Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Genet.
Sec. Genomics of Plants and the Phytoecosystem
Volume 15 - 2024 | doi: 10.3389/fgene.2024.1458656
This article is part of the Research Topic Multi-omics and molecular biology studies on abiotic stress in crops View all 5 articles

Metabolomics combined with transcriptomics and physiology reveals the regulatory responses of soybean plants to drought stress

Provisionally accepted
Liwei Wang Liwei Wang 1,2Peijin He Peijin He 1Mengmeng Hui Mengmeng Hui 1Hainan Li Hainan Li 3Anni Sun Anni Sun 4Hong Yin Hong Yin 1,2Xining Gao Xining Gao 1,2*
  • 1 College of Agronomy, Shenyang Agricultural University, Shenyang, Liaoning Province, China
  • 2 Liaoning Key Laboratory of Agrometeorological Disasters, Shenyang, Liaoning Province, China
  • 3 Liaoyang Meteorological Bureau,, Liaoyang, China
  • 4 Anshan Meteorological Bureau, ,Anshan, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Drought, a prevalent environmental stressor, has had significant consequences on soybean (Glycine max L.), notably impeding its growth and production. Therefore, it is crucial to gain insight into the regulatory responses of soybean plants exposed to drought stress during soybean flowering in the field. In this study, the cultivar 'Liaodou 15' was performed light drought (LD, 24.3% soil moisture content), moderate drought (MD, 20.6% soil moisture content) and severe drought (SD, 16.9% soil moisture content) treatments at flowering stages of soybean and then rehydrated (30% soil moisture content) until harvest. The yield-related indicators were measured and revealed that MD and SD treatments significantly reduced 6.3% and 10.8% of the 100-grain weight. Soybean plants subjected to three drought stresses showed that net photosynthetic rates were 20.8%, 51.5% and 71.8% lower in LD, MD and SD than that of CK. The WUE increased by 31.8%, 31.5% and 18.8% under three drought stress treatments compared to CK. In addition, proline content was 25.94%, 41.01% and 65.43% greater than that of CK under three drought stress treatments. The trend of the MDA content was consistent with that of the proline content. SOD activity was significantly increasing by 10.86%, 46.73% and 14.54% under three drought stress treatments. The activity of CAT in the SD treatment increased by 49.28%. All the indices recovered after rehydration. Furthermore, 54,78 and 51 different expressed metabolomics (DEMs) were identified in the LDCK/LD, MDCK/MD and SDCK/SD groups, respectively. There were 1211, 1265 and 1288 different expressed genes (DEGs) were upregulated and 1003, 1819 and 1747 DEGs were downregulated. Finally, combined transcriptomic and metabolomic analysis suggested that 437 DEGs and 24 DEMs of LDCK/LD group, 741 DEGs and 35 DEMs of MDCK/MD group, 633 DEGs and 23 DEMs of SDCK/SD group, were highly positively correlated in soybean plants under drought stress. Drought stress induced the expression of the PAO1, PAO4, PAO5 and P5CS genes to promote the accumulation of spermidine and proline. Our study elucidates the responses of drought-stressed soybean plants in the field and provides a genetic basis for the breeding of drought-tolerant soybean plants.

    Keywords: Soybean, Drought stress, Metabolomics, Transcriptomics, Proline, Spermidine

    Received: 02 Jul 2024; Accepted: 16 Oct 2024.

    Copyright: © 2024 Wang, He, Hui, Li, Sun, Yin and Gao. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: Xining Gao, College of Agronomy, Shenyang Agricultural University, Shenyang, 110161, Liaoning Province, China

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.