Miyako Tazaki- Department of Psychology, Faculty of Medicine, Toho University, Tokyo, Japan
Neurofeedback training (NFT) is a non-invasive method and has been shown to be effective for attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and various psychiatric disorders. The aim of this paper is to evaluate the effectiveness of NFT for patients with Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) and Alzheimer’s disease (AD) or Vascular Diseases (VD), so that we searched research articles from four databases, using the keywords neurofeedback, elderly, MCI, AD, VD, and dementia. As a result, 13 articles were identified regarding the effectiveness of NFT in patients with MCI and AD. Although each study differed in study design, training protocol, electroencephalogram (EEG) electrode placement, and reward and inhibition frequency bands, all were shown to enhance memory, attention, and other cognitive abilities. Additional well-designed, randomized studies with sufficient power are needed to further confirm the effectiveness of NFT.
Introduction
According to the World Alzheimer Report 2015 (Alzheimer’s Disease International, 2015), the number of patients with dementia worldwide, currently 46 million, is expected to increase to more than 130 million by 2050, although currently available drugs for dementia may be able to reduce core symptoms such as memory disruptions, disorientation, performance disorders, depression, and anxiety, they cannot cure the disease itself. Consequently, it has been announced by the WHO that prevention is the most important target for dementia.
Dementia refers to a group of symptoms associated with the decline of memory or other thinking skills. The symptoms associated with dementia must be severe enough to reduce a person’s ability to perform everyday activities. Alzheimer’s disease (AD) accounts for 60–80% of all cases of dementia. Vascular Dementia (VD) is the second most common type of dementia. Other forms of dementia include frontotemporal dementia and Lewy body dementia (Ubhi and Masliah, 2013). The main symptom of dementia is the deterioration of cognitive function caused by the destruction of neurons in the brain. This deterioration typically manifests as memory loss, confusion about time and place, mood changes, and difficulties concentrating, carrying out familiar daily tasks, following a conversation, or word retrieval (World Health Organization, 2023).
It was recently suggested that EEG plays a special role in the diagnosis of AD. EEG revealed an increased activity in the theta band and decreased activity in the alpha and beta bands of the heathy elderly (Ubhi and Masliah, 2013). In addition, spectral coherence between the two hemispheres decreased between the alpha and beta frequency bands, and the amplitude of the peak of the alpha frequency band reduced (van der Zande et al., 2018). Mild cognitive impairment (MCI) represents a transitional stage between healthy aging and dementia, and it affects 10–15% of the population aged over 65 years. The neurobiological features of MCI are hypoperfusion and hypometabolism in the temporoparietal cortices as well as medial temporal lobe atrophy particularly in the rhinal cortices (Angelakis et al., 2007). In dementia with Lewy bodies, slow and sharp waves generally appear in the subcortical and temporal lobe structures on EEG (Angelakis et al., 2007).
As a preventive measure for dementia, healthy dietary habits (Anderson, 2019), moderate exercise (Swaminathan and Jicha, 2014), smoking cessation (Karstens et al., 2019), sobriety (Ahlskog et al., 2011), adequate sleep (World Health Organization, 2014), and good relationships with people (Ridley et al., 2013) are strongly recommended. Lifestyle diseases (Spira et al., 2014), such as diabetes and high blood pressure, can accelerate arteriosclerosis within the brain, potentially leading to cerebral infarction and hemorrhages, which can cause vascular dementia. It has been reported that AD and vascular dementia are two to four times more common in patients with diabetes. In addition to the above measures, over the last few years, research on the effects of NFT in elderly people with and without dementia has gradually increased.
Neurofeedback training is a type of biofeedback, referred to as EEG biofeedback. Based on operant conditioning paradigm, brainwaves of a participant are measured and analyzed, and spontaneous auditory and visual stimuli are given as the desirable brain activity are rewarded and the undesirable brain activity are inhibited, to regulate the brain for the better. Nowadays, particularly in North American and European countries, NFT has been applied as a non-pharmacological intervention to patients with a wide range of mental disorders, such as attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) (Enriquez-Geppert et al., 2019; Van Doren et al., 2019), anxiety (Chen et al., 2021), depression (Fernández-Alvarez et al., 2022), insomnia (Lambert-Beaudet et al., 2021) and epilepsy (Monderer et al., 2002). NFT is also a form of neuromodulation, but simpler and less expensive than other devices used to measure brainwaves, such as EEG, functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), and near-infrared spectroscopy. NFT requires a personal computer, monitors, and an amplifier connected to electrodes, which are placed on the patient’s head and earlobes. The placement of the electrodes is determined by the patient’s arousal level and the cognitive obstacle.
