
94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.
Find out more
ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Glob. Womens Health
Sec. Sex and Gender Differences in Disease
Volume 6 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fgwh.2025.1441242
The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Background: Caregiver barriers to accessing immunizations are a key factor influencing childhood vaccination. In preparation for the rollout of the second dose measles-containing vaccine (MCV2) in Uganda in October 2022, we aimed to identify possible barriers specific to female caregivers that could influence MCV2 implementation and suggest initiatives to facilitate MCV2 uptake.In September 2022, we conducted a rapid community assessment in 18 districts in Uganda. We conducted key informant interviews with 17 district health managers and 18 community leaders, and 18 focus group discussions, one in each district, with caregivers of immunization-eligible children. We conducted a rapid analysis based of debriefing notes and in-depth thematic analysis of translated transcripts. Data were analyzed using NVivo version 12, wherein we used the framework analysis approach to define and structure codes deductively and inductively to identify themes. We mapped themes onto the socio-ecological model to examine factors that influence immunization at individual, household, community, and health system level.We found that individual, household, and health system factors influenced childhood vaccination and could be potential barriers to MCV2 uptake. At the individual level, female caregiver's heavy workload and limited decision-making power hindered their ability to take children for vaccination, with mothers often relying on fathers and depended on men for transport costs to immunization centers. At the household level, participants mothers were primarily responsible for taking children to vaccination centers, while fathers were less involved in child health. Health workers often gave preferential treatment to fathers over mothers at the health facility when they brought the child in for vaccination Participants suggested that approaches that ensure the involvement of fathers, other family members and mother-to-mother peer groups could address the barriers specific to female caregivers.Role differentiation between female and male caregivers affect childhood vaccination practices within communities in Uganda, potentially exacerbating challenges in accessing vaccines for children in the second year of life.Integrating interventions responsive to specific caregiver needs and that improve family participation may improve childhood vaccination in Uganda.
Keywords: caregiver barriers, social ecological, life course, Measles vaccination, Second year of life, demand, Uganda
Received: 30 May 2024; Accepted: 24 Mar 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Twimukye, Ryan, Najjuma, Wibabara, Nanyondo, Nakato, Nabaggala, Sugerman, Kadobera, Atugonza, Kamulegeya, Magoola, Beyagira, Lamorde, Ario, Driwale and Kulkarni. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Adelline Twimukye, Institute of Infectious Diseases, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda
Flavia Vivian Najjuma, Institute of Infectious Diseases, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Research integrity at Frontiers
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.