Skip to main content

CORRECTION article

Front. Hum. Neurosci., 13 February 2024
Sec. Cognitive Neuroscience

Corrigendum: Aesthetic experience models human learning

  • Department of Neuroscience and English, Pomona College, Claremont, CA, United States

A corrigendum on
Aesthetic experience models human learning

by Starr, G. G. (2023). Front. Hum. Neurosci. 17:1146083. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2023.1146083

In the published article there was an error in Section 4, Aesthetics, expectation, and Bayesian prediction, paragraph three, which misstated a component of the findings of Cheung et al. (2019). The sentence stated: “The second key is that Cheung et al. (2019) found that individuals experienced high pleasure when an unexpected chord came in the context of high uncertainty: the potential to gain information—to learn—is here at its highest because baseline predictability is so low (there is not enough knowledge to enable a confident prediction).”

This should have been written as:

“The second key is that Cheung et al. (2019) found that individuals experienced high pleasure when an unexpected chord came in the context of high certainty: the potential to gain information—to learn—is significant because baseline predictability was high (listeners can update a previously confident prediction).”

The author apologizes for this error and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.

Publisher's note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

Cheung, V. K., Harrison, P. M., Meyer, L., Pearce, M. T., Haynes, J. D., and Koelsch, S. (2019). Uncertainty and surprise jointly predict musical pleasure and amygdala, hippocampus, and auditory cortex activity. Curr. Biol. 29, 4084–4092. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2019.09.067

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: neuroaesthetics, learning, aesthetics, pleasure, preference, default mode network, salience network, central executive network

Citation: Starr GG (2024) Corrigendum: Aesthetic experience models human learning. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 18:1356631. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2024.1356631

Received: 15 December 2023; Accepted: 23 January 2024;
Published: 13 February 2024.

Edited and reviewed by: Pietro Sarasso, University of Turin, Italy

Copyright © 2024 Starr. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: G. Gabrielle Starr, gabrielle.starr@pomona.edu

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.