Major NFT training protocols include the beta/SMR and alpha/theta training and iftar-low frequency training. The beta/SMR training is used to train the beta activity, which is associated with conscious precision focus, and the ability to solve problems. Beta/SMR training improves focus and attention and cognitive processing and is usually conducted with the eyes open. Alpha/theta training is typically used for stress reduction and to attain peak performance by enhancing the alpha and theta waves with the eyes closed.
The purpose of this paper was to gather and review current evidence related to NFT to determine whether NFT is effective measure for cognitive impairment in the elderly with MCI and AD or VD.
Method
We searched for articles within the PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and PsycINFO databases using the following keywords on October 15, 2023, (“neurofeedback” or “EEG neurofeedback”) AND (elderly), (neurofeedback OR “EEG neurofeedback”) AND (dementia) OR (mild cognitive impairment) OR (Alzheimer’s disease) OR (Vascular dementia).
Results
We found seven research articles applied NFT a healthy elderly population, and only six articles that examined the efficacy of NFT in elderly individuals with MCI, and eight articles on AD. No article was found on VD. Research of NFT on healthy elderly showed improvement of cognitive processing speed and executive function (Katsel et al., 2018), attention (Becerra et al., 2012), and working memory (Wang and Hsieh, 2013; Reis et al., 2016), and memory performance (Yamaguchi and Tazaki, 2018), and enhance Quality of Life (Lecomte and Juhel, 2011).
Effects of EEG NFT on the elderly with MCI, and AD
Six researches on NFT on patients with MCI, and five research on NFT with patients AD or VD and other were found and described in order of the year of publication:
(1) NFT on patients with MCI and dementia
Fotuhi et al. (2016), Van Eijk et al. (2017) trained 127 elderly participants with MCI (with an average age of 70.69 years) during a personalized 12-week “Brain fitness Program.” In the program, each patient received weekly personalized cognitive stimulation, neurofeedback training, and brain coaching/counseling for eating a Mediterranean diet, taking omega-3 supplements, increasing fitness, and practicing mindfulness meditation. The post program testing showed that 84% of the patients experienced statistically significant improvements in their cognitive function, but there were no clear effects on the volume of the hippocampus.
Similarly, Fotuhi et al. (2016), Lavy et al. (2019) conducted another research with 11 MCI patients (mean age: 71.93 years). The participants were divided into two groups; a control group receiving sham NFTs and an experimental group receiving upward NFTs with alpha training and reported improvement in performance in complex memory, cognitive flexibility, composite attention, reaction time and executive functions.
Jang et al. (2019), Lavy et al. (2019) trained 5 MCI patients (mean age:66.6 years) with 16 sessions of NF training (twice a week for 8 weeks) and reported that cognitive function of the patients improved significantly in domains such as composite memory, cognitive flexibility, complex attention, reaction time, and executive function.
Jirayucharoensak et al. (2019) evaluated NFT on the cognitive performance in 54 healthy elderly participants and 65 individuals with anamnestic MCI (mean age; 71.7). All participants received Game-based NFT 20 sessions for 30 min 2–3 sessions per week, and all of them significantly improved spatial WM—a characteristic of amnestic MCI—and rapid visual processing.
Jang et al. (2019), Marlats et al. (2019) published a randomized controlled trial protocol to compare the effect NFT on 20 MCI patients (mean age: 76.1 years). NFT group received SMR upward at CZ 2–3 times per week for 4 months and reported improvement with multiple cognitive tests, compared to the control group in psycho-pedagogical care.
Marlats et al. (2019), Li et al. (2020) trained 40 MCI patients (mean age: 54.3 years) of upward training of alpha, and beta/alpha ratio in 10 sessions. All the patients increased overall connectivity in delta, theta, and beta bands. The results indicate that NFT can improve the brain functional connectivity of people with MCI. Coherence and phase synchronization analysis can objectively and accurately evaluate improvements in functional connectivity.
Li et al. (2020), Trambaiolli et al. (2021) published a systematic review of NFT protocols for dementia and MCI and reported most patients of 10 research (N = 81) showed improvement in different cognitive tests applying NFT. The authors pointed out that data from RCT remains scarce, and clinical evidence based on standardized metrics is still inconclusive.
(2) NFT on patients with AD or VD
Luijmes et al. (2016), Trambaiolli et al. (2021) conducted NFT for 10 participants with AD (with an average age of 71.5 years) who were on medication as a pilot study. Post-training of Cambridge Cognitive Examination scores indicated that NFT had a beneficial effect on cognitive functions like information recognition, short-term memory, and learning in patients with AD. Similar results were found in the following two experiments.
