Guy-Lucien Whembolua
Daudet Ilunga Tshiswaka
Adi Chereni3,4
- 1Department of Africana Studies, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, United States
- 2Department of Public Health, University of West Florida, Pensacola, FL, United States
- 3School of Social Sciences and Professions, London Metropolitan University, London, United Kingdom
- 4Center for Academic Technologies, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg, South Africa
Editorial on the Research Topic
Influence of intimate partner violence and male partner involvement in maternity care in low-and-middle income countries
In this issue of Frontiers in Global Women's Health, we present papers that focus on the influence of Intimate Partner Violence (IPV) and male partner involvement in maternity care in low-and-middle income countries.
Since the mid-1990s, attention has increasingly shifted toward investigating and promoting men's involvement in maternal and child health (1). Numerous studies have highlighted the positive impact of male partner's involvement on maternal health care services. Specifically, male partner involvement in maternal care reduces risk of HIV transmission to infants of HIV-positive mothers (2), improves adherence to recommended infant feeding practices (3), and increases uptake of maternal health services such as antenatal care (4). This involvement is also linked to reduce risks of preterm births, low birth weight, fetal growth restrictions, and infant mortality (5–7). Conversely, extensive research has shown that IPV negatively influences maternal health outcomes, with affected women facing higher rates of physical trauma, suicidal ideation, and increased visits to emergency rooms (8–13).
Globally, women's utilization of maternity health care services has been shown to improve women's health outcomes. In low-and-middle income countries from which the articles in this issue draw, effective use of maternal health services has been reported to reduce maternal mortality and both short- and long-term morbidity, with positive impacts on women's overall health and well-being during pregnancy, postpartum, and beyond (14). More specifically, this special issue highlights various aspects of male partner involvement in women's maternity care, revealing that, in low-and middle-income countries, men also play a significant role in encouraging greater use of maternity care services (15), or, conversely, they prevent maternity care access due to IPV, ultimately impacting women's health outcomes.
A first thread connecting the articles in this issue is the role of partner involvement and factors influencing their engagement in women's health care use. Through a community cross-sectional study in Ethiopia, Aman et al. studied husbands' intent to support the use of maternity waiting home. They found that husbands who adhered to specific cultural norms and felt in control of barriers were more likely to plan on supporting their partner's use of a maternity waiting home. Similarly, in Nigeria, Akinyemi and Ibrahim conducted a mixed-methods study to examine the predictors of men's involvement in pregnancy care. Overall, they found that unmarried men were significantly less likely to be involved in pregnancy care compared to their married counterparts. Similarly, men with negative perceptions toward supporting their partners in antenatal visits had lower odds of involvement in pregnancy care than those with positive perceptions.
Conversely, as illustrated in our second group of articles, IPV is associated with a lower likelihood of using maternity care (16). To study this issue, Adetutu et al. further explored the influence of IPV and male involvement in the utilization of maternal care services by analyzing data from the 2018 Nigeria Demographic and Health Survey (NDHS). Interestingly, they found that women who experienced sexual violence were more likely to use heath facility for antenatal care. In Kenya, a country that has an estimated lifetime prevalence of IPV in women to 38% (17), Schellhammer et al. analyzed household surveys conducted in six wards of Migori County, focusing on identifying factors associated with IPV and assessing its effects on maternal care, based on responses from female participants. They found that having experienced IPV was negatively associated with attending at least four antenatal care visits during the most recent pregnancy and with having a skilled birth attendant.
Thirdly, IPV has a strong negative impact on maternal and infant health outcomes. More specifically, in Brazil, Blumrich et al. examined data from two birth cohorts in two distinct cities collected during pregnancy and at the beginning of the second year of life. They reported an association of violence during pregnancy with infant morbidity in a poorer socioeconomic setting. Meanwhile, in their work in Ghana, Okoror et al. focused on financial abuse experienced by nursing mothers from their significant others. Through thematic analysis, they highlight that nursing mothers who reported lack of financial support perceive it as hinderance to their efforts to care for their children.
Lastly, Alemu et al. described the factors contributing to IPV among women during the recent COVID-19 pandemic. Their review of the literature indicated that having a partner who has either a history of alcohol use or no formal education, women who had lost income during COVID-19, and household decisions made by the husband alone were significant factors for intimate partner violence during the COVID-19 pandemic.
In summary, these papers collectively highlight the need for a better understanding of the different dimensions linked to male involvement in maternity and infant care particularly in low-and-middle income countries. While enhancing men's involvement in maternity and infant care may require community-based awareness, future interventions should: (1) address men's socio-cultural beliefs to improve their participation, (2) address social and gender norms that perpetuate IPV, (3) provide women who are victims of violence with comprehensive healthcare. These actionable recommendations presented by the authors may prove to be difficult to implement but offer a pathway toward social justice for activists and health practitioners in resource limited environments.
