Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Genet., 09 March 2023
Sec. Evolutionary and Population Genetics

Population genetic characteristics of Aedes aegypti in 2019 and 2020 under the distinct circumstances of dengue outbreak and the COVID-19 pandemic in Yunnan Province, China

Ge Wang&#x;Ge WangJian Gao&#x;Jian GaoZu MaZu MaYuan LiuYuan LiuMing WangMing WangDan XingDan XingChunxiao LiChunxiao LiXiaoxia GuoXiaoxia GuoTeng ZhaoTeng ZhaoYuting JiangYuting JiangYande DongYande DongHengduan Zhang
Hengduan Zhang*Tongyan Zhao
Tongyan Zhao*
  • State Key Laboratory of Pathogen and Biosecurity, Beijing Institute of Microbiology and Epidemiology, Beijing, China

Introduction: Since Aedes aegypti invaded Yunnan Province in 2002, its total population has continued to expand. Shi et al. used microsatellite and mitochondrial molecular markers to study the Ae. aegypti populations in Yunnan Province in 2015 and 2016, found that it showed high genetic diversity and genetic structure. However, there are few studies on the population genetic characteristics of Ae. aegypti in Yunnan Province under different levels of human intervention. This study mainly used two common types of molecular markers to analyze the genetic characteristics of Ae. aegypti, revealing the influence of different input, prevention and control pressures on the genetic diversity and structure of this species. Understanding the genetic characteristics of Ae. aegypti populations and clarifying the diversity, spread status, and source of invasion are essential for the prevention, control and elimination of this disease vector.

Methods: We analyzed the genetic diversity and genetic structure of 22 populations sampled in Yunnan Province in 2019 and 17 populations sampled in 2020 through nine microsatellite loci and COI and ND4 fragments of mitochondrial DNA. In 2019, a total of 22 natural populations were obtained, each containing 30 samples, a total of 660 samples. In 2020, a total of 17 natural populations were obtained. Similarly, each population had 30 samples, and a total of 510 samples were obtained.

Results: Analysis of Ae. aegypti populations in 2019 and 2020 based on microsatellite markers revealed 67 and 72 alleles, respectively. The average allelic richness of the populations in 2019 was 3.659, while that in 2020 was 3.965. The HWE analysis of the 22 populations sampled in 2019 revealed significant departure only in the QSH-2 population. The 17 populations sampled in 2020 were all in HWE. The average polymorphic information content (PIC) values were 0.546 and 0.545, respectively, showing high polymorphism. The average observed heterozygosity of the 2019 and 2020 populations was 0.538 and 0.514, respectively, and the expected average heterozygosity was 0.517 and 0.519, showing high genetic diversity in all mosquito populations. By analyzing the COI and ND4 fragments in the mitochondrial DNA of Ae. aegypti, the populations sampled in 2019 had a total of 10 COI haplotypes and 17 ND4 haplotypes. A total of 20 COI haplotypes were found in the populations sampled in 2020, and a total of 24 ND4 haplotypes were obtained. STRUCTURE, UPGMA and DAPC cluster analyses and a network diagram constructed based on COI and ND4 fragments showed that the populations of Ae. aegypti in Yunnan Province sampled in 2019 and 2020 could be divided into two clusters. At the beginning of 2020, due to the impact of COVID-19, the flow of goods between the port areas of Yunnan Province and neighboring countries was reduced, and the sterilization was more effective when goods enter the customs, leading to different immigration pressures on Ae. aegypti population in Yunnan Province between 2019 and 2020, the source populations of the 2019 and 2020 populations changed. Mantel test is generally used to detect the correlation between genetic distance and geographical distance, the analysis indicated that population geographic distance and genetic distance had a moderately significant correlation in 2019 and 2020 (2019: p < 0.05 R2 = 0.4807, 2020: p < 0.05 R2 = 0.4233).

Conclusion: Ae. aegypti in Yunnan Province maintains a high degree of genetic diversity. Human interference is one reason for the changes in the genetic characteristics of this disease vector.

Introduction

Aedes aegypti originated in Africa (Brown et al., 2014) and spread to other continents with the slave trade ships between the 15th and 17th centuries, after which it invaded Asia in the late 19th century (Smith, 1956).The main distribution areas of Ae. aegypti include tropical and subtropical regions (Tabachnick, 1991). It is the main vector of dengue virus (DENV) (Simmons et al., 2012), yellow fever virus (Jentes et al., 2011) and chikungunya virus (CHIKV) (Leparc-Goffart et al., 2014). In the past, it was believed that the distribution of Ae. aegypti in China included only in the areas south of 22° north latitude (Shi et al., 2017a). Since the discovery of Ae. aegypti at Jiegao Port, Yunnan Province, in 2002 (Xueshu et al., 2004), the population of Ae. aegypti has shown an expansion trend in Yunnan Province. In a 2015 survey, Ae. aegypti was found in seven counties/cities in Yunnan Province, namely, Jinghong, Mengla, Menghai, Yingjiang, Longchuan, Ruili, and Lushui (Yang et al., 2015).

Yunnan Province is in southwestern China, with subtropical and tropical monsoon climates, which provides favorable conditions for the breeding and transmission of mosquitoes. Therefore, there are many kinds of mosquitoes with wide distribution and high density, which is conducive to the maintenance and transmission of existing arboviruses and the emergence of new arboviruses (Zha et al., 2012; Hameed et al., 2020). The Southeast Asian countries (Myanmar, Laos, and Vietnam) bordering Yunnan Province are all dengue fever endemic areas (Zhang et al., 2013). Dengue fever is an acute infectious disease transmitted by Ae. aegypti and Ae. albopictus (Shi et al., 2017b). It is one of the main public health problems in the world. Dengue fever is mainly prevalent in tropical and subtropical areas, and one-third of the world’s people are at risk of infection (Chen and Vasilakis, 2011). Before 2000, in Yunnan Province, dengue fever cases had been reported only in Hekou County in 1975 (Zhang et al., 1999). In 2008, local cases of dengue fever were reported for the first time in Mangshi, Dehong Prefecture, Zhenkang County, and Lincang City (Li et al., 2010). Since then, dengue fever cases have been reported every year. In 2013, a number of dengue fever outbreaks occurred in Xishuangbanna and Dehong (Li et al., 2016; Yuanyuan et al., 2016). According to a survey of dengue fever outbreaks in recent years, a high density of Ae. aegypti was monitored at the outbreak sites. Detection and survey results for Ae. aegypti populations also showed that the distribution areas were consistent with the local dengue fever epidemic area. This phenomenon means that in recent years, Ae. aegypti has become the main transmission vector of DENV in Yunnan Province (Shi and Zhao, 2016).

Biological invasion is closely related to human health and genetic factors of invasive species, such as genetic variation and diversity (Ivey et al., 2019). These factors are important indicators for revealing the status of invasive species (Rasheed et al., 2013; Chown et al., 2015). After an invasion, the invasive species may establish in the new habitat; eventually, the invasion of the species leads to ecological imbalance in the local area, which changes or destroys the local ecological environment and severely reduces biodiversity (Mollot et al., 2017). Identifying invasions and spread is critical for improving prevention and control measures.

