Editorial: Methods in speech and language: 2023

Editorial on the Research Topic
Methods in speech and language: 2023

With rapid technological advancements, speech and language research has expanded significantly over the last two decades, impacting disciplines such as neuroscience, linguistics, computer and cognitive science. Cutting-edge experimental methods have allowed researchers to explore the complexities of speech and language more thoroughly, unraveling new insights and driving both theoretical and practical innovations. Techniques like neuroimaging, electrophysiology, computational modeling and machine learning algorithms have improved our understanding of human communication. Beyond addressing communication disorders, speech and language therapy (SLT) also covers swallowing disorders (aka dysphagia) which often accompany speech and language impairments. Addressing dysphagia is vital for improving individuals' quality of life (QoL) and requires specialized assessment and intervention techniques. The present Research Topic, part of the Methods in Human Neuroscience series, highlights the latest techniques and methods in speech and language research. The six featured articles include original research, detailed protocols, and insightful reviews, all making a substantial impact on the field. Together, these studies offer valuable insights for clinicians and researchers dedicated to improving the lives of individuals with communication disorders and dysphagia.

Dysarthria is a neuromotor disorder characterized by weakness or coordination difficulties in the vocal and respiratory muscles (Enderby, 2013). These challenges produce imprecise articulation, monotonous speech prosody, reduced voice quality, and inadequate respiratory control. Treatment approaches for dysarthria include speech therapy to enhance speech production skills and augmentative therapies, such as gesture use, to improve communication. Specific speech therapy methods include Phonemic Contrast Therapy, which focuses on enhancing articulatory precision and auditory phoneme discrimination, and the Accent Method, which targets improving respiratory control and voice production. The research of Ge et al. innovatively integrated these two methodologies into a more holistic approach for improving speech production in speakers with post-stroke dysarthria. The results demonstrated that this synergistic technique offered significant advantages in optimizing the segmental (speech clarity) and suprasegmental (prosody) aspects of speech production. Research about more effective methods to improve speech production is crucial for enhancing access to education, employment, and socialization opportunities in individuals with dysarthria.

The event-related potentials (ERPs) technique is important for exploring different levels of linguistic structure, including phonetic (Whitten et al., 2020), lexical (Xia and Peng, 2022), syntactic (Deng and Zhu, 2020), and discourse analysis (Rasenberg et al., 2019). Despite many reviews, a comprehensive overview of ERPs research in language processing is lacking. Sun and Luo's study addresses this gap by using Citespace to analyze 3,772 publications from 2002 to 2022, providing insights into historical developments, current trends, and future predictions. Important research areas include sentence and reading comprehension, mismatch negativity, and topics like speech perception, temporal dynamics, and working memory. The study calls for future research on larger linguistic units, ERP component integration, and individual differences to improve the understanding of language processing. This comprehensive analysis broadens our understanding of ERPs applications in linguistic research, guiding future studies in the field.

Auditory feedback is essential for speech production and is central to speech motor control models (Parrell et al., 2019). Over the past 30 years, the real-time altered auditory feedback (AAF) paradigm has become popular for studying auditory feedback control. This technique changes a speaker's speech and feeds it back in approximately real-time. Tang reviewed AAF's development for studying pitch motor control in tonal language speakers, analyzing 18 studies. The findings indicate that tonal language speakers can adapt to pitch perturbations, with response magnitude and latency affected by various factors. Combining AAF with brain stimulation and neuroimaging techniques allows for the exploration of the neural basis of pitch motor control. This review highlights AAF's importance in understanding pitch motor control and its potential applications in speech research and therapy.

Neurolinguistic assessments are crucial but often time-consuming in neurological exams. Open Brain Artificial Intelligence (OBAI) (http://openbrainai.com) aims to improve these processes with advanced AI tools for analyzing spoken and written language. Initially developed by one person (Themistocleous), OBAI now needs a research group for further development and global impact. The platform supports multiple languages and offers models for several linguistic tasks (e.g., audio transcription, translation, and grammar correction). “OBAI Companion” helps clinicians in structuring and summarizing texts, improves functionality, innovation, and the platform's impact, enabling professionals to focus on therapeutic interventions. Themistocleous reviews OBAI's architectures and applications, underscoring its significance in making neurolinguistic assessments more efficient and less resource-intensive.

