Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Genet.
Sec. Applied Genetic Epidemiology
Volume 15 - 2024 | doi: 10.3389/fgene.2024.1485306

Implementation of a national rapid prenatal exome sequencing service in England: Evaluation of service outcomes and factors associated with regional variation

Provisionally accepted
Rema Ramakrishnan Rema Ramakrishnan 1Corinne Mallinson Corinne Mallinson 2Steven Hardy Steven Hardy 2*Jennifer Broughan Jennifer Broughan 2*Maisie Blythe Maisie Blythe 2*Gabriella Melis Gabriella Melis 2*Catherine Franklin Catherine Franklin 2*Melissa Hill Melissa Hill 3*Rhiannon Mellis Rhiannon Mellis 3*Wing H. Wu Wing H. Wu 3*Stephanie Allen Stephanie Allen 4*Lyn S. Chitty Lyn S. Chitty 3*Marian Knight Marian Knight 1*
  • 1 National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, Nuffield Department of Population Health, Medical Sciences Division, University of Oxford, Oxford, England, United Kingdom
  • 2 NHS England, London, England, United Kingdom
  • 3 Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
  • 4 Birmingham Women's and Children's Hospital, Birmingham, United Kingdom

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Prenatal exome sequencing(pES) can enhance genetic diagnosis of fetuses with structural anomalies and has recently been introduced as a national service in England. We aimed to examine service outcomes such as diagnostic yield (definite final diagnosis), referral rate, and sources of referral, and explore variation in outcomes of pES by individual or service level factors between 01 October 2021 and 30 June 2022.pES testing results from the NHS laboratories performing testing were linked to National Congenital Anomaly and Rare Disease Registration Service data and the Maternity Services Data Set and descriptive statistics computed.There were 475,089 women who gave birth in England during the study period. The referral rate for pES was 8.6(95% CI 7.8, 9.4)per 10,000 maternities. About 59% of those referred proceeded with pES testing and 35% of women who proceeded received a definite final diagnosis with a median turnaround time of 15 days. Of those who had pES testing,64.6% had a live birth,25.3% underwent termination of pregnancy(median gestational age at termination:26 weeks),and 9.3% had a stillbirth. Among the 85 women who had a definite final diagnosis, 40% had a termination of pregnancy, 18% had a stillbirth, and 42% had a live birth. The corresponding figures among women without a definite final diagnosis were 18%, 5%, and 78%, respectively. Among women who had a termination of pregnancy, the median gestational age at final report was 24.9weeks and 26.2weeks at termination. Variation observed in some of the characteristics and outcomes between regional services were limited by small sample size.This study showed that of those referred, pES testing provided a diagnosis for one in three pregnancies with a fetal anomaly across England during the study period when other tests had been non-informative. Women who opted for a termination of pregnancy underwent the procedure at relatively late gestations. Earlier referral for pES, streamlining pathways, and faster turnaround times may help results to be available at an earlier gestation to allow families more time to make decisions around continuing or terminating their pregnancy. The variation in service outcomes between regional services needs to be investigated further to understand the reasons for these differences.

    Keywords: prenatal, exome sequencing, Structural defects, genetic diagnosis, implementation

    Received: 23 Aug 2024; Accepted: 17 Oct 2024.

    Copyright: © 2024 Ramakrishnan, Mallinson, Hardy, Broughan, Blythe, Melis, Franklin, Hill, Mellis, Wu, Allen, Chitty and Knight. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence:
    Steven Hardy, NHS England, London, WF3 1WE, England, United Kingdom
    Jennifer Broughan, NHS England, London, WF3 1WE, England, United Kingdom
    Maisie Blythe, NHS England, London, WF3 1WE, England, United Kingdom
    Gabriella Melis, NHS England, London, WF3 1WE, England, United Kingdom
    Catherine Franklin, NHS England, London, WF3 1WE, England, United Kingdom
    Melissa Hill, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, WC1N 3JH, United Kingdom
    Rhiannon Mellis, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, WC1N 3JH, United Kingdom
    Wing H. Wu, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, WC1N 3JH, United Kingdom
    Stephanie Allen, Birmingham Women's and Children's Hospital, Birmingham, United Kingdom
    Lyn S. Chitty, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, WC1N 3JH, United Kingdom
    Marian Knight, National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, Nuffield Department of Population Health, Medical Sciences Division, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX3 7LF, England, United Kingdom

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.