Skip to main content

MINI REVIEW article

Front. Hum. Neurosci. , 28 January 2025

Sec. Brain Health and Clinical Neuroscience

Volume 19 - 2025 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2025.1443463

This article is part of the Research Topic Genetics and Mechanisms of Neurodevelopmental Disorders View all articles

Clinical characteristics, diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis of Atezolizumab-induced encephalitis, aseptic meningitis or meningoencephalitis

Qingzi YanQingzi YanYixiang HuYixiang HuXiang Liu
Xiang Liu*Hong XiaHong Xia
  • Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Xiangtan Central Hospital, Xiangtan, China

Objective: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionized cancer treatment and expanded the range of tumor indications. However, as the usage of this medication has increased, related adverse events are increasingly being identified. Among these, Atezolizumab-induced encephalitis, aseptic meningitis, and meningoencephalitis remain poorly understood regarding clinical features. This study provides a comprehensive reference for classifying, identifying, and managing Atezolizumab-associated neurological adverse events, specifically encephalitis, aseptic meningitis, and meningoencephalitis.

Methods: This study systematically collected published case reports from public databases such as PubMed, Web of Science, Wanfang Database, and CNKI Database. Two independent reviewers screened titles and abstracts and then extracted data in the included article according to the designed table and analyzed the clinical characteristics of Atezolizumab-induced encephalitis, aseptic meningitis, or meningoencephalitis.

Results: A total of 17 articles were included, with 19 patients diagnosed with encephalitis, aseptic meningitis, or meningoencephalitis after Atezolizumab treatment. The most common presenting symptoms included fever, altered consciousness, fatigue, somnolence, and seizures. Diagnosis was primarily based on cerebrospinal fluid analysis, blood tests, and imaging studies, such as computed tomography (CT) scans. Treatment strategies typically involved systemic steroids, antiviral agents, antibiotics, and anti-epileptic medications, as appropriate.

Conclusion: Neurological immune-related adverse events may rapidly progress and impact prognosis. Therefore, clinical practitioners should have a deep understanding of these neurological immune-related adverse events, promptly diagnose them, and provide accurate and timely treatment.

Introduction

Atezolizumab is a humanized monoclonal antibody that targets the programmed cell death ligand (PD-L1), releasing the immune suppression mediated by PD-1/PD-L1 and thereby promoting T cells to attack tumor cells. Approved by the FDA in 2016, Atezolizumab was later authorized for the treatment of small cell lung cancer (SCLC) in China in 2020 (Johnson et al., 2022; Bagchi et al., 2021). As the use of Atezolizumab becomes more widespread, the understanding of immuno-related adverse events of Atezolizumab becomes increasingly important. However, encephalitis, aseptic meningitis, and meningoencephalitis—rare but serious immune-related adverse events—have received insufficient attention to Atezolizumab. Currently, there are no large-scale randomized controlled trials on the diagnosis and treatment of these neurological adverse events. The understanding of Atezolizumab-induced encephalitis, aseptic meningitis, or meningoencephalitis is largely based on case reports, and the clinical features remain unclear. Therefore, we conducted a summary analysis of cases of encephalitis, aseptic meningitis, or meningoencephalitis induced by Atezolizumab, aiming to provide reference experience for the diagnosis and treatment of encephalitis, aseptic meningitis, or meningoencephalitis induced by Atezolizumab.

Methods

Retrieval strategy

We conducted an independent search for full-text articles in both Chinese and English databases including Pubmed, Web of Science, Wanfang Database, and CNKI database to collect case reports, case series, and clinical studies related to Atezolizumab-induced encephalitis, aseptic meningitis or meningoencephalitis. The search was performed by two authors, covering publications from the launch of Atezolizumab up until January 30, 2024. The search strategy (as shown in S1) included the following key terms: ‘Atezolizumab’, ‘anti-PDL1’, ‘PD-L1 Inhibitor’, ‘PD-L1 Blockade’, ‘Programmed Death-Ligand 1 Inhibitors’, ‘immune Checkpoint Inhibitor’, ‘Immune Checkpoint Inhibition’, ‘Immune Checkpoint Blockers’, ‘Immune Checkpoint Blockade’, ‘MPDL3280A’, ‘Tecentriq’, ‘RG7446’, ‘Brain Inflammations’, ‘inflammation, Brain’, ‘Brain Inflammation’, ‘Rasmussen Syndrome’, ‘Rasmussen’s Syndrome’, ‘Encephalitis, Meningitides’, ‘Pachymeningitis’, ‘Pachymeningitides.’