Luijmes et al. (2016), Surmeli et al. (2016) assessed the effects of NFT on 20 participants with AD and VD (with an average age of 68.9 years) using qEEG NFT. All patients were on medication and trained in appropriate neurofeedback protocols specific to the individual over different time periods. The results indicated that NFT was effective based on Mini-Mental State Examination scores before and after treatment. On average, scores improved statistically significantly.
Surmeli et al. (2016), Hohenfeld et al. (2017) conducted NFT on 16 healthy elderly subjects (mean age 63.5 years) and 10 AD prodromal patients (mean age 66.2 years). Four additional healthy subjects served as a false-feedback condition to validate the paradigm (WMS backward digit-span) With neurofeedback training, patients with prodromal AD showed improved visuospatial memory performance. The healthy subjects also performed better on a working memory task (WMS backward digit-span), and visuospatial memory performance. Both groups were able to elicit para hippocampal activation during training. Although no significant changes in brain activation were observed, Granger causality analysis revealed changes in brain connectivity during the training period. Controls who received sham feedback showed neither cognitive enhancement nor para hippocampal activation.
Hohenfeld et al. (2017), Galvin-McLaughlin et al. (2022) used Brain Computer Interface (BCI) NFT to improve visual attention and language skills to six mild AD (mean age: 57.6 years) for 4–7 weeks. The study protocol consisted of a within-subject A-B design with multiple data collection sessions both before and during administration of the intervention. In the baseline phase, participants received RSVP Keyboard training without NFT. In the intervention phase, the training incorporated NFB. As the results, increase of frontal power theta with stable beta power was reported indicate feasibility of NFT.
Galvin-McLaughlin et al. (2022), Vilou et al. (2023) reviewed the studies using NFT in rehabilitation of memory deficits in patients with dementia, multiple sclerosis, strokes, and traumatic brain injury. In the review of NFT on dementia, research design and protocol of NFT varied such as SMR/Beta training or Beta or alpha wave enhancement, but addressed that patients showing memory loss and cognitive deficits and behavioral changes altered for the better by NFT.
Discussion
Neurofeedback training has proven to be very effective in reducing problem behaviors by suppressing abnormally high delta and theta wave amplitudes in ADHD and developmentally disabled children. Similarly, abnormally high theta EEG activity is thought to best predict age-related cognitive dysfunction. Therefore, NFT studies of older adults with MCI or dementia used NFT protocols in which abnormal high wave amplitudes were suppressed by increasing alpha power training or alpha/beta training over 10 to 30 sessions. However, since healthy lifestyle composing of healthy diet with adequate amount of protein intake and carbohydrate restriction, as well as moderate exercise, adequate sleep, and social relationships, have a greater impact on cognitive function in the elderly, it would be more effective to apply NFT to dementia patients after improving these factors. However, research on NFTs for older adults with MCI and dementia only began in 2016, and the number of studies is limited. This may be because the NFT researchers themselves did not think that NFTs could be applied to dementia, since the cause of dementia is due to excessive amyloid β and genetic abnormalities and has nothing to do with neuroinflammation that causes abnormalities in brain waves, until in last decade.
Future studies should include larger sample sizes and robust controls over covariates, such as disease severity, types and dosages of medications used, educational background, and lifestyle habits, including diet and regular physical exercise. Although a few research studies have used an RCT design and most used control groups, only a few attempted to control for placebo effects; therefore, it is important to use more robust methodologies for the investigations. In addition, it should be noted that research findings may not be generalized to real-world settings.
Author contributions
MT: Writing–review and editing.
Funding
The author(s) declare that no financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
Ahlskog, J., Geda, Y., Graff-Radford, N., and Petersen, R. (2011). Physical exercise as a preventive or disease-modifying treatment of dementia and brain aging. Mayo Clin. Proc. 86, 876–884. doi: 10.4065/mcp.2011.0252
Alzheimer’s Disease International (2015). World Alzheimer Report 2015. London: Alzheimer’s Disease International.