With the emergence of molecular biology technology, abundant genetic markers have been identified for the study of population genetic characteristics. Microsatellite markers are widely used in population genetics research, especially in the exploration of invasive biological populations, taking advantage of their ability to analyze invasion routes, diffusion paths, evolutionary conditions and population genetic structure characteristics of invading populations (Cao et al., 2015; Maynard et al., 2017; Lv et al., 2020). Such analyses revealed that Ae. aegypti in Brazil reinvaded from northern South America and the Caribbean after being completely eliminated based on analysis of Ae. aegypti in Brazil using 12-site microsatellite markers (Monteiro et al., 2014). Pless et al. (2017) used microsatellite markers to trace the invasion of Ae. aegypti in California, United States, and clarified that Ae. aegypti in California may come from the central and southern regions of the United States . Microsatellite loci can also be used to evaluate the genetic variation and population structure of mosquitoes at a fine scale. Zhang et al. used nine pairs of microsatellite markers to study Ae. albopictus in Nanjing, China, and found that it can be divided into two clades (Zhang et al., 2022).

Mitochondrial DNA has a wealth of genetic information, mainly because of its maternal inheritance. Its advantages are a simple structure, fast evolution, and abundant molecular markers. Therefore, mitochondrial DNA has become one of the most widely used sources of molecular markers for determining species gene flow, and it is frequently used in population genetic studies, particularly in Ae. aegypti populations (Feng et al., 2016; Abuelmaali et al., 2022). Naim et al. analyzed the COI fragments of the mitochondrial DNA of Ae. aegypti in Penang, Malaysia, and found 39 haplotypes. The genetic variation within populations was low, but that between populations was high, and overall population differentiation wasn’t obvious (Naim et al., 2020). Gao et al. (2021) used COI gene to classify Ae. albopictus in different climatic regions of China and found that it was divided into two clades, with three dominant haplotypes.

In this study, microsatellite markers and mitochondrial DNA markers were used to analyze the genetic characteristics of natural Ae. aegypti populations in Yunnan Province sampled in 2019 and 2020. In 2019, a total of 5,371 local dengue cases were reported in Yunnan Province, compared with 237 cases in 2020. The main reason for this decrease was that beginning in 2020, due to the prevention and control measures related to COVID-19, people and goods entering through customs along the border between China and Laos and between China and Myanmar drastically declined (Wei et al., 2021). The introduction of Ae. aegypti thus underwent tremendous changes between 2019 and 2020. The degree of genetic structure and variability may depend on the success of national vector control campaigns, migration and international trade flows from each country (Escobar et al., 2022). This study aimed to compare the invasion and spread routes, population diversity and population structure characteristics of Ae. aegypti in different years to clarify the changes in its population genetic characteristics under different mosquito control and immigrations and provide suggestions for the local epidemic prevention department to formulate future prevention and control measures.

Materials and method

Mosquito sampling

From September to October of 2019 and 2020, we collected Ae. aegypti larvae in Xishuangbanna Prefecture (Mengla County, Jinghong City, Menghai County), Lincang City (Nansan Town, Mengding Town), and Dehong Prefecture (Ruili City). To avoid inbreeding effects, we selected at least six larvae from each breeding site in a designated area within 100 m and mixed the larval mosquitoes. All the collected mosquitoes were brought back to the laboratory and separated by sampling site for rearing until they grew into adults, and then they were identified through analysis of morphological characteristics under a microscope to confirm that they were all Ae. aegypti (LBL, 1999). All adult Ae. aegypti samples were preserved in 100% ethanol at 4°C for the isolation of genomic DNA.

DNA isolation and PCR amplification

Genomic DNA was extracted individually from the samples using the Qiagen DNeasy Blood and Tissue Kit (no. 69504, Qiagen, Germany) following the standard DNA extraction protocol provided by the manufacturer. The eluted DNA was measured by a spectrophotometer and stored in a freezer at −40°C for later use.

In this study, nine microsatellite sites developed by Shi were used for analysis (Shi et al., 2017b). The detailed primer information is shown in the Supplementary Appendix SA1. All PCRs were performed on a T100 Thermal Cycler (Bio-Rad, United States) in a 50 μL reaction system containing 0.25 U PrimeSTAR HS DNA polymerase (10 pmol/μL, TaKaRa, Japan), 6 μM dNTPs (2.5 mM each, TaKaRa, Japan) and 5 μM each primer and 10 ng DNA. The PCR program was set as follows: 35 cycles of 95°C for 30 s, 57°C for 30 s and 72°C for 1 min followed by a final elongation at 72°C for 10 min. All products were then checked with 1.2% agarose gel electrophoresis under UV light. After confirming that they were the target band, they were run on a 3730XL DNA analyzer (Applied Biosystems, United States).

We used COI and ND4 gene markers of mitochondrial DNA to analyze the genetic structure of Ae. aegypti populations in Yunnan Province. With the primer set 5′-GGA​GGA​TTT​GGA​AAT​TGA​TTA​GTT​C-3′ (F-COI) and 5′- CCCGGTAAAATTAAAATATAAACTTC-3′(R-COI) plus 5′- ATT​GCC​TAA​GGC​TCA​TGT​AG -3′ (F-ND4) and 5′- TCG​GCT​TCC​TAG​TCG​TTC​AT-3′ (R-ND4), DNA amplification of 550 bp fragments of COI and 361 bp fragments of ND4 was performed on a T100 Thermal Cycler (Bio-Rad, United States). The reaction system was 25 μL, which included 5 µL PCR buffer (TaKaRa, Japan), 4 µL dNTPs (2.5 mM each, TaKaRa, Japan), 1 µL primers (10 pmol/μL, TaKaRa, Japan), 0.5 µL PrimeSTAR HS DNA polymerase (TaKaRa, Japan) and 15.75 µL ddH20. The PCR amplification programs were set as follows: predenaturation at 94°C for 2 min, followed by 40 cycles of denaturation at 94°C for 60 s, annealing at 55°C for 30 s and elongation at 72°C for 1 min, with a final elongation at 72°C for 10 min (COI gene), and predenaturation at 94°C for 2 min, followed by 35 cycles of denaturation at 94°C for 60 s, annealing at 52°C for 30 s and elongation at 72°C for 1 min, with a final elongation at 72°C for 10 min (ND4 gene). All PCR products were detected by 1.2% agarose gel electrophoresis and sequenced on an ABI 3730XL automatic sequencer (Applied Biosystems, United States).

