Alexandre Heeren
Wolf-Gero Lange
Pierre Philippot
Quincy J. J. Wong- 1Laboratory for Experimental Psychopathology, Psychological Science Research Institute, Université Catholique de Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium
- 2Behavioural Science Institute, Radboud University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, Netherlands
- 3Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
- 4Department of Psychology, Centre for Emotional Health, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia
Social anxiety is a common emotional experience that occurs in response to the perceived threat of evaluation from others before, during, or after social situations. When social anxiety reaches a high level of severity such that functioning is impaired and associated with considerable distress, we refer to it as Social Anxiety Disorder (SAD). With a lifetime prevalence ranging from 7.3 to 12.1%, SAD is the fourth most common psychiatric disorder (Kessler et al., 2005). SAD has an early onset and tends to follow a chronic and debilitating course if untreated (e.g., Hayward et al., 2008). SAD usually precedes other anxiety, mood, and substance abuse disorders (e.g., Randall et al., 2001; Lampe et al., 2003).
Although the personal and economic costs of SAD as well as its comorbidity with other disorders have been very well-documented, uncertainty remains regarding the etiological and maintenance factors underlying this condition. As highlighted by Hirsch and Clark (2004), a curious feature of this condition is that it persists even if most individuals with SAD in their daily life perform naturalistic exposure to at least some feared social situations on a regular basis. At a fundamental level, one possible explanation for the enduring nature of SAD may be the way socially anxious individuals process social information. Accordingly, cognitive theorists have argued that negatively biased information-processing may contribute to the maintenance of SAD (e.g., Clark and Wells, 1995; Rapee and Heimberg, 1997; Hirsch and Clark, 2004; Morrison and Heimberg, 2013). An information-processing bias reflects a general processing advantage for disorder-relevant information in a given cognitive domain (e.g., attention, memory, interpretation, mental imagery). Such biases would lead individuals with SAD to evaluate social situations as more threatening than they actually are, and in turn, contribute to the maintenance of the disorder (e.g., Clark and Wells, 1995; Rapee and Heimberg, 1997).
Since the development of maintenance models for SAD (e.g., Clark and Wells, 1995), cumulative evidence indicates that SAD individuals do indeed exhibit such biased cognitions (for a review, see Hirsch and Clark, 2004), and further research has begun to uncover the behavioral, cognitive, and neural correlates of these biases (e.g., Rossignol et al., 2012; Hattingh et al., 2013). Given this progress, researchers have recently started to probe the causal nature of such biased information-processing by directly manipulating these biases in the context of etiological and maintenance frameworks for SAD. Recent findings suggest that these biases do indeed play a crucial role in the development (e.g., Hirsch et al., 2006; Heeren et al., 2012) and the maintenance (e.g., Amir et al., 2009; Clerkin and Teachman, 2010; Amir and Taylor, 2012) of SAD.
The research advances to date have generated interest in the biases of SAD within the scientific and practitioners community. However, integrative advances for channeling all information into a unified account of the different cognitive biases operating in SAD have not been offered thus far. For this purpose, the present Research Topic brings together a number of opinions, perspectives, reviews, and original research that provides state-of-the-art updates on this thriving relation between biased cognitions and SAD. These contributions provide a much needed advance in the current conceptualization of the mechanisms underlying biased cognitions in SAD and set the stage for future research avenues by clarifying and bridging conceptual gaps between different areas. The 11 papers of this Research Topic reveal that the diversity of the methods and approaches used can tell us more than the study of either topic in seclusion. Several key themes can be identified.
First, Haller et al. (2014) have provided a comprehensive neurodevelopmental framework to understand the brain and cognitive mechanisms that lead to biased cognitions in SAD.
Second, two research papers have focused on the implication of working memory capacity that may underlie biased cognition in SAD: Moriya and Sugiura (2013) investigated the role of working memory capacity in the inhibition of goal-irrelevant information and the direction of attention to distractors, while Salemink et al. (2013) explored the moderating nature of working memory capacity on threat-related interpretative bias.
Third, two papers have shed light on the need to move beyond face- and word-stimuli in the assessment and conceptualization of cognitive biases. Indeed, most of the available evidence comes from research paradigms using faces or words as materials. Social information, however, is also conveyed through other channels, such as vocal and postural cues. In their paper, Gilboa-Schechtman and Shachar-Lavie (2013) reviewed the fundamental and applied additive value of integrating nonverbal social cues in SAD research. Compatibly, Peschard et al. (2014) proposed a cross-modal perspective to advance the understanding of cognitive biases in SAD.
Fourth, three papers have focused on the development of new research approaches to gauge the key features of SAD. Van der Molen et al. (2014) explored the neural foundations of anticipating and processing social-evaluative feedback using event-related potentials. Gilboa-Schechtman et al. (2014) examined both self-reported and acoustic (i.e., vibrations of the vocal folds during phonation and speech) reactions to exclusion, acceptance, and popularity induced by a participation in an online ball-tossing game in SAD. In a critical review, Schulze et al. (2013) questioned whether gaze perception is a suitable way to assess attentional biases in SAD.
Finally, three papers have highlighted the need to translate basic advances in cognitive biases repeatedly observed among SAD patients into new innovative neurocognitive interventions directly targeting these biases. Maoz et al. (2013) reported an attempt to develop a subliminal computerized attention bias modification training program. Rinck et al. (2013) reported the benefits of a computerized training program that directly modifies the avoidance tendencies away from smiling faces exhibited by SAD individuals. Finally, Pictet (2014) commented on the acute gain of promoting positive mental imagery in cognitive bias modification when treating SAD individuals.
In sum, this Research Topic illustrates without question how different scientific approaches lead to an important road map for researchers and practitioners in the field of cognitive biases in SAD. We hope that this Topic moves the field closer toward a global framework for understanding the cognitive biases in SAD.
Conflict of Interest Statement
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by a Post-doctoral Grant (FC 78142) from the Belgian National Fund for Scientific Research awarded to Dr. Alexandre Heeren and a National Health and Medical Research Council Early Career Fellowship (1037618) awarded to Dr. Quincy J. J. Wong. These fundings did not exert any editorial direction or censorship on any part of this manuscript.
References
Amir, N., Beard, C., Taylor, C. T., Klumpp, H., Elias, J., Burns, M., et al. (2009). Attention training in individuals with generalized social phobia: a randomized controlled trial. J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 77, 961–973. doi: 10.1037/a0016685
Amir, N., and Taylor, C. T. (2012). Interpretation training in individuals with generalized social anxiety disorder: a randomized controlled trial. J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 80, 497–511. doi: 10.1037/a0026928
Clark, D. M., and Wells, A. (1995). “A cognitive model of social phobia,” in Social Phobia: Diagnosis, Assessment, and Treatment, eds R. G. Heimberg, M. R. Liebowitz, D. A. Hope, and F. R., Schneier (New York, NY: Guilford Press), 69–93.
Clerkin, E. M., and Teachman, B. A. (2010). Training implicit social anxiety associations: an experimental intervention. J. Anxiety Disord. 24, 300–308. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2010.01.001
Gilboa-Schechtman, E., Galili, L., Sahar, Y., and Amir, O. (2014). Being “in” or “out” of the game: subjective and acoustic reactions to exclusion and popularity in social anxiety. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 8:147. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00147
Gilboa-Schechtman, E., and Shachar-Lavie, I. (2013). More than a face: a unified theoretical perspective on nonverbal social cue processing in social anxiety. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 7:904. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00904
Haller, S. P. W., Cohen Kadosh, K., and Lau, J. Y. F. (2014). A developmental angle to understanding the mechanisms of biased cognitions in social anxiety. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 7:846. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00846
Hattingh, C. J., Ipser, J., Tromp, S. A., Syal, S., Lochner, C., Brools, S. J., et al. (2013). Functional magnetic resonance imaging during emotion recognition in social anxiety disorder: an activation likelihood meta-analysis. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 6:347. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2012.00347
Hayward, C., Wilson, K. A., Lagle, K., Kraemer, H. C., Killen, J. D., and Taylor, C. B. (2008). The developmental psychopathology of social anxiety in adolescents. Depress. Anxiety 25, 200–206. doi: 10.1002/da.20289
Heeren, A., Peschard, V., and Philippot, P. (2012). The causal role of attentional bias for threat cues in social anxiety: a test on a cyber-ostracism task. Cogn. Ther. Res. 36, 512–521. doi: 10.1007/s10608-011-9394-7
Hirsch, C. R., and Clark, D. M. (2004). Information-processing bias in social phobia. Clin. Psychol. Rev. 24, 799–825. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2004.07.005
Hirsch, C. R., Mathews, A., Clark, D. M., Williams, R., and Morrison, J. A. (2006). The causal role of negative imagery in social anxiety: a test in confident public speakers. J. Behav. Ther. Exp. Psychiatry 37, 159–170. doi: 10.1016/j.jbtep.2005.03.003
Kessler, R. C., Chiu, W., Demler, O., and Walters, E. (2005). Prevalence, severity, and comorbidity of 12-month DSM-IV disorders in the National Comorbidity Survey Replication. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 62, 617–627. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.62.6.617
Lampe, L., Slade, T., Issakidis, C., and Andrews, G. (2003). Social phobia in the Australian National Survey of Mental Health and Well-Being (NSMHWB). Psychol. Med. 33, 637–646. doi: 10.1017/S0033291703007621
Maoz, K., Abend, R., Fox, N. A., Pine, D. S., and Bar-Haim, Y. (2013). Subliminal attention bias modification training in socially anxious individuals. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 7:389. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00389
Moriya, J., and Sugiura, Y. (2013). Socially anxious individuals with low working memory capacity could not inhibit the goal-irrelevant information. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 7:840. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00840
Morrison, A. S., and Heimberg, R. G. (2013). Social anxiety and social anxiety disorder. Annu. Rev. Clin. Psychol. 9, 249–274. doi: 10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-050212-185631
Peschard, V., Maurage, P., and Philippot, P. (2014). Towards a cross-modal perspective of emotional perception in social anxiety: review and future directions. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 8:322. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00322
Pictet, A. (2014). Looking on the bright side in social anxiety: the potential benefit of promoting positive mental imagery. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 8:43. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00043
Randall, C. L., Thomas, S., and Thevos, A. K. (2001). Concurrent alcoholism and social anxiety disorder: a first step toward developing effective treatments. Alcohol. Clin. Exp. Res. 25, 210–220. doi: 10.1111/j.1530-0277.2001.tb02201.x
Rapee, R. M., and Heimberg, R. G. (1997). A cognitive-behavioral model of anxiety in social phobia. Behav. Res. Ther. 35, 741–756. doi: 10.1016/S0005-7967(97)00022-3
Rinck, M., Telli, S., Kampmann, I. L., Woud, M. L., Kerstholt, M., Te Velthuis, S., et al. (2013). Training approach-avoidance of smiling faces affects emotional vulnerability in socially anxious individuals. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 7:481. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00481
Rossignol, M., Campanella, S., Maurage, P., Heeren, A., Falbo, L., and Philippot, P. (2012). Enhanced perceptual responses during visual processing of facial stimuli in young socially anxious individuals. Neurosci. Lett. 526, 68–73. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2012.07.045
Salemink, E., Friese, M., Drake, E., Mackintosh, B., and Hoppitt, L. (2013). Indicators of implicit and explicit social anxiety influence threat-related interpretive bias as a function of working memory capacity. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 7:220. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00220
Schulze, L., Renneberg, B., and Lobmaier, J. S. (2013). Gaze perception in social anxiety and social anxiety disorder. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 7:872. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00872
Van der Molen, M. J. W., Poppelaars, E. S., Van Hartingsveldt, C. T. A., Harrewijn, A., Gunther Moor, B., and Westenberg, P. M. (2014). Fear of negative evaluation modulates electrocortical and behavioral responses when anticipating social evaluative feedback. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 7:936. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00936
Keywords: social anxiety, cognitive biases, affective neuroscience, experimental cognitive psychopathology, clinical psychology, anxiety disorders and cognitive bias modification, cognitive therapy, behavior therapy
Citation: Heeren A, Lange W-G, Philippot P and Wong QJJ (2014) Biased cognitions and social anxiety: building a global framework for integrating cognitive, behavioral, and neural processes. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 8:538. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00538
Received: 27 June 2014; Accepted: 01 July 2014;
Published online: 22 July 2014.
Edited and reviewed by: Hauke R. Heekeren, Freie Universität Berlin, Germany
Copyright © 2014 Heeren, Lange, Philippot and Wong. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: alexandre.heeren@uclouvain.be; heeren.alexandre@gmail.com
†These authors have contributed equally to this work.