The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.
ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Hum. Neurosci.
Sec. Cognitive Neuroscience
Volume 18 - 2024 |
doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2024.1495592
Baseline dependent differences in the perception of changes in visuomotor delay
Provisionally accepted- 1 Technical University Dresden, Dresden, Germany
- 2 Center for Tactile Internet with Human-in-the-Loop, Technical University Dresden, Dresden, Lower Saxony, Germany
- 3 Department of Psychology, Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Institute of Psychology, University of Greifswald, Greifswald, Mecklenburg-Vorpommern, Germany
The detection of, and adaptation to delayed visual movement feedback has been extensively studied. One important open question is whether the Weber-Fechner Laws hold in the domain of visuomotor delay; i.e., whether the perception of changes in visuomotor delay depends on the amount of delay already present during movement. To address this, we developed a virtual reality based, continuous hand movement task, during which participants had to detect changes in visuomotor mapping (delay): Participants (N=40) performed continuous, auditory-paced grasping movements, which were measured with a data glove and transmitted to a virtual hand model. The movements of the virtual hand were delayed between 0-700ms with the delay changing repeatedly in a roving oddball design. Participants had to indicate any perceived delay changes by key press. This design allowed us to investigate detection accuracy and speed related to the magnitude of the delay change, and to the “baseline” delay present during movement, respectively. As expected, larger delay changes were detected more accurately than smaller ones. Surprisingly, delay changes were detected more accurately and faster when participants moved under large > small delays. These results suggest that visual movement feedback delay indeed affects the detection of changes in visuomotor delay, but not as predicted by the Weber-Fechner Laws. Instead, bodily action under small delays may have entailed a larger tolerance for delay changes due to embodiment-related intersensory conflict attenuation; whereas better change detection at large delays may have resulted from their (visual) saliency due to a strong violation of visuomotor predictions.
Keywords: action, Delay, virtual reality, visuomotor mapping, Weber-Fechner-Law
Received: 12 Sep 2024; Accepted: 16 Dec 2024.
Copyright: © 2024 Vigh and Limanowski. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Gesche Vigh, Technical University Dresden, Dresden, Germany
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.