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria for this study were as follows: (1) case reports documenting Atezolizumab-induced encephalitis, aseptic meningitis, or meningoencephalitis; (2) full articles written in Chinese or English.

Exclusion criteria for this study were as follows: (1) studies published by review; (2) mechanistic studies; (3) only abstract, no full-text research; (4) animal studies; (5) duplicate cases.

Data extraction

Based on the designed table, two independent reviewers screened titles and abstracts and then extracted data from the included article. Patients’ data including gender, age, country, primary disease, medication history and concurrent medications, secondary disease diagnosis, onset time, clinical manifestations, head CT or MRI findings, Cerebral spinal fluid (CSF) analysis, treatment, and outcomes.

Statistical analysis

Data are reported as number (percentage) or median (range). Comparisons of demographic and other features between patients presenting with encephalitis, aseptic meningitis, or meningoencephalitis were performed with Fisher’s test, the chi-squared test, and the Mann–Whitney U test, as appropriate.

Results

Basic information

A total of 19 patients with encephalitis, aseptic meningitis, or meningoencephalitis were selected, including 9 (47.4%) males and 10 (52.6%) females and the article selection methodology as shown in Figure 1. The basic characteristics of 19 patients are summarized in Table 1. The median age of the patients was 59 years (range 38, 78), with the majority from Japan (8, 42.1%), followed by the United States (4, 21.1%), China (3, 15.8%), Germany (1, 5.3%), Lebanon (1, 5.3%), Korea (1, 5.3%), France (1, 5.3%). Six patients received Atezolizumab treatment for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), accounting for 31.6% of the cases. Five patients were treated for small cell lung cancer (SCLC), representing 26.3%. Additionally, three patients were treated for liver cancer, which constituted 15.8% of the cases. Two patients with bladder cancer were also treated with Atezolizumab, making up 10.5% of the total. Lastly, three cases received Atezolizumab treatment for breast cancer (10.5%) and one for cervical cancer (5.3%). More than 80% of cancer patients developed drug-related encephalitis, aseptic meningitis, or meningoencephalitis after 2 weeks of being treated with Atezolizumab, and a small number of patients developed drug-related encephalitis, aseptic meningitis, or meningoencephalitis after a prolonged period of treatment.

Table 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1. Basic characteristics of the 19 patients included.

Clinical symptoms

The clinical symptoms of 19 patients are summarized in Table 2. Fever (13, 68.4%), seizure (7, 36.8%), somnolence (6, 31.6%) and consciousness disorder (11, 57.9%) are the most common symptoms of encephalitis, aseptic meningitis or meningoencephalitis, and other accompanying symptoms included fatigue (4, 21.1%), mental altered (3, 15.8%), dyspnea (2, 10.5%), articular pain and sore (2, 10.5%), as well as cognition impaired specific neurological symptoms such as cognition impaired temporospatial disorientation, memory impairment and aphasia (4, 21.1%). Some patients also experienced unique symptoms including vomiting, hypothermia, headache, tachycardia, forgetfulness and irritability, dysphagia, gait disturbance, dizziness, Emotional instability, and speech confusion.

Table 2
www.frontiersin.org

Table 2. Clinical symptoms of the 17 included patients.

Laboratory testing

In routine laboratory tests, the routine laboratory tests of some patients have not been reported, the patient’s main manifestations were elevated CRP, lymphocytes, and leukopenia. Most patients (17, 89.5%) underwent laboratory tests including cerebrospinal fluid analysis (CFS) was reported in 17 of 19 patients, mainly manifested as increased cell count (11, 57.9%), protein level (15, 78.9%) and glucose level (9, 47.4%). Moreover, CFS analysis showed no malignant tumor cells, no central nervous system infection, and no paraneoplastic inflammation, and CSF culture for negative for bacterial, fungal, viral, and parasite (12, 63.1%). Paraneoplastic antibodies were detected in 10 patients, with 5 patients testing negative and the paraneoplastic antibodies of the other 5 patients’ antibody profiles included anti-CRMP5, Anti-SOX1, Anti-Hu, and Anti-Zic4 positivity.

