AUTHOR=Ding Youde , Liao Yuan , He Ji , Ma Jianfeng , Wei Xu , Liu Xuemei , Zhang Guiying , Wang Jing 

TITLE=Enhancing genomic mutation data storage optimization based on the compression of asymmetry of sparsity

JOURNAL=Frontiers in Genetics

VOLUME=14

YEAR=2023

URL=https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/genetics/articles/10.3389/fgene.2023.1213907

DOI=10.3389/fgene.2023.1213907

ISSN=1664-8021

ABSTRACT=<p><bold>Background:</bold> With the rapid development of high-throughput sequencing technology and the explosive growth of genomic data, storing, transmitting and processing massive amounts of data has become a new challenge. How to achieve fast lossless compression and decompression according to the characteristics of the data to speed up data transmission and processing requires research on relevant compression algorithms.</p><p><bold>Methods:</bold> In this paper, a compression algorithm for sparse asymmetric gene mutations (CA_SAGM) based on the characteristics of sparse genomic mutation data was proposed. The data was first sorted on a row-first basis so that neighboring non-zero elements were as close as possible to each other. The data were then renumbered using the reverse Cuthill-Mckee sorting technique. Finally the data were compressed into sparse row format (CSR) and stored. We had analyzed and compared the results of the CA_SAGM, coordinate format (COO) and compressed sparse column format (CSC) algorithms for sparse asymmetric genomic data. Nine types of single-nucleotide variation (SNV) data and six types of copy number variation (CNV) data from the TCGA database were used as the subjects of this study. Compression and decompression time, compression and decompression rate, compression memory and compression ratio were used as evaluation metrics. The correlation between each metric and the basic characteristics of the original data was further investigated.</p><p><bold>Results:</bold> The experimental results showed that the COO method had the shortest compression time, the fastest compression rate and the largest compression ratio, and had the best compression performance. CSC compression performance was the worst, and CA_SAGM compression performance was between the two. When decompressing the data, CA_SAGM performed the best, with the shortest decompression time and the fastest decompression rate. COO decompression performance was the worst. With increasing sparsity, the COO, CSC and CA_SAGM algorithms all exhibited longer compression and decompression times, lower compression and decompression rates, larger compression memory and lower compression ratios. When the sparsity was large, the compression memory and compression ratio of the three algorithms showed no difference characteristics, but the rest of the indexes were still different.</p><p><bold>Conclusion:</bold> CA_SAGM was an efficient compression algorithm that combines compression and decompression performance for sparse genomic mutation data.</p>