Skip to main content

CORRECTION article

Front. Hum. Neurosci., 13 August 2019
Sec. Sensory Neuroscience
Volume 13 - 2019 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2019.00272

Corrigendum: Analysis of Perceptual Expertise in Radiology – Current Knowledge and a New Perspective

This article is a correction to:

  1. Analysis of Perceptual Expertise in Radiology – Current Knowledge and a New Perspective

    1. Read original article
\nStephen Waite Stephen Waite1*Arkadij GrigorianArkadij Grigorian1Robert G. Alexander,,Robert G. Alexander2,3,4Stephen L. Macknik,,Stephen L. Macknik2,3,4Marisa CarrascoMarisa Carrasco5David J. HeegerDavid J. Heeger5Susana Martinez-Conde,,&#x;Susana Martinez-Conde2,3,4†
  • 1Department of Radiology, SUNY Downstate Medical Center, Brooklyn, NY, United States
  • 2Department of Ophthalmology, SUNY Downstate Medical Center, Brooklyn, NY, United States
  • 3Department of Neurology, SUNY Downstate Medical Center, Brooklyn, NY, United States
  • 4Department of Physiology/Pharmacology, SUNY Downstate Medical Center, Brooklyn, NY, United States
  • 5Department of Psychology and Center for Neural Science, New York University, New York, NY, United States

A Corrigendum on
Analysis of Perceptual Expertise in Radiology – Current Knowledge and a New Perspective

by Waite, S., Grigorian, A., Alexander, R. G., Macknik, S. L., Carrasco, M., Heeger, D. J., et al. (2019) Front. Hum. Neurosci. 13:213. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2019.00213

In the original article, there was a mistake in the caption for Figure 5. The caption incorrectly states that the figure was from Reed et al. (2011) however the figure was reprinted from Litchfield and Donovan (2016) with permission. The correct legend appears below.

The authors apologize for this error and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.

Figure 5. Reprinted from Litchfield and Donovan (2016) with permission. Two different experience groups—expert radiologists and psychology students—searched for lung nodules from CXR images using the flash-preview moving window (FPMW) paradigm. Participants looked at the target word for 15 s (“lung nodule”). They then saw a fixation cross for 200 ms, then either a mask preview (random array of colored pixels) or a CXR (a ‘scene’ preview) for 250 ms. Next, participants saw a mask for 50 ms and then a second fixation cross for 400 ms. Following a second presentation of the fixation cross, they conducted a windowed search, with a 2.5-degree radius window restricting the field of view (Litchfield and Donovan, 2016).

References

Litchfield, D., and Donovan, T. (2016). Worth a quick look? Initial scene previews can guide eye movements as a function of domain-specific expertise but can also have unforeseen costs. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 42, 982–994. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000202

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Reed, W. M., Ryan, J. T., McEntee, M. F., Evanoff, M. G., and Brennan, P. C. (2011). The effect of abnormality-prevalence expectation on expert observer performance and visual search. Radiology 258, 938–943. doi: 10.1148/radiol.10101090

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: visual perception, expertise, radiology, visual search, perceptual learning, attention, holistic processing, gist

Citation: Waite S, Grigorian A, Alexander RG, Macknik SL, Carrasco M, Heeger DJ and Martinez-Conde S (2019) Corrigendum: Analysis of Perceptual Expertise in Radiology – Current Knowledge and a New Perspective. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 13:272. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2019.00272

Received: 02 July 2019; Accepted: 23 July 2019;
Published: 13 August 2019.

Edited and reviewed by: Srikantan S. Nagarajan, University of California, San Francisco, United States

Copyright © 2019 Waite, Grigorian, Alexander, Macknik, Carrasco, Heeger and Martinez-Conde. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Stephen Waite, c3RlcGhlbi53YWl0ZSYjeDAwMDQwO2Rvd25zdGF0ZS5lZHU=

†Senior author

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.