AUTHOR=Rezapour Mostafa , Walker Stephen J. , Ornelles David A. , Niazi Muhammad Khalid Khan , McNutt Patrick M. , Atala Anthony , Gurcan Metin Nafi TITLE=A comparative analysis of RNA-Seq and NanoString technologies in deciphering viral infection response in upper airway lung organoids JOURNAL=Frontiers in Genetics VOLUME=15 YEAR=2024 URL=https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/genetics/articles/10.3389/fgene.2024.1327984 DOI=10.3389/fgene.2024.1327984 ISSN=1664-8021 ABSTRACT=

In this study, we delved into the comparative analysis of gene expression data across RNA-Seq and NanoString platforms. While RNA-Seq covered 19,671 genes and NanoString targeted 773 genes associated with immune responses to viruses, our primary focus was on the 754 genes found in both platforms. Our experiment involved 16 different infection conditions, with samples derived from 3D airway organ-tissue equivalents subjected to three virus types, influenza A virus (IAV), human metapneumovirus (MPV), and parainfluenza virus 3 (PIV3). Post-infection measurements, after UV (inactive virus) and Non-UV (active virus) treatments, were recorded at 24-h and 72-h intervals. Including untreated and Mock-infected OTEs as control groups enabled differentiating changes induced by the virus from those arising due to procedural elements. Through a series of methodological approaches (including Spearman correlation, Distance correlation, Bland-Altman analysis, Generalized Linear Models Huber regression, the Magnitude-Altitude Score (MAS) algorithm and Gene Ontology analysis) the study meticulously contrasted RNA-Seq and NanoString datasets. The Magnitude-Altitude Score algorithm, which integrates both the amplitude of gene expression changes (magnitude) and their statistical relevance (altitude), offers a comprehensive tool for prioritizing genes based on their differential expression profiles in specific viral infection conditions. We observed a strong congruence between the platforms, especially in identifying key antiviral defense genes. Both platforms consistently highlighted genes including ISG15, MX1, RSAD2, and members of the OAS family (OAS1, OAS2, OAS3). The IFIT proteins (IFIT1, IFIT2, IFIT3) were emphasized for their crucial role in counteracting viral replication by both platforms. Additionally, CXCL10 and CXCL11 were pinpointed, shedding light on the organ tissue equivalent’s innate immune response to viral infections. While both platforms provided invaluable insights into the genetic landscape of organoids under viral infection, the NanoString platform often presented a more detailed picture in situations where RNA-Seq signals were more subtle. The combined data from both platforms emphasize their joint value in advancing our understanding of viral impacts on lung organoids.