Microsatellite analysis of population genetic characteristics

To study the population genetic characteristics of Ae. aegypti, some software programs were used to calculate the standard genetic parameters. All microsatellite markers were examined for polymorphism by determining their polymorphic information content (PIC) values via PIC-Calc version 0.6 (Shao et al., 2013). The number of alleles (NA) was calculated by Cervus version 3.0.7 (Zhang et al., 2016). In each population, the allelic richness (r) was assessed by FSTAT (version 2.9.3.2) (Cheng et al., 2006). The observed heterozygosity (Ho), expected heterozygosity (He), inbreeding coefficient (Fis) and fixation index (Fst) values for each population were evaluated with the analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA) test in Arlequin version (version 3.5.2.2) (Excoffier et al., 2005). Departures from Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium (HWE) was assessed via Arlequin (version 3.5.2.2) and the p-value was obtained through multiple comparison corrections. The null allele frequency of each microsatellite locus was calculated by Micro-Checker software (version 2.2.3) (Oosterhout et al., 2010). The stepwise mutation model (SMM) and two-phase model of mutation (TPM) were used to test for bottleneck effects via Bottleneck software (version 1.2.0.2) (Men et al., 2013). STRUCTURE software implementing Bayesian clustering analysis was used to assess the genetic structure differences among populations (Pritchard et al., 2000). The parameters were set as follows: 200,000 burn-in periodand 1,000,000 sampling period. The K value was set from 1 to 24 for the populations sampled during 2019 and 1 to 19 for the populations sampled in 2020. The optimal K value was assessed via STRUCTURE HARVESTER (Earl and Vonholdt, 2012). After that, the differences among the populations were displayed in graphs using DISTRUCT (version 1.1) (Rosenberg, 2004). Discriminant analysis of principal components (DAPC) for the populations was performed with the R package “Adegenet 2.1.3” (Jombart, 2008). Isolation-by-distance (IBD) analysis was performed between genetic distance [FST/(1-FST)] and geographical distance [ln(km)], a Mantel test was performed via NTSYS (version 2.2), and then graphs of the correlations between geographic distance and genetic distance were generated in Excel 2019 (Microsoft Corporation, WA, United States).

Mitochondrial DNA analysis of the genetic characteristics of Ae. aegypti

DNASP 5.0 software was used to calculate the genetic diversity parameters of the haplotypes, including haplotype diversity (Hd), nucleotide diversity (Pi) and average number of nucleotide differences (π) (Rozas et al., 2003). The genetic relationships between all haplotypes were displayed through Network (version 5.0.1.1) (Ahlswede et al., 2000). Arlequin (version 3.5.2.2) software was used to perform neutrality tests based on Tajima’s D and Fu’s Fs.

Results

A total of 22 locations were sampled from September to October 2019, including nine locations at Jinghong City, one location in Mengla County, one location at Daluo Port, one location at Mohan Port, three locations at Ruili City, one location at Nansan Town, Zhenkang County, three locations at Mengding Town, two locations at Qingshuihe Port and one location at Myanmar Muse.

In 2020, a total of 17 locations were sampled from September to October in Yunnan Province, including three locations at Jinghong City, two locations at Mengla County, two locations at Daluo Port, one location at Mohan Port, four locations in Ruili City, one location at Nansan Town, three locations at Mengding Town, and one location at Qingshuihe Port. Detailed acquisition information was listed in the Table 1 and Figure 1.

TABLE 1
www.frontiersin.org

TABLE 1. Detailed information on the field sampling sites in Yunnan Province, 2019 and 2020.

FIGURE 1
www.frontiersin.org

FIGURE 1. Distribution map of sampling locations and a plot of K = 2 cluster in Yunnan Province. Structure bar plot for all Ae. aegypti populations used in this study. The height of each color represents the probability of assignment to a specific cluster Figure 1 (A): Distribution map of sampling locations and a plot of K = 2 cluster in Yunnan Province, 2019. Figure 1 (B): Distribution map of sampling locations and a plot of K = 2 cluster in Yunnan Province, 2020.

Microsatellite analysis of population diversity

In this study, the above nine pairs of primers were used to amplify 660 samples collected in 2019 and 510 samples collected in 2020.

Through the analysis of microsatellite markers of Ae. aegypti samples collected in 2019 and 2020, a total of 67 and 72 alleles were obtained, respectively. On average, the 2019 populations obtained 7.44 alleles per locus, and the 2020 populations obtained eight alleles per locus. In 2019, SQM6 obtained 14 alleles, which was the highest number among all loci. The SQM5 and SQM9 loci had four alleles, which was the lowest number among all loci, while in 2020, the SQM2 and SQM6 loci had the most alleles (14), and SQM5 and SQM9 had only four alleles. The PIC values of the populations sampled in 2019 and 2020 were generally high, with average values of 0.546 and 0.545, respectively. Microchecker software revealed null alleles at nine loci in the 2 years, with frequencies ranging from 0.001 to 0.159, however, frequency p values <0.2 are considered to have no significant effect on the accuracy of data analysis by many studies (Dakin and Avise, 2004; Chapuis and Estoup, 2007) (Table 2).

TABLE 2
www.frontiersin.org

TABLE 2. Polymorphic information at nine microsatellite loci in 2019 and 2020.

We conducted the Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium test with significance p < 0.05 for the populations in 2019 and 2020. The HWE analysis of the 22 populations sampled in 2019 revealed significant departure only in the QSH-2 population. The 17 populations sampled in 2020 were all in HWE (Table 3).

TABLE 3
www.frontiersin.org

TABLE 3. Locus information of each population in 2019 and 2020.

In the 2019 populations, 157 of 792 pairwise tests for linkage disequilibrium remained significant after Bonferroni correction, while 166 of 612 pairwise tests for linkage disequilibrium remained significant in the 2020 populations. No consistency was found between any pair of loci in the 2 years. Details were listed in Supplementary Appendix SA2.

The genetic diversity of Ae. aegypti within the 22 populations sampled in 2019 showed that the observed heterozygosity was higher than the expected heterozygosity, indicating that the Ae. aegypti populations in Yunnan Province included some foreign individuals (Table 3).

The results of genetic diversity analysis of the 17 populations sampled in 2020 showed that the observed heterozygosity was lower than the expected heterozygosity, indicating inbreeding (Table 3).

In this study, Fstat software was used to analyze the allelic richness of 22 populations sampled in 2019 and 17 populations sampled in 2020 (Table 4). The 2019 populations were divided into four regions. Among them, the three populations collected in Xishuangbanna, except that in Jinghong City, showed the lowest allelic richness (3.11), and the Myanmar population had the highest allelic richness, which was 4.62. The statistical test (one-way ANOWA) of Myanmar population and populations in the border area of Yunnan Province showed that the p = 0.023, indicating that the allelic richness of Myanmar population was higher than that of Yunnan populations. The 2020 populations were also classified into four regions. The four populations in Ruili City had the highest allelic richness, which was 4.57. The five populations in Xishuangbanna, except that in Jinghong City, had the lowest allelic richness (3.55). The statistical test (one-way ANOWA) of the populations collected in 2019 and 2020 found that p > 0.05 (p = 0.086), indicating that the gene richness didn’t change significantly between 2 years.

TABLE 4
www.frontiersin.org

TABLE 4. Allelic richness of all populations in 2019 and 2020.

The number of alleles and allelic richness are both important indicators of population diversity. Comparing the 2-year sampling data, the average number of alleles obtained for the 22 populations in 2019 was 3.798, while the average number of alleles in 2020 was 4.353. The average allelic richness of the populations was 3.707 in 2019 and 3.965 in 2020. Regardless of the average number of alleles or the average allelic richness, the populations sampled in 2020 showed higher diversity than the populations sampled in 2019 (Table 3).

In this study, we used TPM and SMM models to analyze the bottleneck effect of samples collected in 2019 and 2020 (Table 5), and a total of six out of 22 natural populations sampled in 2019 showed a bottleneck effect. Three populations in Jinghong City (JH-1, JH-4, and JH-5), one population in Ruili City (RL-3), one population at Qingshuihe Port (QSH-2) and one population in Myanmar experienced a bottleneck effect. Among the 17 populations sampled in 2020, only the Jinghong City population (JH-11) and the Daluo Port (DL-2) population showed a bottleneck effect.

