
94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.
Find out more
ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Health Serv.
Sec. Health Policy and Management
Volume 5 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/frhs.2025.1523196
This article is part of the Research TopicPerspectives and Opinions in Health Services, Volume IIView all 7 articles
The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Social responsibility (SR) in health is of paramount importance in the development of health systems. It is, therefore, frequently presented as one of the solutions for healthcare improvement in most developed countries. In addition, SR in health has been the subject of several publications in the West and Asia. However, the absence of African data on this subject motivated us to carry out this study which aimed to assess SR of African public hospitals in terms of kidney disease management, and to explore the factors that influence it based on the perceptions of patients and nephrologists, and to suggest concrete solutions to improve it. Material and methods: Our study included participants, nephrologists and patients, of public hospitals in ten African countries. Two structured questionnaires were developed to measure the perception of patients and nephrologists regarding the hospital's performance based on four dimensions: Quality of service, pertinence of care, accessibility and professional ethics. Statistical analysis of the survey data included the Student's t-test, the Chi-square test, univariate and multivariate logistic regression methods on several levels, in order to examine the factors influencing the patients' and nephrologists' evaluation of hospital SR.Results: Only 26.95% of the included patients believed that their hospitals were socially responsible. In fact, the general conditions of the hospitals and the accessibility of care (waiting times, overall cost, unavailability of treatments) were generally perceived to be unsatisfactory. Also, patients generally believed that receiving treatment regardless of their ability to pay was not always possible.As for doctors, 60% of the participants considered their hospitals not socially responsible. They had raised, in addition to the social determinants of health, a number of factors hindering SR of African hospitals, such as the lack of health professionals and brain drain.Finally, nephrologists suggested solutions, mainly directed at hospital managers, encompassing the following three components: Recruitment and training of human resources, leadership and governance, as well as strengthening of infrastructures and logistics.Our study highlighted the crucial role of hospital governance and stakeholder involvement in improving SR and care delivery. Participants' perceptions and concerns inform health authorities about managing kidney disease in African hospitals.
Keywords: Africa, kidney disease, Public hospitals, social responsibility in health, Nephrology
Received: 05 Nov 2024; Accepted: 07 Apr 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Haddiya, Ramdani, Chtioui, Sidi Aly, Mah, Niang, Azzabi, Elmowafy, Mahamat, AKAGAH ADEMBA, Nzeyimana and Zalba. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Intissar Haddiya, Laboratory of Epidemiology, Clinical Research and Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy of Oujda, Mohammed First University, Oujda, Morocco
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Supplementary Material
Research integrity at Frontiers
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.