ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Glob. Womens Health
Sec. Infectious Diseases in Women
Volume 6 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fgwh.2025.1525168
This article is part of the Research TopicDisclosure in Sexual and Reproductive HealthView all 5 articles
Intimate Partner Violence among Pregnant Women Related to Disclosure of Sickle Cell Disease: Evidence from the Sickle Cell Belt of Central India
Provisionally accepted- 1Boston University, Boston, United States
- 2Lata Medical Research Foundation, Nagpur, Maharashtra, India
- 3University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, United States
- 4Sickle Cell Association of Nagpur, India, India
- 5Chobanian & Avedisian School of Medicine, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
- 6Institue of Medical Research, Durham, United States
- 7Boston Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Background. Intimate partner violence (IPV) negatively impacts pregnant women and their unborn children. Globally, an estimated 19%, 9%, and 6% of women experience psychological, physical, and sexual IPV, respectively, during pregnancy. These rates are higher for pregnant women living with a stigmatizing disease. We examined the effect of antenatal screening for sickle cell disease (SCD) using the sickle cell solubility test on the risk of IPV among pregnant women in the city of Nagpur in Maharashtra state of India. We hypothesized that a positive solubility test increases the risk of IPV via partner disclosure. Methods. We conducted a cohort study comparing IPV in 182 pregnant women, before (baseline) and after (endline) having a solubility test. Of the 182, 91 pregnant women with a positive solubility test and 91 with a negative solubility test. We used the 49-item Indian Family Violence and Control Scale (=0.88) to measure IPV, and estimated associations using binomial logistic regressions with robust standard errors. Results. Women with a positive solubility test were at least twice as likely to experience physical, sexual, or psychological IPV as pregnant women with a negative solubility test, even after adjusting for baseline differences between these two groups on common IPV risk factors including the lower level of education and scheduled-caste membership. Conclusion.Pregnant women who have a positive solubility test are at risk of IPV after they follow routine instructions to disclose their test result to their male partner, so that both partners can undergo further testing to determine the risk of SCD, sickle cell trait, or no risk of the baby having SCD. Implications.Across resource-poor settings, in areas with high prevalence of SCD, antenatal clinics are increasingly screening pregnant women for prevention of mother-to-child transmission of SCD, there is a need to integrate strategies for women to disclose sickle cell screening test results and prevention of IPV caused by male partners.
Keywords: intimate partner violence, Sickle Cell Disease, Sickle Cell Trait, Pregnacy, antenatal screening, stigma & discrimination, stress
Received: 08 Nov 2024; Accepted: 17 Apr 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Halim, Patel, Turan, Shrikhande, Kavanagh, Drainoni, Henderson, Murali, Agarwal and Hibberd. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Nafisa Halim, Boston University, Boston, United States
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.