94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.
Find out more
Elaine Sang1,2*
Ryan Quinn3Michael A. Stawnychy1,2,4,5
Jiyoun Song1,2,4Karen B. Hirschman1,2,4
Sang Bin You1,2Katherine S. Pitcher1,2Nancy A. Hodgson1,2,4Patrik Garren4
Melissa O'Connor6Sungho Oh1,2
Kathryn H. Bowles1,2,4,7
- 1NewCourtland Center for Transitions and Health, School of Nursing, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States
- 2Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States
- 3Biostatistics Evaluation Collaboration Consultation Analysis (BECCA) Lab, School of Nursing, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States
- 4Department of Biobehavioral Health Sciences, School of Nursing, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States
- 5Penn Medicine Princeton Medical Center, Plainsboro Township, NJ, United States
- 6Gerontology Interest Group, M. Louise Fitzpatrick College of Nursing, Villanova University, Villanova, PA, United States
- 7Center for Home Care Policy & Research, VNS Health, New York, NY, United States
A Corrigendum on
By Sang E, Quinn R, Stawnychy MA, Song J, Hirschman KB, You SB, Pitcher KS, Hodgson NA, Garren P, O'Connor M, Oh S and Bowles KH (2024). Front. Health Serv. 4:1436375. doi: 10.3389/frhs.2024.1436375
In the published article, there was an error in Figure 1 as published. The authors mistakenly labeled Post-Acute Care as Hospital and vice versa. The corrected Figure 1 and its caption appear below.
Figure 1
Figure 1. Box plot showing distribution of ORIC, change commitment, and change efficacy scores separated by healthcare institution. This box plot was created via the ggplot2 package (38) in R (37).
The authors apologize for this error and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Keywords: sepsis survivors, transitions in care, organizational readiness for change, implementation science, healthcare system, home health care (HHC), transition-in-care protocols, hospital to home
Citation: Sang E, Quinn R, Stawnychy MA, Song J, Hirschman KB, You SB, Pitcher KS, Hodgson NA, Garren P, O'Connor M, Oh S and Bowles KH (2025) Corrigendum: Organizational readiness for change towards implementing a sepsis survivor hospital to home transition-in-care protocol. Front. Health Serv. 5:1552666. doi: 10.3389/frhs.2025.1552666
Received: 28 December 2024; Accepted: 13 January 2025;
Published: 24 January 2025.
Edited and Reviewed by: Nick Sevdalis, National University of Singapore, Singapore
Copyright: © 2025 Sang, Quinn, Stawnychy, Song, Hirschman, You, Pitcher, Hodgson, Garren, O'Connor, Oh and Bowles. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Elaine Sang, ZXNhbmdAdXBlbm4uZWR1