Skip to main content

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW article

Front. Hum. Neurosci.
Sec. Motor Neuroscience
Volume 18 - 2024 | doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2024.1498107
This article is part of the Research Topic Insights and Reviews In Movement Science View all 13 articles

Normative data for instrumented posturography: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Provisionally accepted
  • 1 Université de Caen Normandie, Caen, France
  • 2 University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Postural control is a multisensory adaptive system performing predictive (anticipatory) and/or reactive (compensatory) actions, with varying degrees of accuracy, to maintain balance in changing environmental context. Common instrumentation to evaluate balance includes static and dynamic force platforms; added sway-referenced perturbations on the dynamic platform constitute its main advantage. Clinical applications notwithstanding, normative data are needed for interpretation in clinical settings. Posturography norms are used to compare a reference group (healthy individuals) and a specific patient population. To our knowledge, this work represents the first attempt to synthesize the literature on normative data for computerized posturography using a combined mixed method. The search strategy resulted in the retrieval of 1244 articles from PubMed, Web of Science and Science Direct. After deduplication, 689 papers remained and were screened based on title and abstract. One hundred and seven articles met the criteria after the first screening. In depth full text screening resulted in the inclusion of 44 studies for the systematic and 17 studies for the meta-analyses. Main findings of this systematic review are: 1) extensive heterogeneity was found in methodological characteristics, 2) there was insufficient risk of bias mitigation, 3) most tasks evaluated less than four components of the SFPC, 4) studies mostly used distance domain sway parameters and did not report the influence of other variables on postural sway. Based on the multilevel meta-analyses, females appeared to significantly outperform males in eyes closed conditions. Based on the network meta-analyses, we found that younger children swayed significantly more than those aged between 8 and 14 years in eyes open condition and closed. The results also revealed a significant difference in sway between individuals between 50 and 79 years old and younger individuals; with more instability observed in older participants in both eyes open and closed conditions. Thus, future studies need to ensure the following that enough information about participants is provided. Standardization of experimental conditions and sway parameters harmonization are still needed to ensure high-quality assessment. Finally, evidencebased management of postural impairments requires both age and gender-related normative data.

    Keywords: normative data, Postural control, Systematic review, Meta-analysis, Posturography test

    Received: 18 Sep 2024; Accepted: 12 Nov 2024.

    Copyright: © 2024 Julienne, Verbecque and Besnard. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: Angela Julienne, Université de Caen Normandie, Caen, France

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.