Imaging examination

Seventeen patients underwent head CT or MRI, with eleven cases (11, 57.9%) showing no significant abnormalities on the imaging studies, while only 6 patients exhibited abnormal brain imaging. Four of the six patients (4, 21.1%) exhibited diffuse leptomeningeal hyperintensities enhancement. One patient (1, 5.3%) showed a small subdural hematoma and subarachnoid hemorrhage at the right parietal region. Another patient (1, 5.3%) showed multiple patchy T2 hyperintensities in the bilateral cerebellar hemisphere, vermis of the cerebellum, bilateral frontal lobe, temporal lobe, parietal lobe, and occipital cortex.

Treatment and prognosis

The treatment and prognosis of 19 patients with encephalitis, aseptic meningitis, or meningoencephalitis are summarized in Table 3. All patients (19, 100%) received systemic Steroids after being diagnosed with encephalitis, aseptic meningitis, or meningoencephalitis. Among these, eight patients (8, 42.1%) were also treated with antiviral, antibacterial, antifungal, and other antimicrobial agents. Two patients (2, 10.5%) administered intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIG). Additionally, five patients (5, 26.3%) were treated with levetiracetam, valproic acid, and other antiepileptic drugs. The symptoms of encephalitis, aseptic meningitis, or meningoencephalitis in 17 patients were improved after treatment. Two patients (2, 10.5%) did not show improvement after treatment; one of the two patients continued to experience fever and elevated C-reactive protein (CRP) levels despite antibiotic administration, while another’s condition deteriorated, resulting in cardiac and respiratory arrest.

Table 3
www.frontiersin.org

Table 3. Laboratory examination, treatment, and prognosis of 19 patients included.

Discussion

Most patients experiencing Atezolizumab-induced encephalitis, aseptic meningitis, or meningoencephalitis showed improvement in symptoms after discontinuation of Atezolizumab and appropriate treatment. Therefore, a graded assessment of adverse reactions should be conducted to determine whether discontinuation of Atezolizumab is necessary. Patients with lower-grade adverse reactions (G1, G2) typically do not require discontinuation of treatment (Schneider et al., 2021). This study suggests that Atezolizumab-induced encephalitis, aseptic meningitis, or meningoencephalitis typically manifests in most patients within approximately 2 weeks of initiating Atezolizumab therapy. However, a minority of patients may develop central nervous system adverse reactions after prolonged use of Atezolizumab. The onset time of Atezolizumab-induced encephalitis, aseptic meningitis, or meningoencephalitis varied significantly, ranging from 1 day to 5 months after treatment initiation, highlighting the unpredictability of immune-related adverse events. Reports indicate that the median latency period from the initiation of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy to the occurrence of these events was 8 weeks (Fan et al., 2020).

Drug-induced immune-related encephalitis, aseptic meningitis, or meningoencephalitis should be suspected when patients experiencing epileptic seizures with abnormal mental state, speech disorder, dystonia, or various forms of tonic–clonic seizures, fever, headache, joint pain or neurological abnormalities during the use of Atezolizumab (Watanabe et al., 2019). However, it is important to distinguish Atezolizumab-induced encephalitis, aseptic meningitis, or meningoencephalitis from other types of encephalitis, as the clinical features of infectious encephalitis closely resemble those of drug-induced encephalitis, aseptic meningitis, and meningoencephalitis (Seki et al., 2022). Common symptoms of infectious and immune encephalitis, as well as aseptic meningitis or meningoencephalitis encompass fever and altered consciousness. In addition, patients with immune-related encephalitis, aseptic meningitis, or meningoencephalitis, as well as those with infectious encephalitis, may present with seizures, drowsiness, coma, and changes in mental state (Meyfroidt et al., 2020). Therefore, CSF analysis is essential for ruling out other etiologies. In cases of immune encephalitis, CSF analysis typically shows an elevated lymphocyte count, increased protein levels, and decreased glucose levels. Furthermore, CSF cultures from patients with immune encephalitis, aseptic meningitis, or meningoencephalitis generally do not detect any microorganisms.

In addition to CFS and culture, imaging examinations may help to distinguish between Atezolizumab-induced encephalitis, aseptic meningitis, or meningoencephalitis and other forms of encephalitis. For more than half of patients with Atezolizumab-induced encephalitis, aseptic meningitis, or meningoencephalitis, imaging findings are normal. However, a small proportion of patients showed brain imaging abnormalities, including diffuse leptomeningeal hyperintensities enhancement, subdural hematoma, subarachnoid hemorrhage, and multiple patchy T2 hyperintensities in the bilateral cerebellar hemisphere, vermis of the cerebellum, bilateral frontal lobe, temporal lobe, parietal lobe, and occipital cortex.

