Skip to main content

EDITORIAL article

Front. Hum. Neurosci.
Sec. Brain-Computer Interfaces
Volume 18 - 2024 | doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2024.1468938
This article is part of the Research Topic The ethics of speech ownership in the context of neural control of augmented assistive communication. View all 6 articles

Editorial: The ethics of speech ownership in the context of neural

Provisionally accepted
Zachary Freudenburg Zachary Freudenburg 1*Julia Berezutskaya Julia Berezutskaya 1Cornelia Herbert Cornelia Herbert 2
  • 1 Brain Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
  • 2 Institute of Psychology and Education, Faculty of Engineering, Computer Science and Psychology, University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Keywords: Brain-computer interfaces (BCI), Augmented Assistive Communication (AAC), 10 speech ownership, user agency 11, executory control, guidance control

    Received: 22 Jul 2024; Accepted: 26 Jul 2024.

    Copyright: © 2024 Freudenburg, Berezutskaya and Herbert. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: Zachary Freudenburg, Brain Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.