Skip to main content

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW article

Front. Glob. Womens Health
Sec. Maternal Health
Volume 6 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fgwh.2025.1339685

Utilization of partograph and associated factors among obstetric care givers in Ethiopia: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Provisionally accepted
  • 1 Department of Midwifery, College of Health Science, Woldia University, Woldia, Ethiopia
  • 2 nursing, College of Health Science, Woldia University, Woldia, Amhara, Ethiopia
  • 3 Department of Medical Laboratory Science, College of Health Sciences, Woldia University, Woldia, Ethiopia
  • 4 Department of Pediatrics and Child Health, College of Health Science, Woldia University, Woldia, Ethiopia
  • 5 Department of Nursing, College of Health Science, Woldia University, Woldia, Ethiopia

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Introduction: Using the partograph effectively is crucial in identifying abnormal labor (prolonged and obstructed labor) and taking appropriate actions. However, in Ethiopia, the prevalence of obstructed labor is much higher at 11.8% and contributes to 14.4% of total maternal deaths due to underutilization of the partograph by obstetric caregivers. Although a previous systematic review and meta-analysis had been conducted, they were not representative on a national level as they included a limited number of studies and did not evaluate the current prevalence of partograph utilization beyond July 2019. Since then, inconsistent studies have assessed the proportion of partograph utilization and its associated factors. Therefore, the aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis is was to estimate the pooled prevalence of partograph utilization and its associated factors in Ethiopia Method: Comprehensive literature searches were conducted in PubMed, Google Scholar, and HINARI from September 1, 2013, to October 23, 2023. A random effect model was used to estimate pooled prevalence and adjusted odds ratio. Stata (version 11.0) was used to analyze the data. Cochrane I squared statistics were computed to assess heterogeneity among studies. A sub-group analysis was done based on study region to minimize underling heterogeneity. Funnel plot and Eggers test were done to assess publication bias.Result: Overall, six hundred sixty one articles were retrieved, and finally, twenty-three studies were included in this systematic review, including 7649 participants. The pooled prevalence of partograph utilization was 54.92% (95% ). Subgroup analysis showed that utilization of partograph was highest in Diredaw region and lowest in the Amhara region. Factors such as training about partograph (AOR = 3.63, 95% CI: 2.57-5.25), good knowledge about partograph (AOR = 2.63, 95% CI: 1.62-4.26), a favorable attitude towards partograph (AOR = 1.95, 95% CI:1.35-2.82), availability of partograph (AOR = 3.89, 95% CI: 2.24-6.61) and being midwife in profession (AOR = 3.09, 95% CI: 1.78-5.25) were significantly associated with partograph utilization.The pooled prevalence of partograph utilization in Ethiopia was low. Trained about partograph, good knowledge about partograph, favorable attitude towards partograph, partograph availability in the health facility, and being midwife in profession were significantly associated with partograph utilization.

    Keywords: Partograph, Partograph utilization, Systematic review, systematic review and meta-analysis, Ethiopia

    Received: 21 Feb 2024; Accepted: 02 Jan 2025.

    Copyright: © 2025 Ayele, lake, Yilak, Gesesse, Abate, Zemariam and Tilahun. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: Mulat Ayele, Department of Midwifery, College of Health Science, Woldia University, Woldia, Ethiopia

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.