Regarding the treatment of drug-induced immune encephalitis, aseptic meningitis, or meningoencephalitis, all patients receive high-dose steroid therapy, two patients are also treated with IVIG, and partial of patients also receive empirical antibiotics and antiviral therapy, as well as supportive treatments such as fluid supplementation, plasma exchange, and tracheostomy. The majority of patients presenting with Atezolizumab-induced encephalitis, aseptic meningitis, or meningoencephalitis exhibit significant symptomatic improvement following treatment. This includes the restoration of language faculties, a reduction in fever, and the mitigation of other symptoms such as seizures and fatigue.

The exact pathophysiology of drug-induced autoimmune encephalitis, aseptic meningitis, or meningoencephalitis is not yet fully clear. ICIs may induce encephalitis, aseptic meningitis, or meningoencephalitis through multiple pathways (Wu et al., 2019). Combining PD-L1 with PD-1 can induce T cell apoptosis, dysfunction, and exhaustion, inhibiting the activation, proliferation, and anti-tumor function of tumor antigen-specific CD8 + T cells, inhibition of PD1 and CTLA4 can stimulate antibody production, thereby leading to antibody-mediated autoimmune diseases (Llovet et al., 2022). Atezolizumab selectively binds to PD-L1, blocks the PD-1/PD-L1 signaling pathway, enhances the recognition of tumor cells by immune cells T cells in the body, and kills tumor cells after T cell activation (Huppert et al., 2020). However, after tumor cell destruction, intracellular antigens are released into the systemic environment, which may trigger the immune system to produce aberrant antibodies, potentially precipitating autoimmune conditions such as autoimmune encephalitis, aseptic meningitis, or meningoencephalitis (Fan et al., 2020). Furthermore, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) can elicit immune responses against shared self-antigens found in both tumor and neural tissues. Patients experiencing ICI-related toxicities may exhibit a pre-existing susceptibility before the initiation of immunotherapy, potentially due to the presence of anti-neuronal antibodies. The target antigens of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), namely PD-1, PD-L1, and CTLA-4, are also expressed on cells within the nervous system. This expression can lead to complement-dependent or cell-mediated cytotoxic reactions following ICI engagement, thereby potentially inducing adverse neuronal reactions (Farina et al., 2024; Velasco et al., 2021) (Figure 1).

Figure 1
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 1. Article selection methodology.

Conclusion

Neurological immune-related adverse events, especially autoimmune encephalitis, aseptic meningitis, or meningoencephalitis, are rare but serious complications. The initial nonspecific symptoms of neurological immune-related adverse events (irAEs) present a significant challenge for diagnosis. Moreover, these irAEs can progress rapidly, significantly impacting patient prognosis. Therefore, healthcare providers must have a thorough understanding of these conditions, enabling them to make timely and accurate diagnoses and administer appropriate interventions. This study presents a summary of a recommended diagnostic workflow for reference purposes as shown in Figure 2.

Figure 2
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 2. The diagnostic process of immune-related adverse effects.

Author contributions

QY: Conceptualization, Data curation, Funding acquisition, Writing – original draft. YH: Writing – review & editing, Data curation, Investigation. XL: Writing – review & editing, Conceptualization, Formal analysis. HX: Supervision, Writing – review & editing.

Funding

The author(s) declare that no financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

Arakawa, M., Yamazaki, M., Toda, Y., Saito, R., Ozawa, A., Kosaihira, S., et al. (2019). Atezolizumab-induced encephalitis in metastatic lung cancer: a case report and literature review. Eneurol. Sci. 14, 49–50. doi: 10.1016/j.ensci.2018.12.001

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Bagchi, S., Yuan, R., and Engleman, E. G. (2021). Immune checkpoint inhibitors for the treatment of Cancer: clinical impact and mechanisms of response and resistance. Annu. Rev. Pathol. 16, 223–249. doi: 10.1146/annurev-pathol-042020-042741

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Chao, K. H., and Tseng, T. C. (2023). Atezolizumab-induced encephalitis with subdural hemorrhage and subarachnoid hemorrhage in a patient with hepatocellular carcinoma. J. Formos Med. Assoc. Taiwan Yi Zhi 122, 1208–1212. doi: 10.1016/j.jfma.2023.07.019