TABLE 5
www.frontiersin.org

TABLE 5. Probability value for bottlenecks in 2019 and 2020.

Microsatellite analysis of population structure and differences

In this study, according to the microsatellite analysis results, both the UPGMA dendrogram and Evanno et al.’s ΔK methods (Evanno et al., 2005) divided the Ae. aegypti collected in Yunnan Province in 2019 into two clades (Figures 2A, D, E), with the 12 populations sampled in Xishuangbanna Prefecture grouped into one cluster and the nine populations sampled in Lincang City and Ruili City in Dehong Prefecture grouped into the other cluster. The Myanmar population was clustered with the populations from Lincang City and Ruili City. The population structure analysis results for the 17 populations sampled in 2020 were similar to those for the 2019 populations, which were also divided into two major clades. The eight populations sampled in Xishuangbanna Prefecture were clustered together, and the five populations sampled in Lincang City and four in Ruili City, Dehong Prefecture, were grouped together. The Myanmar population sampled in 2019 was separated from the populations collected in 2020 (Figures 2B, F, G). Based on the UPGMA method, we conducted a conjoint analysis of the populations in 2019 and 2020, found that 22 populations collected in 2019 were clustered into one group and 17 populations collected in 2020 were clustered into another group (Figure 2C).

FIGURE 2
www.frontiersin.org

FIGURE 2. UPGMA (A), (B), (C) and STRUCTURE (D), (E), (F), (G) cluster analysis. Figure 2A represents the UPGMA cluster analysis results of the populations collected in 2019; Figure 2B represents the UPGMA cluster analysis results of Myanmar population collected in 2019 and populations collected in the border area of Yunnan Province in 2020; Figure 2C the conjoint analysis of collected populations in 2019 and 2020; Figures 2D, F show the STRUCTURE cluster analysis of the populations collected in 2019 (K = 2, K = 4) and 2020 (K = 2, K = 4) respectively. The two black lines represent a population, and each color represents the percentage of individuals belonging to this cluster. The STRUCTURE software calculates that the optimal k value of the populations collected in 2019 and 2020 is 2 (represented by red and yellow bars respectively). Figures 2E, G represent K values of the populations collected in 2019 and 2020 assessed via Evanno et al.’s ΔK methods.

The DAPC results for the 22 populations sampled in 2019 (Figure 3A) showed that the 12 populations in Xishuangbanna Prefecture (JH-1, JH-2, JH-3, JH-4, JH-5, JH-6, JH-7, JH-8, JH-9, ML-1, DL-1, MH-1) formed one cluster, while three populations (RL-1, RL-2, RL-3) in Ruili City, Dehong Prefecture, six populations (NS-1, QSH-1, QSH-2, MD-1, MD-2, MD-3) in Lincang City, and one population in Myanmar were clustered together. There was also some genetic communication between the two clusters. Figure 3B showed that the Myanmar population sampled in 2019 and the 17 populations sampled in 2020 were divided into two large groups, which didn’t overlap with each other. The results of DAPC of the 17 Yunnan populations sampled in 2020 are shown in Figure 3C, revealing that five populations (NS-2, MD-4, MD-5, MD-6, QSH-3) in Lincang City and four populations in Ruili City (RL-4, RL-5, RL-6, RL-7) were gathered into one cluster. The eight populations in Xishuangbanna Prefecture tended to intersect with each other. Overall, the clustering pattern was basically the same as that of the 2019 populations.

FIGURE 3
www.frontiersin.org

FIGURE 3. DAPC analysis of Ae. aegypti population structure based on microsatellite loci in the border areas of Yunnan Province. Each circle represents a cluster and each color represents the different subpopulations identified by the DAPC. Panel (A) represents the DAPC results for the 22 populations sampled in 2019; panel (B) represents DAPC results of collected population in 2019 and 2020; panel (C) represents the DAPC results for the 17 populations sampled in 2020.

The AMOVA results (Table 6) showed that of the total genetic variation in the populations sampled in 2019, 88.18% could be attributed to differences within individuals and 8.40% to differences among populations within groups (Fit = 0.11822, Fsc = 0.09072, all p < 0.0001). Meanwhile, of the genetic variation in the populations sampled in 2020, 85.99% could be attributed to differences within individuals and 7.88% to differences among populations within groups (Fit = 0.14013, Fsc = 0.08433, all p < 0.0001).

TABLE 6
www.frontiersin.org

TABLE 6. Results of AMOVA in 2019 and 2020.

The genetic distributions of 22 populations sampled in 2019 and 17 populations sampled in 2020 as obtained by the IBD model are shown in Figure 4 (Figure 4A 2019: p < 0.05 R = 0.6933; Figure 4B 2020: p < 0.05 R = 0.6506); the geographical distance and genetic distance of the populations were positively correlated in both years.

FIGURE 4
www.frontiersin.org

FIGURE 4. Analysis of the relationship between genetic distance [FST/(1-FST)] and geographical distance [㏑(km)] for (A) 22 populations sampled in 2019 (R2 = 0.4806, p < 0.05) and (B) 17 populations sampled in 2020 (R2 = 0.4233, p < 0.05)

Mitochondrial markers for the population structure and neutrality test

Based on COI gene analysis, 10 and 20 haplotypes were found in the populations sampled in 2019 and 2020, respectively.

Analyzing the ND4 fragments of the populations sampled in 2019 and 2020, we obtained a total of 17 haplotypes in the 2019 populations and 24 haplotypes in the 2020 populations.

The 30 haplotypes obtained for the COI gene of the populations sampled in the 2 years were compared and analyzed by MEGA software, revealing that the haplotypes H1, H2, H3, H4, H5, H6, H7, and H10 in 2019 were the same as H1, H7, H12, H2, H5, H20, H18, and H19 obtained from the 17 populations in 2020. Forty-one haplotypes of the ND4 gene were analyzed by the same method. Haplotypes H1, H2, H4, H5, H7, H10, H13, H15, and H17 obtained from the 22 populations in 2019 were the same as H1, H6, H15, H2, H19, H17, H20, H23, and H16 in the 2020 populations. GenBank IDs of COI haplotype are OM865371-OM865392. GenBank IDs of ND4 haplotype are OM877316-OM877347. Haplotype details were recorded in the Supplementary Appendix SA3.

