data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7e1e6/7e1e61f01d233b91960c61442e748a5609c80a7c" alt="Man ultramarathon runner in the mountains he trains at sunset"
94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.
Find out more
MINI REVIEW article
Front. Hum. Neurosci.
Sec. Brain Imaging and Stimulation
Volume 19 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2025.1492744
This article is part of the Research Topic What Can DBS Teach Us About the Mechanisms of Neurological Function? View all 3 articles
The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
In 2010, treatment-resistant OCD was FDA-approved as an indication for deep brain stimulation (DBS) under a Humanitarian Device Exemption (HDE). This review examines the mechanisms by which DBS may produce its effects, with specific attention to how it may interact with the pathophysiology of OCD, a psychiatric condition thought to be caused by overactive corticostriatal-thalamo-cortical (CSTC) circuits. We first review initial theories of excitation and inhibition. We then transition to discussion of the "informational lesion" hypothesis, which suggests that DBS may prevent the transmission of usual neural activity through the stimulated region. Specifically, high frequency stimulation may disrupt pathological network patterns by masking or antidromically blocking synaptic inputs. Another hypothesis explaining a disruption of network activity is that by driving action potentials antidromically, DBS may activate upstream inhibitory interneurons, imposing rhythmic activity on local regions based on DBS stimulation parameters. Recent animal studies support theories of disruption of pathological network activity, showing that high-frequency DBS can prevent neurons from responding to intrinsic oscillations, and thereby perhaps relieve OCD symptoms. This review also discusses the variable effects of DBS, noting immediate improvements in mood and anxiety, with a gradual reduction in OCD symptoms over time. These differential findings suggest that DBS may produce its effects through both immediate neuromodulation and long-term synaptic remodeling. In summary, this review synthesizes current mechanistic understanding of DBS with a focus on OCD, highlighting areas of discrepancies between studies and opportunities for future research.
Keywords: Obsessive - compulsive disorder, Psychosurgery, Deep Brain Stimulation, CSTC circuitry, alternative treatment
Received: 07 Sep 2024; Accepted: 28 Feb 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Shea, Feigen, Eskandar and Killian. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Julia Shea, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, New York City, United States
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Research integrity at Frontiers
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.