ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Genet.

Sec. Computational Genomics

Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fgene.2025.1586880

This article is part of the Research TopicGenetic Horizons: Exploring Genetic Biomarkers in Therapy and Evolution with the Aid of Artificial IntelligenceView all 3 articles

Key Gene Screening and Diagnostic Model Establishment for Acute Type A Aortic Dissection

Provisionally accepted
Yue  PanYue PanZhiming  YuZhiming YuXiaoyu  QianXiaoyu QianXuesong  ZhangXuesong ZhangQun  XueQun Xue*Weizhang  XiaoWeizhang Xiao*
  • Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University, Nantong, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Background: Aortic dissection, particularly acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD), is a lifethreatening cardiovascular emergency with alarmingly high mortality rates globally. Despite advancements in imaging techniques like computed tomography angiography (CTA), delayed diagnosis and incomplete understanding of molecular mechanisms persist, contributing to poor outcomes. Recent studies highlight the role of immune dysregulation, vascular smooth muscle cell (VSMC) apoptosis, and metabolic-epigenetic interactions in AD pathogenesis, underscoring the need for novel biomarkers and therapeutic targets.Objective: This study aims to identify critical genes and molecular pathways associated with ATAAD, develop a multi-omics diagnostic model, and evaluate potential therapeutic interventions to improve clinical outcomes.Transcriptome datasets from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database were analyzed using differential expression analysis, weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA), and machine learning algorithms (SVM, Random Forest, LASSO regression). Functional enrichment and immunoinfiltration analyses were performed to explore biological pathways and immune cell interactions. External dataset validation and PCR testing of clinical samples (n = 9) were conducted to confirm gene expression differences. A nomogram diagnostic model was constructed and evaluated for predictive accuracy.Results: Six core genes were identified: Ccl2, Cdh8, Hk2, Tph1, Npy1r, and Slc24a4, with four (Ccl2, Hk2, Tph1, and Npy1r) showing significant differential expression in clinical validation. Functional enrichment revealed associations with immune cell migration, vascular development regulation, extracellular matrix pathways, and the PI3K-Akt signaling pathway. Immunoinfiltration analysis demonstrated increased infiltration of B cell precursors, resting NK cells, and M2 macrophages in ATAAD tissues, negatively correlating with core gene expression. The nomogram model exhibited high diagnostic precision (AUC=0.935, 95% CI: 0.908-0.963), supported by calibration and decision curve analyses.This study identifies key molecular markers and pathways in ATAAD pathogenesis, emphasizing the role of immune dysregulation and extracellular matrix remodeling. The multi-omics diagnostic model provides a novel tool for early screening, potentially reducing mortality through timely intervention. These findings advance the understanding of aortic dissection mechanisms and offer actionable targets for future research and clinical applications.

Keywords: bioinformatics, Diagnostic model, Drug prediction, machine learning, Type a aortic dissection

Received: 04 Mar 2025; Accepted: 01 Apr 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Pan, Yu, Qian, Zhang, Xue and Xiao. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence:
Qun Xue, Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University, Nantong, China
Weizhang Xiao, Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University, Nantong, China

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Research integrity at Frontiers

94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good

Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.


Find out more