PERSPECTIVE article

Front. Genet.

Sec. ELSI in Science and Genetics

Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fgene.2025.1566291

This article is part of the Research TopicInsights in ELSI in Science and Genetics 2024-2025View all articles

Emerging and Evolving Values in the Changing Landscape of Genomics

Provisionally accepted
  • 1KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
  • 2Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands
  • 3Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
  • 4CNRS, Toulouse, France
  • 5Université de Toulouse, Toulouse, Midi-Pyrénées, France
  • 6Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom
  • 7Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands
  • 8Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
  • 9University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands, Netherlands
  • 10McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
  • 11Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Baden-Württemberg, Germany
  • 12University of the Basque Country, Bilbao, Basque Country, Spain
  • 13University of Hasselt, Hasselt, Limburg, Belgium
  • 14University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
  • 15University of Leicester, Leicester, East Midlands, United Kingdom

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Recent advances in human genomics have transformed the field, leading to increased integration of genomics into mainstream clinical care, broadening the potential of personalized medicine, and expanding data generation and sharing. From the outset, genetics and genomics have given rise to a broad array of ethical concerns, including issues related to discrimination and stigmatization, informed consent, and reporting requirements of secondary findings. Ethics considerations and trends have evolved in parallel with the rapid technological progress in genomics. Like other transformative technologies, genomic innovations are governed by a combination of laws and ethics guidelines to ensure their responsible implementation. In this manuscript, we propose three key values that are crucial and timely to address now: equity, collective responsibility in the mainstreaming of genomics, and, sustainability. Equity warrants renewed attention due to its critical role in ensuring fair access to genomic innovations and promoting equality within society at large. Collective responsibility in the mainstreaming of genomics is equally important, especially as genomics becomes more broadly available in healthcare and to the broader public, thereby emphasizing shared accountability in its ethical application. Finally, in a context of scarcity of financial, personnel and environmental resources, sustainability needs to be considered to ensure the future of responsible governance in research and healthcare. The goal is to ensure equal access to genomic innovations, promote the ethically responsible use of genomic technologies, and support the long-term sustainability of the field.

Keywords: Genetics, Genomics, Ethics, ELSI, Equity, Collective responsibility, sustainability

Received: 24 Jan 2025; Accepted: 14 Apr 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Siermann, Mohan, Bunnik, Cambon-Thomsen, Chadwick, Cornel, Van Delden, Joly, Molnár- Gábor, Nicolás Jiménez, Pinxten, Rial-Sebbag, Shabani, Van Steijvoort, Wallace, Zawati, Knoppers and Borry. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Maria Siermann, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Research integrity at Frontiers

94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good

Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.


Find out more