The haplotype network diagrams constructed with 653 COI fragments and 656 ND4 fragments obtained in 2019 showed that H1 and H2 were the most frequent haplotypes, and nearly all the other haplotypes derived were from H1 and H2 with several mutations. H1 haplotypes were mainly distributed in Xishuangbanna Prefecture, the other dominant haplotype H2 was mainly distributed in the Lincang City, Ruili City and Burmese populations. The COI and ND4 network diagram showed that the Ae. aegypti collected in 2019 were mainly divided into two clades, and the Myanmar population had more frequent exchanges with the populations of Lincang City and Ruili City (Figures 5A, B). The haplotype network diagram constructed based on the 508 COI fragments obtained in 2020 showed that H1 and H7 were two dominant haplotypes (Figures 5C, D). Analysis performed with MEGA software clearly showed that the H1 and H7 haplotypes of the COI fragments of the 2020 populations were consistent with the H1 and H2 haplotypes of the 2019 populations, respectively. The haplotype network diagram of 510 ND4 fragments showed that the two dominant haplotypes were H1 and H6, which were the same as the H1 and H2 haplotypes of the 2019 ND4 fragments (Additional files). The H1 haplotypes (COI and ND4 fragments) were mainly distributed in Xishuangbanna Prefecture, while the other dominant haplotypes H7 (COI fragments) and H6 (ND4 fragments) were mainly distributed in the Lincang City, Ruili City and Burmese populations sampled in 2019. In summary, the Ae. aegypti collected in 2020 were roughly divided into two clades, one in Xishuangbanna Prefecture and the other consisting of Lincang City and Ruili City populations sampled in 2020 and the Myanmar population sampled in 2019. This pattern was different from the clustering results based on microsatellite markers.

FIGURE 5
www.frontiersin.org

FIGURE 5. The haplotype network diagram based on COI and ND4 genes; (A) COI gene haplotype network diagram of populations in 2019; (B) ND4 gene haplotype network diagram of populations in 2019; (C) COI gene haplotype network diagram of populations in 2020; (D) ND4 gene haplotype network diagram of populations in 2020. The haplotypes of Ae. aegypti in each region are distinguished by different colors.

The results of the neutrality tests based on the COI and ND4 fragments of the sampled populations in 2019 (Table 7) showed that the Tajima’s D of JH-3 and JH-5 in Jinghong City, MD-3 in Mengding Town, QSH-1 and QSH-2 at Qingshuihe Port, and RL-2 in Ruili City were negative and had a p < 0.05, indicating that these populations had experienced bottleneck effects and then expanded. Based on the COI and ND4 fragments of the populations sampled in 2020 (Table 7), the neutrality test result showed that the JH-12 population in Jinghong City, the RL-7 population in Ruili City, and the MD-6 population in Mengding Town had historically experienced bottleneck effects. The nucleotide mismatch distribution (Figure 6) showed that the distribution curves of the populations in 2019 and 2020 had a single peak, indicating that Ae. aegypti underwent obvious population expansion in these areas.

TABLE 7
www.frontiersin.org

TABLE 7. Neutrality test of 22 populations and 17 populations based on mtDNA in 2019, 2020.

FIGURE 6
www.frontiersin.org

FIGURE 6. The distribution of the number of pairwise differences in COI and ND4 in 2019, 2020. (A) The distribution of the number of pairwise differences in COI in 2019. (B) The distribution of the number of pairwise differences in ND4 in 2019. (C) The distribution of the number of pairwise differences in COI in 2020. (D) The distribution of the number of pairwise differences in ND4 in 2020.

Discussion

Molecular markers were previously used to analyze the genetic characteristics of Ae. aegypti populations in the border areas of Yunnan Province (Shi et al., 2017b). However, very few studies have focused on the changes in the genetic characteristics of Ae. aegypti populations under different selection pressures. Ae. aegypti in the border areas of Yunnan were collected in 2019 and 2020, respectively, and this study focused on analyzing the changes in the genetic characteristics of Ae. aegypti populations under different immigration pressures, especially the outbreak of dengue that occurred in 2019, where an integrated vector management approach was implemented. Because of the COVID-19 pandemic, the border was closed and crossings were limited in 2020, which led to declines in person and logistic flows. The status of the populations over 2 years provides an opportunity to study the population structure of Ae. aegypti with prevention and control pressures and human intervention related to COVID-19, thereby revealing the impact of human intervention, which will have important guiding significance for the prevention and control of this population in the future.

The genetic diversity of Ae. Aegypti populations in border areas of Yunnan Province

Null alleles are one of the biggest defects of microsatellite markers; they mainly reduce population genetic diversity and increase genetic differentiation between populations (Chapuis and Estoup, 2007; Girard, 2011; Rico et al., 2017). Yan et al. found that the number of alleles increases with increasing sample size. A minimum sample size of 30–50 individuals is required for microsatellite DNA analysis (Luna and Dexing, 2004). The sample sizes collected in this study in 2019 and 2020 were both 30, and this sample size can reflect the true diversity of the population. The PIC of nine loci in 22 populations sampled in 2019 reached 0.546, and the PIC of 17 populations sampled in 2020 was 0.545; both values exceeded the standard for inferring high polymorphism. The diversity index results showed that a total of 67 alleles were obtained from 22 populations in 2019, and a total of 72 alleles were obtained from 17 populations in 2020. The Shannon index (SI) is another important factor reflecting population diversity. The average SI of the sampled populations in 2019 was 0.971. The average SI of the sampled populations in 2020 was 0.969. Thus, it could be concluded that the genetic diversity of the 17 populations in 2020 had little change compared with that of the 22 populations in 2019. The average observed heterozygosity of the populations sampled in 2019 was 0.538, while the average expected heterozygosity was 0.517, indicating that the Ae. aegypti populations sampled in 2019 had immigration. Considering that the flight distance of Ae. aegypti is usually short, it is possible that the immigrants mainly came from the flow of people or goods. In 2020, the average observed heterozygosity of the sampled populations was 0.514, and the average expected heterozygosity was 0.519, which were basically the same, indicating that the populations experienced inbreeding. This may be due to the outbreak of COVID-19 in early 2020. China quickly took strong measures to control the epidemic. However, the epidemic prevention abroad was not optimistic. To reduce the risk of foreign imports, the management of the movement of people and goods was strengthened at Chinese ports. As a result, the opportunity for invasion and number of invading individuals of Ae. aegypti from neighboring countries through the movement of people and goods were greatly reduced.

The diversity index of the populations sampled in 2019 and 2020 was relatively high after microsatellite marker analysis. In summary, the overall diversity of Ae. aegypti populations in Yunnan Province was relatively high. Stable populations have been established and have the ability to resist adverse external environmental influences and expansion. The flow restriction of people and goods had a certain impact on the populations of Ae. aegypti. If the populations cannot be fully supplemented in the long run, the diversity of the Ae. aegypti in border areas of Yunnan Province may decline.

The current colonization and expansion patterns of Ae. aegypti in border areas of Yunnan Province

Generally, only a few individuals of invasive species can enter new areas, and newly invasive individuals will experience genetic bottleneck effects after arriving in the new areas, which will eventually lead to a decrease in genetic diversity (Tabachnick et al., 1979). The bottleneck effect analysis based on the microsatellite markers of the populations sampled in 2019 revealed that a total of six natural populations (JH-1, JH-4, JH-5, RL-3, QSH-2, MD1) sampled in 2019 experienced a bottleneck effect. Among them, the three populations in Jinghong City had positive inbreeding coefficients (Fis), indicating inbreeding in the populations. The bottleneck effect may be due to the serious dengue fever epidemic in Jinghong City and subsequent focus on vector control. The QSH-2 population at Qingshuihe Port and the RL-3 population in Ruili City both came from ports, with low genetic diversity and a negative inbreeding coefficient (Fis). Therefore, it was speculated that these two populations were more likely to be new invasively colonized. Two of the populations (JH-11 and DL-2) sampled in 2020 experienced a bottleneck effect. The collection locations of these two populations were far from the ports, and the inbreeding coefficient (Fis) was positive, so it was inferred that the local control of mosquito vectors caused the bottleneck effect. The neutrality test results based on the COI and ND4 fragments showed that six of the populations sampled in 2019 (JH-3, JH-5, MD-3, QSH-1, QSH-2, RL-2) experienced a bottleneck effect, and the 2020 populations JH-12, RL-7, MD-6 also experienced bottleneck effects. If the distribution of the number of pairwise differences shows a single peak and followed a Poisson distribution, it indicates that the population experienced expansion recently, whereas multiple peaks indicates that the population was in a stable state recently (Harpending, 1994). The nucleotide mismatch distribution analysis performed in this study showed that the distribution curves had a single peak, indicating that Ae. aegypti, as an invasive mosquito species, experienced population expansion in Yunnan Province in 2019 and 2020.

