The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.
ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Hum. Neurosci.
Sec. Brain Health and Clinical Neuroscience
Volume 18 - 2024 |
doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2024.1468204
The POPulation based Cognitive testing in subjects with SARS-CoV-2 (POPCOV2) Study: Longitudinal investigation of remote cognitive and fatigue screening in PCR-positive cases and negative controls Authors and Affiliation
Provisionally accepted- 1 Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, Heinrich-Heine-University, Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
- 2 Deparment of Neurology, Clinic Maria Hilf GmbH, Mönchengladbach, Germany
- 3 Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Infectious Diseases, University Hospital of Düsseldorf, Dusseldorf, Germany
- 4 Emergency Department, Faculty of Medicine, Heinrich-Heine-University, Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
- 5 institute for Clinical Neuroscience and Medical Psychology, Faculty of Medicine, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
- 6 Centre for Health and Society, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
- 7 Department of Laboratory Medicine, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria
Background: The majority of people infected with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) only show mild respiratory symptoms. However, some patients with SARS-CoV-2 display neurological symptoms. Data on the exact prevalence and course of cognitive symptoms are often limited to patient reported outcomes or studies recruited at specialized centers. Methods: For this prospective, non-interventional population based POPCOV2 study, 156 subjects who performed SARS-CoV-2 testing in the Düsseldorf metropolitan area at public test centers between December 2020 and February 2022 were recruited by handouts. SARS-CoV-2-positive and negatively tested subjects were included within the first seven days after the PCR test results. Cognitive testing was performed at baseline during home quarantine and after 4-6 as well as 12-14 weeks of follow-up. Individuals were examined remotely by videocalls using the Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT) and the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) in addition to the Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI) and the Beck Depression Inventory-Fast Screen (BDI-FS). Results: At baseline, the SARS-CoV-2-positive group presented with higher levels of fatigue in the BFI. In both the SARS-CoV-2-positive and SARS-CoV-2-negative groups, some subjects presented attention and memory deficits, defined as a z-score < -1,65 on the SDMT or <26 points on the MoCA (SDMT: 22.9% in the positive and 8.8% in the negative group, p=0.024; MoCA: 35.6% in the positive and 27.3% in the negative group, p=0.313). MoCA and SDMT improved over time in both groups. For MoCA scores, a significant difference between the two groups was only seen at the first follow-up. SDMT z-scores did not differ at any time between the groups. Conclusion: These results support previous evidence that mild SARS-CoV-2 infections are associated with increased fatigue. However, we found relevant rates of cognitive impairment not only in the infected but also in the control group. This underlines the importance of including a control group in such investigations.
Keywords: neurocognitive deficit Covid-19, cognitive testing in COVID-19, fatigue screening COVID-19, depression screening COVID-19, population based cognitive testing COVID-19
Received: 26 Jul 2024; Accepted: 25 Oct 2024.
Copyright: © 2024 von Etzdorf, Harzen, Heinrichs, Seifert, Groiß, Balloff, Feldt, Jensen, Lüdde, Bernhard, Schnitzler, Goebels, Kraus, Meuth, Elben and Albrecht. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Philipp Albrecht, Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, Heinrich-Heine-University, Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.