Anderson, N. (2019). State of the science on mild cognitive impairment (MCI). CNS Spectr. 24, 78–87. doi: 10.1017/S1092852918001347
Angelakis, E., Stathopoulou, S., Frymiare, J., Green, D., Lubar, J., and Kounios, J. (2007). EEG neurofeedback: a brief overview and an example of peak alpha frequency training for cognitive enhancement in the elderly. Clin. Neuropsychol. 21, 110–129. doi: 10.1080/13854040600744839
Becerra, J., Fernández, T., Roca-Stappung, M., Díaz-Comas, L., Galán, L., Bosch, J., et al. (2012). Neurofeedback in healthy elderly human subjects with electroencephalographic risk for cognitive disorder. J. Alzheimers Dis. 28, 357–367. doi: 10.3233/JAD-2011-111055
Chen, C., Xiao, X., Belkacem, A., Lu, L., Wang, X., Yi, W., et al. (2021). Efficacy evaluation of neurofeedback-based anxiety relief. Front. Neurosci. 15:758068. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2021.758068
Enriquez-Geppert, S., Smit, D., Pimenta, M., and Arns, M. (2019). Neurofeedback as a Treatment Intervention in ADHD: Current Evidence and Practice. Curr. Psychiatry Rep. 21:46. doi: 10.1007/s11920-019-1021-4
Fernández-Alvarez, J., Grassi, M., Colombo, D., Botella, C., Cipresso, P., Perna, G., et al. (2022). Efficacy of bio- and neurofeedback for depression: a meta-analysis. Psychol. Med. 52, 201–216. doi: 10.1017/S0033291721004396
Fotuhi, M., Lubinski, B., Trullinger, M., Hausterman, N., Riloff, T., Hadadi, M., et al. (2016). A Personalized 12-week “Brain Fitness Program” for Improving Cognitive Function and Increasing the Volume of Hippocampus in Elderly with Mild Cognitive Impairment. J. Prev. Alzheimers Dis. 3, 133–137. doi: 10.14283/jpad.2016.92
Galvin-McLaughlin, D., Klee, D., Memmott, T., Peters, B., Wiedrick, J., Fried-Oken, M., et al. (2022). Methodology and preliminary data on feasibility of a neurofeedback protocol to improve visual attention to letters in mild Alzheimer’s disease. Contemp. Clin. Trials Commun. 28:100950. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2022.100950
Hohenfeld, C., Nellessen, N., Dogan, I., Kuhn, H., Müller, C., Papa, F., et al. (2017). Cognitive improvement and brain changes after real-time functional MRI neurofeedback training in healthy elderly and prodromal Alzheimer’s disease. Front. Neurol. 8:384. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2017.00384
Jang, J., Kim, J., Park, G., Kim, H., Jung, E., Cha, J., et al. (2019). Beta wave enhancement neurofeedback improves cognitive functions in patients with mild cognitive impairment: A preliminary pilot study. Medicine 98, e18357. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000018357
Jirayucharoensak, S., Israsena, P., Pan-Ngum, S., Hemrungrojn, S., and Maes, M. (2019). A game-based neurofeedback training system to enhance cognitive performance in healthy elderly subjects and in patients with amnestic mild cognitive impairment. Clin. Interv. Aging 14, 347–360. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S189047
Karstens, A., Tussing-Humphreys, L., Zhan, L., Rajendran, N., Cohen, J., Dion, C., et al. (2019). Associations of the Mediterranean diet with cognitive and neuroimaging phenotypes of dementia in healthy older adults. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 109, 361–368. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/nqy275
Katsel, P., Roussos, P., Beeri, M., Gama-Sosa, M., Gandy, S., Khan, S., et al. (2018). Parahippocampal gyrus expression of endothelial and insulin receptor signaling pathway genes is modulated by Alzheimer’s disease and normalized by treatment with anti-diabetic agents. PLoS One 13:e0206547. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0206547
Lambert-Beaudet, F., Journault, W., Rudziavic Provençal, A., and Bastien, C. (2021). Neurofeedback for insomnia: Current state of research. World J. Psychiatry 11, 897–914. doi: 10.5498/wjp.v11.i10.897
Lavy, Y., Dwolatzky, T., Kaplan, Z., Guez, J., and Todder, D. (2019). Neurofeedback improves memory and peak alpha frequency in individuals with mild cognitive impairment. Appl. Psychophysiol. Biofeedback 44, 41–49. doi: 10.1007/s10484-018-9418-0
Lecomte, G., and Juhel, J. (2011). The effects of neurofeedback training on memory performance in elderly subjects. Psychology 2, 846–852.
Li, C., Zhang, J., Li, X., and Cui, W. (2020). Neurofeedback training for brain functional connectivity improvement in Mild Cognitive Impairment. J. Med. Biol. Eng. 40, 484–495.