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Chen, G., Zhang, C., Lan, J., Lou, Z., Zhang, H., and Zhao, Y. (2022). Atezolizumab-associated encephalitis in metastatic breast cancer: a case report. Oncol. Lett. 24:324. doi: 10.3892/ol.2022.13444

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Fan, S., Ren, H., Zhao, L., Yin, J., Feng, G., Wang, J., et al. (2020). Neurological immune-related adverse events associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors: a review of the literature. Asia Pac. J. Clin. Oncol. 16, 291–298. doi: 10.1111/ajco.13375

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Farina, A., Villagrán-García, M., Vogrig, A., Zekeridou, A., Muñiz-Castrillo, S., Velasco, R., et al. (2024). Neurological adverse events of immune checkpoint inhibitors and the development of paraneoplastic neurological syndromes. Lancet Neurol. 23, 81–94. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(23)00369-1

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Huppert, L. A., Gordan, J. D., and Kelley, R. K. (2020). Checkpoint inhibitors for the treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. Clin. Liver Dis. 15, 53–58. doi: 10.1002/cld.879

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Ibrahim, E. Y., Zhao, W. C., Mopuru, H., Janowiecki, C., and Regelmann, D. J. (2022). Hope, cure, and adverse effects in immunotherapy: Atezolizumab-associated encephalitis in metastatic small cell lung cancer - a case report and literature review. Case Rep. Neurol. 14, 366–371. doi: 10.1159/000526248

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Johnson, D. B., Nebhan, C. A., Moslehi, J. J., and Balko, J. M. (2022). Immune-checkpoint inhibitors: long-term implications of toxicity. Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. 19, 254–267. doi: 10.1038/s41571-022-00600-w

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Kim, A., Keam, B., Cheun, H., Lee, S. T., Gook, H. S., and Han, M. K. (2019). Immune-checkpoint-inhibitor-induced severe autoimmune encephalitis treated by steroid and intravenous immunoglobulin. J. Clin. Neurol. Seoul Korea 15, 259–261. doi: 10.3988/jcn.2019.15.2.259

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Laserna, A., Tummala, S., Patel, N., El Hamouda, D. E. M., and Gutiérrez, C. (2018). Atezolizumab-related encephalitis in the intensive care unit: case report and review of the literature. SAGE Open Med. Case Rep. 6:2050313X18792422. doi: 10.1177/2050313X18792422

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Levine, J. J., Somer, R. A., Hosoya, H., and Squillante, C. (2017). Atezolizumab-induced encephalitis in metastatic bladder cancer: a case report and review of the literature. Clin. Genitourin. Cancer 15, e847–e849. doi: 10.1016/j.clgc.2017.03.001

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Llovet, J. M., Castet, F., Heikenwalder, M., Maini, M. K., Mazzaferro, V., Pinato, D. J., et al. (2022). Immunotherapies for hepatocellular carcinoma. Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. 19, 151–172. doi: 10.1038/s41571-021-00573-2

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Mandal, S., and Gosain, R. (2021). A case of anti-hu-antibodies-medicated encephalitis induced by atezolizumab in extensive-stage small cell lung cancer. Chest 160, A1524–1524A. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2021.07.1392

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Meyfroidt, G., Kurtz, P., and Sonneville, R. (2020). Critical care management of infectious meningitis and encephalitis. Intensive Care Med. 46, 192–201. doi: 10.1007/s00134-019-05901-w

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Nader, R., Tannoury, E., Rizk, T., and Ghanem, H. (2021). Atezolizumab-induced encephalitis in a patient with metastatic breast cancer: a case report and review of neurological adverse events associated with checkpoint inhibitors. Autopsy Case Rep. 11:e2021261. doi: 10.4322/acr.2021.261

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Nakashima, K., Demura, Y., Kurokawa, K., Takeda, T., Jikuya, N., Oi, M., et al. (2022). Immune checkpoint inhibitor-induced limbic encephalitis during treatment with atezolizumab in a patient with small-cell lung cancer: a case report and review of the literature. Case Rep. Immunol. 2022, 1–5. doi: 10.1155/2022/9290922

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Özdirik, B., Jost-Brinkmann, F., Savic, L. J., Mohr, R., Tacke, F., Ploner, C. J., et al. (2021). Atezolizumab and bevacizumab-induced encephalitis in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: case report and literature review. Medicine 100:e26377. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000026377

