV) of ITI was significantly smaller for the antiphase condition than for the unilateral or in-phase conditions in the SC-tap and SCA-tap tasks. In addition, considering the timing of taps on both sides, the CV was significantly lower for antiphase only in the SC-tap task. The findings indicated that the antiphase condition exhibited superior temporal stability in repetitive lower limb movements. The findings also underscored the significance of tactile feedback from the soles of the feet when stability of rhythmic limb movements unpaced by the tones in antiphase movements was taken into consideration.
Keywords: Time Perception, timing, Physical Therapy, Gait rehabilitation, auditory input, Tactile Feedback, synchronized tapping task, Synchronization-continuation task
Received: 28 Oct 2024; Accepted: 15 Jan 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Numata, Terao, Sugawara, Ugawa and Furubayashi. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Atsuki Numata, Physical Therapy Course, Department of Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medical Science and Welfare, Tohoku Bunka Gakuen University, Sendai, Japan
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.