Dysphagia impacts about 40% of stroke survivors (Balcerak et al., 2022), emphasizing the urgent need for effective treatments. Although several studies have examined the effects of repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) on post-stroke dysphagia, there is no consensus on the optimal stimulation site and parameters (Li et al., 2022). The umbrella review of Georgiou et al. evaluated the methodological quality of systematic reviews (SRs) and meta-analyses (MAs) on rTMS's effectiveness in managing post-stroke dysphagia. Using AMSTAR 2 (A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews) (Shea et al., 2017), the researchers rated two studies as low quality and 17 as critically low, noting high literature overlap. Despite methodological flaws, all MAs found significant evidence supporting rTMS's effectiveness. This research is important as it shows the potential of rTMS in improving post-stroke dysphagia, guiding future studies toward more robust methodologies.

Last but not least, the study of Demetriou and Georgiou illustrate the absence of standardized protocols and evidence-based guidelines for post-extubation dysphagia (PED) screening and assessment in intensive care units (ICUs). Their paper explored current dysphagia screening and assessment methods as well as existing dysphagia protocols in ICUs, emphasizing the need for innovative approaches. Their study urges the establishment of internationally standardized, patient-centered guidelines to improve diagnosis, prevention, and management of PED. Such guidelines would reduce the burden on critically ill patients, ensure consistency across the world, enhance the effectiveness of interventions, and support international educational programs. This step is crucial for improving global PED practices and patient outcomes.

Overall, this editorial illustrates the need for continued innovation and methodological advancements in speech and language research, emphasizing the potential for future studies to improve diagnostic precision, therapeutic outcomes, and QoL for people with communication disorders and dysphagia.

Author contributions

AG: Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. SJ: Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing.

Funding

The author(s) declare that no financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

The author(s) declared that they were an editorial board member of Frontiers, at the time of submission. This had no impact on the peer review process and the final decision.

Publisher's note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

Balcerak, P., Corbiere, S., Zubal, R., and Kägi, G. (2022). Post-stroke dysphagia: prognosis and treatment-a systematic review of RCT on interventional treatments for dysphagia following subacute stroke. Front. Neurol. 13:823189. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2022.823189

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Deng, Y., and Zhu, H. (2020). To move or not to move: an ERP study on the processing of fictive and literal motion expressions. Lingua 244, 1–17. doi: 10.1016/j.lingua.2020.102908

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Enderby, P. (2013). Disorders of communication: dysarthria. Handb. Clin. Neurol. 110, 273–281. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-444-52901-5.00022-8

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Li, H., Li, L., Zhang, R., Huang, X., Lin, J., Liu, C., et al. (2022). Effectiveness of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on poststroke dysphagia: a meta-analysis of randomized-controlled trials. Int. J. Rehabil. Res. 45, 109–117. doi: 10.1097/MRR.0000000000000517

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Parrell, B., Ramanarayanan, V., Nagarajan, S., and Houde, J. (2019). The FACTS model of speech motor control: fusing state estimation and task-based control. PLoS Comput. Biol. 15:e1007321. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007321

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Rasenberg, M., Rommers, J., and van Bergen, G. (2019). Anticipating predictability: an ERP investigation of expectation-managing discourse markers in dialogue comprehension. Lang. Cognit. Neurosci. 35, 1–16. doi: 10.1080/23273798.2019.1624789

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Shea, B. J., Reeves, B. C., Wells, G., Thuku, M., Hamel, C., Moran, J., et al. (2017). AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both. BMJ 358:j4008. doi: 10.1136/bmj.j4008

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Whitten, A., Key, A. P., Mefferd, A. S., and Bodfish, J. W. (2020). Auditory event-related potentials index faster processing of natural speech but not synthetic speech over nonspeech analogs in children. Brain Lang. 207:104825. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2020.104825

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Xia, Q., and Peng, G. (2022). The roles of object and action, and concreteness and imageability, in the distinction between nouns and verbs: an ERP study on monosyllabic words in Chinese. J. Neurolinguist. 61:101026. doi: 10.1016/j.jneuroling.2021.101026

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar