ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Hematol.

Sec. Blood Cancer

Volume 4 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/frhem.2025.1570055

Disease and treatment burden in patients with leukemia: family members/partner perspective

Provisionally accepted
  • 1U.O.C. di Ematologia, Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Bianchi Melacrino Morelli, Reggio Calabria, Italy
  • 2Saint Petersburg State University Hospital, Saint Petersburg, Russia
  • 3Acute Leukemia Advocates Network (ALAN), Leukemia Patient Advocates Foundation, Bern, Bern, Switzerland
  • 4Novartis (Switzerland), Basel, Switzerland
  • 5CLL Advocates Network, Leukemia Patient Advocates Foundation, Bern, Bern, Switzerland
  • 6CML Advocates Network, Bern, Switzerland
  • 7School of Life and Medical Sciences, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, Hertfordshire, United Kingdom

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Background: Leukaemia patients require comprehensive care, including treatment, hospital visits, and family support. An awareness of the impact of leukaemia on family members is crucial. The Acute Leukemia Advocates Network, Chronic Lymphoid Leukemia (CLL) Advocates Network, and Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CML) Advocates Network assessed the impact of leukaemia on patients and their families.Methods: A global anonymous online study ran from 18/09/21 to 07/01/2022, targeting leukaemia patients and their family members/partners. Demographics information, disease characteristics, treatment, and family members' experiences of caring for a relative with blood cancer were collected. Family members/partner assessed the disease impact on patients using the Hematological Malignancy-Patient Reported Outcome measure (HM-PRO) Part-A.Results: 571 family members/partners (70.9% female, aged 55 years) responded. They represented patients with CML (32.0%), CLL (26.3%), acute myeloid leukaemia (19.3%) acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (17.5%), and other leukaemias (4.9%). The majority (89.1%) lived with the patient, and 69.7% accompanied them to clinics. Daily support included household chores (60%), shopping (51.5%), transportation (37.1%), finances (28.9%), personal care (23.3%) and childcare (16.8%). About one-third (29.6%) felt that the diagnosis was insensitively conveyed and 81.3% sought prognosis information. Approximately 64% searched for alternative treatments. Approximately 40% Formatted: English (United Kingdom) Formatted: English (United Kingdom) Formatted: English (United Kingdom) of family members/partners (prevalently sons/daughters) expressed an impact on general quality of life, particularly on emotional behaviour and eating/drinking habits. The impact was greatest in family members representing patients aged <18 years with ALL and AML compared to CLL and CML.The burden on leukaemia patients' family members is significant but often overlooked.1 Deleted: is Deleted: However, less attention is given to the burden on families and caregivers(6-8).

Keywords: Leukaemia, Quality of Life, HM-PRO, Burden, caregiver

Received: 02 Feb 2025; Accepted: 10 Apr 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Oliva, Ionova, Nier, Pemberton-Whiteley, York, Costello and Salek. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Esther Natalie Oliva, U.O.C. di Ematologia, Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Bianchi Melacrino Morelli, Reggio Calabria, Italy

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Research integrity at Frontiers

94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good

Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.


Find out more