
94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.
Find out more
REVIEW article
Front. Hematol.
Sec. Blood Cancer
Volume 4 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/frhem.2025.1550681
This article is part of the Research Topic Elevating Supportive Care Measures for Multiple Myeloma in the Modern Era View all articles
The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Background: Multiple myeloma (MM) is the second most common blood cancer after leukemia in adults. Despite advancements in treatment that have extended survival, MM remains incurable and the cancer and its treatment result in adverse acute, long-term and latent side-effects, necessitating a focus on strategies to attenuate these side-effects and improve quality of life. This narrative review highlights MM patient preferences for exercise and/or diet interventions relative to complete and ongoing interventions to identify gaps and needs for future lifestyle interventions in MM patients aimed at improving MM survivorship care. Methods: This updated review was completed using a comprehensive search that was conducted using PubMed and ClinicalTrials.gov databases using keywords related to MM, exercise, physical activity, diet, nutrition and patient preferences. Studies involving adults diagnosed with MM were included. Results: Among published studies, there are five exercise interventions and four diet and nutrition observational studies. The importance of individualized exercise interventions tailored to MM patients' needs was emphasized. Supervised exercise interventions showed higher adherence and engagement compared to unsupervised interventions. Observational diet/nutrition studies demonstrated that decreased gut microbiome diversity post-transplant is linked to poorer outcomes. Additionally, nutritional status and dietary patterns, such as high-carbohydrate and plant-based diets, can significantly impact clinical outcomes in MM patients, including sustained minimal residual disease negativity. Current clinical trials are primarily focused on feasibility and adherence, with a limited emphasis on long-term outcomes. In ClinicalTrials.gov, there are six ongoing exercise interventions, with an additional seven that are completed with no published results, one suspended trial and one active but not recruiting. Additionally, there are two combined diet and exercise interventions that are currently recruiting, with one active but no longer recruiting. Among diet and nutrition ongoing trials, there are currently two actively recruiting, two completed with no primary paper published and one study that was withdrawn. Discussion: These findings underscore the need for more comprehensive, long-term and adequately powered studies on the impact of exercise and diet interventions in MM patients. Patient education and empowerment within these trials are crucial for enhancing engagement and adherence to these interventions.
Keywords: Multiple Myeloma, Exercise, Diet and nutrition, gut microbiome, patient preferences
Received: 23 Dec 2024; Accepted: 06 Mar 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Maslana, Skogerboe, Sborov and Coletta. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Adriana M Coletta, Health and Kinesiology, The University of Utah, Salt Lake City, United States
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Research integrity at Frontiers
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.