AUTHOR=Napolitano Constanza , Clavijo Cristhian , Rojas-Bonzi Viviana , Miño Carolina I. , González-Maya José F. , Bou Nadia , Giraldo Alan , Martino Angela , Miyaki Cristina Yumi , Aguirre Luis F. , Cosacov Andrea , Milián-García Yoamel , Prosdocimi Laura , Ramírez-Bravo O. Eric , Tovar Luis Antonio , Velez-Zuazo Ximena , Barrios Mercedes , Herrera-Fernández Bernal , Montiel-Villalobos María G. , Oliveira-Miranda María A. , Pool Monique , Santos-Murgas Alonso , Segovia-Salcedo Maria Claudia , Cecchi Felipe , Dans Armando J. , Dilchand Nelanie , Lima Sergio M. Q. , Novas María Caridad , Pelz-Serrano Karla , Pougy Nina , Rodríguez Iris , van der Meer Liesbeth , Zapata-Ríos Galo
TITLE=Understanding the conservation-genetics gap in Latin America: challenges and opportunities to integrate genetics into conservation practices
JOURNAL=Frontiers in Genetics
VOLUME=15
YEAR=2024
URL=https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/genetics/articles/10.3389/fgene.2024.1425531
DOI=10.3389/fgene.2024.1425531
ISSN=1664-8021
ABSTRACT=Introduction: Integrating genetic data into conservation management decisions is a challenging task that requires strong partnerships between researchers and managers. Conservation in Latin America is of crucial relevance worldwide given the high biodiversity levels and the presence of hotspots in this region.
Methods: We conducted a survey across Latin America to identify gaps and opportunities between genetic researchers and conservation managers. We aimed to better understand conservation managers’ points of view and how genetic research could help conservation practitioners to achieve their goals, by implementing genetic assessments that could effectively inform conservation practices. We distributed an online survey via four regional collaborating organizations and 32 focal points based in 20 Latin American countries. The target respondents were conservation managers of species or areas in Latin America.
Results: We collected a total of 468 answered questionnaires from 21 Latin American countries. Most respondents (44%) were from an academic or research institution while non-academics were mainly from non-governmental institutions (30%) and government agencies (25%). Most respondents (65%) have performed or used genetic assessments in their managed area or species, either alone, in partnership, contracting someone else or using published results. For the majority of this group, the genetic results were relevant to their conservation management goals, helping to inform management decisions. Respondents that had not performed genetic assessments (35%) were mainly from the non-academic group, and their main barriers were limited access to funds, genetic lab facilities, and trained personnel to design studies and conduct lab work.
Discussion: From the findings, we describe the current situation and provide a general diagnosis of the conservation-genetics gap in Latin America. We describe the gender gap, academic-practitioner co-development of conservation questions and projects, and the nationality and residency of Latin American conservation managers in relation to the countries where they work. We discuss opportunities to co-create research questions and co-develop studies based on conservation practitioners’ needs. We offer recommendations for overcoming barriers to integrate genetic information into conservation actions, and advance agendas that fit the needs and realities of the highly heterogeneous, biodiverse and challenging Latin American region.