
95% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.
Find out more
ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Glob. Womens Health
Sec. Sex and Gender Differences in Disease
Volume 6 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fgwh.2025.1516925
The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Background: Female genital mutilation (FGM) is a widely practiced custom in Ethiopia. The women's knowledge and attitudes toward it and influencing factors have not been explored in Ethiopia, particularly in the rural districts. Hence, this study assessed women's knowledge and attitudes toward female genital mutilation and associated factors in Diguna Fango, a rural district in southern Ethiopia.This study adopted a community-based cross-sectional study design using a sequential mixed-method explanatory approach. It was conducted from May 20, 2023, to June 30, 2023, among 821 participants selected using a multistage sampling technique. The quantitative data were collected using a structured interviewer-administered questionnaire. A key informant interview was conducted to collect the qualitative data. A binary logistic regression analysis was conducted to identify factors associated with the outcome variables. A p-value < 0.05 at a 95% CI was used to declare statistical significance.Results: Of the 821 participants included in the study, 53.2% had good knowledge and 46% had an unfavorable attitudes towards female genital mutilation, respectively. Monthly income (AOR = 1.61; 95% CI: 1.39-2.95) and partners' educational status (AOR = 2.17; 95% CI: 1.37-4.89) were significantly associated with knowledge, whereas being a government employee (AOR = 2.12; 95% CI = 1.45-3.11) and private employee (AOR = 3.99; 95% CI = 1.63-6.77), having student partners (AOR = 2.64; 95% CI = 1.40-4.95), circumcision history (AOR = 2.58; 95% CI = 1.41-4.71), and knowledge (AOR = 1.48; 95% CI = 1.11-1.98) were shown to be associated with attitude towards female genital mutilation. Moreover, sociocultural drivers, awareness of adverse health effects, religious attributes, and sexuality concerns were explored as attributes of knowledge and attitudes toward female genital mutilation/cutting.Compared to previous similar local and global findings, lower levels of knowledge and higher levels of support for female genital mutilation were observed in the area. Sociocultural, religious, and sexual concerns influence knowledge and attitudes toward female genital mutilation.Therefore, the concerned bodies need to mobilize the community and work closely with the health development armies and religious institutions to boost women's knowledge and change favorable attitudes towards FGM/C.
Keywords: knowledge, Attitude, Female genital mutilation, Diguna Fango, Ethiopia
Received: 25 Oct 2024; Accepted: 31 Mar 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Gezimu, Beyene, Demissie and Sewmehone. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Wubishet Gezimu, Department of Nursing, College of Health Sciences, Mettu University, Mettu, Ethiopia
Tamirat Beyene, School of Midwifery, College of Health Sciences and Medicine, Wolaita Sodo University, Sodo, Ethiopia
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Research integrity at Frontiers
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.