Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Health Serv.

Sec. Health Policy and Management

Volume 5 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/frhs.2025.1545864

This article is part of the Research Topic Health Services and the 4th Industrial Revolution View all 4 articles

The Effectiveness, Equity and Explainability of Health Service Resource Allocation -With Applications in Kidney Transplantation & Family Planning

Provisionally accepted
  • 1 Business School, Adolfo Ibáñez University, Santiago, Chile
  • 2 Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands
  • 3 Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Santiago Metropolitan Region (RM), Chile
  • 4 University of Minnesota Twin Cities, St. Paul, Minnesota, United States

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Halfway to the deadline of the 2030 agenda, humankind continues to face long-standing yet urgent policy and management challenges to address resource shortages and deliver on Sustainable Development Goal 3; health and well-being for all at all ages. More than half of the global population lacks access to essential health services. Additional resources are required and need to be allocated effectively and equitably.Resource allocation models, however, have struggled to accurately predict effects and to present optimal allocations, thus hampering effectiveness and equity improvement. The current advances in machine learning present opportunities to better predict allocation effects and to prescribe solutions that better balance effectiveness and equity. The most advanced of these models tend to be 'black box' models that lack explainability. This lack of explainability is problematic as it can clash with professional values and hide biases that negatively impact effectiveness and equity.Through a novel theoretical framework and two diverse case studies, this manuscript explores the trade-offs between effectiveness, equity, and explainability. The case studies consider family planning in a low income country and kidney allocation in a high income country. Both case studies find that the least explainable models hardly offer improvements in effectiveness and equity over explainable alternatives. As this may more widely apply to health resource allocation decisions, explainable analytics, which are more likely to be trusted and used, might better enable progress towards SDG3 for now. Future research on explainability, also in relation to equity and fairness of allocation policies, can help deliver on the promise of advanced predictive and prescriptive analytics.

    Keywords: Explainability, Equity, effectiveness, Kidney allocation, Family planning, healthcare analytics, Explainable AI

    Received: 16 Dec 2024; Accepted: 24 Mar 2025.

    Copyright: © 2025 Klundert, De Vries, Galarce, Valdes and Simon. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: Joris Van De Klundert, Business School, Adolfo Ibáñez University, Santiago, Chile

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

    Research integrity at Frontiers

    Man ultramarathon runner in the mountains he trains at sunset

    94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good

    Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.


    Find out more