In the port areas of Yunnan Province, the bottleneck effect impacting the populations occurred in the 2 years, indicating continuous invasion of Ae. aegypti in the port areas. The bottleneck effect experienced by the populations in Jinghong City may be due to the outbreak of dengue fever year after year, and the Ae. aegypti populations face great environmental pressure, such as disinfection and sterilization, so it is difficult for them to maintain a stable colonization state. The populations in other regions have not experienced bottleneck effects and were in a stable state. The nucleotide mismatch distribution analysis of the populations sampled in 2019 and 2020 revealed that Ae. aegypti in Yunnan Province had experienced expansion. This may be because although the populations sampled in 2020 received less gene flow, the population diversity was similar to that of the 2019 populations, and it also had the ability to expand.

The population genetic characteristics of Ae. aegypti under different immigration pressures

The cluster analysis results of the populations sampled in 2019 based on microsatellite markers and mitochondrial DNA showed that the populations can be divided into two major clades; one clade included the populations of Ae. aegypti in Xishuangbanna Prefecture, and the other clade included the populations of Lincang City, Ruili City, Dehong Prefecture and Myanmar. The Myanmar population had the highest allelic richness. Generally, multiple invasions can increase the genetic diversity of the invading population, but the overall level will not be higher than that of the source populations. With spread, genetic diversity will further decline (Dlugosch and Parker, 2010; Uller and Leimu, 2011); therefore, the population of Ae. aegypti in Myanmar is likely a source population of Ae. aegypti in Yunnan Province. Comparing the allelic richness of various populations in Yunnan Province sampled in 2019, the Lincang City populations had higher values than the Ruili City populations. Because the Lincang City and Ruili City populations were located in the border areas, the Lincang populations likely didn’t directly spread from the Ruili populations but invaded from Myanmar, which indicates that invasion followed not a single route but multiple routes. Jinghong City is far from the border, the Lancang River flows through the city, tourism is developed, and freight transport is frequent. Therefore, the populations of Ae. aegypti in Jinghong City may come from invasion by foreign populations with travelers and then spread to other areas of Xishuangbanna Prefecture. They may also come from Laos bordering Mohan Port and eastern Myanmar bordering Daluo Port.

Microsatellite molecular marker analysis showed that the Burmese population sampled in 2019 and the Yunnan populations sampled in 2020 could not be grouped together. However, the haplotype network map constructed by mitochondrial DNA molecular markers revealed that the Myanmar population sampled in 2019 and the populations in Lincang and Ruili sampled in 2020 shared haplotypes. The dominant haplotypes didn’t change between the 2 years. This phenomenon may be caused by the fact that the mutation rate of mitochondrial DNA molecular markers is lower than that of microsatellite markers. In summary, the Ae. aegypti populations in the border areas of Yunnan Province in 2020 may have come from a new invasion of Myanmar, or they may have resulted from breeding of the Ae. aegypti population in Yunnan Province after natural selection and vector control in 2019. There was inbreeding in 17 populations sampled in Yunnan Province in 2020. Considering the situation at the border ports, due to the impact of COVID-19, the flow of people and goods was reduced, and the disinfection and sterilization of goods entering Yunnan through ports were more effective than before. As a result, the probability of Burmese Ae. aegypti population invasion with the flow of people and logistics decreased.

Conclusion

The genetic diversity of Ae. aegypti in Yunnan Province was relatively high, and the populations were mainly divided into two major clusters. The main reason for the formation of the two clusters may be different invasion events. The continued invasion of Ae. aegypti in border areas maintained population diversity. Under different immigration pressures, prevention and control pressures, the structure and diversity of the Ae. aegypti populations could change. Human activities may be one cause of the expansion of Ae. aegypti in the border areas of Yunnan Province. These research results can provide some guidance for the prevention and control of Ae. aegypti in China.

Data availability statement

The datasets presented in this study can be found in online repositories. The names of the repository/repositories and accession number(s) can be found in the article/Supplementary Material.

Author contributions

GW, JG, HZ, and ToZ jointly designed and coordinated the study, with contributions from ZM, YL, MW, DX, CL, XG, TeZ, YJ, and YD. GW and JG drafted the article. GW, JG, HZ, ZM, and YL collected samples from Yunnan Province of China. GW, JG, ZM, and YL carried out the laboratory work and performed the statistical analysis. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was funded by grants from the Infective Diseases Prevention and Cure Project of China (No.2017ZX10303404).

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Supplementary material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fgene.2023.1107893/full#supplementary-material

References

Abuelmaali, S. A., Jamaluddin, J. A. F., Allam, M., Abushama, H. M., Elnaiem, D. E., Noaman, K., et al. (2022). Genetic polymorphism and phylogenetics of Aedes aegypti from Sudan based on ND4 mitochondrial gene variations. Insects 13, 1144. doi:10.3390/insects13121144

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ahlswede, R., Ning, C., Li, S. Y., and Yeung, R. (2000). Network information flow. IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 46, 1204–1216. doi:10.1109/18.850663

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Brown, J. E., Evans, B. R., Zheng, W., Obas, V., Barrera-Martinez, L., Egizi, A., et al. (2014). Human impacts have shaped historical and recent evolution in Aedes aegypti, the dengue and yellow fever mosquito. Evolution 68, 514–525. doi:10.1111/evo.12281

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Cao, L. J., Wen, J. B., Wei, S. J., Liu, J., Yang, F., and Chen, M. (2015). Characterization of novel microsatellite markers for Hyphantria cunea and implications for other Lepidoptera. Bull. Entomol. Res. 105, 273–284. doi:10.1017/S0007485315000061

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Chapuis, M. P., and Estoup, A. (2007). Microsatellite null alleles and estimation of population differentiation. Mol. Biol. Evol. 24, 621–631. doi:10.1093/molbev/msl191

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Chen, R., and Vasilakis, N. (2011). Dengue — quo tu et quo vadis? Viruses 3, 1562–1608. doi:10.3390/v3091562

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Cheng, Y. P., Hwang, S. Y., Chiou, W. L., and Lin, T. P. (2006). Allozyme variation of populations of Castanopsis carlesii (Fagaceae) revealing the diversity centres and areas of the greatest divergence in Taiwan. Ann. Bot. 98, 601–608. doi:10.1093/aob/mcl135

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Chown, S. L., Hodgins, K. A., Griffin, P. C., Oakeshott, J. G., and Hoffmann, A. A. (2015). Biological invasions, climate change and genomics. Evol. Appl. 8, 23–46. doi:10.1111/eva.12234