Author contributions
G-LW: Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. DI: Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. AC: Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
1. UNPF. Male Involvement in Reproductive Health, Including Family Planning and Sexual Health. New York: United Nations Population Fund (1995).
2. Farquhar C, Kiarie JN, Richardson BA, Kabura MN, John FN, Nduati RW, et al. Antenatal couple counseling increases uptake of interventions to prevent HIV-1 transmission. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. (2004) 37(5):1620–6. doi: 10.1097/00126334-200412150-00016
3. Deressa W, Seme A, Asefa A, Teshome G, Enqusellassie F. Utilization of PMTCT services and associated factors among pregnant women attending antenatal clinics in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. BMC Pregnancy Childb. (2014) 14:328. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-14-328
4. Aarnio P, Olsson P, Chimbiri A, Kulmala T. Male involvement in antenatal HIV counseling and testing: exploring men’s perceptions in rural Malawi. AIDS Care. (2009) 21(12):1537–46. doi: 10.1080/09540120902903719
5. Alio AP, Salihu HM, Kornosky JL, Richman AM, Marty PJ. Feto-infant health and survival: does paternal involvement matter? Matern Child Health J. (2010) 14:931–7. doi: 10.1007/s10995-009-0531-9
6. Alio AP, Mbah AK, Kornosky JL, Wathington D, Marty PJ, Salihu HM. Assessing the impact of paternal involvement on racial/ethnic disparities in infant mortality rates. J Community Health. (2011) 36:63–8. doi: 10.1007/s10900-010-9280-3
7. Ghosh JKC, Wilhelm MH, Dunkel-Schetter C, Lombardi CA, Ritz BR. Paternal support and preterm birth, and the moderation of effects of chronic stress. Arch Womens Ment Health. (2010) 13:327–38. doi: 10.1007/s00737-009-0135-9
8. Bonomi AE, Anderson ML, Rivara FP, Thompson RS. Health care utilization and costs associated with physical and nonphysical-only intimate partner violence. Health Serv Res. (2009) 44(3):1052–67. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2009.00955.x
9. Rivara FP, Anderson ML, Fishman P, Bonomi AE, Reid RJ, Carrell D, et al. Healthcare utilization and costs for women with a history of intimate partner violence. Am J Prev Med. (2007) 32:89–96. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2006.10.001
10. Devries KM, Mak JY, Bacchus LJ, Child JC, Falder G, Petzold M, et al. Intimate partner violence and incident depressive symptoms and suicide attempts: a systematic review of longitudinal studies. PLoS Med. (2013) 10:e1001439. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001439
11. Machtinger EL, Haberer JE, Wilson TC, Weiss DS. Recent trauma is associated with antiretroviral failure and HIV transmission risk behavior among HIV-positive women and female-identified transgenders. AIDS Behav. (2012) 16(8):2160–70. doi: 10.1007/s10461-012-0158-5
12. Stockman JK, Hayashi H, Campbell JC. Intimate partner violence and its health impact on disproportionately affected populations, including minorities and impoverished groups. J Womens Health. (2015) 24(1):62–79. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2014.4879
13. Campbell JC. Health consequences of intimate partner violence. Lancet. (2002) 359(9314):1331–6. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)08336-8
14. Say L, Raine R. A systematic review of inequalities in the use of maternal health care in developing countries: examining the scale of the problem and the importance of context. Bull W H O. (2007) 85(10):812–9. doi: 10.2471/BLT.06.035659
15. Yargawa J, Leonardi-Bee J. Male involvement and maternal health outcomes: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Epidemiol Community Health. (2015) 69(6):604–12. doi: 10.1136/jech-2014-204784
16. Musa A, Chojenta C, Geleto A, Loxton D. The associations between intimate partner violence and maternal health care service utilization: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Womens Health. (2019) 19:1–14. doi: 10.1186/s12905-019-0735-0
17. World Health Organization. Violence against Women Prevalence Estimates, 2018—WHO African Region. (2018). Available online at: https://www.who.int/publications-detail-redirect/WHO-SRH-21.7 (accessed May 20, 2022).
Keywords: maternity care, intimate partner violence, low-and-middle income countries, male partner, influence
Citation: Whembolua G-L, Ilunga Tshiswaka D and Chereni A (2024) Editorial: Influence of intimate partner violence and male partner involvement in maternity care in low-and-middle income countries. Front. Glob. Womens Health 5:1513159. doi: 10.3389/fgwh.2024.1513159
Received: 17 October 2024; Accepted: 5 November 2024;
Published: 18 November 2024.
Edited and Reviewed by: Tabassum Firoz, Yale New Haven Health System, United States
Copyright: © 2024 Whembolua, Ilunga Tshiswaka and Chereni. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Guy-Lucien Whembolua, whembogn@uc.edu