Luijmes, R., Pouwels, S., and Boonman, J. (2016). The effectiveness of neurofeedback on cognitive functioning in patients with Alzheimer’s disease: Preliminary results. Neurophysiol. Clin. 46, 179–187. doi: 10.1016/j.neucli.2016.05.069
Marlats, F., Djabelkhir-Jemmi, L., Azabou, E., Boubaya, M., Pouwels, S., and Rigaud, A. (2019). Comparison of effects between SMR/delta-ratio and beta1/theta-ratio neurofeedback training for older adults with Mild Cognitive Impairment: a protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials 20:88. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-3170-x
Monderer, R., Harrison, D., and Haut, S. (2002). Neurofeedback and epilepsy. Epilepsy Behav. 3, 214–218. doi: 10.1016/s1525-5050(02)00001-x
Reis, J., Portugal, A., Fernandes, L., Afonso, N., Pereira, M., Sousa, N., et al. (2016). An alpha and theta intensive and short neurofeedback protocol for healthy aging working-memory training. Front. Aging Neurosci. 8:157. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2016.00157
Ridley, N., Draper, B., and Withall, A. (2013). Alcohol-related dementia: an update of the evidence. Alzheimers Res. Ther. 5:3. doi: 10.1186/alzrt157
Spira, A., Chen-Edinboro, L., Wu, M., and Yaffe, K. (2014). Impact of sleep on the risk of cognitive decline and dementia. Curr. Opin. Psychiatry. 27, 478–483. doi: 10.1097/YCO.0000000000000106
Surmeli, T., Eralp, E., Mustafazade, I., Kos, H., Özer, G., and Surmeli, O. (2016). Quantitative EEG neurometric analysis-guided neurofeedback treatment in dementia: 20 cases. How neurometric analysis is important for the treatment of dementia and as a biomarker? Clin. EEG Neurosci. 47, 118–133. doi: 10.1177/1550059415590750
Swaminathan, A., and Jicha, G. (2014). Nutrition and prevention of Alzheimer’s dementia. Front. Aging Neurosci. 6:282. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2014.00282
Trambaiolli, L., Cassani, R., Mehler, D., and Falk, T. (2021). Neurofeedback and the aging brain: a systematic review of training protocols for dementia and Mild Cognitive Impairment. Front. Aging Neurosci. 13:682683. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2021.682683
Ubhi, K., and Masliah, E. (2013). Alzheimer’s disease: recent advances and future perspectives. J. Alzheimers Dis. 33 Suppl 1, S185–S194. doi: 10.3233/JAD-2012-129028
van der Zande, J., Gouw, A., van Steenoven, I., Scheltens, P., Stam, C., and Lemstra, A. (2018). EEG Characteristics of Dementia With Lewy Bodies, Alzheimer’s Disease and Mixed Pathology. Front. Aging Neurosci. 10:190. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2018.00190
Van Doren, J., Arns, M., Heinrich, H., Vollebregt, M., Strehl, U., and Loo, S. (2019). Sustained effects of neurofeedback in ADHD: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur. Child Adolesc. Psychiatry 28, 293–305. doi: 10.1007/s00787-018-1121-4
Van Eijk, L., Zwijsen, S., Keeser, D., Oosterman, J., Pogarell, O., and Engelbregt, H. (2017). EEG-neurofeedback training and quality of life of institutionalized elderly women (a pilot study). Adv. Gerontol. 30, 248–254.
Vilou, I., Varka, A., Parisis, D., Afrantou, T., and Ioannidis, P. E. E. G. - (2023). Neurofeedback as a potential therapeutic approach for cognitive deficits in patients with dementia, multiple sclerosis, stroke and traumatic brain injury. Life 13:365. doi: 10.3390/life13020365
Wang, J., and Hsieh, S. (2013). Neurofeedback training improves attention and working memory performance. Clin. Neurophysiol. 124, 2406–2420. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2013.05.020
World Health Organization (2014). Tobacco use knowledge summaries: tobacco use and dementia, 4, WHO/NMH/PND/CIC/TKS/14.1. Geneva: World Health Organization.
World Health Organization (2023). The World Health Organization (WHO) Health topics/Mental health Neurology and public health/Dementia: a public health priority. Geneva: World Health Organization.
Keywords: neurofeedback, cognitive decline, mild cognitive impairment, Alzheimer’s disease, dementia
Citation: Tazaki M (2024) A review: effects of neurofeedback on patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI), and Alzheimer’s disease (AD). Front. Hum. Neurosci. 17:1331436. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2023.1331436
Received: 01 November 2023; Accepted: 29 November 2023;
Published: 14 February 2024.
Edited by:
Ryouhei Ishii, Osaka Metropolitan University, JapanReviewed by:
Jungmi Choi, Human Anti-aging Standards Research Institute, Republic of KoreaCopyright © 2024 Tazaki. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Miyako Tazaki, bXRhemFraUBtZWQudG9oby11LmFjLmpw