Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Genet.
Sec. Statistical Genetics and Methodology
Volume 15 - 2024 | doi: 10.3389/fgene.2024.1462855

A Comparison of Design Algorithms for Choosing the Training Population in Genomic Models Genomic Experiments

Provisionally accepted
  • Johannes Kepler University of Linz, Linz, Austria

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    In contemporary breeding programs, typically genomic best linear unbiased prediction (gBLUP) models are employed to drive decisions on artificial selection. Experiments are performed to obtain responses on the units in the breeding program. Due to restrictions on the size of the experiment, an efficient experimental design must usually be found in order to optimize the training population. Classical exchange-type algorithms from optimal design theory can be employed for this purpose. This article suggests several variants for the gBLUP model and compares them to brute-force approaches from the genomics literature for various design criteria. Particular emphasis is placed on evaluating the computational runtime of algorithms along with their respective efficiencies over different sample sizes.

    Keywords: GBLUP, genomic selection, optimal design, Training Population Selection, Design of Experiment - DoE

    Received: 10 Jul 2024; Accepted: 20 Dec 2024.

    Copyright: © 2024 Stadler, G. Müller and Futschik. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: Werner G. Müller, Johannes Kepler University of Linz, Linz, Austria

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.