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Robert, L., Langner-Lemercier, S., Angibaud, A., Sale, A., Thepault, F., Corre, R., et al. (2020). Immune-related encephalitis in two patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitor. Clin. Lung Cancer 21, e474–e477. doi: 10.1016/j.cllc.2020.03.006

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Satake, T., Maruki, Y., Kubo, Y., Takahashi, M., Ohba, A., Nagashio, Y., et al. (2022). Atezolizumab-induced encephalitis in a patient with hepatocellular carcinoma: a case report and literature review. Intern. Med. Tokyo Jpn. 61, 2619–2623. doi: 10.2169/internalmedicine.8919-21

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Schneider, B. J., Naidoo, J., Santomasso, B. D., Lacchetti, C., Adkins, S., Anadkat, M., et al. (2021). Management of Immune-Related Adverse Events in patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy: ASCO guideline update. J. Clin. Oncol. Off. J. Am. Soc. Clin. Oncol. 39, 4073–4126. doi: 10.1200/JCO.21.01440

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Seki, M., Kitano, S., and Suzuki, S. (2022). Neurological disorders associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors: an association with autoantibodies. Cancer Immunol. Immunother. CII 71, 769–775. doi: 10.1007/s00262-021-03053-9

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Tatsumi, S., Uryu, K., Iwasaki, S., and Harada, H. (2021). A case of anti-CRMP5 paraneoplastic neurological syndrome induced by atezolizumab for small cell lung cancer. Intern. Med. doi: 10.2169/internalmedicine.4889-20

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Toyozawa, R., Haratake, N., Toyokawa, G., Matsubara, T., Takamori, S., Miura, N., et al. (2020). Atezolizumab-induced aseptic meningitis in patients with NSCLC. JTO Clin. Res. Rep. 1:100012. doi: 10.1016/j.jtocrr.2020.100012

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Velasco, R., Villagrán, M., Jové, M., Simó, M., Vilariño, N., Alemany, M., et al. (2021). Encephalitis induced by immune checkpoint inhibitors: a systematic review. JAMA Neurol. 78, 864–873. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2021.0249

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Watanabe, Y., Kikuchi, R., Iwai, Y., Ito, M., Tsukamoto, H., Yamazaki, K., et al. (2019). Varicella zoster virus encephalitis mimicking Nivolumab-induced autoimmune neuropathy in a patient with lung Cancer. J. Thorac. Oncol. Off. Publ. Int. Assoc. Study Lung Cancer 14, e163–e165. doi: 10.1016/j.jtho.2019.02.033

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Wu, J., Lu, A. D., Zhang, L. P., Zuo, Y. X., and Jia, Y. P. (2019). Study of clinical outcome and prognosis in pediatric core binding factor-acute myeloid leukemia. Zhonghua Xue Ye Xue Za Zhi Zhonghua Xueyexue Zazhi 40, 52–57. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-2727.2019.01.010

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Xiao, L., and Yanhua, Z. (2023). A case of anti-SOX1 paraneoplastic neurological encephalitis induced by atezolizumab in patient with small cell lung cancer and literature review of neurological adverse events. Chin. J. New. Drugs 32, 1269–1274. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-3734.2023.12.014

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Yamaguchi, Y., Nagasawa, H., Katagiri, Y., and Wada, M. (2020). Atezolizumab-associated encephalitis in metastatic lung adenocarcinoma: a case report. J. Med. Case Rep. 14:88. doi: 10.1186/s13256-020-02411-y

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: atezolizumab, PD-L1, encephalitis, immune checkpoint inhibitor, aseptic meningitis, meningoencephalitis

Citation: Yan Q, Hu Y, Liu X and Xia H (2025) Clinical characteristics, diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis of Atezolizumab-induced encephalitis, aseptic meningitis or meningoencephalitis. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 19:1443463. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2025.1443463

Received: 12 June 2024; Accepted: 15 January 2025;
Published: 28 January 2025.

Edited by:

Anjana Munshi, Central University of Punjab, India

Reviewed by:

Laura Cacciaguerra, Mayo Clinic, United States

Copyright © 2025 Yan, Hu, Liu and Xia. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Xiang Liu, bHgxOTg5MEAxNjMuY29t

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Research integrity at Frontiers

Man ultramarathon runner in the mountains he trains at sunset

94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good

Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.


Find out more