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Dakin, E. E., and Avise, J. C. (2004). Microsatellite null alleles in parentage analysis. Heredity 93, 504–509. doi:10.1038/sj.hdy.6800545

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Dlugosch, K. M., and Parker, I. M. (2010). Founding events in species invasions: Genetic variation, adaptive evolution, and the role of multiple introductions. Mol. Ecol. 17, 431–449. doi:10.1111/j.1365-294X.2007.03538.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Earl, D. A., and Vonholdt, B. M. (2012). Structure HARVESTER: A website and program for visualizing STRUCTURE output and implementing the Evanno method. Conserv. Genet. Resour. 4, 359–361. doi:10.1007/s12686-011-9548-7

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Escobar, D., Ortiz, B., Urrutia, O., and Fontecha, G. (2022). Genetic diversity among four populations of Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae) from Honduras as revealed by mitochondrial DNA cytochrome oxidase I. Pathogens 11, 620. doi:10.3390/pathogens11060620

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Evanno, G. S., Regnaut, S. J., and Goudet, J. (2005). Detecting the number of clusters of individuals using the software structure: A simulation study. Mol. Ecol. 14, 2611–2620. doi:10.1111/j.1365-294X.2005.02553.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Excoffier, L., Laval, G., and Schneider, S. (2005). Arlequin (version 3.0): An integrated software package for population genetics data analysis. Evol. Bioinform Online 1, 117693430500100–117693430500150. doi:10.1177/117693430500100003

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Feng, Y. N., Zhou, D. Y., Liu, Y. Q., Zhao, W. Z., and He, S. Y. (2016). Analysis on genetic diversity of Apis cerana in Yunnan Province using mitochondrial DNA COⅠ ∼ COⅡ. J. Yunnan Agric. Univ. Nat. Sci. 31, 73–80. doi:10.16211/j.issn.1004-390X(n).2016.01.012

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Gao, J., Zhang, H. D., Guo, X. X., Xing, D., Zhao, T. Y., Lan, C. J., et al. (2021). Dispersal patterns and population genetic structure of Aedes albopictus (Diptera: Culicidae) in three different climatic regions of China. Parasites Vectors 14, 12. doi:10.1186/s13071-020-04521-4

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Girard, P. (2011). A robust statistical method to detect null alleles in microsatellite and SNP datasets in both panmictic and inbred populations. Stat. Appl. Genet. Mol. Biol. 10, 9–10. doi:10.2202/1544-6115.1620

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hameed, M., Wahaab, A., Shan, T., Wang, X., Khan, S., Di, D., et al. (2020). A metagenomic analysis of mosquito virome collected from different animal farms at Yunnan-Myanmar border of China. Front. Microbiol. 11, 591478. doi:10.3389/fmicb.2020.591478

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Harpending, H. C. (1994). Signature of ancient population growth in a low-resolution mitochondrial DNA mismatch distribution. Human-mediated 66, 591–600. doi:10.2307/41465371

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ivey, M. R., Colvin, M., Strickland, B. K., and Lashley, M. A. (2019). Reduced vertebrate diversity independent of spatial scale following feral swine invasions. Ecol. Evol. 9, 7761–7767. doi:10.1002/ece3.5360

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Jentes, E. S., Poumerol, G., Gershman, M. D., Hill, D. R., Lemarchand, J., Lewis, R. F., et al. (2011). The revised global yellow fever risk map and recommendations for vaccination, 2010: Consensus of the informal WHO working group on geographic risk for yellow fever. Lancet Infect. Dis. 11, 622–632. doi:10.1016/s1473-3099(11)70147-5

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Jombart, T. (2008). , adegenet: a R package for the multivariate analysis of genetic markers. Bioinformatics 24, 1403–1405. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btn129

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

LBL (1999). Integrated mosquito control. Beijing: Beijing Science Press.

Google Scholar

Leparc-Goffart, I., Nougairede, A., Cassadou, S., Prat, C., and Lamballerie, X. D. (2014). Chikungunya in the americas. Lancet 383, 514. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60185-9

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Li, H. X., Zhou, H. N., Yang, Y. C. h., and Jiang, H. (2010). Dengue fever epidemicsituation in Yunnan province from 2004 to 2008. Chin J Vector Biol Control 21, 576–577.

Google Scholar

Li, H. C., Pan, H., Feng, Y., Deng, W., Yang, G. R., Yang, P., et al. (2016). Epidemiological survey of an outbreak of dengue fever in Lincang, Yunnan, 2015. Dis. Surveill. 31, 561–565. doi:10.3784/j.issn.1003-9961.2016.07.007

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Luna, Y., and Dexing, Z. (2004). Effects of sample size on various genetic diversity measures in population genetic study with microsatellite DNA markers. Acta Zool. Sin. 50, 279–290. doi:10.1007/BF02911033

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lv, R. C., Zhu, C. Q., Wang, C. H., Ai, L. L., Tan, W. L., Zhang, B., et al. (2020). Genetic diversity and population structure of Aedes aegypti after massive vector control for dengue fever prevention in Yunnan border areas. Sci. Rep. 10, 12731. doi:10.1038/s41598-020-69668-7

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Maynard, A. J., Ambrose, L., Cooper, R. D., Chow, W. K., Davis, J. B., Muzari, M. O., et al. (2017). Tiger on the prowl: Invasion history and spatio-temporal genetic structure of the Asian tiger mosquito Aedes albopictus (Skuse 1894) in the Indo-Pacific. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 11, e0005546. doi:10.1371/journal.pntd.0005546

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Men, Q. L., Chen, M. H., Zhang, Y. L., and Feng, J. N. (2013). Genetic structure and diversity of a newly invasive species, the codling moth, Cydia pomonella (L.) (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) in China. Biol. Invasions 15, 447–458. doi:10.1007/s10530-012-0299-5

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Mollot, G., Pantel, J. H., and Romanuk, T. N. (2017). The effects of invasive species on the decline in species richness: A global meta-analysis. Adv. Ecol. Res. 56, 61–83. doi:10.1016/bs.aecr.2016.10.002

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Monteiro, F. A., Shama, R., Martins, A. J., Gloria-Soria, A., Brown, J. E., Powell, J. R., et al. (2014). Genetic diversity of Brazilian Aedes aegypti: Patterns following an eradication program. Plos Neglected Trop. Dis. 8, e3167. doi:10.1371/journal.pntd.0003167

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Naim, D. M., Kamal, N. Z. M., and Mahboob, S. (2020). Population structure and genetic diversity of Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus in Penang as revealed by mitochondrial DNA cytochrome oxidase I. Saudi J. Biol. Sci. 27, 953–967. doi:10.1016/j.sjbs.2020.01.021

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Oosterhout, C. V., Hutchinson, W. F., Wills, D., and Shipley, P. (2010). micro-checker: software for identifying and correcting genotyping errors in microsatellite data. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 4, 535–538. doi:10.1111/j.1471-8286.2004.00684.x

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Pless, E., Gloria-Soria, A., Evans, B. R., Kramer, V., Bolling, B. G., Tabachnick, W. J., et al. (2017). Multiple introductions of the dengue vector, Aedes aegypti, into California. PLOS Neglected Trop. Dis. 11, e0005718. doi:10.1371/journal.pntd.0005718

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Pritchard, J. K., Stephens, M. J., and Donnelly, P. J. (2000). Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics 155, 945–959. doi:10.1093/genetics/155.2.945

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Rasheed, S. B., Boots, M., Frantz, A. C., and Butlin, R. K. (2013). Population structure of the mosquito Aedes aegypti (Stegomyia aegypti) in Pakistan. Med. Veterinary Entomology 27, 430–440. doi:10.1111/mve.12001

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Rico, C., Cuesta, J. A., Drake, P., Macpherson, E., and Marie, A. D. (2017). Null alleles are ubiquitous at microsatellite loci in the Wedge Clam (Donax trunculus). PeerJ 5, e3188. doi:10.7717/peerj.3188

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Rosenberg, N. A. (2004). distruct: a program for the graphical display of population structure. Mol. Ecol. Notes 4, 137–138. doi:10.1046/j.1471-8286.2003.00566.x

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Rozas, J., Sanchez-Delbarrio, J. C., Messeguer, X., and Rozas, R. (2003). DnaSP, DNA polymorphism analyses by the coalescent and other methods. Bioinformatics 19, 2496–2497. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btg359

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Shao, K., Xiong, M., Xu, N., Zhu, B., and Shi, F. (2013). Characterization of microsatellite loci in Sinilabeo rendahli and cross-amplification in four other Chinese cyprinid species. Conserv. Genet. Resour. 5, 9–13. doi:10.1007/s12686-012-9717-3

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Shi, Q. M., Zhang, H. D., Wang, G., Guo, X. X., Xing, D., Dong, Y. D., et al. (2017). The genetic diversity and population structure of domestic Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae) in yunnan province, southwestern China. Parasit. Vectors 10, 292. doi:10.1186/s13071-017-2213-6

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Shi, Q. M., Zhang, H. D., Wang, G., Guo, X. X., Dan, X., Dong, Y. D., et al. (2017). The genetic diversity and population structure of domestic Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae) in yunnan province, southwestern China. Parasites Vectors 10, 292. doi:10.1186/s13071-017-2213-6

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Shi, Q. M., and Zhao, T. Y. (2016). Invasion and spread of dengue fever vector Aedes aegypti in yunnan province, acta parasitol. Med. Entomol. Sin. 23 (03), 175–179. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-0507.2016.03.008

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Simmons, C. P., Farrar, J. J., Nguyen, V., and Wills, B. (2012). Dengue. N. Engl. J. Med. 366, 1423–1432. doi:10.1056/NEJMra1110265

CrossRef Full Text

Smith, C. E. G. (1956). The history of dengue in tropical Asia and its probable relationship to the mosquito Aedes aegypti. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 59, 243–251. doi:10.1016/j.agsy.2005.09.002

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Tabachnick, W. J. (1991). Evolutionary genetics and arthropod-borne disease: The yellow fever mosquito. Am. Entomologist 37, 14–26. doi:10.1093/ae/37.1.14

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Tabachnick, W. J., Munstermann, L. E., and Powell, J. R. (1979). Genetic distinctness of sympatric forms of Aedes aegypti in East Africa. Evolution 33, 287–295. doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.1979.tb04682.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Uller, T., and Leimu, R. (2011). Founder events predict changes in genetic diversity during human-mediated range expansions. Glob. Change Biol. 17, 3478–3485. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2486.2011.02509.x

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wei, C., Guo, X., Yang, R., Tang, Y., Yu, Y., Liu, X., et al. (2021). Epidemiological and cluster characteristics of dengue fever in Yunnan province, China, 2013-2020. Chin. J. Vector Bio Control 29, 7. doi:10.11853/j.issn.1003.8280.2021.06.013

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Xueshu, D., Fuchang, C., Hongning, Z., Xiang, W., Limin, D., Chao, W., et al. (2004). Investigation of mosquitoes at frontier ports in Yunnan Province. Chin. J. Vector Biol. Control 15, 142–145. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1003-4692.2004.02.022

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yang, M. D., Jiang, J. Y., Zheng, Y. T., and Zhou, H. N. (2015). Distribution survey on Aedes aegypti in the border areas of Yunnan province, China. Chin J Vector Biol Control 26, 406–408. doi:10.11853/j.issn.1003.4692.2015.04.020

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yuanyuan, L., Jin, Z., and Hongbin, L. (2016). Distribution of the dengue fever vector in Xishuangbanna prefecture of yunnan. China Trop. Med. 16, 237–239. doi:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1003-9279.2016.04.002

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zha, B., Zhou, H. N., Zhang, H. L., and Liang, G. D. (2012). Investigation of mosquitoes and mosquito⁃borne arboviruses in Yunnan province, China in 1975-2010. Chin J Vector Biol Control 23, 439–444.

Google Scholar

Zhang, H. L., Zi, D. Y., and Gong, Z. D. (1999). The epidemiological survey of dengue fever in Yunnan Province, China. Endem. Dis. Bull. 14, 50–54.

Google Scholar

Zhang, H. L., Zhang, Y. Z., Yang, W. H., Feng, Y., Nasci, R. S., Yang, J., et al. (2013). Mosquitoes of western yunnan province, China: Seasonal abundance, diversity, and arbovirus associations. Plos One 8, e77017. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0077017

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhang, H. R., Niu, S. F., Wu, R. X., Zhai, Y., and Tian, L. T. (2016). Development and characterization of 26 polymorphic microsatellite markers in Lateolabrax maculatus and cross-species amplification for the phylogenetically related taxa. Biochem. Syst. Ecol. 66, 326–330. doi:10.1016/j.bse.2016.05.008

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhang, H. D., Gao, J., Xing, D., Guo, X. X., Li, C. X., Dong, Y. D., et al. (2022). Fine-scale genetic structure and wolbachia infection of Aedes albopictus (Diptera: Culicidae) in nanjing city, China. Front. Genet. 13, 827655. doi:10.3389/fgene.2022.827655

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: Aedes aegypti, genetic diversity, haplotype, molecular marker, China

Citation: Wang G, Gao J, Ma Z, Liu Y, Wang M, Xing D, Li C, Guo X, Zhao T, Jiang Y, Dong Y, Zhang H and Zhao T (2023) Population genetic characteristics of Aedes aegypti in 2019 and 2020 under the distinct circumstances of dengue outbreak and the COVID-19 pandemic in Yunnan Province, China. Front. Genet. 14:1107893. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2023.1107893

Received: 28 November 2022; Accepted: 27 February 2023;
Published: 09 March 2023.

Edited by:

Vindhya Mohindra, National Bureau of Fish Genetic Resources (ICAR), India

Reviewed by:

Jose Aurelio Castro, University of the Balearic Islands, Spain
Rui-De Xue, University of the Sciences, United States

Copyright © 2023 Wang, Gao, Ma, Liu, Wang, Xing, Li, Guo, Zhao, Jiang, Dong, Zhang and Zhao. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Hengduan Zhang, NDUzMTQ5NDUyQHFxLmNvbQ==; Tongyan Zhao, dG9uZ3lhbnpoYW9AMTI2LmNvbQ==

These authors have contributed equally to this work and share first authorship.

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.